Randy Dawson via cctalk wrote:
> Since I know there's tons of PDP/11 geniuses here, and other gurus with a
> NOVA 4, and a Tektronix 4052 guy (I have the 4051):
>
>
> What have you done, with microprogramming this part? In your architecture,
> have you changed the microcode, create an instru
On 12/27/2017 9:35 PM, Randy Dawson via cctalk wrote:
Since I know there's tons of PDP/11 geniuses here, and other gurus
with a NOVA 4, and a Tektronix 4052 guy (I have the 4051):
What have you done, with microprogramming this part? In your
architecture, have you changed the microcode, create
What is a "Lisa Source Code" ?
The schematics? The source code for the Lisa firmware and/or Lisa OS?
Christian
Saw the announcement via slashdot also the other day. Definitely a kudos to
the CHM team!
null
https://groups.google.com/forum/m/#!msg/lisalist/aIo6cNu54xM/_Ck_CsmSBgAJ
They may still be getting approvals, but here is the announcement implying both
OS and some applications may be included.
Original message From: Christian Corti via cctalk
Date: 12/28/17 3:23 AM (GMT-06:
> On Dec 28, 2017, at 3:23 AM, Christian Corti via cctalk
> wrote:
>
> What is a "Lisa Source Code" ?
> The schematics? The source code for the Lisa firmware and/or Lisa OS?
Whatever it is, it won’t be enough, someone will throw a fit about something
being there or not there.
On 12/27/2017 10:35 PM, Randy Dawson via cctalk wrote:
Here's my 32-bit 2903 project. It was to roughly emulate an
IBM 360. But, I realized there would be an IMMENSE software
slog ahead to get a usable computer system. (If I had known
about the Unix 360 system, I might have continued with i
On 28.12.2017 05:35, Randy Dawson via cctalk wrote:
What about the coding tools? ADASM? Looks long gone, how
do you do microcode today?
Oh, I first started out with an assembler macro hack, but it
was insanely cumbersome, due to the limits of the macro
capability of the Z-80 assembler I
On 12/27/2017 9:35 PM, Randy Dawson via cctalk wrote:
Since I know there's tons of PDP/11 geniuses here, and other gurus with a NOVA
4, and a Tektronix 4052 guy (I have the 4051):
Well I am not one of them. 2901's seem only on epay now, so lack of
parts have kept me from designing with them.
Wirewrapped the design in the 2900 family guide sometime in the 70s it even
worked. No idea what became of it
On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 9:53 AM, ben via cctalk
wrote:
> On 12/27/2017 9:35 PM, Randy Dawson via cctalk wrote:
>
>> Since I know there's tons of PDP/11 geniuses here, and other gurus w
On 12/28/17 12:43 AM, Holm Tiffe via cctalk wrote:
> The Micorocode Assembler should be here:
http://bitsavers.org/bits/AMD/AM29
manuals
http://bitsavers.org/pdf/amd/amsys29/
lör 2017-12-23 klockan 20:12 -0800 skrev Chuck Guzis via cctalk:
> On 12/23/2017 07:24 PM, Chris Elmquist wrote:
>
> > I’m not sure you can smell the difference between failed selenium
> > rectifiers and lutefisk...
>
> It probably doesn't get interesting until you toss in a can of
> surströmmi
On 12/27/2017 8:35 PM, Randy Dawson via cctalk wrote:
Since I know there's tons of PDP/11 geniuses here, and other gurus with a NOVA
4, and a Tektronix 4052 guy (I have the 4051):
What have you done, with microprogramming this part? In your architecture,
have you changed the microcode, cr
On 12/28/2017 11:44 AM, Stefan Skoglund via cctalk wrote:
> Surströmming isn't a christmas tradition.
>
> It is more like a late august,september tradition (or in summer together
> with the season potatoes, onion and bread.)
>
> the sale of this year surströmming was until 1998 legally delayed
On Thursday (12/28/2017 at 11:58AM -0800), Chuck Guzis via cctalk wrote:
> On 12/28/2017 11:44 AM, Stefan Skoglund via cctalk wrote:
>
> > Surströmming isn't a christmas tradition.
> >
> > It is more like a late august,september tradition (or in summer together
> > with the season potatoes, onion
> On Dec 27, 2017, at 8:23 AM, Paul Koning wrote:
>
> ; "A SOURCE OF INNOCENT MERRIMENT!"
> ; - W.S. GILBERT, "MIKADO"
> ; "DID NOTHING IN PARTICULAR, AND DID IT VERY WELL"
> ; - W.S. GILBERT, "IOLANTHE"
> ; "TO BE IDLE IS THE ULTIMATE PURPOSE OF THE BUSY"
> ; - SAMUEL JOHNSON, "THE
The sources to each release were usually included with the distribution
so that custom system settings could be sysgened. The sources are
uncommented, however.
You could implement this by finding the commented out source in the
sources and regenerating the system, with the code in the appropr
17 matches
Mail list logo
