Hi Jacob,
>>The systematic absences in the hkl file pointed to P212121 being the
space group, which is what it was processed in.
If the data were processed in this space group (Laue class), the analysis
of the systematic absence won't tell anything else. Probably, it would be
more useful to proces
Not sure someone already mentioned these (highly likely)
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-019-1923-7
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03819-2
https://science.sciencemag.org/content/early/2021/07/19/science.abj8754
On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 12:53 PM Thorn, Dr. Andrea <
andrea.th...@u
If a random variable gets the same value in its all occurrences, its
variance should be zero, isn't it? Or do I not understand that?
Rangana.
On Sat, 16 Oct 2021, 08:49 Kay Diederichs,
wrote:
> Dear Gergely,
>
> with " 10 x 10 patch of pixels ", I believe James means that he observes
> 100 neig
Hi Gihan,
Apart from Takanori's answer, you'll lose information in high resolution
data as they usually tend to be this nature. This can introduce bias in the
refinement.
Rangana
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 12:27 AM, Gihan Ketawala wrote:
> can someone tell me what are the posible consiquences of
CrysAlisPro would be my best bet. It has an option for multicystals and
twinning. Also it offers a very good visual tools to see any relationships
between multiple lattices, if they have.
Rangana
On Mon, 16 Jul 2018 at 22:16 Andreas Förster wrote:
> Dear Tommi,
>
> DIALS is good with multiple l
Hi Careina,
Some other things to check for:
Where did you measure the crystal, on a home source or at a synchrotron? if
at a synchrotron, try to put bit more flux and see whether you see any
diffraction?
Also check the beam and your crystal alignment.
Rangana
On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 12:15 PM,
"The best estimate we have of the "true" B factor is the model B factors
we get at the end of refinement, once everything is converged, after we
have done all the building we can. It is this "true B factor" that is a
property of the data, not the model, "
If this is the case, why can't we use mod
B-factors similar to true B-factors is
another question.
Rangana
On Sun, Mar 8, 2020 at 7:06 PM Ethan A Merritt wrote:
> On Sunday, 8 March 2020 01:08:32 PDT Rangana Warshamanage wrote:
> > "The best estimate we have of the "true" B factor is the model B factors
> &g
What's the purpose of this contest?
Why one method needs to be crowned over another?
Rangana
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 7:01 PM Gloria Borgstahl
wrote:
> I personally don't tweet.
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 12:21 PM Sweet, Robert <
> 27e0eb9d20ec-dmarc-requ...@jiscmail.ac.uk> wrote:
>
>> Re
The line causing troubles is SFAC, I think
On Thu, 14 Mar 2024, 22:44 Navdeep Sidhu, wrote:
> Dear Fred,
>
> I hope you'd agree that another good way to bypass similar issues is
> that before working on data where you don't know the model, you try out
> data where you do. And so I'd recommend t
10 matches
Mail list logo
