Re: [CentOS] 12V computing?

a 100 Watt system draws a little less than 1 Amp at 120 VAC and about 8 Amps at 12VDC. there's about 10 times power loss per foot of conductor and per connection (estimate 1/2 Ohm per connection). Yes, heavier guage wire is required for a lower voltage supplying the same power. for tha

Re: [CentOS] 12V computing?

jim wrote: 12VDC is appropriate for places that don't have other electrical supplies. these places include automobiles and boats as well as remote regions that use windmills, creekmills, solar panels, car batteries, and deep discharge gel batteries, possibly in a mix. typically there's noise

Re: [CentOS] 12V computing?

12VDC is appropriate for places that don't have other electrical supplies. these places include automobiles and boats as well as remote regions that use windmills, creekmills, solar panels, car batteries, and deep discharge gel batteries, possibly in a mix. typically there's noise and varian

[CentOS] gallery2 under CentOS-5.1

Is there a CentOS RPM for gallery2? I'm thinking of installing gallery2 through the preinstaller if I can't find an RPM. Is this the best way to go? Is anyone happily running gallery2 under CentOS? Any advice or suggestions gratefully received. ___

Re: [CentOS] Interface bonding?

On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 19:45 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > Timothy Selivanow wrote: > > On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 17:23 -0400, Ross S. W. Walker wrote: > > > >> This should give you what you need when doing 802.3ad LAGs: > >> > >> interface FastEthernet0/21 > >> port group 1 > >> spanning-tree portfas

Re: [CentOS] Interface bonding?

On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 19:51 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > John wrote: > > > >>> Now for what version of the 2900 you have I do not know. But it seems > >>> the info on Ciscos site is kind of misleading in places. There is some > >>> documentation that says it works and some say you have to have th

Re: [CentOS] 12V computing?

there are computer systems that take 12VDC (for example the PC-104 type and others). such a computer system is a box that has a connection for 12VDC. inside the box is a power supply that takes the 12VDC and presents the +12VDC, -12VCD, 5VDC, and -5VDC that's needed by the various electro

Re: [CentOS] Interface bonding?

John wrote: Now for what version of the 2900 you have I do not know. But it seems the info on Ciscos site is kind of misleading in places. There is some documentation that says it works and some say you have to have the add on modules. Your best bet if your not comfortable with the IOS comma

Re: [CentOS] Interface bonding?

Timothy Selivanow wrote: On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 17:23 -0400, Ross S. W. Walker wrote: This should give you what you need when doing 802.3ad LAGs: interface FastEthernet0/21 port group 1 spanning-tree portfast ! interface FastEthernet0/22 port group 1 spanning-tree portfast ! Using this on

RE: [CentOS] Interface bonding?

On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 17:13 -0700, Timothy Selivanow wrote: > On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 17:23 -0400, Ross S. W. Walker wrote: > > > This should give you what you need when doing 802.3ad LAGs: > > > > interface FastEthernet0/21 > > port group 1 > > spanning-tree portfast > > ! > > interface FastEthe

RE: [CentOS] Interface bonding?

On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 17:23 -0400, Ross S. W. Walker wrote: > This should give you what you need when doing 802.3ad LAGs: > > interface FastEthernet0/21 > port group 1 > spanning-tree portfast > ! > interface FastEthernet0/22 > port group 1 > spanning-tree portfast > ! Using this on the swit

Re: [CentOS] Interface bonding?

On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 18:05 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > John wrote: > > > > Now for what version of the 2900 you have I do not know. But it seems > > the info on Ciscos site is kind of misleading in places. There is some > > documentation that says it works and some say you have to have the add

Re: [CentOS] 12V computing?

If you want to minimize power costs, look to higher voltage, not lower. Run your computers off 208-240 volts instead of 100-120. If your supply is not auto ranging, make sure it's set to the high / 230 setting. Having a massive 12v power supply to run several computers isn't going to save any p

Re: [CentOS] Interface bonding?

John wrote: Now for what version of the 2900 you have I do not know. But it seems the info on Ciscos site is kind of misleading in places. There is some documentation that says it works and some say you have to have the add on modules. Your best bet if your not comfortable with the IOS comma

Re: [CentOS] 12V computing?

Ben Gore wrote: I have run CentOS 4.5 on this platform without problems. I wouldn't expect any issues with CentOS 5+. are these Via C7 processors i686 compliant? I think the earlier Cyrix/VIA stuff was i586 only. I thought CentOS5 was i686 only, and no longer supported i586 level CPU

RE: [CentOS] 12V computing?

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of John R Pierce > Sent: Friday, April 11, 2008 4:55 PM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] 12V computing? > > Jason Pyeron wrote: > > Yes. We are trying to minimize costs ( certification

Re: [CentOS] 12V computing?

I have run CentOS 4.5 on this platform without problems. I wouldn't expect any issues with CentOS 5+. -Ben Jason Pyeron wrote: Any ideas if this can run centos with out a special modifications? Elite C7VCM Mini-ITX Motherboard with VIA C7 1.5GHz Processor http://resources.mini-box.com/onlin

RE: [CentOS] Interface bonding?

On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 17:23 -0400, Ross S. W. Walker wrote: > Les Mikesell wrote: > > Ross S. W. Walker wrote: > > > > > > > I don't think you need to do all that: > > > > > > Check out: > > http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst2900xl_3500xl/release12.0_5_wc3/swg/Swgports.html >

RE: [CentOS] Interface bonding?

On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 16:59 -0400, Ross S. W. Walker wrote: > John wrote: > > On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 15:46 -0400, Ross S. W. Walker wrote: > > > Timothy Selivanow wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 15:14 -0400, John wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 14:08 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > > > > >

RE: [CentOS] Interface bonding?

Les Mikesell wrote: > Ross S. W. Walker wrote: > > > > > I don't think you need to do all that: > > > > Check out: > http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst2900xl_3500xl/release12.0_5_wc3/swg/Swgports.html > > > > > I've run 2900xl's connected to each other though 2 ports

Re: [CentOS] Interface bonding?

Ross S. W. Walker wrote: > I don't think you need to do all that: Check out: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst2900xl_3500xl/release12.0_5_wc3/swg/Swgports.html I've run 2900xl's connected to each other though 2 ports each configured with: port group 1 distribu

RE: [CentOS] Interface bonding?

John wrote: > On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 15:46 -0400, Ross S. W. Walker wrote: > > Timothy Selivanow wrote: > > > On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 15:14 -0400, John wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 14:08 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > > > > > Timothy Selivanow wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 14:26 -0400

Re: [CentOS] 12V computing?

Jason Pyeron wrote: Yes. We are trying to minimize costs ( certification of deviation from baseline centos/RHEL vs. hardware costs) in a 12VDC only environment. by 12VDC, do you mean regulated 12VDC +/- xx%, or vehicular 12V which typically is 11-14V, and should be engineered to not burn u

RE: [CentOS] 12V computing?

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Gordon McLellan > Sent: Friday, April 11, 2008 4:10 PM > ... > There's no such thing as a "12 volt" computer... unless you're looking > at some sort of weird industrial setup. Yes. We are trying to

Re: [CentOS] Updating Dovecot package?

On Wednesday, April 02, 2008 8:13 AM -0400 Drew Weaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: And by insecure, I of course refer to the recent rash of bugs which have been found. Can you give Red Hat bugzilla numbers for these? If none exist, they should be entered in the system.

RE: [CentOS] Interface bonding?

On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 15:46 -0400, Ross S. W. Walker wrote: > Timothy Selivanow wrote: > > On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 15:14 -0400, John wrote: > > > On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 14:08 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > > > > Timothy Selivanow wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 14:26 -0400, John wrote: > > > > >>

[CentOS] Adding Ethernet alias (why 3 hard links for an ifcfg-eth file?)

I need to add eth0:1 with a new IP address to my C5-based router. Does a design document exist for the ifcfg family of scripts that explains how they're to be used? Before I go digging through the script hierarchy I'm hoping someone can point me to documentation to make the process easier. On

Re: [CentOS] 12V computing?

Jason, I don't see why the 32 bit version of centos would not run on that hardware. Despite the fancy processor name, it still has to work with the i586 command set (at the worst). There's no such thing as a "12 volt" computer... unless you're looking at some sort of weird industrial setup. Th

Re: [CentOS] Interface bonding?

On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 12:33 -0700, Timothy Selivanow wrote: > On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 15:14 -0400, John wrote: > > On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 14:08 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > > > Timothy Selivanow wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 14:26 -0400, John wrote: > > > >> If I paid a couple grand for a core

Re: [CentOS] Interface bonding?

On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 12:33 -0700, Timothy Selivanow wrote: > On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 15:14 -0400, John wrote: > > On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 14:08 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > > > Timothy Selivanow wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 14:26 -0400, John wrote: > > > >> If I paid a couple grand for a core

RE: [CentOS] Interface bonding?

Timothy Selivanow wrote: > On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 15:14 -0400, John wrote: > > On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 14:08 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > > > Timothy Selivanow wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 14:26 -0400, John wrote: > > > >> If I paid a couple grand for a core switch i'd be calling Cisco! > > >

Re: [CentOS] kickstart ks.cfg file on USB devices

On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 12:24 -0700, Bill Campbell wrote: > On Fri, Apr 11, 2008, John wrote: > >On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 12:18 -0600, Milton Calnek wrote: > >> findfs comes to mind. > >> > >> other than that... > >> fdisk -l | grep > >> > >> Bill Campbell wrote: > >> > Is there an easy way to specif

Re: [CentOS] kickstart ks.cfg file on USB devices

Bill Campbell wrote: On Fri, Apr 11, 2008, John wrote: On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 12:18 -0600, Milton Calnek wrote: findfs comes to mind. other than that... fdisk -l | grep Bill Campbell wrote: Is there an easy way to specify the proper device location for the kickstart configuration file if

RE: [CentOS] Interface bonding?

Les Mikesell wrote: > John wrote: > > On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 14:08 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > >> Timothy Selivanow wrote: > >>> On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 14:26 -0400, John wrote: > If I paid a couple grand for a core switch i'd be calling Cisco! > > >>> They're not core switches, they're jus

Re: [CentOS] Interface bonding?

On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 15:14 -0400, John wrote: > On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 14:08 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > > Timothy Selivanow wrote: > > > On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 14:26 -0400, John wrote: > > >> If I paid a couple grand for a core switch i'd be calling Cisco! > > >> > > > > > > They're not core swi

Re: [CentOS] Interface bonding?

John wrote: On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 14:08 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: Timothy Selivanow wrote: On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 14:26 -0400, John wrote: If I paid a couple grand for a core switch i'd be calling Cisco! They're not core switches, they're just the catalyst 2900XL which is a small 24 port swi

RE: [CentOS] Interface bonding?

Timothy Selivanow wrote: > > On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 14:26 -0400, John wrote: > > If I paid a couple grand for a core switch i'd be calling Cisco! > > > > They're not core switches, they're just the catalyst 2900XL which is a > small 24 port switch. We've got stacks of these sitting unused, so I

Re: [CentOS] kickstart ks.cfg file on USB devices

On Fri, Apr 11, 2008, John wrote: >On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 12:18 -0600, Milton Calnek wrote: >> findfs comes to mind. >> >> other than that... >> fdisk -l | grep >> >> Bill Campbell wrote: >> > Is there an easy way to specify the proper device location for >> > the kickstart configuration file if

Re: [CentOS] kickstart ks.cfg file on USB devices

On Fri, Apr 11, 2008, Milton Calnek wrote: >findfs comes to mind. > >other than that... >fdisk -l | grep That's fine -- once the system has been installed, but I'm looking for a general way when attempting kickstart installs on new hardware that may find devices in different places. >Bill Campbe

Re: [CentOS] Interface bonding?

On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 14:08 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > Timothy Selivanow wrote: > > On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 14:26 -0400, John wrote: > >> If I paid a couple grand for a core switch i'd be calling Cisco! > >> > > > > They're not core switches, they're just the catalyst 2900XL which is a > > small 2

Re: [CentOS] Interface bonding?

On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 11:49 -0700, Timothy Selivanow wrote: > On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 14:26 -0400, John wrote: > > If I paid a couple grand for a core switch i'd be calling Cisco! > > > > They're not core switches, they're just the catalyst 2900XL which is a > small 24 port switch. We've got stack

Re: [CentOS] Interface bonding?

Timothy Selivanow wrote: On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 14:26 -0400, John wrote: If I paid a couple grand for a core switch i'd be calling Cisco! They're not core switches, they're just the catalyst 2900XL which is a small 24 port switch. We've got stacks of these sitting unused, so I doubt they're t

Re: [CentOS] Mail problems? Need help finding this process!

Keith Christian wrote: --- Glenn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello All, I can't get this one figured out. The few search hits I get on it suggest it is mail-related, but I don't even know how that was determined. Apr 11 12:18:17 mxt root: Process did not exit cleanly, returned 255 with sign

Re: [CentOS] Interface bonding?

On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 14:26 -0400, John wrote: > If I paid a couple grand for a core switch i'd be calling Cisco! > They're not core switches, they're just the catalyst 2900XL which is a small 24 port switch. We've got stacks of these sitting unused, so I doubt they're too expensive/valuable.

Re: [CentOS] Interface bonding?

On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 13:43 -0400, Guy Boisvert wrote: > You may have a look at: > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/140.pdf > http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps607/products_configuration_example09186a0080094789.shtml > I've looked at both of these documents already. In th

Re: [CentOS] kickstart ks.cfg file on USB devices

On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 12:18 -0600, Milton Calnek wrote: > findfs comes to mind. > > other than that... > fdisk -l | grep > > Bill Campbell wrote: > > Is there an easy way to specify the proper device location for > > the kickstart configuration file if it is on a USB flash or USB > > floppy driv

Re: [CentOS] Mail problems? Need help finding this process!

--- Glenn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello All, > > I can't get this one figured out. The few search hits I get on it > suggest it is mail-related, but I don't even know how that was determined. > > Apr 11 12:18:17 mxt root: Process did not exit cleanly, returned 255 > with signal 0 > > I

RE: [CentOS] 12V computing?

Any ideas if this can run centos with out a special modifications? Elite C7VCM Mini-ITX Motherboard with VIA C7 1.5GHz Processor http://resources.mini-box.com/online/MBD-E-C7VCM/MBD-E-C7VCM-manual.pdf -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -

Re: [CentOS] Interface bonding?

On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 13:43 -0400, Guy Boisvert wrote: > Timothy Selivanow wrote: > > On Thu, 2008-04-10 at 11:24 +0100, Michael Simpson wrote: > >> Certainly the 2900 will support 802.3ad or LACP natively. > >> > >> i found this which may be of use > >> > >>

Re: [CentOS] kickstart ks.cfg file on USB devices

findfs comes to mind. other than that... fdisk -l | grep Bill Campbell wrote: Is there an easy way to specify the proper device location for the kickstart configuration file if it is on a USB flash or USB floppy drive? Depending on the hard disk configuration they might by /dev/sda, /dev/sdb

[CentOS] kickstart ks.cfg file on USB devices

Is there an easy way to specify the proper device location for the kickstart configuration file if it is on a USB flash or USB floppy drive? Depending on the hard disk configuration they might by /dev/sda, /dev/sdb, etc. On SuSE'autoyast instalattions, the system searches all available devices fo

[CentOS] [Rpm/Yum - Enabled Exception Qt]

Hi all, I am trying to install the packages of Qt/Trolltech by "yum", but the Qt comes without the support of exceptions, it possible enable that? I do not want to compile the Qt manually! Best regards, edm. -- Ederson de Moura "Your mind is like a parachute: it works better when open." __

[CentOS] LDAP global address book

has anyone seen any sort of tutorial pertaining to centos 5? I have found some old ones on redhat 9, but was looking for something a little more modern. dnk ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Re: fastrack channel?

On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 1:35 PM, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 10:10 AM, Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > You left out sleep, occasional meals, a day job, and at least some > > interaction with family/friends! ;-P > > Sleep is overrated > Sleep is

Re: [CentOS] Interface bonding?

Timothy Selivanow wrote: On Thu, 2008-04-10 at 11:24 +0100, Michael Simpson wrote: Certainly the 2900 will support 802.3ad or LACP natively. i found this which may be of use So, as it turns

Re: [CentOS] ssl and NameVirtualHost

On Apr 11, 2008, at 1:10 PM, Curtis H. Wilbar Jr. wrote: Take a look at http://www.verisign.com/support/advisories/page_040611.html You can download the intermediate cert and install it in your file system and point to it with SSLCertificateChainFile in your Apache's SSL configuration as Ross

[CentOS] Mail problems? Need help finding this process!

Hello All, I can't get this one figured out. The few search hits I get on it suggest it is mail-related, but I don't even know how that was determined. Apr 11 12:18:17 mxt root: Process did not exit cleanly, returned 255 with signal 0 I get one of these per minute. I can't seem to tweak for

Re: [CentOS] Re: fastrack channel?

On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 10:10 AM, Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You left out sleep, occasional meals, a day job, and at least some > interaction with family/friends! ;-P Sleep is overrated Sleep is for the weak Sleep is for the wimp (All quoted from the hughesjr's book) Akemi ___

Re: [CentOS] Interface bonding?

On Thu, 2008-04-10 at 11:24 +0100, Michael Simpson wrote: > Certainly the 2900 will support 802.3ad or LACP natively. > > i found this which may be of use > > So, as it turns out, it's a 2900XL,

[CentOS] Re: fastrack channel?

on 4-11-2008 6:20 AM Johnny Hughes spake the following: Rainer Traut wrote: Dear all, will there be a fastrack channel for C5? What are the problems inventing one? Thx Rainer There is a centos 5 fast track channel now, however populating it is the problem. We are currently working to get

Re: [CentOS] ssl and NameVirtualHost

Take a look at http://www.verisign.com/support/advisories/page_040611.html You can download the intermediate cert and install it in your file system and point to it with SSLCertificateChainFile in your Apache's SSL configuration as Ross Cavanagh pointed out. I've been bit by this one personally

Re: [CentOS] Strange reboots

On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 6:06 PM, Linux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Every 59 minutes (maybe every hour) it reboots without any logs, > without any traces and unfortunately with breaking software raid. > After reboot dmesg does not have any strange entries. I have^Whad exactly the same problem w

Re: [CentOS] Strange reboots

On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 5:06 PM, Linux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Every 59 minutes (maybe every hour) it reboots without any logs, > without any traces and unfortunately with breaking software raid. > After reboot dmesg does not have any strange entries. I have several both CentOS 4.1 and 5

Re: [CentOS] MS Exchange to CentOs (multiuser)

Frank M. Ramaekers wrote: Is there a way to get mail from a MS Exchange server that is addressed as [EMAIL PROTECTED] rather than the [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that users on host.domain.com can read their mail on that host (CentOS). (I'm assuming that Exchange needs to know about host.domain.com, so

Re: [CentOS] ssl and NameVirtualHost

On Apr 10, 2008, at 6:08 PM, Kai Schaetzl wrote: Scott Silva wrote on Thu, 10 Apr 2008 12:28:42 -0700: I think you can download the intermediate certs from their webpage. I had a look at their KB website yesterday and exactly the page that explains how to get and install the intermediates i

RE: [CentOS] Building a 64bit rpm

Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote: > On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 10:26 -0400, Ross S. W. Walker wrote: > > It would be nice to have yum install the build requirements. Has > > anybody developed a plugin to allow yum to install SRPMs and > > optionally install the requirements as part of this? > > You mean li

RE: [CentOS] Building a 64bit rpm

On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 10:26 -0400, Ross S. W. Walker wrote: > It would be nice to have yum install the build requirements. Has > anybody developed a plugin to allow yum to install SRPMs and > optionally install the requirements as part of this? You mean like yum-builddep in yum-utils? -- Ignacio

Re: [CentOS] MS Exchange to CentOs (multiuser)

On Apr 11, 2008, at 9:40 AM, Frank M. Ramaekers wrote: Is there a way to get mail from a MS Exchange server that is addressed as [EMAIL PROTECTED] rather than the [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that users on host.domain.com can read their mail on that host (CentOS). (I'm assuming that Exchange needs

Re: [CentOS] MS Exchange to CentOs (multiuser)

So you want exchange to forward the mail to the centos? Or you want the centos to pickup the mail from the exchange? Frank M. Ramaekers wrote: Is there a way to get mail from a MS Exchange server that is addressed as [EMAIL PROTECTED] rather than the [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that users on host.domai

[CentOS] MS Exchange to CentOs (multiuser)

Is there a way to get mail from a MS Exchange server that is addressed as [EMAIL PROTECTED] rather than the [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that users on host.domain.com can read their mail on that host (CentOS). (I'm assuming that Exchange needs to know about host.domain.com, somehow.) Frank M. Ramaekers

Re: [CentOS] Strange reboots

Kai Schaetzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Linux wrote on Fri, 11 Apr 2008 00:06:40 +0300: > Every 59 minutes (maybe every hour) it reboots without any logs, > without any traces and unfortunately with breaking software raid. > After reboot dmesg does not have any strange entries. > > I doubl

RE: [CentOS] Building a 64bit rpm

Johnny Hughes wrote: > Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote: > > On Tue, 2008-04-08 at 10:49 -0600, Joseph L. Casale wrote: > >> I want to build the 64bit version of Xen 3.2, they only show one srpm > >> available. I assume if its compiled on a x86_64 version of CentOS 5.1 > >> it will be a 64bit rpm when

Re: [CentOS] Building a 64bit rpm

Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote: On Tue, 2008-04-08 at 10:49 -0600, Joseph L. Casale wrote: I want to build the 64bit version of Xen 3.2, they only show one srpm available. I assume if its compiled on a x86_64 version of CentOS 5.1 it will be a 64bit rpm when its done? Yes. I am aware its not g

[CentOS] Is iptables -j CONNMARK not available in CentOS4??

Hi, I'm running CentOS 4 with most of the latest updates, but am having trouble with iptables and the CONNMARK target. Is it available in the CentOS 4 kernel? Running on i386: kernel: 2.6.9-67.0.4.ELsmp iptables: v1.2.11 # iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -j CONNMARK --set-mark 1 iptables: N

RE: [CentOS] question on RAID performance

Jason wrote: > John J. Lee wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 8:18 PM, Miguel Medalha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> > >>> I was wonder what experiences there are out there with using RAID-X for > >>> performance increases. I do use RAID-1 (2 disks) but am interested in > >>> attemtps to gain hig

Re: [CentOS] question on RAID performance

while it takes a minimum of 6 disks, we've had great luck with RAID 50. Two separate RAID 5 arrays (fast read, moderate writes) that are then placed into a RAID 0 (fast read, fast write). you lose 2 drives worth of space, but lord it's fast and the data is mirrored. Not sure if you can do the wh

Re: [CentOS] fastrack channel?

Rainer Traut wrote: Dear all, will there be a fastrack channel for C5? What are the problems inventing one? Thx Rainer There is a centos 5 fast track channel now, however populating it is the problem. We are currently working to get yum-security, RHWAS for c5, openjdk, CentOS Directory Se

Re: [CentOS] SugarCRM pro and PHP 5.2

On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 3:48 PM, Chris Boyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We're looking at SugarCRM 5, but they strongly recommend PHP 5.2.4. Looking > around I see that a few individuals are maintaining repos for CentOS, but > I'd prefer to get it from one of the larger repositories. > > Anyone o

[CentOS] fastrack channel?

Dear all, will there be a fastrack channel for C5? What are the problems inventing one? Thx Rainer ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] aide questions, please

On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 8:35 AM, Steve Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks all for the assistance. I'm going to put the machine into full > production today (a necessity). I'll reconfigure the system and hope for the > best. As it is now, AIDE is working fine. Hey, gave me a chance to lea

Re: [CentOS] aide questions, please

Thanks all for the assistance. I'm going to put the machine into full production today (a necessity). I'll reconfigure the system and hope for the best. As it is now, AIDE is working fine. steve Michael Simpson wrote: On 4/10/08, Steve Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Jim, I tried the

Re: [CentOS] Strange reboots

On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 12:31:15PM +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > Linux wrote on Fri, 11 Apr 2008 00:06:40 +0300: > > > Every 59 minutes (maybe every hour) it reboots without any logs, > Disable cron and at completely for two hours or so and see what happens. [watch physical console and/or serial on

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 38, Issue 4

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can reac

[CentOS] Command to get tape capacity status?

I have an Overland tape library connected, via SCSI card, to an out-of-box, full install of C5 install on an old PC. I have a script that uses tar to archive data to tape and mtx to change tapes. What I don't know, if possible, is to obtain the status of how much tape is left in the drive.

[CentOS] Mozilla in centos

how to deny changes to proxy setting in Mozilla firefox . Please help me out. Regards, Gopinath M Signal Networks Pvt. Ltd. Smile... it increases your face value! ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Strange reboots

Linux wrote on Fri, 11 Apr 2008 00:06:40 +0300: > Every 59 minutes (maybe every hour) it reboots without any logs, > without any traces and unfortunately with breaking software raid. > After reboot dmesg does not have any strange entries. > > I double-checked crons, any strange services, nothing

Re: [CentOS] aide questions, please

On 4/10/08, Steve Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jim, > > I tried the new config file - the downloaded one - and it still gives me the > errors. I then went through and removed the xattr options on all of them > with no luck still. I have not ran the --check yet. > > OK, so what if I enable