[ccp4bb] small-angle scattering and radiation damage control

2009-07-09 Thread William Scott
Hi folks: A colleague of mine here is doing small angle X-ray scattering at SSRL and finding his samples are suffering significant radiation damage. He asked me for advice as to what potential radical scavengers might be useful. I told him to take 10 mg of ascorbic acid and to call me in

Re: [ccp4bb] small-angle scattering and radiation damage control

2009-07-09 Thread Susan Tsutakawa
Hi Bill, 5-10% glycerol usually helps in the majority of cases. However, some proteins require a scan of different conditions and different protein concentrations. Like everything else, it's protein dependent. Changing the wavelength can also make a difference. I also know some SAXS b

Re: [ccp4bb] small-angle scattering and radiation damage control

2009-07-09 Thread Kushol Gupta
Does the beamline have an attenuator? (I'm pretty sure SSRL BL4-2 has a series of them that can be flipped on.) cheers, Kushol Kushol Gupta, Ph.D. Mathilde Krim Fellow in Basic Biomedical Research Van Duyne Laboratory - Univ. of Pennsylvania School of Medicine kgu...@mail.med.upenn.edu 215-573-7

Re: [ccp4bb] small-angle scattering and radiation damage control

2009-07-09 Thread Joerg Stetefeld
we have excellent experiences with cocoamidopropylbetaine (CAPB) especially in SAXS experiments of protein-protein and protein-rna complexes, js At Thu, 9 Jul 2009 17:57:36 -0700, Susan Tsutakawa wrote: Hi Bill, 5-10% glycerol usually helps in the majority of cases. However, some proteins req

Re: [ccp4bb] small-angle scattering and radiation damage control

2009-07-09 Thread Ruben Martinez-Buey
Hi Bill, 2mM DTT usually helps. Besides, using a large cell which moves up and down and, of course, low temperatures also help. Bests 2009/7/10 William Scott : > Hi folks: > > A colleague of mine here is doing small angle X-ray scattering at SSRL and > finding his samples are suffering significan

Re: [ccp4bb] small-angle scattering and radiation damage control

2009-07-10 Thread Eddie Snell
I'll second the previous glycerol posting. However, beware condensation problems and watch the dew point when using lower temperatures. Condensation can really screw up the signal. Note that scavengers that work under cryogenic conditions can actually be worse in SAXS, instead of just an electron

Re: [ccp4bb] small-angle scattering and radiation damage control

2009-07-10 Thread Richard Gillilan
There was a paper a couple years ago that suggested very low concentration of glycerol (I think 0.5%). I recently did some systematic comparisons of different glycerol concentrations and found that higher concentrations do seem to worsen the so-called concentration effects. This makes intui