Re: [RESOLVED] Re: EPROM baking

2018-02-06 Thread dwight via cctalk
: cctalk on behalf of Chuck Guzis via cctalk Sent: Tuesday, February 6, 2018 7:28:38 AM To: Tor Arntsen via cctalk Subject: Re: [RESOLVED] Re: EPROM baking On 02/06/2018 12:05 AM, Tor Arntsen via cctalk wrote: > .. which led me to accidentally power a USB hub with 12V instead of > 5V - the

Re: [RESOLVED] Re: EPROM baking

2018-02-06 Thread Alexander Schreiber via cctalk
On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 11:06:29AM -0800, Chuck Guzis via cctalk wrote: > On 02/05/2018 10:20 AM, Mark G Thomas via cctalk wrote: > > > 2) Many of the chips were failing to program because my Batronix > >programmer apparently requires more current than my USB port provides. > >This surpr

Re: [RESOLVED] Re: EPROM baking

2018-02-06 Thread Chuck Guzis via cctalk
On 02/06/2018 12:05 AM, Tor Arntsen via cctalk wrote: > .. which led me to accidentally power a USB hub with 12V instead of > 5V - the power supplies looked the same, had the same plug, and I > couldn't read the tiny writing on the warts. That blew the nicest > notebook PC I've ever found - I bo

Re: [RESOLVED] Re: EPROM baking

2018-02-06 Thread Tor Arntsen via cctalk
On 5 February 2018 at 20:06, Chuck Guzis via cctalk wrote: > I have a similar gripe with barrel connectors, > which don't seem to enforce any standard at all regarding polarity or AC > vs. DC. .. which led me to accidentally power a USB hub with 12V instead of 5V - the power supplies looked the s

Re: [RESOLVED] Re: EPROM baking

2018-02-05 Thread Eric Smith via cctalk
On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 12:06 PM, Chuck Guzis via cctalk < cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote: > You should be aware that many "thin" Far East USB cables will not pass > the full USB 1.5A current without substantial voltage drop. > "Full USB current" is only 0.5A for USB 2, and 0.9A for USB 3. Any USB d

Re: [RESOLVED] Re: EPROM baking

2018-02-05 Thread Chuck Guzis via cctalk
On 02/05/2018 01:02 PM, Bill Degnan via cctalk wrote: > I was going to say...I would not have thought any USB-powered prom > programmer to be the best solution. I have two programmers both have their > own wall power connectors and they're reliable. I am not saying that it > would not be possibl

Re: [RESOLVED] Re: EPROM baking

2018-02-05 Thread Paul Berger via cctalk
On 2018-02-05 8:00 PM, Chuck Guzis via cctalk wrote: On 02/05/2018 01:02 PM, Bill Degnan via cctalk wrote: I was going to say...I would not have thought any USB-powered prom programmer to be the best solution. I have two programmers both have their own wall power connectors and they're relia

Re: [RESOLVED] Re: EPROM baking

2018-02-05 Thread Bill Degnan via cctalk
> > > > On 02/05/2018 02:06 PM, Chuck Guzis via cctalk wrote: > > On 02/05/2018 10:20 AM, Mark G Thomas via cctalk wrote: > > > >> 2) Many of the chips were failing to program because my Batronix > >> programmer apparently requires more current than my USB port > provides. > >> This surpris

Re: [RESOLVED] Re: EPROM baking

2018-02-05 Thread Bill Gunshannon via cctalk
My EPROM Programmers all have a connection foir external power specifically because sometimes USB can't provide the needed current. bill On 02/05/2018 02:06 PM, Chuck Guzis via cctalk wrote: > On 02/05/2018 10:20 AM, Mark G Thomas via cctalk wrote: > >> 2) Many of the chips were failing to pro

Re: [RESOLVED] Re: EPROM baking

2018-02-05 Thread Chuck Guzis via cctalk
On 02/05/2018 10:20 AM, Mark G Thomas via cctalk wrote: > 2) Many of the chips were failing to program because my Batronix >programmer apparently requires more current than my USB port provides. >This surprised me because I have been programming chips for years >using this programme

[RESOLVED] Re: EPROM baking

2018-02-05 Thread Mark G Thomas via cctalk
Hi, Please see resolution below, if you are curious about how this turned out. On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 09:18:50PM -0500, Mark G Thomas via cctalk wrote: > Hi, > > > On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 9:08 AM, Mark G Thomas via cctalk < > > cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I am worki

Re: EPROM baking

2017-12-23 Thread drlegendre . via cctalk
All chips should have windows. On Sat, Dec 23, 2017 at 11:04 PM, Chuck Guzis via cctalk < cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote: > On 12/23/2017 08:47 PM, Ethan Dicks via cctalk wrote: > > > I did that once and had the same experience - a glow from under the > > lid, but no smoke... and put right-way-roun

Re: EPROM baking

2017-12-23 Thread Chuck Guzis via cctalk
On 12/23/2017 08:47 PM, Ethan Dicks via cctalk wrote: > I did that once and had the same experience - a glow from under the > lid, but no smoke... and put right-way-round, was still programmable > and verifiable. Well, that's one way to "bake" an EPROM! --Chuck

Re: EPROM baking

2017-12-23 Thread Ethan Dicks via cctalk
On Sat, Dec 23, 2017 at 12:04 PM, Jon Elson via cctalk wrote: > I made my own 2716-2764 programmer MANY years ago. On a few occasions I put > an EPROM in wrong and saw the bonding wires light up! I killed power and > corrected the mistake, and the EPROM worked fine. I did that once and had the

Re: EPROM baking

2017-12-23 Thread Jon Elson via cctalk
On 12/23/2017 10:00 AM, dwight via cctalk wrote: When I had access to a wire bonder, we took EPROMs that had been plugged in upside down and removed the lids. We'd see a blown wire and replace it. On several of these parts we found that 100% worked. So it would seem that no silicon damage was

Re: EPROM baking

2017-12-23 Thread dwight via cctalk
t: Re: EPROM baking I see the same things. Some chips just won't reprogram. Symptoms include failure to program just like you, but also "chip backwards" errors. Can't remember the chip brands, I just toss them out when that happens. I have not found any way to resuscitate them

Re: EPROM baking

2017-12-22 Thread Curious Marc via cctalk
I see the same things. Some chips just won't reprogram. Symptoms include failure to program just like you, but also "chip backwards" errors. Can't remember the chip brands, I just toss them out when that happens. I have not found any way to resuscitate them. Maybe ~10% of the chips I tried had t

Re: EPROM baking

2017-12-21 Thread dwight via cctalk
AM To: Mark G Thomas; General Discussion: On-Topic Posts Cc: cctalk@classiccmp.org Subject: Re: EPROM baking > Hi, > >> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 9:08 AM, Mark G Thomas via cctalk < >> cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> > >> > I am w

Re: EPROM baking

2017-12-21 Thread Pete Rittwage via cctalk
> Hi, > >> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 9:08 AM, Mark G Thomas via cctalk < >> cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> > >> > I am working on several projects requiring 2708 and 2716 EPROMs, and >> > am finding some of my chips will not erase, and some will not take >> > a program. I've also learne

Re: EPROM baking

2017-12-20 Thread Mark G Thomas via cctalk
Hi, > On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 9:08 AM, Mark G Thomas via cctalk < > cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I am working on several projects requiring 2708 and 2716 EPROMs, and > > am finding some of my chips will not erase, and some will not take > > a program. I've also learned more in

Re: EPROM baking

2017-12-13 Thread systems_glitch via cctalk
tched to EEPROMs. I would also be >> interested in hearing about whether or not baking would work and how to do >> the baking, exactly. I have a bunch of old EPROMs, that I figured were >> dead, but maybe not? Mike Zahorik >> >> >> From: Holm Tiffe via cc

Re: EPROM baking

2017-12-13 Thread systems_glitch via cctalk
sted in hearing about whether or not baking would work and how to do > the baking, exactly. I have a bunch of old EPROMs, that I figured were > dead, but maybe not? Mike Zahorik > > > From: Holm Tiffe via cctalk > To: dwight via cctalk > Sent: Wednesday, Decembe

Re: EPROM baking

2017-12-13 Thread Michael Zahorik via cctalk
baking, exactly. I have a bunch of old EPROMs, that I figured were dead, but maybe not? Mike Zahorik From: Holm Tiffe via cctalk To: dwight via cctalk Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2017 9:17 AM Subject: Re: EPROM baking Hmm..I've read about that baking in conjunction with

RE: EPROM baking

2017-12-13 Thread Dave Wade via cctalk
-Original Message- > From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Mark G > Thomas via cctalk > Sent: 13 December 2017 14:09 > To: CCtalk > Subject: EPROM baking > > Hi, > > I am working on several projects requiring 2708 and 2716 EPROMs, and am > finding some of my c

Re: EPROM baking

2017-12-13 Thread Holm Tiffe via cctalk
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2017 6:18:16 AM > To: Mark G Thomas; General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts > Subject: Re: EPROM baking > > On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 9:08 AM, Mark G Thomas via cctalk < > cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > >

Re: EPROM baking

2017-12-13 Thread dwight via cctalk
18:16 AM To: Mark G Thomas; General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts Subject: Re: EPROM baking On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 9:08 AM, Mark G Thomas via cctalk < cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote: > Hi, > > I am working on several projects requiring 2708 and 2716 EPROMs, and > am f

Re: EPROM baking

2017-12-13 Thread william degnan via cctalk
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 9:08 AM, Mark G Thomas via cctalk < cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote: > Hi, > > I am working on several projects requiring 2708 and 2716 EPROMs, and > am finding some of my chips will not erase, and some will not take > a program. I've also learned more in the past week than I