Re: [ccp4bb] Autodock vina docking results

2023-11-20 Thread Thripthi Shenoy
I am thankful and grateful to everyone for guiding me through. Regards, Thripthi S. On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 1:50 PM Subhomoi Borkotoky wrote: > Hi, > > Probably you are not setting the grid right. Try the AMDock tool, it uses > Autodock vina. Here you can specify your residues, and the grid

Re: [ccp4bb] Autodock vina docking results

2023-11-20 Thread Subhomoi Borkotoky
Hi, Probably you are not setting the grid right. Try the AMDock tool, it uses Autodock vina. Here you can specify your residues, and the grid will be prepared accordingly. https://github.com/Valdes-Tresanco-MS/AMDock-win Thanks & Regards, -- *Subhomoi Borkotoky, Ph.

Re: [ccp4bb] Autodock vina docking results

2023-11-19 Thread Sorin Draga
It is most likely the spacing setting in PMV (it is set to the default value used by the original Autodock, namely 0.375A). In Autodock Vina it should be set to 1 angstrom. Let me know if this helps Kind regards, Sorin On Sun, Nov 19, 2023 at 1:57 PM BRUNO DI GERONIMO QUINTERO <

Re: [ccp4bb] Autodock vina docking results

2023-11-19 Thread BRUNO DI GERONIMO QUINTERO
Hello Thripthi S. , Given the information you provide, it is quite difficult to figure out what your issue is with VINA. If you provide me the data (receptor, ligand, and box), I can do some tests, to see what's happening. In VINA, *pdbqt files for both receptor/ligand are the most tricky part to

[ccp4bb] Autodock vina docking results

2023-11-19 Thread Thripthi Shenoy
Greetings to all, I have performed docking through Glide and Autodock vina for a protein for which the active site has been taken from the literature. Glide is able to dock the compounds correctly in the active site whereas autodock vina does not dock the compounds within the specified site. I