Re: [ccp4bb] MR problem in muti-domain structure

Brief followup: 1. Typo: Phaser struggled with the second copy of domain *2*, not domain 1. 2. I thought the single job searching for 1+1+2+3+3+2 would work, but it failed at the last step. The easiest way to solve this with Phaser might be to do one job with 1+1+2+3+3, and then do a second jo

Re: [ccp4bb] MR problem in muti-domain structure

Hi, I had a hard time tracking down the data in the legacy CCP4 site but eventually found it! Then I tried solving the MR tutorial case with Phaser. Instead of using the tutorial domain 1, 2 and 3 files, I prepared them from the deposited PDB file using a sequence alignment followed by using s

Re: [ccp4bb] MR problem in muti-domain structure

Where did you find the tutorial files?? Eleanor On Tue, 11 May 2021 at 10:24, Jon Cooper < 488a26d62010-dmarc-requ...@jiscmail.ac.uk> wrote: > Hello, just to double check, I assume that you input the correctly > oriented and positioned structure of each domain from successive runs as a > 'fix

[ccp4bb] Instruct-ERIC and iNEXT-Discovery Joint Access Call

[Instruct-ERIC logo] [Instruct-ERIC] [LinkedIn] [Twitter] Dear All The COVID19 crisis is still a dominant part of all of our lives. Instruct-E

Re: [ccp4bb] MR problem in muti-domain structure

Hello, just to double check, I assume that you input the correctly oriented and positioned structure of each domain from successive runs as a 'fixed' model? Cheers, Jon.C. Sent from ProtonMail mobile Original Message On 11 May 2021, 02:53, Lande wrote: > Hi everyone, I starte