On Sat, 4 Oct 2008, Liam Kirsher wrote:
I forgot to remove an LVM snapshot after making a backup. Now neither
the snapshot nor the original volume are available.
How do I recover and get the original volume back online?
Currently, the output of lvs looks like
LV VG Attr
Hi --
I forgot to remove an LVM snapshot after making a backup. Now neither
the snapshot nor the original volume are available.
How do I recover and get the original volume back online?
Currently, the output of lvs looks like
LV VG Attr LSize OriginSnap% Move Lo
PS:
z00dax in irc made a good point, that I should mention that this is a
VPS and i have root access. No one else is on this machine.
Furthermore, disabling the fastestmirror plugin solves the problem
for now. (thanks z00dax)
If anything else weird happens i'll write back.
Thanks for the
On Sat, 2008-10-04 at 13:01 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 10:25 AM, Damian S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Also, I'm thinking I might run into more problems with SELinux silently
> > interfering with ejabberd later on, so maybe I should disable SELinux
> > and be don
On Sat, 2008-10-04 at 09:43 -0700, nate wrote:
> Damian S wrote:
> > Also, I'm thinking I might run into more problems with SELinux silently
> > interfering with ejabberd later on, so maybe I should disable SELinux
> > and be done with it.
>
> That's what I'd suggest too. SELinux isn't even insta
On 4-Oct-08, at 7:06 PM, Stephen Harris wrote:
On Sat, Oct 04, 2008 at 07:02:18PM -0400, Dac Chartrand wrote:
* utterramblings: www.jasonlitka.com
Do you have this added to your yum repo list? What happens if you
remove
it?
Yes, it's in /etc/yum.repos.d/utterramblings.repo
Looks lik
On Sat, Oct 04, 2008 at 07:02:18PM -0400, Dac Chartrand wrote:
> * utterramblings: www.jasonlitka.com
Do you have this added to your yum repo list? What happens if you remove
it?
--
rgds
Stephen
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://list
Hi all. Thanks for reading and replying.
Isn't there php in the CentOS plus repo? What repo is that you
messed about with? ATRPMS or Livna?
These don't have the latest versions of PHP5, the repo I am using is
"Jason's Utter Ramblings Repo" @ www.jasonlitka.com and the only
files I pulled
Josh Donovan wrote:
> It looks like it could be this bug http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2549
> meaning yumex has been broken on CentOS 4.X for quite some time.
>
I have pushed a new yum-plugin-priorities to fix this problem and yumex
should now be working OK.
signature.asc
Description: Op
Hal Martin wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I'm relatively new to CentOS, but I've been using linux as my main
> operating system on both the desktop and server ends for the past 4 years.
>
> I currently have a PIII server with two 160GB IDE hard drives in it, in
> a virtual RAID 1 array. At the time of i
Vandaman wrote:
> Dac Chartrand wrote:
>
>> Yum is broken.
>
Please check your version of python and mysql as I can not imagine that
mysql itself is effecting yum, at least not the way CentOS builds it.
>> I have the priorities plug-in setup. I did `yum update` before
>> messing around with 3
On Sat, 2008-10-04 at 16:26 -0400, William L. Maltby wrote:
>
> >
> > On centos 4.7
> > --
> > test001:/% date -d "2008-10-25 +1 days" "+%Y-%m-%d"
> > 2008-10-26
> > test001:/% date -d "2008-10-26 +1 days" "+%Y-%m-%d"
> > 2008-10-26
>
> I just typed the above in on the console on m
On Sat, 2008-10-04 at 21:48 +0200, Thomas Johansson wrote:
>
> On centos 4.6
> --
> test000:/% date -d "2008-10-25 +1 days" "+%Y-%m-%d"
> 2008-10-26
> test000:/% date -d "2008-10-26 +1 days" "+%Y-%m-%d"
> 2008-10-26
> test000:/% uname -a
> Linux test000... 2.6.9-67.ELsmp #1 SMP Fri N
On Sat, Oct 04, 2008 at 09:48:28PM +0200, Thomas Johansson wrote:
> Is there someone that can explain why I get incorrect results on centos
> 4.6 and 4.7 but not on centos 5.2??
> test000:/% date -d "2008-10-25 +1 days" "+%Y-%m-%d"
> 2008-10-26
> test000:/% date -d "2008-10-26 +1 days" "+%Y-%m-%d
Is there someone that can explain why I get incorrect results on centos
4.6 and 4.7 but not on centos 5.2??
The date "2008-10-26 +1 days" should results in 2008-10-27
On centos 4.6
--
test000:/% date -d "2008-10-25 +1 days" "+%Y-%m-%d"
2008-10-26
test000:/% date -d "2008-10-26 +1 da
On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 10:25 AM, Damian S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To answer my question, I have found the allow_execmem boolean, and set
> it.
>
> So, should I file a bug with someone?
>
> Also, I'm thinking I might run into more problems with SELinux silently
> interfering with ejabberd later
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 7:25 PM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Where, oh where, is Jim when we need him?
Don't even think of trying to call me a voice of reason on this!
While I am usually a fan of organization, and I do try on irc to keep
things in their place, however in this case, I think a
Robert wrote:
> U. I s'pect Johnny Hughes, to whom you replied,
> understands repo
> mixing.
Yeah Johnny understands repo mixing alright it was for the
benefit of those who don't. Johnny has had to deal with
City Managers threatening to call the FBI over CentOS see
http://www.theregister.c
Vandaman wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Now ... an upgrade from 4.5 or 4.6 to 4.7 should not have broken your
machine either, so we need to figure out why it did.
The server CD contains 4.4 and if you use yum you should be able to
get to 4.7 without any problems. Its a different story if
Johnny Hughes wrote:
> Now ... an upgrade from 4.5 or 4.6 to 4.7 should not have broken your
> machine either, so we need to figure out why it did.
The server CD contains 4.4 and if you use yum you should be able to
get to 4.7 without any problems. Its a different story if you have
packages from
Dac Chartrand wrote:
> Yum is broken.
> I have the priorities plug-in setup. I did `yum update` before
> messing around with 3rd party repositories. The only modules I
> installed from the 3rd party sties are PHP related.
Isn't there php in the CentOS plus repo? What repo is that you
messed
Scott Silva wrote:
> on 10-2-2008 4:11 AM Griesbach, Lutz spake the following:
>> Hy there,
>>
>> i have a centos (4.?) Box with nightly yum update enabled. Last night, it
>> did an upgrade to 4.7 leading to several problem i.e. not respawning the
>> dhcrelay, which is needed on this box.
>>
>>
Damian S wrote:
> To answer my question, I have found the allow_execmem boolean, and set
> it.
>
> So, should I file a bug with someone?
>
> Also, I'm thinking I might run into more problems with SELinux silently
> interfering with ejabberd later on, so maybe I should disable SELinux
> and be done
To answer my question, I have found the allow_execmem boolean, and set
it.
So, should I file a bug with someone?
Also, I'm thinking I might run into more problems with SELinux silently
interfering with ejabberd later on, so maybe I should disable SELinux
and be done with it.
Does anyone here run
Lordy, I've been having problems with this darn thing, so I hope someone
can help me. :s
My troubles started when I downloaded the latest erlang and ejabberd
packages. I crashed and burned very quickly, trying two or three
different versions of erlang along with several of ejabberd 2.0.x.
Final
On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 11:43 -0400, Mark A. Lewis wrote:
> So, in that spirit, some orgs have setup auto responders telling you
> how to get in touch with them. In my opinion, this is a perfectly
> reasonable solution that accomplishes the same goal. Why you feel like
> you are too good to communica
On Sat, 2008-10-04 at 14:27 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
>
> >
> Then we must agree to differ. I consider it thoughtful to tell them once
> what
> is expected of them - and politely, which is not always the case on this or
> any other list I've read. Of course if they persist in breaking the r
Hi,
I am very new to this community.
I want to make a custom iso which contains CentOS5.2 & scopserv(asterisk based
PBX). Please provide me the proper steps for creating an iso.
I have created an iso but during installation, only CentOS5.2 rpms get
installed & scopserv rpms doesn't install.
Is
On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 23:23 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> Vandaman wrote:
> >>From the notes on the "bug" you would have to have 4.5/os/$basearch/
> > instead of $releasever/os/$basearch/ to get the "bug".
>
> And you assume that since he is seeing similar effects, he must also
> have done the ex
On Saturday 04 October 2008 12:09:04 William L. Maltby wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-10-04 at 08:32 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > On Friday 03 October 2008 21:33:09 Vandaman wrote:
> >
> >
> > > On some mailing lists, long time users are put off by the
> > >
> > > flood of posts by newbies who don't even
Hi,
[snip]
> Presently the setting for rip is:
>
> router rip
> version 2
> passive-interface [[FastEthernet]]0/0
> network aaa.bbb.ccc.0
> no auto-summary
is that aaa.bbb.ccc.0 a *public* IP class?
if it is with the conf below:
> router rip
> version 2
> passive-interface [[FastEthernet
>Akemi Yagi wrote:
>>
>> This has to do with ipv6.
>Thanks!
>Got it fixed.
Hi,
Maybe (?) it would be helpful for us all if
You would tell us how the Problem was
Fixed instead of telling us "Thanks, got it
fixed" ;-)
P.S. Sorry for the horrible Format of this Mail. But i'm using the lausy
M$
lently ignored
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url :
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20081004/fc4c3dd1/attachment-0001.bin
---
Akemi Yagi wrote:
This has to do with ipv6.
Thanks!
Got it fixed.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Sat, 2008-10-04 at 08:32 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
> On Friday 03 October 2008 21:33:09 Vandaman wrote:
>
> > On some mailing lists, long time users are put off by the
>
> > flood of posts by newbies who don't even conform to the list
>
> > guidelines. Some pay back by not replying to those
Please, take the time to intersperse your replies. Top-posting makes it
harder to follow.
On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 17:39 -0700, Fong Vang wrote:
> So you're saying that the CentOS 4.x system is married with the 2.6.9
> kernel?
No.
> Maybe the packaging of the kernel RPM is different between 4.x and
On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 2:36 AM, Michael A. Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyway - while the server is working on the new port and I can connect, I
> noticed this error:
>
> Oct 4 09:01:25 li34-4 sshd[2305]: Server listening on :: port 1294.
> Oct 4 09:01:25 li34-4 sshd[2305]: error: Bind t
Hi -
I just bought a xen VPS and am running CentOS 5 on it (updated to 5.2).
With all my personal machines sitting at home behind a router with all
ports (except for BitTorrent) closed - I had forgotten how frequent
brute force ssh attacks are, but within a day, the log was loaded with them.
Dac Chartrand wrote on Fri, 3 Oct 2008 20:40:35 -0400:
> The only modules I
> installed from the 3rd party sties are PHP related.
I would nevertheless verify that mysql, yum, python, sqllite and any add-
ons for them are really the ones from base/updates and not anywhere else.
Especially pytho
On Friday 03 October 2008 22:23:16 Bill Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 03, 2008, Ned Slider wrote:
> > Vandaman wrote:
> >> Off course people are going to ask. In my opinion as long
> >> as a topic is marked OT, it is preferable to one not marked
> >> but one in which the OP has not even done basic
On Friday 03 October 2008 21:33:09 Vandaman wrote:
> Karanbir Singh wrote:
> > And yea, working on setting up a sort of list to handle
> > much of this semi OT traffic. More news on that around
> > Wed next week, dint ask about it now.
>
> Off course people are going to ask. In my opinion as long
>
41 matches
Mail list logo
