Re: [CentOS] Re: clustered mail server?

On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 1:15 AM, Guy Boisvert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Good point. Does Google supports encryption? > > On top of that, "Echelon" is listening... As for unencrypted emails, it's > child play. A couple of points. 1) Regardless of whether or not Google can look into people's

Re: [CentOS] Re: clustered mail server?

Guy Boisvert wrote: Good point. Does Google supports encryption? On top of that, "Echelon" is listening... As for unencrypted emails, it's child play. Guy Boisvert, ing. IngTegration inc. They have pretty good information available on the various versions you can use. http://www.google

Re: [CentOS] Re: clustered mail server?

Tom Diehl wrote: On Sun, 18 May 2008, Guy Boisvert wrote: Well, i just hope you don't have anything secret or sensitive... With their "search power", it's very easy to automate the info harvesting! If you are sending secret or sensitive information via unencrypted email you already have a b

Re: [CentOS] Convert a real system in a DomU

Sergio Belkin wrote: Hi, I was a server running Fedora 6. I want to migrate it to Xen on a Centos 5.1. Can I make something like You might want to take a look at this code that Richard has been working on recently : http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-p2v/ -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.kara

Re: [CentOS] clustered mail server?

Rudi Ahlers wrote: Simple, you need to be connected to the internet 24/7 to use something like hosted gmail :) Not everyone has 24/7 broadband internet your mail server would need to be connected 24/7 to recieve mail anyways. and, you can use gmail with POP or IMAP, and with many IMAP client

Re: [CentOS] clustered mail server?

Christopher Chan wrote: That default setting is no longer applicable today. Users will scream if they find out that their mails have been sitting in the queue for a day. For today's businesses, one day can make or break a deal and so email, being a much faster form of communication than snail m

Re: [CentOS] clustered mail server?

Christopher Chan wrote: I am sorry but I do not share that view for incoming mail. The latency in getting the mail replicated probably is longer than it takes to do the actually delivery to the mail store. I am not sure what you mean by the word 'replication' but in most cases the user mail s

Re: [CentOS] clustered mail server?

Christopher Chan wrote: No, mail spools/queues do not need replication. Stuff in the queue are usually deleted in a second and such dynamic change is not worth replicating. If you do put the queue on a distributed filesystem, in most cases you cannot have more than one instance running save f

Re: [CentOS] clustered mail server?

Karanbir Singh wrote: Christopher Chan wrote: No, mail spools/queues do not need replication. Stuff in the queue are usually deleted in a second and such dynamic change is not worth replicating. If you do put the queue on a distributed filesystem, in most cases you cannot have more than one in

[CentOS] Re: clustered mail server?

On Sun, 18 May 2008, Guy Boisvert wrote: Ruslan Sivak wrote: David G. Mackay wrote: I'm not sure why nobody has asked this yet, but why not try hosted GMail instead? It's free and you can use it with your domain name. We currently run a linux based mail server, but are thinking of migrating

Re: [CentOS] Convert a real system in a DomU

2008/5/16 Luke S Crawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > "Sergio Belkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> dd if=/dev/sdaX of=fedora6.img (on FC6) > > of course, you can't do this if you are booting off /dev/sdaX- boot > into a rescue disk or something. > >> and then on Centos 5.1 >> >> dd if=fedora6.img of=

Re: [CentOS] clustered mail server?

Ruslan Sivak wrote: David G. Mackay wrote: I'm not sure why nobody has asked this yet, but why not try hosted GMail instead? It's free and you can use it with your domain name. We currently run a linux based mail server, but are thinking of migrating over to hosted GMail, and have one so for

Re: [CentOS] clustered mail server?

Ruslan Sivak wrote: David G. Mackay wrote: On Sat, 2008-05-17 at 10:30 +0200, Rudi Ahlers wrote: Thank you for your input. I can't justify exchange (and don't want MS) for 10 users. I do want IMAP though, and the calendar & address book would be nice. This IMO has nothing todo with CentOS th

Re: [CentOS] clustered mail server?

David G. Mackay wrote: On Sat, 2008-05-17 at 10:30 +0200, Rudi Ahlers wrote: Thank you for your input. I can't justify exchange (and don't want MS) for 10 users. I do want IMAP though, and the calendar & address book would be nice. This IMO has nothing todo with CentOS though, but at the sa

Re: [CentOS] Re: tar spanning

Lanny Marcus wrote: On Sun, 2008-05-18 at 11:49 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: If you have a suitable server where you can park your IMAP folders you can get the best of everything by using fetchmail to grab mail via POP from gmail and deliver to your local IMAP folders. This gives you a chance

[CentOS] Re: (Solved) ndiswrapper and 4K stacks problem (system freezes)

It works with the Kernel-Modul from atrpms ndiswrapper-kmdl-2.6.18-53.1.19.el5.centos.plus-1.52-16.el5.i686.rpm Bye Timothy ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Re: tar spanning

On Sun, 2008-05-18 at 11:49 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > If you have a suitable server where you can park your IMAP folders you > can get the best of everything by using fetchmail to grab mail via POP > from gmail and deliver to your local IMAP folders. This gives you a > chance to filter with

RE: [CentOS] Re: tar spanning

On Sun, 2008-05-18 at 10:22 -0400, John wrote: > I use IMAP for Gmail, as Google recommends, with the Evolution MUA. The > "filters" and "labels" that Gmail uses are not working as I would like them > to. Possibly with time, I will improve on those settings. After I download > my email into Evol

Re: [CentOS] Re: [CentOS-announce] Impact of the Debian OpenSSL vulnerability

On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 7:55 PM, Stephen John Smoogen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't think either Red Hat or OpenSSH are going to do much with > this. From what I have been told the search for bad ssh items if used > inside of SSH slows down connections quite a bit because it does a > search

Re: [CentOS] clustered mail server?

Christopher Chan wrote: No, mail spools/queues do not need replication. Stuff in the queue are usually deleted in a second and such dynamic change is not worth replicating. If you do put the queue on a distributed filesystem, in most cases you cannot have more than one instance running save for

Re: [CentOS] OT: Top Posting

Can we drop this topic, it comes up very month or so, and with more than a 100 emails... -- Thanks http://www.911networks.com When the network has to work ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Re: [CentOS-announce] Impact of the Debian OpenSSL vulnerability

On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 7:57 PM, Karanbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Daniel de Kok wrote: >> >> - What does our upstream think about this? >> - What do the OpenSSH developers think about this? > > Someone is going to need to ask those questions of the people... > I don't think either Red H

RE: [CentOS] OT: Top Posting

On Fri, 2008-05-16 at 08:00 -0700, Carol Anne Ogdin wrote: > I actually DO subscribe to this list via gmail. However, I seldom bother > doing so through webmail, because I like my information to come to me, > rather than spending my time logging on, waiting for pages to refresh, etc. > My exper

Re: [CentOS] Re: tar spanning

Lanny Marcus wrote: she gets the best of both worlds, it maintains copies of her folders locally AND on the gmail server, and synchronizes each time she connects so that she can look up stuff in her email when she's offline. the imap 'folders' she creates in windows mail are in fact filters

Re: [CentOS] problem of building stardict

On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 10:44 AM, cjzjm100 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi guys! today i tried to install the latest stardict. > ... > If i install the software from source code,how can i uninstall it? You should try to always stick to RPMs when using RHEL/CentOS. There are several advantages to i

Re: [CentOS] problem of building stardict

On Sun, 18 May 2008, cjzjm100 wrote: If i install the software from source code,how can i uninstall it? If you are building from source code and want the ability to uninstall it, I recommend using checkinstall . There is a slightly out of

[CentOS] problem of building stardict

Hi guys! today i tried to install the latest stardict. When i configure it.The result is : [EMAIL PROTECTED] stardict-3.0.1]$ ./configure --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc --mandir=/usr/share/man checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c checking whether build environment is sane..

RE: [CentOS] Re: tar spanning

-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lanny Marcus Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2008 10:15 AM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Re: tar spanning On Thu, 2008-05-15 at 06:56 -0700, John R Pierce wrote: > Anne Wilson wrote: > > Labelling in

Re: [CentOS] Re: tar spanning

On Thu, 2008-05-15 at 06:56 -0700, John R Pierce wrote: > Anne Wilson wrote: > > Labelling in gmail doesn't help if you are forwarding to an Outlook > > account, > > though. > > outlook supports imap, doesn't it? I have my wife setup with Microsoft > Windows Mail (Vista, fka outlook express)

[CentOS] Re: howto use kvm-amd on centos 5.1

On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 21:33:53 +0200, Daniel de Kok wrote: > On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Jerry Geis > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I want to put this on my desktop that is running 2.6.18-53.1.14.el5. >> Is >> there a way or do I just wave to use 2.6.24 or 25. > > yum install kmod-kvm > > s

Re: [CentOS] clustered mail server?

Rudi Ahlers wrote: Karanbir Singh wrote: Rudi Ahlers wrote: Well, that's one of the problems I foresee, but also the fact that each email has a unique message ID, so I don't know if the backup server will pickup the changed messages ID's or not? I have been thinking of running a MySQL backed

Re: [CentOS] Re: [CentOS-announce] Impact of the Debian OpenSSL vulnerability

Daniel de Kok wrote: > Speaking of which, this seems to be a nice poor man's hardware RNG, > that uses ALSA: > > http://www.digital-scurf.org/software/randomsound For the slightly richer man: :) Cheers, Ralph pgpz6FYX6Qp13.pgp Description: PGP signatu

Re: [CentOS] Re: [CentOS-announce] Impact of the Debian OpenSSL vulnerability

On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 10:06 AM, Les Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "The generation of random numbers is to important to be left to chance". Speaking of which, this seems to be a nice poor man's hardware RNG, that uses ALSA: http://www.digital-scurf.org/software/randomsound (Per Russell Coke

Re: [CentOS] Re: [CentOS-announce] Impact of the Debian OpenSSL vulnerability

Ralph Angenendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I don't think the OpenSSH devels really do care about that - there is no discussion whatsoever on the secureshell list or on the devel list. No idea about our upstream, but I don't think so either. << Correct: all that needs to be said was said year

Re: [CentOS] Re: [CentOS-announce] Impact of the Debian OpenSSL vulnerability

Karanbir Singh wrote: > Daniel de Kok wrote: >> - What does our upstream think about this? >> - What do the OpenSSH developers think about this? > > Someone is going to need to ask those questions of the people... I don't think the OpenSSH devels really do care about that - there is no discussion