[cctalk] Re: NTSC TV demodulator

2024-05-20 Thread Tony Duell via cctalk
On Sun, May 19, 2024 at 1:08 PM Will Cooke via cctalk wrote: > Does anyone know of a small TV tuner that tunes old analog TV channels (US > NTSC) and outputs composite or VGA or HDMI signals? I've looked around a bit > but haven't found anything. It's relatively easy to build one, but I would

[cctalk] Re: Thirties techies and computing history

2024-05-20 Thread Tony Duell via cctalk
On Sun, May 19, 2024 at 4:56 PM Tarek Hoteit via cctalk wrote: > > Thank you, Josh. How did your passion start with classical computers? Maybe > this helps in understanding the generation? I know how I got started, but not really why. Although I can explain how it progressed. It was May 1986, I

[cctalk] Re: NTSC TV demodulator

2024-05-20 Thread Adrian Godwin via cctalk
At one time I had a few Bt848 based PCI TV tuner cards for a PC - Hauppage was a big player but there were others. Some were composite video in, some also had a TV tuner section. I tried one as a video converter for PAL composite out from some home micro - possibly a Jupiter Ace. It wasn't that g

[cctalk] Re: NTSC TV demodulator

2024-05-20 Thread Adrian Godwin via cctalk
I've also had TVs with modular RF inputs. One was a huge plasma wall TV and the other a tiny cheap caravan TV but both had locations for an RF input card which I assumed could be replaced by cards to suit local national TV standards. These have no visible controls and, like the PC TV cards, probabl

[cctalk] Re: Thirties techies and computing history

2024-05-20 Thread Nico de Jong via cctalk
Den 2024-05-20 kl. 10:56 skrev Tony Duell via cctalk: On Sun, May 19, 2024 at 4:56 PM Tarek Hoteit via cctalk wrote: Thank you, Josh. How did your passion start with classical computers? Maybe this helps in understanding the generation? I know how I got started, but not really why. Although

[cctalk] Re: Thirties techies and computing history

2024-05-20 Thread Paul Koning via cctalk
> On May 20, 2024, at 6:08 AM, Nico de Jong via cctalk > wrote: > > ... > I used to work on the P6000 series, and they had a very interesting > architecture. For those who want to know a bit more about Philips' history, I > can recommend an e-book written by one of the guys in Sweden, where

[cctalk] Re: Thirties techies and computing history

2024-05-20 Thread Nico de Jong via cctalk
Den 2024-05-20 kl. 15:26 skrev Paul Koning via cctalk: On May 20, 2024, at 6:08 AM, Nico de Jong via cctalk wrote: ... I used to work on the P6000 series, and they had a very interesting architecture. For those who want to know a bit more about Philips' history, I can recommend an e-book

[cctalk] Re: Thirties techies and computing history

2024-05-20 Thread Paul Koning via cctalk
> On May 20, 2024, at 9:33 AM, Nico de Jong via cctalk > wrote: > > > Den 2024-05-20 kl. 15:26 skrev Paul Koning via cctalk: >> >> ... >> I just flipped through it briefly, and spotted what was the Electrologica >> headquarters (page 143). And a few pages later there is a bit of history

[cctalk] Re: Thirties techies and computing history

2024-05-20 Thread The Doctor via cctalk
On Sunday, May 19th, 2024 at 13:31, ben via cctalk wrote: > My mind is fine, it the eyes that are going. > Screens are getting bigger and text is getting smaller. > I must be dreaming that. HiDPI flatpanel displays definitely don't help with this. :/ The Doctor [412/724/301/703/415/510] WWW:

[cctalk] Re: interlace [was: NTSC TV demodulator ]

2024-05-20 Thread CAREY SCHUG via cctalk
This may have been covered before, VERY early in this tread. I think I tried a game on a flatscreen, and had issues. I don't know if it applies to the radio shack Color Computer, the interest of the original poster. many games and entry pcs with old style tv analog format, don't interlace, and

[cctalk] Re: interlace [was: NTSC TV demodulator ]

2024-05-20 Thread Paul Koning via cctalk
I think you have that backwards. TVs use interlace. Older PC displays may do so, or not; typically the 480 line format was not interlaced but there might be high resolution modes that were. The reason was to deal with bandwidth limitations. Flat panel displays normally support a pile of input

[cctalk] Re: interlace [was: NTSC TV demodulator ]

2024-05-20 Thread Wayne S via cctalk
IIRC, didn’t most older pc monitors have a setup mode where one of the options was interlace or non-interlace. Sent from my iPhone > On May 20, 2024, at 09:35, Paul Koning via cctalk > wrote: > > I think you have that backwards. > > TVs use interlace. Older PC displays may do so, or not;

[cctalk] Re: interlace [was: NTSC TV demodulator ]

2024-05-20 Thread CAREY SCHUG via cctalk
Wayne, you must be one of those thirty-something techies from another thread. for those of us in our 60s and 70s, setup mode? huh? old TVs and monitors were purely analog. No on-screen displays and non-volatile memory bytes for setup. adjustments for size and position were rheostats. i

[cctalk] Re: Thirties techies and computing history

2024-05-20 Thread Christian Liendo via cctalk
I see computer history slowly growing. Before you had only one museum in the United States and now you have multiple ones such as but not limited to: American Computer Museum Computer History Museum Computer Museum of America Large Scale Systems Museum Rhode Island Computer Museum System Source Co

[cctalk] Re: Thirties techies and computing history

2024-05-20 Thread Christian Liendo via cctalk
Sorry I forgot to add Kennet Classic. I failed, my mistake. On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 1:11 PM Christian Liendo wrote: > > I see computer history slowly growing. Before you had only one museum > in the United States and now you have multiple ones such as but not > limited to: > > American Computer M

[cctalk] Re: Thirties techies and computing history

2024-05-20 Thread Bill Degnan via cctalk
Lol!I don't care, our little non profit is but a wee dot on the map compared with the well-funded giants. On Mon, May 20, 2024, 1:12 PM Christian Liendo via cctalk < cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote: > Sorry I forgot to add Kennet Classic. I failed, my mistake. > > On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 1:11 PM

[cctalk] Re: interlace [was: NTSC TV demodulator ]

2024-05-20 Thread Wayne S via cctalk
Young , hah. No i’m old 70. The pc monitors, not Tv, always had a setup menu. Even the Vt100 series let you choose interlace if you needed. Sent from my iPhone > On May 20, 2024, at 10:06, CAREY SCHUG wrote: > > Wayne, you must be one of those thirty-something techies from another thread. >

[cctalk] Re: Thirties techies and computing history

2024-05-20 Thread Chuck Guzis via cctalk
On 5/20/24 10:25, Bill Degnan via cctalk wrote: >>> American Computer Museum >>> Computer History Museum >>> Computer Museum of America >>> Large Scale Systems Museum >>> Rhode Island Computer Museum >>> System Source Computer Museum Of course, there's the Living Computer Museum--oh, wait -C

[cctalk] Re: Thirties techies and computing history

2024-05-20 Thread Christian Liendo via cctalk
Kennet Classic is still important in getting history out to the public. On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 1:25 PM Bill Degnan via cctalk wrote: > > Lol!I don't care, our little non profit is but a wee dot on the map > compared with the well-funded giants. > > On Mon, May 20, 2024, 1:12 PM Christian Lie

[cctalk] Re: interlace [was: NTSC TV demodulator ]

2024-05-20 Thread Peter Corlett via cctalk
On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 11:13:38AM -0500, CAREY SCHUG via cctalk wrote: [...] > many games and entry pcs with old style tv analog format, don't interlace, > and tube TVs nearly all (except maybe a few late model high end ones?) are > fine with that, but I seem to recall that most or all digital/fla

[cctalk] Re: interlace [was: NTSC TV demodulator ]

2024-05-20 Thread Paul Koning via cctalk
> On May 20, 2024, at 1:37 PM, Wayne S via cctalk wrote: > > Young , hah. No i’m old 70. > The pc monitors, not Tv, always had a setup menu. Even the Vt100 series let > you choose interlace if you needed. VT100? I don't think so. And yes, it has a setup menu, but that's setup of the term

[cctalk] Re: interlace [was: NTSC TV demodulator ]

2024-05-20 Thread Wayne S via cctalk
In the vt100, setup menu “B” had an interlace on or off setting. I just looked it up. Sent from my iPhone > On May 20, 2024, at 10:51, Paul Koning via cctalk > wrote: > >  > >> On May 20, 2024, at 1:37 PM, Wayne S via cctalk >> wrote: >> >> Young , hah. No i’m old 70. >> The pc monitors,

[cctalk] Re: interlace [was: NTSC TV demodulator ]

2024-05-20 Thread Wayne S via cctalk
The setup on the earlier monitors was sometimes call “ODB” , don‘t know why. Was equivalent to setup. Sent from my iPhone > On May 20, 2024, at 11:02, Wayne S wrote: > > In the vt100, setup menu “B” had an interlace on or off setting. > I just looked it up. > > > Sent from my iPhone > >>

[cctalk] Re: interlace [was: NTSC TV demodulator ]

2024-05-20 Thread Will Cooke via cctalk
> On 05/20/2024 1:02 PM CDT Wayne S via cctalk wrote: > > > In the vt100, setup menu “B” had an interlace on or off setting. > I just looked it up. > > That is almost certainly setting what type of signal is generated. Like a TV of the same era, the monitor (display) portion doesn't care;

[cctalk] Re: interlace [was: NTSC TV demodulator ]

2024-05-20 Thread ben via cctalk
On 2024-05-20 12:16 p.m., Will Cooke via cctalk wrote: On 05/20/2024 1:02 PM CDT Wayne S via cctalk wrote: In the vt100, setup menu “B” had an interlace on or off setting. I just looked it up. That is almost certainly setting what type of signal is generated. Like a TV of the same era,

[cctalk] Re: interlace [was: NTSC TV demodulator ]

2024-05-20 Thread Sellam Abraham via cctalk
Is it perhaps OBD--On-Board Diagnostics? Sellam On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 11:06 AM Wayne S via cctalk wrote: > The setup on the earlier monitors was sometimes call “ODB” , don‘t know > why. Was equivalent to setup. > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On May 20, 2024, at 11:02, Wayne S wrote: > > > >

[cctalk] Re: interlace [was: NTSC TV demodulator ]

2024-05-20 Thread Peter Corlett via cctalk
On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 12:06:13PM -0500, CAREY SCHUG via cctalk wrote: [...] > so, just curious. how do digital TVs (and monitors) work? I presume the > dots are a rectangle, not sloping down to the right, no half a line at the > top and bottom. Do they just assume the brain can't tell that (for t

[cctalk] Re: interlace [was: NTSC TV demodulator ]

2024-05-20 Thread Will Cooke via cctalk
> On 05/20/2024 12:06 PM CDT CAREY SCHUG via cctalk > wrote: > > > so, just curious. how do digital TVs (and monitors) work? I presume the dots > are a rectangle, not sloping down to the right, no half a line at the top and > bottom. Do they just assume the brain can't tell that (for the co

[cctalk] Re: interlace [was: NTSC TV demodulator ]

2024-05-20 Thread Adrian Godwin via cctalk
I remember the VT100 interlace setting. Yes, it changed the signal generated. I don't know if it also changed the characteristics of the monitor but I would think not. It gave slightly higher resolution (the expectation would be double but the tube didn't have focus that good) at the cost of a hor

[cctalk] Re: interlace [was: NTSC TV demodulator ]

2024-05-20 Thread Paul Koning via cctalk
> On May 20, 2024, at 3:40 PM, Adrian Godwin via cctalk > wrote: > > I remember the VT100 interlace setting. Yes, it changed the signal > generated. I don't know if it also changed the characteristics of the > monitor but I would think not. The Pro also has such a thing in its video card. I

[cctalk] Re: Thirties techies and computing history

2024-05-20 Thread Kevin Jordan via cctalk
Virtual museums as well, e.g.: http://www.nostalgiccomputing.org On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 1:28 PM Christian Liendo via cctalk < cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote: > I see computer history slowly growing. Before you had only one museum > in the United States and now you have multiple ones such as