Dear all,
We have extended the application deadline for two fully-funded open positions,
one for a postdoctoral researcher and one for a PhD student, in our research
group located at the University Medical Center Göttingen and the
Max-Planck-Institute for Multidisciplinary Sciences in
Dear all,
We have two fully-funded open positions, one for a postdoctoral researcher and
one for a PhD student, in our research group located at the University Medical
Center Göttingen and the Max-Planck-Institute for Multidisciplinary Sciences in
Göttingen, Germany.
Our team studies the
Dear all,
I have an open PhD student position in my research group, which is joint
between the University Medical Center Göttingen and the Max-Planck-Institute
for Biophysical Chemistry in Göttingen, Germany.
Our team studies the structure and function of molecular machineries involved
in
Dear all,
Thank you for your many suggestions!
Indeed, I was not able to fix the issue to my satisfaction. As Paul suspected,
set_add_terminal_residue_do_post_refine was already set to 0. The triple-refine
also did not improve anything. I also checked for the TER records, which I also
Hi All,
Lately I have been having a strange issue with Coot (0.8.9.2-pre on MacOS X).
Sometimes when I add residues using “Add residue…”, they are not linked to the
previous residue. When I try to real space refine / normalize they behave as if
they were part of the chain, but the atoms that
;> wrote:
Dear Hauke,
when you use twin refinement, your R-factor is bound to drop whether it is
twinned or not. In your case Rfree rises, which is actually hinting at your
data not being twinned. How many reflections do you have in the Rfree set?
Best,
Tim
On Friday, October 28, 2016 1:59
Dear Kay,
Thank you for your answer!
I have meanwhile processed my anomalous data also also as P1 and solved the
structure with MR-SAD in P1, which works flawlessly and gives the same
solution. Compared to P21, I now have 4 instead of 2 molecules in the ASU,
which makes sense. I then tried
Agreed, and this is ongoing work. Yet it is not trivial to get better
resolution than this for small (in the world of EM) samples either.
Von: Mark van Raaij [mjvanra...@cnb.csic.es]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 27. Oktober 2016 22:08
An: Hillen, Hauke
Betreff
: Donnerstag, 27. Oktober 2016 21:36
An: Hillen, Hauke; CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Betreff: RE: intensity statistics and twinning
It would be helpful to know what your current R values are in modelling, and
also the merging statistics. It looks like you might have a twinned p1 crystal.
JPK
From: CCP
,
Hauke
Von: Mark van Raaij [mjvanra...@cnb.csic.es]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 27. Oktober 2016 21:29
An: Hillen, Hauke
Betreff: Re: [ccp4bb] intensity statistics and twinning
I'd say intensity statistics at this resolution at not reliable and your
crystal
Dear ccp4 community,
I am currently working on some low resolution datasets (around 4.5A). The space
group seems to be P21, as suggested by XDS and pointless. I have collected many
datasets of these crystals, both native as well as SeMet-labeled. Using MR-SAD
I have been able to obtain a
11 matches
Mail list logo
