Re: [ccp4bb] Pilatus and Strategy wrt Radiation Damage

2014-05-01 Thread Graeme Winter
] on behalf of Keller, Jacob [kell...@janelia.hhmi.org] Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2014 7:49 AM To: CCP4BB@jiscmail.ac.uk Subject: [ccp4bb] Pilatus and Strategy wrt Radiation Damage Dear Pilatus/Radiation Damage Cognoscenti, I read a few years ago, before the advent of Pilatus detectors

Re: [ccp4bb] Pilatus and Strategy wrt Radiation Damage

2014-05-01 Thread Tim Gruene
of Keller, Jacob [kell...@janelia.hhmi.org] Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2014 7:49 AM To: CCP4BB@jiscmail.ac.uk Subject: [ccp4bb] Pilatus and Strategy wrt Radiation Damage Dear Pilatus/Radiation Damage Cognoscenti, I read a few years ago, before the advent of Pilatus detectors, that the best strategy

Re: [ccp4bb] Pilatus and Strategy wrt Radiation Damage

2014-05-01 Thread Graeme Winter
@jiscmail.ac.uk Subject: [ccp4bb] Pilatus and Strategy wrt Radiation Damage Dear Pilatus/Radiation Damage Cognoscenti, I read a few years ago, before the advent of Pilatus detectors, that the best strategy was a sort of compromise between number of images and detector readout noise overhead. I

Re: [ccp4bb] Pilatus and Strategy wrt Radiation Damage

2014-05-01 Thread Christophe Wirth
...@anl.gov From: CCP4 bulletin board [CCP4BB@jiscmail.ac.uk] on behalf of Keller, Jacob [kell...@janelia.hhmi.org] Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2014 7:49 AM To: CCP4BB@jiscmail.ac.uk Subject: [ccp4bb] Pilatus and Strategy wrt Radiation Damage Dear

Re: [ccp4bb] Pilatus and Strategy wrt Radiation Damage

2014-05-01 Thread Keller, Jacob
, 2014 3:26 AM To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Pilatus and Strategy wrt Radiation Damage Hi All, A major opportunity with Pilatus detectors is the chance to redistribute the dose in reciprocal space i.e. measure a lot more data, with less dose / frame, then decide in hindsight where

[ccp4bb] Pilatus and Strategy wrt Radiation Damage

2014-04-30 Thread Keller, Jacob
Dear Pilatus/Radiation Damage Cognoscenti, I read a few years ago, before the advent of Pilatus detectors, that the best strategy was a sort of compromise between number of images and detector readout noise overhead. I have heard that Pilatus detectors, however, have essentially no readout

Re: [ccp4bb] Pilatus and Strategy wrt Radiation Damage

2014-04-30 Thread Sanishvili, Ruslan
, Jacob [kell...@janelia.hhmi.org] Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2014 7:49 AM To: CCP4BB@jiscmail.ac.uk Subject: [ccp4bb] Pilatus and Strategy wrt Radiation Damage Dear Pilatus/Radiation Damage Cognoscenti, I read a few years ago, before the advent of Pilatus detectors, that the best strategy

Re: [ccp4bb] Pilatus and Strategy wrt Radiation Damage

2014-04-30 Thread Harry Powell
:49 AM To: CCP4BB@jiscmail.ac.uk Subject: [ccp4bb] Pilatus and Strategy wrt Radiation Damage Dear Pilatus/Radiation Damage Cognoscenti, I read a few years ago, before the advent of Pilatus detectors, that the best strategy was a sort of compromise between number of images and detector readout