. Juli 2020 13:11
An: Schreuder, Herman /DE
Cc: CCP4BB@jiscmail.ac.uk
Betreff: Re: [ccp4bb] AW: [ccp4bb] AW: [EXTERNAL] Re: [ccp4bb] number of frames
to get a full dataset?
EXTERNAL : Real sender is dgwater...@gmail.com<mailto:dgwater...@gmail.com>
Hi Herman,
I started googling and en
are happy with the
> multiplicity/redundancy they grew up with, that is the way it will stay.
>
> Best regards,
> Herman
>
>
>
>
> Von: David Waterman
> Gesendet: Freitag, 3. Juli 2020 10:49
> An: Schreuder, Herman /DE
> Cc: CCP4BB@jiscmail.ac.uk
> Betreff: Re:
t; Best regards,
> Herman
>
>
>
>
> Von: David Waterman
> Gesendet: Freitag, 3. Juli 2020 10:49
> An: Schreuder, Herman /DE
> Cc: CCP4BB@jiscmail.ac.uk
> Betreff: Re: [ccp4bb] AW: [ccp4bb] AW: [EXTERNAL] Re: [ccp4bb] number of
> frames to get a full datas
, that is the way it will stay.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Herman
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *Von:* David Waterman
> *Gesendet:* Freitag, 3. Juli 2020 10:49
> *An:* Schreuder, Herman /DE
> *Cc:* CCP4BB@jiscmail.ac.uk
> *Betreff:* Re: [ccp4bb] AW:
way it will stay.
Best regards,
Herman
Von: David Waterman
Gesendet: Freitag, 3. Juli 2020 10:49
An: Schreuder, Herman /DE
Cc: CCP4BB@jiscmail.ac.uk
Betreff: Re: [ccp4bb] AW: [ccp4bb] AW: [EXTERNAL] Re: [ccp4bb] number of frames
to get a full dataset?
EXTERNAL : Real sender is dgwater
Hi Herman,
I like the idea of MPR, but I continue to worry about the term
"measurement". The intensity associated with a particular reflection is a
fit based on a scaling model, and ultimately, depending on your integration
software, may be linked to a weighted sum of two raw measurements: the
sum
Dear Ian,
Since some very advanced countries still use miles, Fahrenheit and inches, I
did not expect anything to change. It was an escalating discussion in this
thread on data completeness(!) on the use of multiplicity vs redundancy that
made me suggest a different term. Except for an occasion
