of a
strand. Just a guess.
Best,
Tim
On 05/09/2014 08:05 PM, Horacio Botti wrote:
Dear all,
Why does (if it is suppossed to do so) Superpose output results for a
subset of atoms only? See a summary of log file below (just the top
lines, data on atoms, and final data and message). In the example,
results
Dear all,
Why does (if it is suppossed to do so) Superpose output results for a
subset of atoms only? See a summary of log file below (just the top
lines, data on atoms, and final data and message). In the example,
results for residues 69-76 are absent, other atoms are absent as well,
I should have said that this is the comparison of two crystaline
states of the same molecule, the sequences are identical.
Best
H
hbo...@pasteur.edu.uy ha escrito:
Dear all,
Why does (if it is suppossed to do so) Superpose output results for a
subset of atoms only? See a summary of log
Dear all, hi!!
I need help in order to use Refmac in two particular ways. On one hand I
would like to ask the program not to refine B factor values (whichever
the selected refinement mode was) and in the other I would like to ask
it not to refine coordinates (whichever the selected refinement
Dear Naveed A Nadvi
I think that your results highlight the fact that modelling the
disorder/complex ordering of your crystal is relevant and in general,
that we should take care in optimizing B factor refinement as a strong
factor for model improvement.
In this sense I would not relay
the pKa is 3.8 or 6.44; isn’t that true? d) Have
similar increase in pKa values observed for aspartic acids before? I would
be grateful if anybody could explain or comment on the above queries.
Deepak Oswal
--
Horacio Botti
PhD MD
Protein Crystallography Unit
Institut Pasteur of Montevideo
Dear all
Perhaps a bit off of theme, just an example about resolution cut-off
mean I/sigma(I) = 2 for dmin = 3.35 A
(please have a look at the attached pdf)
I would trust in I/s(I) = 2 (in this case it worked), but why not to
determine what is information after the model has been refined to
will be appreciated. Thks!!
Horacio Botti
Unit of Protein Crystallography,
Institut Pasteur of Montevideo, Uruguay.
PS: below you have an old short CCP4 discussion:
[ccp4bb]: Crystallization robots and protease.
* /To/: ccp
Hi Israel!
The phenomena you describe seems to be related to cryoprotection, but
you don't say anything about collection temperature or cryoprotection
used. Controlled-slow dehydration is one way of achieving optimized
cryocooling of specially fragile crystals. I would recommend you to
Dear Mike
BME readily autooxidizes (need for metal traces and dissolved O2). Is
yours a metalloprotein? Is your buffer contaminated with metals? Those
situations would make the case a bit different. If not, unless your
BME stock is already oxidized, blocking of the accesible thiols with
10 matches
Mail list logo