Re: [ccp4bb] What makes the difference between 2 composite omit maps?

2010-11-02 Thread Hailiang Zhang
Thanks! Can you refer me some documents about your following statements: derivation of sigmaa-weighted 2mFo-DFc formula is by calculating Fourier coefficients of the following map: Rescaled composite omit map, where minimal structural element (of the size about the resolution element) is being

Re: [ccp4bb] What makes the difference between 2 composite omit maps?

2010-11-02 Thread Zbyszek Otwinowski
I am not aware of this point being explicitly made. Maybe somebody else could point to the relevant reference? However, the logic here is very simple: (1) Take a model and generate from it Fc (2) Calculate map with minimal rms error m*Fo*exp(i*phiCalc) (3) This map is biased with respect to

[ccp4bb] What makes the difference between 2 composite omit maps?

2010-11-01 Thread Hailiang Zhang
Hi, I want to calculate the sigmaa-weighted 2mFo-DFc composite omit map, and tried the following 2 scripts: (1) ./omit hklin ${f}.mtz mapout ${f}.map EOF LABI FP=mFo FC=DFC PHI=PHIC RESO 29.50 3.22 SCAL 2.0 -1.0 EOF (2) ./omit hklin ${f}.mtz mapout ${f}.map EOF LABI FP=FWT FC=FC PHI=PHIC RESO

Re: [ccp4bb] What makes the difference between 2 composite omit maps?

2010-11-01 Thread Zbyszek Otwinowski
sigmaa-weighted 2mFo-DFc is the _COMPOSIT_OMIT_ map. There is no point in calculating omit map of an omit map A brief explanation: derivation of sigmaa-weighted 2mFo-DFc formula is by calculating Fourier coefficients of the following map: Rescaled composite omit map, where minimal structural