I’m sure they are if you travel to Seattle. The ACM has a Digital Library
containing essentially everything they published, plus additional material such
as the AFIPS conference proceedings (annual and semiannual Joint Computer
Conferences), ALGOL Bulletins and more. (Thanks go to Al Kossow for
> On December 30, 2018 at 7:44 PM Paul Koning via cctalk
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> > On Dec 30, 2018, at 1:59 PM, B M via cctalk wrote:
> >
> > Does anyone know the OFFICIAL status of RSTS/E source? I am aware of the
> > Mentec license, but it appears to only grant a license to the binary
> > dist
Do you have any more details to share about this X terminal? Is it an XP217M or
XP217C? How much RAM is in it? What version of the CD/firmware?
— Chris
Sent from my iPad
> On Dec 29, 2018, at 4:13 PM, Carlo Pisani via cctalk
> wrote:
>
> so, already asked but i haven't yet got a clear answ
Hi all,
Some here may know I’ve been working on an 11/45 restoration off and on for
some time now. My ’45 currently has floating point, KT11-C mem mgmt, 124 kword
MS11-L, and an RK11-C with one restored RK05 drive.
Last week I decided to see if I could bring up RSTS/E on the machine. I managed
On 30/12/2018, Daniel Seagraves via cctalk wrote:
>
>> On Dec 30, 2018, at 12:37 AM, Rod Smallwood via cctalk
>> wrote:
>>
>> What is dox?
>
> New-era-internet term for illegally gaining access to someone's real world
> “documents" (place of employment, home address, phone numbers, medical
> reco
> On Dec 30, 2018, at 2:37 PM, Paul McJones via cctalk
> wrote:
>
> Chuck,
>
> I’ve found the Living Computers Museum in Seattle is interested in building
> their collection of paper copies of journals, and will pay for shipping.
Yes, but are those documents accessible to others?
> On Dec 29, 2018, at 7:35 PM, Guy Dunphy via cctalk
> wrote:
>
> At 12:05 PM 29/12/2018 -0800, Al Kossow wrote:
>> On 12/29/18 12:00 PM, Chuck Guzis via cctalk wrote:
>>> Stupid question, but doesn't IEEE CS already have these archived?
>>
>> of course they are
>>
>> we are speaking with
> On Dec 30, 2018, at 1:59 PM, B M via cctalk wrote:
>
> Does anyone know the OFFICIAL status of RSTS/E source? I am aware of the
> Mentec license, but it appears to only grant a license to the binary
> distribution.
>
> I believe I have source tapes to RSTS/E version 5 & 6 that I would like
If you can't get these released, please send images to people that have been
entrusted
with other sources from the current rights holder, like Johnny Billquist.
On 12/30/18 10:59 AM, B M via cctalk wrote:
> I believe I have source tapes to RSTS/E version 5 & 6 that I would like to
> release copi
We have a few dupes here but reserving those for someone that might
help us out.
Another great reference are the old joint computer conference east and
west books. were or became AFIPS WOW THEY HAVE ALL THE INSERTING
EARLY STUFF!
We have the stuff from start to
Chuck,
I’ve found the Living Computers Museum in Seattle is interested in building
their collection of paper copies of journals, and will pay for shipping. The
form to offer items for donation is here:
https://livingcomputers.org/Discover/Contribute-Historical-Artifacts.aspx . The
more careful
Is the optional RSTS/E COBOL software available for RSTS/E V5 or V6?
I Googled for it, but I didn't uncover a copy.
--barrym
Does anyone know the OFFICIAL status of RSTS/E source? I am aware of the
Mentec license, but it appears to only grant a license to the binary
distribution.
I believe I have source tapes to RSTS/E version 5 & 6 that I would like to
release copies, but I cannot until I can get official permission.
On 12/29/18 6:59 PM, Brad H via cctalk wrote:
And then other boards used a 3A-xx number instead of the 2A2001 number.
Kind of confusing.
For what it's worth, looking at a photo, my[1] machine's board looks more
like "3P10083 REV A" down by the front edge of the board, unless there's
some
On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 6:35 PM Guy Dunphy via cctalk
wrote:
>
> At 12:05 PM 29/12/2018 -0800, Al Kossow wrote:
> >On 12/29/18 12:00 PM, Chuck Guzis via cctalk wrote:
> >> Stupid question, but doesn't IEEE CS already have these archived?
> >
> >of course they are
> >
> >we are speaking with paper
RIGHT ON!
In a message dated 12/29/2018 5:35:20 PM US Mountain Standard Time,
cctalk@classiccmp.org writes:
The prime benefit of silverfish infested bulky piles of old paper, distributed
widely among individuals who
value history, is that no central entity can just suddenly decide to destroy
th
yep IEEE lets none of thier stuff into the open that is sought after...
Worse yet... Lucent gave them Bell System Tech Journals which Lucent had
up for free... then then IEEE slapped them behind a paywall.
Ed#
In a message dated 12/29/2018 1:00:29 PM US Mountain Standard
We don’t know yet. Looks like a very difficult repair.
Marc
> On Dec 29, 2018, at 7:25 PM, Adrian Stoness wrote:
>
> think that core pack will ever live again?
>
Peter, the second one in your list is an example of a 6X00 cordwood package.
--
Dave Mausner. +1-312-925-3694. +1-708-848-2775.
Rem tene; verba sequentur -- Cato
On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 3:01 PM <
controlfreaks-requ...@lists.controlfreaks.org> wrote:
> Send Controlfreaks mailing list submission
Pdp 8 tapes...
I have a bid i for these. Was planning to duplicate - not for profit - and
stick em up on a we-site for others to view/download Is there a repository
for such tapes?? Bitsaver??
Sent from my HUAWEI P10 on Three
Zane wrote:
> I didn?t realize they were 48-bit, though I seem to remember them being
> 24-bit.
> The system I used was more ?logistics? and general purpose ADP. I spent a
> *LOT*
> of time using the MUSE word processor.
>
> Zane
>> On Dec 28, 2018, at 1:19 PM, Bob Smith wrote:
>>
>> I alm
21 matches
Mail list logo
