On Wed, 11 Apr 2007, [ISO-8859-1] "F.Xavier Gomis-R?th" wrote:
> I fully agree with Hermann due to obvious reasons
> Xavier
For antibodies there are several numbering schemes in use, or at least
proposed (Kabat, Chothia, AHo, IMGT, ..). So it would be nice to have a
file format that allows se
April 2007 11:09
An: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Betreff: Re: [ccp4bb] antibody refinement in REFMAC with Kabat numbering
John Pak wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I'm currently refining an Fab structure. All was going reasonably
> well until I renumbered the PDB according to the Kabat numbering
John Pak wrote:
Hi all.
I'm currently refining an Fab structure. All was going reasonably
well until I renumbered the PDB according to the Kabat numbering
convention. After which, REFMAC does not refine the inserted residues
properly (ie. residues 82A, 82B, 100A, 100B, 100C, etc.). It refi
Pak
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 7:40 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: [ccp4bb] antibody refinement in REFMAC with Kabat numbering
Hi all.
I'm currently refining an Fab structure. All was going reasonably
well
until I renumbered the PDB according to the Kabat numbering
convent
cp4bb] antibody refinement in REFMAC with Kabat numbering
Hi all.
I'm currently refining an Fab structure. All was going reasonably well
until I renumbered the PDB according to the Kabat numbering convention.
After which, REFMAC does not refine the inserted residues properly (ie.
residue
e pdb file refmac writes replaced with 'TRANS'
I squawked this a while ago.
BR
-Original Message-
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John
Pak
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 7:40 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: [ccp4bb] antibody refinement
Hi all.
I'm currently refining an Fab structure. All was going reasonably
well until I renumbered the PDB according to the Kabat numbering
convention. After which, REFMAC does not refine the inserted residues
properly (ie. residues 82A, 82B, 100A, 100B, 100C, etc.). It refines
these re
