At 12:56 PM 25/06/2019 +0200, Liam Proven wrote:
>On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 at 12:31, Tony Aiuto via cctalk
> wrote:
>>
>> On a related note, a fun talk about ARM
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=2045=_6sh097Dk5k
>
>Remarkable. Thanks for the link. Astounding. Very thought-provoking.
On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 at 12:31, Tony Aiuto via cctalk
wrote:
>
> On a related note, a fun talk about ARM
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=2045=_6sh097Dk5k
Remarkable. Thanks for the link. Astounding. Very thought-provoking.
--
Liam Proven - Profile: https://about.me/liamproven
On a related note, a fun talk about ARM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=2045=_6sh097Dk5k
On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 08:25:13AM -0700, Chuck Guzis via cctalk wrote:
>
> It's difficult to say exactly, because of the constraints on the
> definition. Or does something have to be RISC only if it came after
> the definition?
>
I would say that one of the points he was making is that the
On 6/16/19 8:17 AM, Noel Chiappa via cctalk wrote:
> Still, the basic idea of RISC still applies; make the CPU clock rate as fast
> as
> possible by making the instructions simple, and let software deal with the
> resulting
> issues.
I'll mention in passing here that the goal of executing the
I finally got around to reading that note. My principal reponse is that it got
so
far down into details that I couldn't see the larger picture any more.
Going back to the original IBM 801 work, the RISC concept is very simple: to
make
the overall system as fast as possible; it did this by
On 6/15/19 3:40 PM, ben via cctalk wrote:
> On 6/15/2019 8:47 AM, Stefan Skoglund via cctalk wrote:
>
>> With VAX 11/780 and S/360 involved ? I don't think so soo
>> the Cyber series and 709(4) could be interesting.
>
> Well the early 1960's was the rise of BIG IRON that had REAL POWER
> and
On 6/15/2019 8:47 AM, Stefan Skoglund via cctalk wrote:
With VAX 11/780 and S/360 involved ? I don't think so soo
the Cyber series and 709(4) could be interesting.
Well the early 1960's was the rise of BIG IRON that had REAL POWER
and that led to people thinking about high level languages and
On 6/15/19 7:47 AM, Stefan Skoglund wrote:
>
> With VAX 11/780 and S/360 involved ? I don't think so soo
> the Cyber series and 709(4) could be interesting.
It's difficult to say exactly, because of the constraints on the
definition. Or does something have to be RISC only if it came after
the
ons 2019-06-12 klockan 14:35 -0700 skrev Chuck Guzis via cctalk:
> On 6/12/19 1:47 PM, alan--- via cctalk wrote:
> > I especially appreciated he not only offered an opinion - his
> > specific
> > ideas on where the boarder between RISC and CISC was - but then
> > provided
> > an analysis of a
On 6/12/19 1:47 PM, alan--- via cctalk wrote:
>
> I especially appreciated he not only offered an opinion - his specific
> ideas on where the boarder between RISC and CISC was - but then provided
> an analysis of a bunch of processors based on those criteria and an
> analysis of the outliers that
Alan,
> I especially appreciated he not only offered an opinion - his specific
> ideas on where the boarder between RISC and CISC was - but then provided
> an analysis of a bunch of processors based on those criteria and an
> analysis of the outliers that challenged his criteria. It's a well
I especially appreciated he not only offered an opinion - his specific
ideas on where the boarder between RISC and CISC was - but then provided
an analysis of a bunch of processors based on those criteria and an
analysis of the outliers that challenged his criteria. It's a well
thought-out
> On June 12, 2019 at 12:45 PM Alan Perry via cctalk
> wrote:
>
>
> Ok. Here is a second thank you. An interesting read.
> > On Jun 12, 2019, at 9:58 AM, Liam Proven via cctalk
> > wrote:
> > > On Wed, 12 Jun 2019 at 18:55, David wrote:
> > >
> > > I found it most interesting, thanks for
On 6/12/19 10:14 AM, Paul Koning via cctalk wrote:
>
>
>> On Jun 12, 2019, at 11:59 AM, Liam Proven via cctalk
>> wrote:
>>
>> Goes a bit over my head but may be of interest:
>>
>> https://userpages.umbc.edu/~vijay/mashey.on.risc.html
>
> Nice. Still reading through it.
>
> I like his
Ok. Here is a second thank you. An interesting read.
> On Jun 12, 2019, at 9:58 AM, Liam Proven via cctalk
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 12 Jun 2019 at 18:55, David wrote:
>>
>> I found it most interesting, thanks for sending out the link.
>
> Oh good. I'm glad to hear that. One "thank you" makes
> On Jun 12, 2019, at 11:59 AM, Liam Proven via cctalk
> wrote:
>
> Goes a bit over my head but may be of interest:
>
> https://userpages.umbc.edu/~vijay/mashey.on.risc.html
Nice. Still reading through it.
I like his definition of RISC. It captures the key points. Interesting that a
On Wed, 12 Jun 2019 at 18:55, David wrote:
>
> I found it most interesting, thanks for sending out the link.
Oh good. I'm glad to hear that. One "thank you" makes it worth the while. :-)
--
Liam Proven - Profile: https://about.me/liamproven
Email: lpro...@cix.co.uk - Google Mail/Hangouts/Plus:
I found it most interesting, thanks for sending out the link.
David
> On Jun 12, 2019, at 8:59 AM, Liam Proven via cctalk
> wrote:
>
> Goes a bit over my head but may be of interest:
>
> https://userpages.umbc.edu/~vijay/mashey.on.risc.html
>
> --
> Liam Proven - Profile:
Goes a bit over my head but may be of interest:
https://userpages.umbc.edu/~vijay/mashey.on.risc.html
--
Liam Proven - Profile: https://about.me/liamproven
Email: lpro...@cix.co.uk - Google Mail/Hangouts/Plus: lpro...@gmail.com
Twitter/Facebook/Flickr: lproven - Skype/LinkedIn: liamproven
UK:
20 matches
Mail list logo