Zane Healy wrote:
>
> > On Oct 13, 2017, at 9:51 AM, Antonio Carlini via cctalk
> > wrote:
> >
> > On 13/10/17 07:17, Holm Tiffe wrote:
> >>
> >> I meant that brick:
> >> http://www.tiffe.de/Robotron/PDP-VAX/VAX/rtVAX300-internal-3.jpg
> >> http://www.tiffe.de/Robotron/PDP-VAX/VAX/rtVAX300-in
> On Oct 13, 2017, at 9:51 AM, Antonio Carlini via cctalk
> wrote:
>
> On 13/10/17 07:17, Holm Tiffe wrote:
>>
>> I meant that brick:
>> http://www.tiffe.de/Robotron/PDP-VAX/VAX/rtVAX300-internal-3.jpg
>> http://www.tiffe.de/Robotron/PDP-VAX/VAX/rtVAX300-internal-1.jpg
>> http://www.tiffe.de/R
Antonio Carlini wrote:
> On 13/10/17 07:17, Holm Tiffe wrote:
> >
> > I meant that brick:
> > http://www.tiffe.de/Robotron/PDP-VAX/VAX/rtVAX300-internal-3.jpg
> > http://www.tiffe.de/Robotron/PDP-VAX/VAX/rtVAX300-internal-1.jpg
> > http://www.tiffe.de/Robotron/PDP-VAX/VAX/rtVAX300-internal-12jpg
>
On 13/10/17 07:17, Holm Tiffe wrote:
I meant that brick:
http://www.tiffe.de/Robotron/PDP-VAX/VAX/rtVAX300-internal-3.jpg
http://www.tiffe.de/Robotron/PDP-VAX/VAX/rtVAX300-internal-1.jpg
http://www.tiffe.de/Robotron/PDP-VAX/VAX/rtVAX300-internal-12jpg
on those boards:
http://www.tiffe.de/Robo
Antonio Carlini via cctalk wrote:
> On 12/10/17 21:10, Holm Tiffe via cctalk wrote:
>
> This thread is becoming a little confusing. The VAXstation II/RC was a
> VAXstation II in a pedestal enclosure
> and differed from a normal VAXstation II in only one way: some of the
> backplane slots had gl
On 12/10/17 21:10, Holm Tiffe via cctalk wrote:
This thread is becoming a little confusing. The VAXstation II/RC was a
VAXstation II in a pedestal enclosure
and differed from a normal VAXstation II in only one way: some of the
backplane slots had glue in them.
(OK, two ways, since apparently DE
Jon Elson via cctalk wrote:
> On 10/11/2017 01:51 AM, Steven M Jones via cctalk wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 10/10/2017 12:51, allison via cctalk wrote:
> >> Memory says: it was MICROVAX/RT and the cpu had a reduced instruction
> >> set and was used with ELN/PASCAL. IT was a reduced capability
>
> >Memory says: it was MICROVAX/RT and the cpu had a reduced instruction
> >set and was used with ELN/PASCAL. IT was a reduced capability machine.
>
> You¹re thinking of the rtVAX, which was a different product; the rtVAX
> 1000 was a MicroVAX II, but without memory managent. It could not run VMS
On 10/11/2017 01:51 AM, Steven M Jones via cctalk wrote:
On 10/10/2017 12:51, allison via cctalk wrote:
Memory says: it was MICROVAX/RT and the cpu had a reduced instruction
set and was used with ELN/PASCAL. IT was a reduced capability
machine.
As I recollect it used the same KA630/M7606,
> On Oct 10, 2017, at 3:51 PM, allison via cctalk wrote:
>
> Memory says: it was MICROVAX/RT and the cpu had a reduced instruction set and
> was used with
> ELN/PASCAL. IT was a reduced capability machine.
Microvaxen in general have reduced instruction sets, as specifically sanctioned
by lat
On 10/10/17, 9:51 PM, "cctech on behalf of allison via cctech"
wrote:
>
>
>On 10/10/17 3:17 PM, Antonio Carlini via cctalk wrote:
>> On 10/10/17 14:26, Zane Healy via cctalk wrote:
>>> It's a VAXstation II/RC backplane, it was sold cheaper and crippled
>>> by DEC to prevent adding more cards to
On 10/10/2017 12:17, Antonio Carlini via cctalk wrote:
>
> The /RC was (apparently) for "Reduced Connectivity" or some such.
The RC stood for Restricted Configuration. (I didn't remember it
correctly either.)
https://books.google.com/books?id=Sr4cRFxEX7QC&lpg=PA15&ots=5XAty8lkUd&dq=VAXstation%
On 10/10/17 3:17 PM, Antonio Carlini via cctalk wrote:
On 10/10/17 14:26, Zane Healy via cctalk wrote:
It's a VAXstation II/RC backplane, it was sold cheaper and crippled
by DEC to prevent adding more cards to it. That was my first VAX,
and I think I still have mine.
Zane
The /RC was (ap
i aparently would put pennys in the floppy drivers of my parents rainbow
100 when i was a kid for some reason
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 8:31 PM, Chris Elmquist via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
> Same kid that put oatmeal in the VCR?
>
> https://youtu.be/25abPjKr06U
>
>
> On October 10, 20
Same kid that put oatmeal in the VCR?
https://youtu.be/25abPjKr06U
On October 10, 2017 8:07:47 AM CDT, Rod Smallwood via cctalk
wrote:
>I have in my possession a back plane from a BA23.
>
>Somebody has put glue in the last three slots.
>
>Can anybody explain that?
>
>Rod
--
Chris Elmquist
On 10/10/17 14:26, Zane Healy via cctalk wrote:
It's a VAXstation II/RC backplane, it was sold cheaper and crippled by DEC to
prevent adding more cards to it. That was my first VAX, and I think I still
have mine.
Zane
The /RC was (apparently) for "Reduced Connectivity" or some such.
The sm
It's a VAXstation II/RC backplane, it was sold cheaper and crippled by DEC to
prevent adding more cards to it. That was my first VAX, and I think I still
have mine.
Zane
> On Oct 10, 2017, at 6:07 AM, Rod Smallwood via cctalk
> wrote:
>
> I have in my possession a back plane from a BA23.
>
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 6:07 AM, Rod Smallwood via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
> I have in my possession a back plane from a BA23.
> Somebody has put glue in the last three slots.
> Can anybody explain that?
DEC sold a lower-priced, limited expansion MicroVAX II/RC, and rather than
ac
18 matches
Mail list logo
