CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0890
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0890.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:
ia64:
updates/ia64/RPMS/wireshark-1.0.3-EL3.3.ia64.rpm
updates/ia64/RPMS/wireshark-gnome-1.0.3-EL3.3.ia64.rpm
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0847 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0847.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
42a9eab3bf627d24deeb14efc48ad0f0
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0847 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0847.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
70d3d221117f9697ba6b3612fa2a898f
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2008:0933
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0933.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
49b3e14a95809bd554a274e2d3830684
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2008:0933
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0933.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
26444b53ab44cd23da0ee79d1a796dde
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0890 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0890.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
235ae988a2e6bcf2960ac8e7cb7c49a0
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0890 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0890.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
1c5ef3911d6fb91ff9aedaa8d0068b59
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0908 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0908.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
dc41312f4978b037a39a59bfaae7450f
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0908 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0908.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
554daac8bd04099a2438d89ae2541aa2
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0890
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0890.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:
s390:
updates/s390/RPMS/wireshark-1.0.3-EL3.3.s390.rpm
updates/s390/RPMS/wireshark-gnome-1.0.3-EL3.3.s390.rpm
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0908
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0908.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:
x86_64:
thunderbird-1.5.0.12-16.el4.centos.x86_64.rpm
src:
thunderbird-1.5.0.12-16.el4.centos.src.rpm
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0908
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0908.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:
i386:
thunderbird-1.5.0.12-16.el4.centos.i386.rpm
src:
thunderbird-1.5.0.12-16.el4.centos.src.rpm
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0890
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0890.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:
i386:
wireshark-1.0.3-3.el4_7.i386.rpm
wireshark-gnome-1.0.3-3.el4_7.i386.rpm
src:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0890
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0890.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:
x86_64:
wireshark-1.0.3-3.el4_7.x86_64.rpm
wireshark-gnome-1.0.3-3.el4_7.x86_64.rpm
src:
Gente,
Gracias por responder, les comento un poquito mas las distintas dificultades
por las que no puedo usar Rsync
1- NO tengo acceso SSH
2- Todos los datos estan distribuidos en 2 FTPs, uno con las fuentes del
sitio, y otro con todo el contenido multimedia, y estatico, algo asi como un
CDN.
Hola Alejandro:
por las que no puedo usar Rsync
1- NO tengo acceso SSH
rsync por defecto no utiliza ssh sino su propio demonio. Esta claro
que si no tienes ssh es poco probable que puedas tener un demonio
rsync pero es una probabilidad que no pierdes nada con investigar.
Lo que mas bronca me
Alejandro wrote:
Gente,
Gracias por responder, les comento un poquito mas las distintas
dificultades por las que no puedo usar Rsync
1- NO tengo acceso SSH
2- Todos los datos estan distribuidos en 2 FTPs, uno con las fuentes del
sitio, y otro con todo el contenido multimedia, y
buenas gente como puedo crear un dominio virtual en el qmail lo
administro mediante el webmin
--
* *
Saludos,
*Wilder Deza*
*GAMMA CARGO SAC***
*/Área/**/ de /**/Sistemas/*
Phone: + 51 (1) 222 4176 ext. /205* */
Fax : + 51 (1) 221 4955
Nextel: 51 (1) 403*8302
Visit us on:
Buenas Noches,
Vi que esta tarjeta afortunadamente trabaja sin problema en Centos 5.2
Gracias
Rene Chirivi
- Mensaje reenviado
De: Rene Chirivi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Para: centos-es@centos.org
Enviado: jueves, 2 de octubre, 2008 10:34:19
Asunto: Tarjeta de Red Realteck
Buenos Dias
Hi all,
I got the previously mentioned Dell Poweredge 2850 with 4GB RAM and Perc4e
raid controller. Installation went well and the raid is pretty fast even with
level 5.
However I have another problem now... CentOS 5.2 only sees 256MB RAM. Googling
a bit, got me to install kernel-PAE, this went
Tru Huynh scribbled on Friday, October 03, 2008 11:15 AM:
On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 10:23:46AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I got the previously mentioned Dell Poweredge 2850 with 4GB RAM and Perc4e
raid controller. Installation went well and the raid is pretty fast even
with
On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 11:35:51AM +0200, Sorin Srbu wrote:
Tru Huynh scribbled on Friday, October 03, 2008 11:15 AM:
...
does your bios see 4GB? try also memtest to make sure the 4GB are there.
cat /proc/meminfo and the boot lines of /var/log/messages
Yupp, pressing F2 at boot and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However I have another problem now... CentOS 5.2 only sees 256MB RAM.
Is OS install mode set to On in the BIOS? I seem to remember this
sets the memory limit to 256Mb
Dan
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Tru Huynh scribbled on Friday, October 03, 2008 11:48 AM:
does your bios see 4GB? try also memtest to make sure the 4GB are there.
cat /proc/meminfo and the boot lines of /var/log/messages
Yupp, pressing F2 at boot and checking in bios says it's 4GB DDR2 ECC IIRC.
Is memtest available at
Sorin Srbu scribbled on Friday, October 03, 2008 11:36 AM:
does your bios see 4GB? try also memtest to make sure the 4GB are there.
cat /proc/meminfo and the boot lines of /var/log/messages
Will be back shortly with /proc/meminfo and boot-messages from /var/log.
Meminfo:
MemTotal:
On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 10:23:46AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I got the previously mentioned Dell Poweredge 2850 with 4GB RAM and Perc4e
raid controller. Installation went well and the raid is pretty fast even with
level 5.
However I have another problem now... CentOS 5.2 only
Sorin Srbu mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] scribbled on Friday, October 03,
2008 12:14 PM:
However I have another problem now... CentOS 5.2 only sees 256MB RAM.
Is OS install mode set to On in the BIOS? I seem to remember this
sets the memory limit to 256Mb
It is in fact. Lemme' check. BRB.
Hot
Daniel Bird scribbled on Friday, October 03, 2008 11:57 AM:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However I have another problem now... CentOS 5.2 only sees 256MB RAM.
Is OS install mode set to On in the BIOS? I seem to remember this
sets the memory limit to 256Mb
It is in fact. Lemme' check. BRB.
BTW,
Sorin Srbu scribbled on Friday, October 03, 2008 12:22 PM:
However I have another problem now... CentOS 5.2 only sees 256MB RAM.
Is OS install mode set to On in the BIOS? I seem to remember this
sets the memory limit to 256Mb
It is in fact. Lemme' check. BRB.
Hot diggety, that did it!!
Sorin Srbu mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] scribbled on Friday, October 03,
2008 12:32 PM:
However I have another problem now... CentOS 5.2 only sees 256MB RAM.
Is OS install mode set to On in the BIOS? I seem to remember this
sets the memory limit to 256Mb
It is in fact. Lemme' check. BRB.
Hot
Sorin Srbu wrote:
What is that install mode for anyway??
According to my Dell docs, some OS's had/have trouble with 2GB RAM
during install, so this was the recommended setting for new installs.
You guys think I will now be able to run that bios update as well?
I have a hunch that you
Sorin Srbu wrote:
Heh, googling for poweredge install mode
on reveals it's not only having
had
this problem. ;-)
Very helpful indeed. Not!
http://support.dell.com/support/topics/global.aspx/support/dsn/en/document?c=u
scs=04l=ens=bsddn=1082724
My friend you are on a public
James B. Byrne wrote:
...
At boot:
linux acpi=off
I use:
linux pci=nomsi,nommconf hda=noprobe hdc=noprobe
for the DC7[78]00 machines when installing CentOS.
The last two are needed to get the right driver for
the SATA drives, else the disks are extremely slow.
They need to be added to
Jeff Kinz wrote on Thu, 2 Oct 2008 22:04:09 -0400:
Your email client doesn't understand plain/text ?
Sorry, if that was not clear, I was referring (like you) to Ramon's
messages which were sent/typed with utf-8 character-encoding, but not
declared as such.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin,
/etc/services
vnc800 5900/tcp # VNC GDM 800x600
vnc1024 5901/tcp # VNC GDM 1024x768
JohnStanley Writes:
Do you have your vncserver screen configured? And xserver running in init 3?
___
attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url :
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20081003/98c6e98a/attachment-0001.bin
--
Message: 2
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 13:17:59 +0300
On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 01:31:49PM +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Jeff Kinz wrote on Thu, 2 Oct 2008 22:04:09 -0400:
Your email client doesn't understand plain/text ?
Sorry, if that was not clear, I was referring (like you) to Ramon's
messages which were sent/typed with utf-8
I am looking for something similar to the windows SEARCH FILES comman
with the option files containing ... (that is where I can specify a
string and it will find all files containing that string -- not just having
the string as part of the name but actually containing it in the text).
Is there
[EMAIL PROTECTED] írta:
I am looking for something similar to the windows SEARCH FILES comman
with the option files containing ... (that is where I can specify a
string and it will find all files containing that string -- not just having
the string as part of the name but actually containing
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
I am looking for something similar to the windows SEARCH FILES comman
with the option files containing ... (that is where I can specify a
string and it will find all files containing that string -- not just having
the string as part of the name but actually
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
I am looking for something similar to the windows SEARCH FILES comman
with the option files containing ... (that is where I can specify a
string and it will find all files containing that string -- not just having
the string as part of the name but actually
MHR wrote:
Ah, thank you - I couldn't even read what you wrote without beginning
this reply, so I figured I'd follow through and remind you to send
your email in text only (which you can do from Yahoo email, too, BTW).
Muchas gracias, señor!
but if you were using a proper email client you
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking for something similar to the windows SEARCH FILES comman
with the option files containing ... (that is where I can specify a
string and it will find all files containing that string -- not just having
the string as part of the name but actually containing
Akemi Yagi wrote:
http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?viewmode=flattopic_id=16315forum=27
It boils down to Seth Vidal's own words,
upgrade/update do the same thing unless you've gone out of your way
to disable obsoletes in your yum.conf
and who else can say more about yum than
Hi,
Griesbach, Lutz wrote:
Hy there,
i have a centos (4.?) Box with nightly yum update enabled. Last night, it did
an upgrade to 4.7 leading to several problem i.e. not respawning the dhcrelay,
which is needed on this box.
ok, so there is something I dont understand here. You have yum
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking for something similar to the windows SEARCH FILES comman
with the option files containing ... (that is where I can specify a
string and it will find all files containing that string -- not just
having the string as part of the name but actually containing
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 6:54 AM, Bo Lynch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, October 3, 2008 10:00 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking for something similar to the windows SEARCH FILES comman
with the option files containing ... (that is where I can specify a
string and it will find all
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 7:24 AM, Akemi Yagi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 6:54 AM, Bo Lynch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would recommend taking a look at grep. THere are many ways you can use it.
One such example is:
find . -type f -exec grep -il !* {} \; -exec grep -i !* {}
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 7:13 AM, Karanbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also as was clarified at the time of release for 5.2,
there are lots of ways in which an update and an upgrade could give you
different results.
This 'update vs upgrade' question is almost a FAQ. It will be very
helpful
On Fri, October 3, 2008 10:00 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking for something similar to the windows SEARCH FILES comman
with the option files containing ... (that is where I can specify a
string and it will find all files containing that string -- not just
having
the string as part
Karanbir Singh wrote:
ok, so you chased down Lutz's machine, broke into it
and were able to
verify his yum configs are changed or did you pull that one
out of thin
air.
I do suspect something is not right, since the 4.7 updates
took as long
as they did to get to his machine. They
On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 16:04 +0200, Niki Kovacs wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
I am looking for something similar to the windows SEARCH FILES comman
with the option files containing ... (that is where I can specify a
string and it will find all files containing that string -- not just
At 01:47 AM 10/3/2008, you wrote:
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 8:21 PM, Chris Boyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 2, 2008, at 3:17 PM, Vandaman wrote:
1. Go to the eircom page or type abuse at eircom in google to get the web
form. The form looks like it goes direct to their tech support, they
This is why the RFC clearly states that you must answer certain email
addresses; abuse@ being one! If you don't follow the RFC's than how
can anyone expect your protocols or operations to be compliant with
any standards?
Now, someone decided, in their infinite wisdom, that if you send an
On Fri, Oct 03, 2008, Mark A. Lewis wrote:
This is why the RFC clearly states that you must answer certain email
addresses; abuse@ being one! If you don't follow the RFC's than how
can anyone expect your protocols or operations to be compliant with
any standards?
Now, someone decided, in their
Just the idea of a autoresponder for abuse mail account is dang scary. Would
make a spammers job easy.
I do not use autoresponders ever for any accounts. I have the server eat all
mail that comes in and not bounce them off, Again, a good thing for a
spammer to find.
With today's spoofing there is
On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 11:43 -0400, Mark A. Lewis wrote:
snippity, snippity - irrelevant text, not irrelevant attitude issues
The spirit of the RFC is that you could send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
get in touch with someone. When the RFC was written, the idea that
someone will monitor this
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 2:58 AM, Sorin Srbu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:
Sorry for any n00b-statements from my side. 8-}
The truth always comes out eventually
:-)
mhr
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 4:48 AM, Vandaman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Look at the following post and welcome to the CentOS Mailing List.
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2008-October/065626.html
Trim your mails, turn off html in your client and do some basic
homework on your problem
Bob Hoffman wrote:
I wait until a legitimate company spams me...then I call them
up and see if it was themthen I let years of spam aggression
boil out to the company over the phoneand hope they take me
off the list.
Now that is how to blow off spam steam.
Sadly you have a long
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 7:08 AM, Karanbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MHR wrote:
Ah, thank you - I couldn't even read what you wrote without beginning
this reply, so I figured I'd follow through and remind you to send
your email in text only (which you can do from Yahoo email, too, BTW).
Male Bovine Defecation! If yahoo is going to provide mail services,
they damn well should do it in a responsible manner. Just becaue
they are big does not exempt them from this responsibility. On
the contrary, the large free mail providers, yahoo, hotmail,
gmail, etc. are frequently used by
Just the idea of a autoresponder for abuse mail account is dang scary. Would
make a spammers job easy.
I do not use autoresponders ever for any accounts. I have the server eat all
mail that comes in and not bounce them off, Again, a good thing for a
spammer to find.
And what are they going to do,
At 11:56 AM 10/3/2008, you wrote:
On Fri, Oct 03, 2008, Mark A. Lewis wrote:
This is why the RFC clearly states that you must answer certain email
addresses; abuse@ being one! If you don't follow the RFC's than how
can anyone expect your protocols or operations to be compliant with
any
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 7:27 AM, Akemi Yagi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 7:24 AM, Akemi Yagi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 6:54 AM, Bo Lynch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would recommend taking a look at grep. THere are many ways you can use it.
One such
Well, there are ways and there are ways. An e-mail that allows a single
reply to confirm an abuse report (avoiding spurious reports/spams) could
be sent to the original reporter. Have a single change needed, varied
with an arbitrary value to avoid mechanical responses, could accomplish
the same
Sadly you have a long way to go ... I'm willing to bet that
the eircom.net spammer has spammed many on this list but due
to no-one taking action he was still in business.
...
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
And what are they going to do, spam people with Yahoo's auto
reply? It's not like it's an open relay. Possible it could be
used for a DOS attack, but not for spamming.
Spoof the return headers and send a million or two mails to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
just
for funif the responder also
Hello? This is way off topic for the CentOS list.
Enough already.
mhr
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
At 12:34 PM 10/3/2008, you wrote:
Bob Hoffman wrote:
I wait until a legitimate company spams me...then I call them
up and see if it was themthen I let years of spam aggression
boil out to the company over the phoneand hope they take me
off the list.
Now that is how to blow off spam
Hi,
Here is a newbie to Xen and LVM on Centos. I've created a Logical Volumn(LV)
in the domain 0. and then install a XenU on the LV. IN more details: The LV is
exported to XenU as xvda, and default Centos disk Layout is accepted --
/dev/xvda1 for /boot, /dev/xvda2 as Physical Volumn).
Now
MHR wrote:
This list is for people who need, want or can give help w.r.t.
CentOS and peripherally related issues.
That's why I posted my question about Xboard on CentOS 4 here.
I guess you did not see this nor the question about mailing list spam.
For someone whose name does not even
At 12:46 PM 10/3/2008, you wrote:
Hello? This is way off topic for the CentOS list.
Enough already.
mhr
Sorry. My last one slipped-in before you called 'cease-fire.'
I'm done.
Thanks Moderator!
Cheers!
___
CentOS mailing list
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 3:57 AM, Daniel Bird [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However I have another problem now... CentOS 5.2 only sees 256MB RAM.
Is OS install mode set to On in the BIOS? I seem to remember this
sets the memory limit to 256Mb
Yes.. that will limit the
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Vandaman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's why I posted my question about Xboard on CentOS 4 here.
I guess you did not see this nor the question about mailing list spam.
I didn't see a need for comment - I imagine the hundreds of other who
also did not comment on
MHR wrote:
Hello? This is way off topic for the CentOS list.
Enough already.
The audience groans with dismay. We shuffle off, looking for a Springer
inspired Reality Internet Game Show.
--
tkb
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Toby Bluhm wrote:
MHR wrote:
Hello? This is way off topic for the CentOS list.
Enough already.
The audience groans with dismay. We shuffle off, looking for a Springer
inspired Reality Internet Game Show.
Dang, and I had money on this being October's useless thread with (what
seems
Bob Hoffman wrote:
Dang, and I had money on this being October's useless thread
with (what seems like) 1000 or more responses!
\
Naw, someones gonna go into the bailout rep vs dem thing and that will be
the winner
I hope you guys realise that you are not really helping the cause much
On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 15:23 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
The real problem I see here is that updates within a release are not
supposed to break things. So, what you really need to do is workout what
apps broke and why, then I'd request you to file bug reports against
those packages at
On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 12:42 -0400, Mark A. Lewis wrote:
Well, there are ways and there are ways. An e-mail that allows a single
reply to confirm an abuse report (avoiding spurious reports/spams) could
be sent to the original reporter. Have a single change needed, varied
with an arbitrary
Dang, and I had money on this being October's useless thread
with (what seems like) 1000 or more responses!
\
Naw, someones gonna go into the bailout rep vs dem thing and that will be
the winner
:)
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 19:36 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Bob Hoffman wrote:
Dang, and I had money on this being October's useless thread
with (what seems like) 1000 or more responses!
\
Naw, someones gonna go into the bailout rep vs dem thing and that will be
the winner
I hope
I am contemplating converting some of our internal networks from routable
to private IPv4 address space. I have a question about RIP as implemented
under Cisco IOS 12.x.
Presently the setting for rip is:
router rip
version 2
passive-interface [[FastEthernet]]0/0
network aaa.bbb.ccc.0
no
MHR wrote:
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 7:27 AM, Akemi Yagi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 7:24 AM, Akemi Yagi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 6:54 AM, Bo Lynch
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would recommend taking a look at grep. THere are many ways
on 10-3-2008 9:57 AM Robinson Tiemuqinke spake the following:
Hi,
Here is a newbie to Xen and LVM on Centos.
Welcome to the CentOS list.
Please follow the rules like not hijacking threads and wrapping long lines.
See the bottom of this page;
Karanbir Singh wrote:
And yea, working on setting up a sort of list to handle
much of this semi OT traffic. More news on that around
Wed next week, dint ask about it now.
Off course people are going to ask. In my opinion as long
as a topic is marked OT, it is preferable to one not marked
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 4:33 PM, Vandaman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Karanbir Singh wrote:
And yea, working on setting up a sort of list to handle
much of this semi OT traffic. More news on that around
Wed next week, dint ask about it now.
Off course people are going to ask. In my opinion as
Did this patch make it into the kernel for C5.2?
http://linux.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/Kernel/2006-03/msg03750.html
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Monday, September 29, 2008 1:26 PM +0100 Timothy Murphy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was a bit surprised to find that BackupPC
does not seem to be available on my CentOS-5.2 system.
I got it from the testing repo. I use it to back up Windows servers to my
Linux server.
What do people
Vandaman wrote:
Off course people are going to ask. In my opinion as long
as a topic is marked OT, it is preferable to one not marked
but one in which the OP has not even done basic research
on his problem.
It may be preferable to YOU, but marking something OT doesn't stop it
wasting MY
Ned Slider wrote:
It may be preferable to YOU, but marking something
OT doesn't stop it wasting MY bandwidth or clogging
up MY inbox does it?
Your latter point is a separate issue that has no
relevance to this discussion.
If you cannot understand what is wrong with using
the mailing
On Fri, Oct 03, 2008, Ned Slider wrote:
Vandaman wrote:
Off course people are going to ask. In my opinion as long
as a topic is marked OT, it is preferable to one not marked
but one in which the OP has not even done basic research on his
problem.
It may be preferable to YOU, but marking
On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 14:23 -0700, Bill Campbell wrote:
snip
Personally I have no problem with the occassional OT thread, and
think that, within reason, they can make a list more ``friendly''
and less intimidating to newbies.
Amen brother!
I also prefer more general lists to those that
Has anyone tried to install a CentOS 5.x kernel on a CentOS 4.x system? Is
this doable? Im aware of the dependencies but I'm curious if anyone has
done this successfully.
Basically, we have a few hundred 4.x systems that cannot be upgraded to 5.x,
yet, but we do need the kernel update to fix
Vandaman wrote:
Karanbir Singh wrote:
And yea, working on setting up a sort of list to handle
much of this semi OT traffic. More news on that around
Wed next week, dint ask about it now.
Off course people are going to ask.
your email is just a rant about nonsense and assumption. You
Vandaman wrote:
Ned Slider wrote:
It may be preferable to YOU, but marking something
OT doesn't stop it wasting MY bandwidth or clogging
up MY inbox does it?
Your latter point is a separate issue that has no
relevance to this discussion.
If you cannot understand what is wrong with using
Vandaman wrote:
From the notes on the bug you would have to have 4.5/os/$basearch/
instead of $releasever/os/$basearch/ to get the bug.
And you assume that since he is seeing similar effects, he must also
have done the exact same thing ?
Also yum update
or upgrade should not break anything
Akemi Yagi wrote:
This 'update vs upgrade' question is almost a FAQ. It will be very
helpful if you recite/describe the differences in this thread. Then
we can update the forum, too.
one of the commands has its behaviour changed depending on what the
configured value for an option is, the
Bill Campbell wrote:
Personally I have no problem with the occassional OT thread, and
think that, within reason, they can make a list more ``friendly''
and less intimidating to newbies.
I also prefer more general lists to those that have very tight
charters as I learn quite a bit when I see
John wrote:
If the OS contains ONLY CentOs Bits then it should not Break.
I dont see how this is relevant to this thread, the *only* bit of real
info passed down from the OP is dhcrelay, which comes from the dhcp
suite, and I am unaware of anyone shipping a different dhcp suite.
Also I do
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
