Re: [ccp4bb] Modeling residues with very poor density

2008-12-09 Thread Tim Gruene
I am aware of to opposing schools of thought about modelling residues without density: - You can argue that since you know those residues are present in the sequence, you can model them, even though there is no or hardly any density. If you do so, you must set the occupancy of those

Re: [ccp4bb] Modeling residues with very poor density

2008-12-09 Thread Eleanor Dodson
I think if you cant see it dont build it, but deposit the data.. There are many (most?) structures with missing loops Eleanor Pavel Afonine wrote: This might help: Acta Cryst. (1997). D53, 540-543 Local Improvement of Electron-Density Maps Pavel. PS It will be implemented in PHENIX

Re: [ccp4bb] Modeling residues with very poor density

2008-12-09 Thread Ed Pozharski
On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 09:31 +0100, Tim Gruene wrote: ...you must set the occupancy of those residues to zero... I think this approach (which Tim is not supporting) makes no sense. When I place an ATOM record into a pdb-file, what I am really saying is based on the data, this atom's

[ccp4bb] Modeling residues with very poor density

2008-12-08 Thread Andy Millston
I am trying to build a model of a 6 Da protein from the diffraction data collected at 2.0 A resolution. There is a 10-residue stretch that has such bad electron density that even at 0.4 sigma level one can hardly see any well defined density for residues with long side chains. My question

Re: [ccp4bb] Modeling residues with very poor density

2008-12-08 Thread Pavel Afonine
This might help: Acta Cryst. (1997). D53, 540-543 Local Improvement of Electron-Density Maps Pavel. PS It will be implemented in PHENIX sometime in future, but for the moment you will need to so some scripting. On 12/8/2008 11:08 AM, Andy Millston wrote: I am trying to build a model of