Warly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Available at http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~warly/files/cdrtools/
>
> Updated DVD patch (at present against a25) with a better DVD+RW
> formatting and burning support.
I just wanted to report that it seems to work well on my Plextor
PX-708A drive, which is no
>From: Kronos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>I have a small problem with my dvd recorder. It's a NEC ND-1300A (dual
>format). It writes DVD+/-R at 4x, DVD-RW at 2x and DVD+RW at 2.4x.
>cdrecord (either from cdrtools or ProDVD) reports that the drive can
>write at most at 2x:
>Cdrecord-ProDVD-Clone 2.01a26
Hi,
I have a small problem with my dvd recorder. It's a NEC ND-1300A (dual
format). It writes DVD+/-R at 4x, DVD-RW at 2x and DVD+RW at 2.4x.
cdrecord (either from cdrtools or ProDVD) reports that the drive can
write at most at 2x:
Cdrecord-ProDVD-Clone 2.01a26 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Copyright (C) 1
Warly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Available at http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~warly/files/cdrtools/
>
> Updated DVD patch (at present against a25) with a better DVD+RW
> formatting and burning support.
I just wanted to report that it seems to work well on my Plextor
PX-708A drive, which is no
>From: Kronos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>I have a small problem with my dvd recorder. It's a NEC ND-1300A (dual
>format). It writes DVD+/-R at 4x, DVD-RW at 2x and DVD+RW at 2.4x.
>cdrecord (either from cdrtools or ProDVD) reports that the drive can
>write at most at 2x:
>Cdrecord-ProDVD-Clone 2.01a26
Hi,
I have a small problem with my dvd recorder. It's a NEC ND-1300A (dual
format). It writes DVD+/-R at 4x, DVD-RW at 2x and DVD+RW at 2.4x.
cdrecord (either from cdrtools or ProDVD) reports that the drive can
write at most at 2x:
Cdrecord-ProDVD-Clone 2.01a26 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Copyright (C) 1
Hello,
I have a kernel 2.6.3, everything else is fine, but I couldn't mount my
dvd
# mount /mnt/dvd
/dev/dvd: Invalid argument
mount: you must specify the filesystem type
# mount /dev/dvd -t udf /mnt/dvd
mount: block device /dev/dvd is write-protected, mounting read-only
mount: wrong fs type,
>From: Lourens Veen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Jon came here asking for advice about a problem he had with
>growisofs (which Andy helped him with). You started about
>cdrecord-ProDVD, Jon explained why he doesn't use cdrecord-ProDVD,
>and now you are complaining that he he is a freeloader because he
On Wed 3 March 2004 14:07, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> From: Lourens Veen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >> WRONG -> RTFM
> >> ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/cdrecord/ProDVD/README
> >
> >I just read that document, and I'm curious what exactly is
> > wrong. To split up Jon's statement:
> >
> >- cdrecord-ProDVD
On Wed 3 March 2004 14:09, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> From: Warly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >scanbus will also display dev=ATA scanning if no dev option is
> > passed on the command line, mostly because we are defaulting on
> > ide-cd with 2.6 linux kernel.
>
> Another attempt to break portability of p
On Wed 3 March 2004 14:04, Joerg Schilling wrote:
>
> If you don't understand that you get a valuable piece of software
> and don't like to even do simple tests, then you are just the
> kind of person nobody likes to get in contact with. But then you
> should be consistent and stay away from this m
Hello,
I have a kernel 2.6.3, everything else is fine, but I couldn't mount my
dvd
# mount /mnt/dvd
/dev/dvd: Invalid argument
mount: you must specify the filesystem type
# mount /dev/dvd -t udf /mnt/dvd
mount: block device /dev/dvd is write-protected, mounting read-only
mount: wrong fs type,
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 07:57:35PM +0100, Lourens Veen wrote:
> - cdrecord-ProDVD will burn a maximum of 1 GB of data without a key
> - cdrecord-ProDVD will burn more than 1 GB of data, but only with a
> key
> - the key must be obtained from you
> - the key is time limited
> - the key restricts us
Joerg Schilling wrote:
From: Lourens Veen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
WRONG -> RTFM ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/cdrecord/ProDVD/README
I just read that document, and I'm curious what exactly is wrong. To
split up Jon's statement:
- cdrecord-ProDVD will burn a maximum of 1 GB of data without a key
- cd
>From: Lourens Veen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Jon came here asking for advice about a problem he had with
>growisofs (which Andy helped him with). You started about
>cdrecord-ProDVD, Jon explained why he doesn't use cdrecord-ProDVD,
>and now you are complaining that he he is a freeloader because he
On Wed 3 March 2004 14:07, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> From: Lourens Veen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >> WRONG -> RTFM
> >> ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/cdrecord/ProDVD/README
> >
> >I just read that document, and I'm curious what exactly is
> > wrong. To split up Jon's statement:
> >
> >- cdrecord-ProDVD
>From: Warly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>scanbus will also display dev=ATA scanning if no dev option is passed on
>the command line, mostly because we are defaulting on ide-cd with 2.6
>linux kernel.
Another attempt to break portability of portable software by adding
Linux specific changes that are even
>From: Lourens Veen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> WRONG -> RTFM ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/cdrecord/ProDVD/README
>I just read that document, and I'm curious what exactly is wrong. To
>split up Jon's statement:
>- cdrecord-ProDVD will burn a maximum of 1 GB of data without a key
>- cdrecord-ProDVD w
On Wed 3 March 2004 14:09, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> From: Warly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >scanbus will also display dev=ATA scanning if no dev option is
> > passed on the command line, mostly because we are defaulting on
> > ide-cd with 2.6 linux kernel.
>
> Another attempt to break portability of p
On Wed 3 March 2004 14:04, Joerg Schilling wrote:
>
> If you don't understand that you get a valuable piece of software
> and don't like to even do simple tests, then you are just the
> kind of person nobody likes to get in contact with. But then you
> should be consistent and stay away from this m
Short answer to your long and wrong message:
It looks like you are a Freeloader
Long answer: you completely missunderstood the idea of free software
and global economic compensations.
I now put more than 6 years of work into cdrecord-ProDVD and I definitely
don't people like you who on
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 07:57:35PM +0100, Lourens Veen wrote:
> - cdrecord-ProDVD will burn a maximum of 1 GB of data without a key
> - cdrecord-ProDVD will burn more than 1 GB of data, but only with a
> key
> - the key must be obtained from you
> - the key is time limited
> - the key restricts us
Joerg Schilling wrote:
From: Lourens Veen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
WRONG -> RTFM ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/cdrecord/ProDVD/README
I just read that document, and I'm curious what exactly is wrong. To
split up Jon's statement:
- cdrecord-ProDVD will burn a maximum of 1 GB of data without a key
-
>From: Warly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>scanbus will also display dev=ATA scanning if no dev option is passed on
>the command line, mostly because we are defaulting on ide-cd with 2.6
>linux kernel.
Another attempt to break portability of portable software by adding
Linux specific changes that are even
>From: Lourens Veen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> WRONG -> RTFM ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/cdrecord/ProDVD/README
>I just read that document, and I'm curious what exactly is wrong. To
>split up Jon's statement:
>- cdrecord-ProDVD will burn a maximum of 1 GB of data without a key
>- cdrecord-ProDVD w
Short answer to your long and wrong message:
It looks like you are a Freeloader
Long answer: you completely missunderstood the idea of free software
and global economic compensations.
I now put more than 6 years of work into cdrecord-ProDVD and I definitely
don't people like you who on
26 matches
Mail list logo
