Fpocket and CAVER are good.
Yarrow
On Friday, September 19, 2014, Faisal Tarique faisaltari...@gmail.com
wrote:
Dear all
Please tell me the names of good servers / tools which calculate the
size and surface area of the active site pocket of a protein..
--
Regards
Faisal
School of Life
Hello CCP4 users.
I noticed a discrepancy between the estimated wilson B reported by XDS and
that reported by truncate. As far as I know XDSconv and truncate use the French
and Wilson (K.S. Acta. Cryst. (1978), A34, 517-525.) method for converting
to structure factors. However, the result below
You can use CAVER but you would have to make all the symmetry mates as one
chain in order to fool it. Still better to just do the experiment I think.
Either it will work or it won't, regardless of what any software tells you.
Just a wild idea : )
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 5:06 PM, Yarrow Madrona
Hey Jeff,
Why not try the command line version of CAVER. It is easily adjustable and
provides nice figures of solvent accessibility for Pymol. It also prints
out a ton of stats in the log files if you want numbers.
-Yarrow
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Jeff Holden hold...@uci.edu wrote:
Hello CCP4 community,
I am stumped and would love some help. I have a molecular replacement
solution that has Rfree stuck around 40% while Rwork is aorund 30%. The
model is actually the same enzyme with a similar inhibitor bound. Relevant
information is below.
-Yarrow
I have solved a structure
.
Dale
On 05/08/2014 10:11 AM, Yarrow Madrona wrote:
Hello CCP4 community,
I am stumped and would love some help. I have a molecular
replacement solution that has Rfree stuck around 40% while Rwork is
aorund 30%. The model is actually the same enzyme with a similar
inhibitor bound
Trust/MRC Building Fax: +44 1223 336827
Hills Road
E-mail: rj...@cam.ac.uk
Cambridge CB2 0XY, U.K.
www-structmed.cimr.cam.ac.uk
On 8 May 2014, at 18:11, Yarrow Madrona amadr...@uci.edu wrote:
Hello CCP4 community,
I am stumped and would love some help. I have
...@janelia.hhmi.orgwrote:
Since your search model is so good, why not go down to p1 to see what’s
going on, then re-merge if necessary?
JPK
*From:* yarrowmadr...@gmail.com [mailto:yarrowmadr...@gmail.com] *On
Behalf Of *Yarrow Madrona
*Sent:* Thursday, May 08, 2014 4:29 PM
*To:* Keller, Jacob
:* CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] *On Behalf Of
*Yarrow
Madrona
*Sent:* Thursday, May 08, 2014 10:12 AM
*To:* CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
*Subject:* [ccp4bb] stalled refinement after MR solution
Hello CCP4 community,
I am stumped and would love some help. I have a molecular
the higher resolution to a greater degree.
Hope this helps.
Brent
*From:* yarrowmadr...@gmail.com [mailto:yarrowmadr...@gmail.com] *On
Behalf Of *Yarrow Madrona
*Sent:* Thursday, May 08, 2014 1:50 PM
*To:* Segelke, Brent W.; CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
*Subject:* Re: [ccp4bb] stalled
Thanks Pavel. I was a little tired from an overnight Synchrotron run when I
wrote that. Lesson: Stay off the internet when you are tired. Haha. I
forgot that the TLS groups would be assigned per chain not per molecule.
Thanks for the correction. I didn't know you could run find TLS groups as
part
Hi Vipin,
I'm not sure what software you are running or your refinement strategy.
However, in some refinement software (phenix.refine), if you run TLS
refinement and you don't specify the TLS groups, the entire structure is
considered one TLS group which is not helpful. This may be why the
of the latest structure we solved. :)
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/5116503/4J05.png
best
-Bjørn
--
Bjørn Panyella Pedersen
Macromolecular Structure Group
Dept. of Biochemistry and Biophysics
University of California, San Francisco
On 03/19/2014 08:58 AM, Yarrow Madrona wrote
Tel/SMS/texting +32 (0)472 928 519
Skype: savvas.savvides_skype http://www.LProBE.ugent.be/xray.html
On 19 Mar 2014, at 16:58, Yarrow Madrona amadr...@uci.edu wrote:
Thank you to everyone for their input. I am posting a picture to some of
the symmetry related molecules shortly. There are six
-3640-9407
Cellular: 0547 459 608
On Mar 19, 2014, at 18:37 , Eleanor Dodson eleanor.dod...@york.ac.uk
wrote:
How pretty - I love circular molecules!
Eleanor
On 19 March 2014 15:58, Yarrow Madrona amadr...@uci.edu wrote:
Thank you to everyone for their input. I am posting a picture to some
. not another molecule.
Does it refine? If you look at the maps following refinement any missing
features should become more obvious.
Solvent content of 65% is not uncommon.
Eleanor
On 19 Mar 2014, at 03:46, Yarrow Madrona wrote:
Hello CCP4 Users,
I recently collected data in-house
. Thank you!
https://www.dropbox.com/s/r01u37owbkz9pon/donut.png
-Yarrow
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 6:59 AM, Yarrow Madrona amadr...@uci.edu wrote:
Yes in the first couple of rounds of refinement it refines very well for a
3.2 angstrom structure (Now at 30%/24% Rfree/R). Everything Packs
Hello CCP4 Users,
I recently collected data in-house on an Raxis IV and am trying to solve a
3.2 angstrom structure.
I have obtained only partial solutions using Phaser and would like some
help. I believe I only have two molecules in the ASU instead of three as
suggested by the mathew's
labels:
H K L I FOM PHI SIGI
Thank you
Yarrow Madrona
this info?
-Yarrow
--
Yarrow Madrona
Graduate Student
Molecular Biology and Biochemistry Dept.
University of California, Irvine
Natural Sciences I, Rm 2403
Irvine, CA 92697
with all original data plus phase information. This will assure
you do not loose anything on the way.
Good luck,
Yury
From: CCP4 bulletin board [CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] on behalf of Yarrow
Madrona [amadr...@uci.edu]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 3:43
a translation
of about 31 A along x so if your A cell edge is about 62 A you have
a 2_1 screw.
Dale Tronrud
On 10/15/2013 12:29 PM, Yarrow Madrona wrote:
Hi Phil,
Thanks for your help.
I ran a Find-NCS routine in the phenix package. It came up with what
I
pasted below:
I am assuming
of helix)
Refinement with twin law:
Rwork = 0.2994
Rfree = 0.3214
--
Yarrow Madrona
Postdoctoral Scholar
Ortiz De Montellano Lab
Pharmeceutical Chemistry Dept.
University of California, San Francisco
Genentech Hall, Rm N556
(+ missing part of helix)
Refinement with twin law:
Rwork = 0.2994
Rfree = 0.3214
--
Yarrow Madrona
Postdoctoral Scholar
Ortiz De Montellano Lab
Pharmeceutical Chemistry Dept.
University of California, San Francisco
Genentech Hall, Rm N556
--
Yarrow Madrona
Graduate Student
Molecular
Refinement without twin law:
Rwork = 0.3387
Rfree = 0.3650
~85% Ramachandran favored (+ missing part of helix)
Refinement with twin law:
Rwork = 0.2994
Rfree = 0.3214
--
Yarrow Madrona
Postdoctoral Scholar
Ortiz De Montellano Lab
Pharmeceutical Chemistry Dept.
University
Jeffrey
Princeton
--
Yarrow Madrona
Graduate Student
Molecular Biology and Biochemistry Dept.
University of California, Irvine
Natural Sciences I, Rm 2403
Irvine, CA 92697
if your A cell edge is about 62 A you have
a 2_1 screw.
Dale Tronrud
On 10/15/2013 12:29 PM, Yarrow Madrona wrote:
Hi Phil,
Thanks for your help.
I ran a Find-NCS routine in the phenix package. It came up with what I
pasted below:
I am assuming the the first rotation matrix is just
% difference is significant depends on how accurate
you think your B factors are. If you kick your coordinates (aka using
noise in PDBSET) and re-refine, how much do the final B factors change?
-James Holton
MAD Scientist
On 2/25/2013 12:08 PM, Yarrow Madrona wrote:
Hello,
Does anyone know a good
for your help.
--
Yarrow Madrona
Graduate Student
Molecular Biology and Biochemistry Dept.
University of California, Irvine
Natural Sciences I, Rm 2403
Irvine, CA 92697
for your help.
--
Yarrow Madrona
Graduate Student
Molecular Biology and Biochemistry Dept.
University of California, Irvine
Natural Sciences I, Rm 2403
Irvine, CA 92697
--
Yarrow Madrona
Graduate Student
Molecular Biology and Biochemistry Dept.
University of California, Irvine
Natural Sciences
additions or modifications to this, but
so far I haven't received much feedback.)
-Nat
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Yarrow Madrona amadr...@uci.edu wrote:
Hello,
Does anyone know a good method to compare B-factors between structures?
I
would like to compare mutants to a wild-type
won't have the exact same number of atoms.
Best, Manfred
On 25.02.2013 21:08, Yarrow Madrona wrote:
Hello,
Does anyone know a good method to compare B-factors between structures?
I
would like to compare mutants to a wild-type structure.
For example, structure2 has a higher B-factor
factors?
I don't need the anomalous data so I don't need to keep it separate.
Thanks.
-Yarrow
--
Yarrow Madrona
Graduate Student
Molecular Biology and Biochemistry Dept.
University of California, Irvine
Natural Sciences I, Rm 2403
Irvine, CA 92697
Hello CCP4 list readers,
Does anyone know how to calculate the dielectric properties of an enzyme
active site? I would like to compare the polarity/hydrophobicity of
similar proteins and different mutants.
Thank you.
--
Yarrow Madrona
Graduate Student
Molecular Biology and Biochemistry Dept
From: CCP4 bulletin board [CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] on behalf of Yarrow
Madrona [amadr...@uci.edu]
Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2012 4:48 PM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: [ccp4bb] calculating dialectric properties of enzyme active site
Hello CCP4 list readers,
Does anyone know how
I have a buried active site and would like to determine if there is room
for a water molecule in various mutants. Does anyone know of a good
program to calculate this? I have heard of GRID and VOID but have never
used them.
Thanks.
--
Yarrow Madrona
Graduate Student
Molecular Biology
From: Yarrow Madrona amadr...@uci.edu
Date: July 12, 2012 7:39:57 PM PDT
To: Peter Hsu hsuu...@u.washington.edu
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] offtopic: packing gel filtration columns
It is also likely that the clogging due to NAOH is due to crapped out
protein. Try cleaning with guanadine
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] offtopic: packing gel filtration columns
We do it pretty routinely in our lab with great results. To do it right you
have to invest in a reservoir sold by GE. It screws onto the end of the
column. It allows you to pour the entire slury (resin and water) into the
anyone know if this is correct?
Also I wondered if there is any way to get a redundancy dependent R value
from scalepack. Thank you.
-Yarrow
--
Yarrow Madrona
Graduate Student
Molecular Biology and Biochemistry Dept.
University of California, Irvine
Natural Sciences I, Rm 2403
Irvine, CA 92697
Madrona
Graduate Student
Molecular Biology and Biochemistry Dept.
University of California, Irvine
Natural Sciences I, Rm 2403
Irvine, CA 92697
--
Yarrow Madrona
Graduate Student
Molecular Biology and Biochemistry Dept.
University of California, Irvine
Natural Sciences I, Rm 2403
are looking for a less expensive
alternative to the SGI work station that just blew-up. We are thinking of
buyng a mac and using something like a Zalman monitor. Alternatively we
are thinking of running Fedora with a Zalman monitor. Thank you for your
help.
-Yarrow
--
Yarrow Madrona
Graduate
, Yarrow Madrona amadr...@uci.edu wrote:
Hello CCP4 mail subscribers,
I know there have been previous threads regarding the use of a Zalman
monitor for using coot and pymol on these message boards. I am wondering
if there is a new alternative since the Zalman monitor is no longer being
produced.
I
42 matches
Mail list logo