On Fri, 20 Mar 2020, Rob Jarratt wrote:
> > Actually, I'm searching (more active than ever) for a proper location to
> > put all
> > of my hardware to. I already have shelves, controllable power plugs, and
> > just
> > today an EPROM reader/writer arrived. Though I'm unsure (to use fair
> > lang
On 20/03/2020 21:28, Jan-Benedict Glaw via cctalk wrote:
Hi Maciej!
Long time no see!
On Fri, 2020-03-20 17:36:25 +, Maciej W. Rozycki
wrote:
On Tue, 10 Mar 2020, Jan-Benedict Glaw via cctalk wrote:
Linux and/or NetBSD/vax would be a good choice, though, to implement the
VAX's system
> -Original Message-
> From: cctalk On Behalf Of Jan-Benedict Glaw
> via cctalk
> Sent: 20 March 2020 21:29
> To: Maciej W. Rozycki
> Cc: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts ;
> Peter Corlett
> Subject: Re: HPE OpenVMS Hobbyist license program is closing
>
> Hi Maciej!
>
Hi Maciej!
Long time no see!
On Fri, 2020-03-20 17:36:25 +, Maciej W. Rozycki
wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Mar 2020, Jan-Benedict Glaw via cctalk wrote:
> > > Linux and/or NetBSD/vax would be a good choice, though, to implement the
> > > VAX's system calls and execute it's binaries. Though there wer
I would bet that that board increases the resolution of one of the early SWTPc
terminals. I'm not sure which one.
Bill S.
-Original Message-
From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Kyle Owen via
cctalk
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2020 3:52 PM
To: General Discussion
In the midst of cleaning up, I came across this board. Can't seem to find
any info online about it. There's another board from another company, not
SWTPC, with the same name—apparently a timekeeping board for an Apple II.
https://imgur.com/a/j8pyqMZ
I assume this is a way to generate a composite
On Sun, 8 Mar 2020, Curious Marc via cctech wrote:
> On the Russian resistors I saw, the value was what is written on it. If
> you can’t measure them, maybe there is some conformal coating or
> corrosion on the leads? You’d need to scratch that off.
At least in the 1980s they used R, K or M re
On Tue, 10 Mar 2020, Jan-Benedict Glaw via cctalk wrote:
> > Linux and/or NetBSD/vax would be a good choice, though, to implement the
> > VAX's system calls and execute it's binaries. Though there were more
> > concerted efforts to do this years ago, but I don't know what became of
> > them. Googl
On 3/18/20 10:02 AM, David Kuder via cctalk wrote:
It was pretty bad last time I tried to run NetBSD on my vaxen. Back around
NetBSD 1.5.2 or something like that I was able to install via mopboot on my
MicroVax 3600 and a few VaxStation 3100's. Years later I tried to boot it
up again and it cou
