Re: [CentOS] OT: Possible for Malware against Windows boxes to attack Firefox on Linux?

Lanny Marcus wrote: > My belief is that this is not possible, but there are many extremely > knowledgeable people participating on this list and I would like to > know if it is in fact possible. I am running CentOS 5.3 (32 bit) fully > updated. Browser is Mozilla Firefox v.3.0.7. > > I believe bot

Re: [CentOS] OT: Possible for Malware against Windows boxes to attack Firefox on Linux?

Lanny Marcus wrote: > the forum, which is a highly restricted area. Today when it happened, what exactly is *it*? > Install-2006-60.exe which I declined, etc. Comes from > Is there any way the Firefox web > browser could have been corrupted by this, while

Re: [CentOS] kernel update doesn't update grub.conf

[I saw this thread in the mailing list archives, but wasn't subscribed at the time, so sorry it's not a proper follow-up.] The symptoms you describe could be a side effect of being previously hit by and .

Re: [CentOS] rt3 3.8.2 latest version as rpm for C5?

Jim, --- On Tue, 4/14/09, Jim Perrin wrote: > From: Jim Perrin > Subject: Re: [CentOS] rt3 3.8.2 latest version as rpm for C5? > To: "CentOS mailing list" > Date: Tuesday, April 14, 2009, 5:12 PM > On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 3:07 AM, > Rainer Traut > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I know, epel has rt3

Re: [CentOS] [OT] rsa host key change

On Thu, Apr 16, 2009, Ed Donahue wrote: >Anyone ever come across a linux server host key changing with out a >reboot, sshd restart, change in negotiating (SSHv1, SSHv2), and >different DNS name or IP address? That would make me very suspicious that the box had been cracked, and that a foreign sshd

[CentOS] [OT] rsa host key change

Anyone ever come across a linux server host key changing with out a reboot, sshd restart, change in negotiating (SSHv1, SSHv2), and different DNS name or IP address? I have a server on RHEL4.4 that changed its host key. Red Hat Enterprise Linux ES release 4 (Nahant Update 4) openssh-server-3.9p1-

[CentOS] OT: Possible for Malware against Windows boxes to attack Firefox on Linux?

My belief is that this is not possible, but there are many extremely knowledgeable people participating on this list and I would like to know if it is in fact possible. I am running CentOS 5.3 (32 bit) fully updated. Browser is Mozilla Firefox v.3.0.7. I believe both times this happened, once yest

[CentOS] CentOS 4 dkms-ndiswrapper

Hi - I'm trying to get wireless running on CentOS 4.7 on a dual core laptop (latitude-e4500) for an employee. I'm having trouble with building dkms-ndiswraper-1.54-1.el4.rf - enclosed are the errors messages. The kernel was rebuilt to disable CONFIG_4KSTACKS. The errors prior to rebuilding the k

Re: [CentOS] 5.3 and XFS

On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 10:34 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 7:21 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > > Joseph L. Casale wrote: > >> I never thought of that given that they come from the plus repo. So its > >> only > >> a matter of time then before it appears for the 5.3 kernels... If

Re: [CentOS] looking for alternative to SME & Clark Connect

On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 9:37 PM, Rudi Ahlers wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm looking for a (preferably free) alternative to SME / Clark Connect. > > I basically need the following: > - firewall > - nat > - VPN > - bandwidth limiting / monitoring > - email (SMTP / POP3 / IMAP) & groupware > - file & print

Re: [CentOS] Dual-boot with WinXP, CentOS already installed

could you please switch to a less broken client that supports threading? (I know that Thunderbord supports threading, but that version or client that you use does not.) Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com _

Re: [CentOS] DKMS and new(er) Nvidia-drivers

On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 1:08 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote: > > Diagonal thin black lines originating from upper left corner for starters. > Then if I open a gui, whatever sort, that window gets those lines too. Menus > are unreadable because of this, but slightly more readable if I move the > mouse pointe

Re: [CentOS] Many missing updates for CentOS 4?

Karanbir Singh wrote: >> According to centos-announce there's been no updates for CentOS 4 >> i386/x86_64 since the seamonkey errata (CESA-2009:0325) on 2009-03-06. >> Is there any work being done on these? I've just started pushing these updates out, there are quite a few so expect them to star

Re: [CentOS] Redland rdf libraries

2009/4/16 James B. Byrne : > I may have a requirement for these libraries on my CentOS-5.3 box. > Does anyone know of a recent rpm for centos that provides them? Found on rpmfind.net, though not for centos, but there is src.rpm. HTH, Laurent ___ CentOS ma

[CentOS] Redland rdf libraries

I may have a requirement for these libraries on my CentOS-5.3 box. Does anyone know of a recent rpm for centos that provides them? -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.hart

Re: [CentOS] Dual-boot with WinXP, CentOS already installed

Toby Bluhm wrote: > David G. Miller wrote: > > I installed Win7 beta on the open partition at the end of my laptop disk > and had to dd restore the mbr so I could boot to Centos again. > > It's amazing that after all these years of multi-booting PCs, MS still > arrogantly stomps all over your s

Re: [CentOS] Dual-boot with WinXP, CentOS already installed

David G. Miller wrote: > "Sorin Srbu" wrote: > > The problem with suggestions to just install Windows and then either use > another boot loader or repair the grub installation is that you are > stuck doing that work through Windows. GAG is a standalone boot disquette / boot CD. It doesn't nee

Re: [CentOS] Dual-boot with WinXP, CentOS already installed

On 4/16/09, Toby Bluhm wrote: > David G. Miller wrote: >> "Sorin Srbu" wrote: >> As noted in other replies, Windows not not play well with anything >> else. Your best bet would be to disable/remove/disconnect the drive > > I installed Win7 beta on the open partition at the end of my laptop disk

Re: [CentOS] Acrobat Reader 9 on Centos 4.7

On Thu, 16 Apr 2009 08:53:10 -0700 Bart Schaefer wrote: > The latest acroread I can find that's NOT the one in the Adobe > repository (which is where that one came from -- > AdobeReader_enu-9.1.0-1) is version 5 from rpmforge. Can anyone point > me to a more recent working RPM for CentOS 4, as in

Re: [CentOS] Dual-boot with WinXP, CentOS already installed

David G. Miller wrote: > "Sorin Srbu" wrote: > . . . > As noted in other replies, Windows not not play well with anything > else. Your best bet would be to disable/remove/disconnect the drive I installed Win7 beta on the open partition at the end of my laptop disk and had to dd restore the m

Re: [CentOS] Dual-boot with WinXP, CentOS already installed

David G. Miller wrote: > The problem with suggestions to just install Windows and then either use > another boot loader or repair the grub installation is that you are > stuck doing that work through Windows. My experience has been that > Windows isn't as easy to work with for making changes t

Re: [CentOS] Dual-boot with WinXP, CentOS already installed

"Sorin Srbu" wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to deploy a solution with dual-booting systems where CentOS 5.3 is > already installed and WinXP will be installed to a separate disk. > > I found > http://apcmag.com/how_to_dual_boot_linux_and_windows_xp_linux_installed_first.htm?page=1 > > and it s

Re: [CentOS] Odd SELinux messages during+after 5.3 upgrade (system_mail_t and postfix_postdrop_t access rpm_var_lib_t)

Dan Mensom wrote: Does anyone know what these accesses are? Also, on a related note, is it normally best practices to 'setenforce 0' during a 5.x upgrade? I also got these type of messages. I just did a yum update from 5.2. Output from audit2allow are as follows: allow useradd_t rpm_

Re: [CentOS] Dual-boot with WinXP, CentOS already installed

Victor Padro wrote on Thu, 16 Apr 2009 09:45:04 -0500: > install windows xp then install easyBCD and make the dual boot work without > changing any file on any OS. Of course you change files. But it works as well, yes, just checked it out. I wasn't aware of this, although I have EasyBCD already

Re: [CentOS] Acrobat Reader 9 on Centos 4.7

On CentOS 4 I'm getting /opt/Adobe/Reader9/Reader/intellinux/bin/acroread: /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.5' not found (required by /opt/Adobe/Reader9/Reader/intellinux/bin/acroread) The latest acroread I can find that's NOT the one in the Adobe repository (which is where that one

Re: [CentOS] Sendmail forwarding external email sent to root

Kai: > If it's really spam straight to "r...@domain" a simple "r...@domain > nouser" in virtusertable or access.db should usually solve > the problem as > cron rather sends to "root" or "r...@localhost". That is the best solution. Thanks, Neil -- Neil Aggarwal, (832)245-7314, www.JAM

Re: [CentOS] re-install package

on 4-16-2009 12:10 AM D Tucny spake the following: > 2009/4/16 John Thomas > > > > Scott Silva wrote: > > And the right repositories have to be online! > > Finally, a successful commercial repository. > > > It's not without it's problems though

Re: [CentOS] Dual-boot with WinXP, CentOS already installed

Sorin Srbu wrote on Thu, 16 Apr 2009 16:03:53 +0200: > Generally speaking, which one is the easiest and/or safest if time is an > issue > and you want to things fast and streamlined doing this, grub-install or > backup > and restore MBR. That is assuming I don't screw up when I do either and

Re: [CentOS] Dual-boot with WinXP, CentOS already installed

Kai Schaetzl wrote: > Sorin Srbu wrote on Thu, 16 Apr 2009 14:08:57 +0200: > >> Basically, what would I need to change in the how-to from apcmag.com above?? > > It's like that tutorial says. Forget about backing up grub.conf. This is > nonsense. You want to make a backup before changing it, just

Re: [CentOS] Dual-boot with WinXP, CentOS already installed

On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 9:32 AM, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > Sorin Srbu wrote on Thu, 16 Apr 2009 14:35:40 +0200: > > > Googled some more. Realised /boot/grub/menu.lst *is* /etc/grub.conf... > Duh! > > You want to change /boot/grub/grub.conf, nothing else ! > > > > > Also some people say it's better to

Re: [CentOS] 5.3 and XFS

On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 7:21 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > Joseph L. Casale wrote: >> I never thought of that given that they come from the plus repo. So its only >> a matter of time then before it appears for the 5.3 kernels... If I have >> time this >> weekend, I'll yank an srpm down from the 5.2

Re: [CentOS] Dual-boot with WinXP, CentOS already installed

Sorin Srbu wrote on Thu, 16 Apr 2009 14:35:40 +0200: > Googled some more. Realised /boot/grub/menu.lst *is* /etc/grub.conf... Duh! You want to change /boot/grub/grub.conf, nothing else ! > > Also some people say it's better to have Windows installed to the first > harddrive and the first partit

Re: [CentOS] 5.3 and XFS

Joseph L. Casale wrote: > I never thought of that given that they come from the plus repo. So its only > a matter of time then before it appears for the 5.3 kernels... If I have time > this > weekend, I'll yank an srpm down from the 5.2 branch kmod and see what's > involved in making this (Never d

Re: [CentOS] Dual-boot with WinXP, CentOS already installed

>-Original Message- >From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf >Of Kai Schaetzl >Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 3:32 PM >To: centos@centos.org >Subject: Re: [CentOS] Dual-boot with WinXP, CentOS already installed > >Instead of using grub-install you can ba

Re: [CentOS] Dual-boot with WinXP, CentOS already installed

>-Original Message- >From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf >Of Guy Boisvert >Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 3:45 PM >To: CentOS mailing list >Subject: Re: [CentOS] Dual-boot with WinXP, CentOS already installed > >As for Winblows, it always wipes the b

[CentOS] SELinux errors on my CentOS 5.3 (32 bit) Desktop after upgrade from 5.2

I am running SELinux in Permissive mode. GNOME and KDE are installed. Following the upgrade from CentOS 5.2 to 5.3 (32 bit) I am getting SELinux messages. Possibly of interest to someone here or upstream? (Since I'm using Permissive mode, this is not a problem for me). If these are known issues, pl

Re: [CentOS] Dual-boot with WinXP, CentOS already installed

Kai Schaetzl wrote: > Sorin Srbu wrote on Thu, 16 Apr 2009 14:08:57 +0200: > >> Basically, what would I need to change in the how-to from apcmag.com above?? > > It's like that tutorial says. Forget about backing up grub.conf. This is > nonsense. You want to make a backup before changing it, just

Re: [CentOS] Dual-boot with WinXP, CentOS already installed

Sorin Srbu wrote on Thu, 16 Apr 2009 14:08:57 +0200: > Basically, what would I need to change in the how-to from apcmag.com above?? It's like that tutorial says. Forget about backing up grub.conf. This is nonsense. You want to make a backup before changing it, just in case, but not because of t

Re: [CentOS] Weird performance problem

Ugo Bellavance a écrit : > Hi, > > I'm running a CentOS 4. server and I sometimes face a weird problem. > It is a weird performance problem, and here is how I discovered it. > > This server runs OpenVZ virtual machines, and one of them is an asterisk > server for my personal use. The first sy

Re: [CentOS] Feature list between 5.2 and 5.3

Drew Weaver a écrit : > does anyone know if (and where) a feature list of the changes between > CentOS 5.2 and 5.3 can be found? > > > > All of the documentation that I could find on centos.org is related to > 5.2 and 5.1 Look for the release notes, and, at worse, look the upstream release n

Re: [CentOS] Feature list between 5.2 and 5.3

On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 2:01 PM, Drew Weaver wrote: > does anyone know if (and where) a feature list of the changes between CentOS > 5.2 and 5.3 can be found? > > > > All of the documentation that I could find on centos.org is related to 5.2 > and 5.1 > > > > thanks, > > -Drew > Have you tried ht

[CentOS] Weird performance problem

Hi, I'm running a CentOS 4. server and I sometimes face a weird problem. It is a weird performance problem, and here is how I discovered it. This server runs OpenVZ virtual machines, and one of them is an asterisk server for my personal use. The first symptom of the problem is that the voice

[CentOS] Feature list between 5.2 and 5.3

does anyone know if (and where) a feature list of the changes between CentOS 5.2 and 5.3 can be found? All of the documentation that I could find on centos.org is related to 5.2 and 5.1 thanks, -Drew ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://l

Re: [CentOS] Dual-boot with WinXP, CentOS already installed

>-Original Message- >From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf >Of Sorin Srbu >Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 2:09 PM >To: 'CentOS mailing list' >Subject: [CentOS] Dual-boot with WinXP, CentOS already installed > >I'd like to deploy a solution with dual-bo

[CentOS] Dual-boot with WinXP, CentOS already installed

Hi all, I'd like to deploy a solution with dual-booting systems where CentOS 5.3 is already installed and WinXP will be installed to a separate disk. I found http://apcmag.com/how_to_dual_boot_linux_and_windows_xp_linux_installed_first.htm?page=1 and it seems straight forward enough, although

Re: [CentOS] Sendmail forwarding external email sent to root

Neil Aggarwal wrote on Wed, 15 Apr 2009 23:54:13 -0500: > I guess that facility just does not exist in sendmail. what facility? Everything Benjamin explained is there. I'm not getting any email to r...@ on my servers. I suggest you try to find out where you might have exposed it. Spammers t

Re: [CentOS] Sharing RAM between VM

> Depends what your goal is, if you want to run a cluster with shared > memory between systems, you typically need a very high speed interconnect > and very low latencies, your not likely to achieve this within VMs. > > Your original message just talked about sharing ram between VMs, you > didn't

Re: [CentOS] Sharing RAM between VM

> AFAIK, openvz can do that. Of course, openvz has its own problems, but > that's another matter. Haven't heard of openvz, till now. Thanks, I'll look at it. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] re-install package

On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 15:10 +0800, D Tucny wrote: > 2009/4/16 John Thomas > Scott Silva wrote: > > And the right repositories have to be online! > > > Finally, a successful commercial repository. > > It's not without it's problems though, especially when

[CentOS] Updates for csgfs on CentOS4

Hi all, I am trying to install csgfs on two CentOS hosts. I have installed latest kernel from updates repository. But when I try to install csgfs, yum returns me this: Dependencies Resolved = Package

Re: [CentOS] DKMS and new(er) Nvidia-drivers

>-Original Message- >From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf >Of JohnS >Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 5:52 PM >To: CentOS mailing list >Subject: Re: [CentOS] DKMS and new(er) Nvidia-drivers > >No none of that is hardware issues. It is issues with the

Re: [CentOS] re-install package

2009/4/16 John Thomas > Scott Silva wrote: > > And the right repositories have to be online! > > Finally, a successful commercial repository. > It's not without it's problems though, especially when using yum... Blindly playing with this repository can be bad for your system's health, plenty of

Re: [CentOS] looking for alternative to SME & Clark Connect

> I'm looking for a (preferably free) alternative to SME / Clark Connect. > I basically need the following: > > - firewall > - nat > - VPN > - bandwidth limiting / monitoring > - email (SMTP / POP3 / IMAP) & groupware > - file & printer sharing > - RAID support > - if possible fail-over / high av