Dear Michael,
as said in this thread, careful re-integration (or other programs) might give
you better data. If using XDS, you could try RELRAD=7 (or even 10 if the
background is very low; the default is 5) in INTEGRATE (this as yet
undocumented option is in the latest XDS and determines the r
Dear Michael,
throwing a few other suggestions into the mix (on top of the good
advice you got already from Graeme and Phil):
* The low resolution I/sigI is quite large and although we have seen
such values for extremely good crystals collected very carefully on
very good instruments, it i
CP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Michael
Jarva
Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2017 7:48 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: [ccp4bb] Optimising data processing of a I432 dataset with 75% solvent
content.
Dear all,
I have a dataset that have two very interesting properties: a) It's in I432,
an
It is puzzling that in the high res shell (to 3.1A) CC(1/2) is 0.533 (OK), but
I/sigI is 0.1 (v low). Is the SDcorrection (SDFAC, SDADD) sensible (and
“Analysis of standard deviations vs. intensity”)? In Aimless the determination
of SDFAC and SDADD sometimes go haywire - with high multiplicity y
Hi Michael
What integration program did you use? Different programs can sometimes give
rather different results with very weak data. I'd try everything to see if one
is better than the others.
It's also worth making sure you are up to date. Certainly there are recent
changes in xds and dials t
Dear all,
I have a dataset that have two very interesting properties: a) It's in I432,
and b) has a whooping 75% solvent content.
You might think that the solvent content obviously is a big red flag, and so
did I, but I have phased this successfully with just one monomer, and the
packing result
