lem burning 870 MB CD-Rs on Linux 2.2.16
ERSEK Laszlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Aug 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > I would not suggest to use disks > 80 Minute for any kind of data
storage
> > as they are most likely not reliable and definitely not reada
ERSEK Laszlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Aug 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > I would not suggest to use disks > 80 Minute for any kind of data storage
> > as they are most likely not reliable and definitely not readable by all drives.
>
> I tried these three big discs only becau
> Clearly anything >90 is asking for troble. However, I'm not as clear on
> why anything <90 would be a problem in terms of a standard. As you note
> there can be all manner of bad firmware misbehaviour, but I would expect
> anything in audio mode to read okay if you can write it.
It's my underst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The time between 90:00/00 and 99:59/75 is the space _before_ the start of the disk.
>
> I would not suggest to use disks > 80 Minute for any kind of data storage
> as they are most likely not reliable and definitely not readable by all drives.
> If you really like to u
On Mon, 13 Aug 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I would not suggest to use disks > 80 Minute for any kind of data storage
> as they are most likely not reliable and definitely not readable by all drives.
I tried these three big discs only because I read some comparisons on
the web, which claimed
>From: ERSEK Laszlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Cdrecord 1.9 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Copyright (C) 1995-2000 Jörg Schilling
>scsidev: '0,0,0'
>scsibus: 0 target: 0 lun: 0
>Linux sg driver version: 2.1.38
>Using libscg version 'schily-0.1'
>Device type: Removable CD-ROM
>Version: 0
>Response Form
6 matches
Mail list logo
