On Apr 17, 2020, at 9:02, Alan Perry via cctalk wrote:
> As I noted, the two sets of appendices are mostly completely different. There
> are 9 appendices that look like they are from the primary document and 5 that
> look like they are from inserted pages. Both sets start numbering from "A".
> T
On Friday, April 17, 2020 at 9:02, Alan Perry via cctech wrote:
> But the really interesting thing is that the copyright date on the
> "primary" document is AFTER the date in the footers of the "inserted"
> pages.
Sometimes an update contains a replacement title page (containing the
update date
On Friday, April 17, 2020 at 18:06, Antonio Carlini via cctech wrote:
> pdftk works well for managing pages and PDFs.
I'll second that. It's been invaluable for combining PDFs (such as when a
supplier insists on delivering its general catalog in individual sections),
as well as extracting subs
On Thursday, April 16, 2020 at 23:53, Frank McConnell wrote:
> The folks who did the 3000 manuals didn´t do that very often. What we
> got were almost always update packets that simply replaced pages in
> their manuals.
To be fair, the 1000 (DSD) manuals were updated by replacement pages also.
W
On 17/04/2020 17:02, Alan Perry via cctalk wrote:
Looking at the document, my case looks more interesting.
As I noted, the two sets of appendices are mostly completely
different. There are 9 appendices that look like they are from the
primary document and 5 that look like they are from insert
On 4/16/20 9:32 PM, J. David Bryan via cctech wrote:
On Thursday, April 16, 2020 at 8:52, Alan Perry via cctech wrote:
Should I create two different pdfs with different appendix sections or
create a single pdf with both sets?
Where both old and new pages were present, and where they c
On Thursday, April 16, 2020 at 23:18, Frank McConnell wrote:
> Sometimes I have come across shrink-wrapped manuals and later updates,
> and scanned them as found. I wouldn´t want to deny other people the
> opportunity to apply updates to manuals, you know?
Oh yes, especially the ones that would
On Apr 16, 2020, at 21:32, J. David Bryan via cctech wrote:
>
> On Thursday, April 16, 2020 at 8:52, Alan Perry via cctech wrote:
>
>> 1. One document is a software installation manual in a loose leaf
>> binder with other documents. It has a title page, tables of contents,
>> etc., several chapte
On Apr 16, 2020, at 23:37, J. David Bryan wrote:
> On Thursday, April 16, 2020 at 23:18, Frank McConnell wrote:
>
>> Sometimes I have come across shrink-wrapped manuals and later updates,
>> and scanned them as found. I wouldn´t want to deny other people the
>> opportunity to apply updates to man
On Thursday, April 16, 2020 at 8:52, Alan Perry via cctech wrote:
> 1. One document is a software installation manual in a loose leaf
> binder with other documents. It has a title page, tables of contents,
> etc., several chapters, and then it gets interesting. It has several
> appendix sections (
I recently received a bunch of hardware/software documents to scan. I am
only roughly familiar with the systems covered by the docs. I have
encountered a couple situations that I would like guidance on.
1. One document is a software installation manual in a loose leaf binder
with other docu
11 matches
Mail list logo
