On Friday 31 July 2009 00:35:03 Clint Dilks wrote:
> This normally happens when you have a service wanting to keep a
> connection open to a Terminal. Eg to display output from standard out,
> or standard error. Are you by chance starting any services manually
> when you see this happen ?
Not at
Hi People,
I have a user who is regularly having X Crash. This seemed to happen
once a month but has increased to once or twice a week. It doesn't seem
to be application specific. The only information about whats causing
the crash is from the X log. But this doesn't really give much to go o
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 20:36 -0400, Jim Perrin wrote:
>
Jim, you're spot-on with all that you posted. Since some don't seem to
understand what I think you're leading to, I thought I would chime in.
> It's not that we OWE the community anything. It's that we should do it
> because it's how we wan
Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 5:36 PM, Jim Perrin wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
>>> Why ... we are under no obligation to tell people how how we spend
>>> monies. There are costs that are incurred for any organization. We are
>>> probably going t
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, Rainer Duffner wrote:
> Am 30.07.2009 um 23:32 schrieb Neil Aggarwal:
>
>>> http://dag.wieers.com/blog/the-burden-of-keeping-things-private
>>
>> That posting states:
>> I heard some vague numbers, likely in the 4 digits EUR range
>> per month but real figures are only known
This is becoming FUD.
Obviously the CentOS Distro is not going to go away.
There seems to be some issues between the
Founders/Volunteers. However, if you read the
messages and the responses, it is very apparent
CentOS will continue. At a new domain or the
original.
Based on the simple fact that
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 5:36 PM, Jim Perrin wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> Why ... we are under no obligation to tell people how how we spend
>> monies. There are costs that are incurred for any organization. We are
>> probably going to disclose how monies are
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> Rainer Duffner wrote:
>
>> "Don't cry over spit milk"
>>
>
> I won't, especially when someone else spat it.
>
> Want to buy an 'l'?
>
> scnr,
>
> Ralph
>
ROTFLMAO
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://list
Jim:
> We're not under any obligation to tell people how the money gets
> spent, but doing so certainly goes a long way building good will. In
> my opinion, a simple 'We got X monies in donations which were used to
> purchase dedicated hosting, bandwidth, and various novelties for booth
> and show
Johnny:
> we are under no obligation to tell people how how
> we spend monies
This project asks for donations from the public.
Implied in that request is that the money will be
used to move the project forward and maybe reward
the workers for their contributions. This situation
seems like the m
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> The problem is this situation is erroding the trust
>> in this project.
This goes back to my original post in this thread about transparency
in the project. I don't see it as erroding the trust, but it's not
building any good will either.
Anne Wilson wrote:
> Occasionally I ssh into my server to check something, and if it needs the gui
> I use 'ssh -X'. Until recently there was no problem. Exiting simply dropped
> me back to my local konsole. Lately, though, the shutdown seems to hang, and
> I have to close the session. Any t
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Christoph Maser wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 31.07.2009, 00:21 +0200 schrieb Rob Townley:
>> Worried, ran yum -y update expecting to get the bind update but am
>> concerned as to why the following instant messaging packages were
>> installed as dependencies. All of the
On 07/30/2009 11:27 PM, Christoph Maser wrote:
>> Did anybody else notice the install of im clients on practically
>> headless non-gui systems?
>> Any explanation?
>
> We observed something similar. On some systems automatic update
> installed kernel-xen-devel on some of our systems. Seems like the
Neil Aggarwal wrote:
>> Rip-off is a harsh word.
>
> Maybe, but it seems to accurately describe the
> situation as it is coming out.
This is potentially true, that some of the developers, who would use the
money in question to attend meetings or obtain hardware or software
(since we have never be
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 6:27 PM, Christoph Maser wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 31.07.2009, 00:21 +0200 schrieb Rob Townley:
>> Did anybody else notice the install of im clients on practically
>> headless non-gui systems?
>> Any explanation?
>
> We observed something similar. On some systems automatic u
Am Freitag, den 31.07.2009, 00:21 +0200 schrieb Rob Townley:
> Worried, ran yum -y update expecting to get the bind update but am
> concerned as to why the following instant messaging packages were
> installed as dependencies. All of the following are instant messaging
> related except cyrus-sasl.
Am Freitag, den 31.07.2009, 00:08 +0200 schrieb Neil Aggarwal:
> > Rip-off is a harsh word.
>
> Maybe, but it seems to accurately describe the
> situation as it is coming out.
>
> > "Don't cry over spit milk"
>
> The problem is this situation is erroding the trust
> in this project.
>
> To me, the
Worried, ran yum -y update expecting to get the bind update but am
concerned as to why the following instant messaging packages were
installed as dependencies. All of the following are instant messaging
related except cyrus-sasl.
Jul 30 17:00:49 Installed: cyrus-sasl-md5-2.1.22-4.i386
Jul 30 17:0
> Rip-off is a harsh word.
Maybe, but it seems to accurately describe the
situation as it is coming out.
> "Don't cry over spit milk"
The problem is this situation is erroding the trust
in this project.
To me, the larger problem is the fact that the rest
of the team kept it under wraps for
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 05:27:27PM -0400, Phil Pinto wrote:
> Just a couple of questions - are the code distribution methods locked
> down to prevent malicious tampering from someone who may be interested
> in selling access to millions of computer systems? Centos is very
> pervasive in hostin
"Bob Hoffman" wrote:
> And to learn the lead guy seems to have absconded with the cash and
> left all the hard working devs high and dry..well that is scary.
PANIC
No he hasn't left them all high and dry. By the sound of it, none of
the devs have *ever* seen any cash. They're all paying fo
Rainer Duffner wrote:
> "Don't cry over spit milk"
I won't, especially when someone else spat it.
Want to buy an 'l'?
scnr,
Ralph
pgpK4fRuvw3OQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/
Am 30.07.2009 um 23:32 schrieb Neil Aggarwal:
>> http://dag.wieers.com/blog/the-burden-of-keeping-things-private
>
> That posting states:
> I heard some vague numbers, likely in the 4 digits EUR range
> per month but real figures are only known by one person.
>
> For at least three years peopl
John Doe schrieb:
> There is BAT that is more advanced, but never tried it.
> http://wiki.bacula.org/doku.php?id=bat
Current bat will not work with CentOS's QT 4.2.
fs
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listi
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 04:32:39PM -0500, Neil Aggarwal wrote:
>
> Can someone confirm this?
Isn't that part of what this is all about? Lack of dilligence
on financial disclosure? If anyone was able to confirm or deny
the cited amount, or hell, *any* amount, wouldn't thi
On Jul 30, 2009, at 12:22 PM, fabian wrote:
> all this had been workin grt until recently some users complined that
> MSOutlook or Outlook expreess is very slow (a simple text mail
> remains 2
> to 3 minutes in outbox) and then sent
Make sure that any DNSBLs that you have configured are actual
> http://dag.wieers.com/blog/the-burden-of-keeping-things-private
That posting states:
I heard some vague numbers, likely in the 4 digits EUR range
per month but real figures are only known by one person.
For at least three years people were donating money and sponsors
were paying for web
Just a couple of questions - are the code distribution methods locked
down to prevent malicious tampering from someone who may be interested
in selling access to millions of computer systems? Centos is very
pervasive in hosting companies around the world. Has Lances access
been restricted,
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 22:31:21 +0200
Kai Schaetzl took out a #2 pencil and
scribbled:
> applause and kudos to the team! I won't say more, a lot has been
> said already. I just hope that everything can be sorted out in a
> manner that doesn't crash too many porcelain and makes all
> involved parties
applause and kudos to the team! I won't say more, a lot has been said
already. I just hope that everything can be sorted out in a manner that
doesn't crash too many porcelain and makes all involved parties
comfortable in the end.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive I
Karanbir Singh wrote:
>
> However, the one thing that most people seem to be moving on already is
> the assumption that CentOS is about to go away - which isnt correct at
> all. For the users, we will make sure that there is as little an impact
> as possible.
As a user, I've appreciated the lon
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 08:29:14PM +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
>> Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
>> > Actually, the most simple explanation would be that he got terribly ill
>> > or even dead.
>>
>> This has been completely ruled o
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 12:53:03PM -0700, MHR wrote:
> A friend of mine sent me this link:
>
> http://linux.slashdot.org/story/09/07/30/130249/CentOS-Project-Administrator-Goes-AWOL
>
> I went to the main page and read the letter and the "Facts." Are
> there any more details, mainly along the li
MHR wrote:
> A friend of mine sent me this link:
>
> http://linux.slashdot.org/story/09/07/30/130249/CentOS-Project-Administrator-Goes-AWOL
>
> I went to the main page and read the letter and the "Facts." Are
> there any more details, mainly along the lines of CentOS sticking
> around - I know y
A friend of mine sent me this link:
http://linux.slashdot.org/story/09/07/30/130249/CentOS-Project-Administrator-Goes-AWOL
I went to the main page and read the letter and the "Facts." Are
there any more details, mainly along the lines of CentOS sticking
around - I know you folks all work really
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 08:29:14PM +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
> > Actually, the most simple explanation would be that he got terribly ill
> > or even dead.
>
> This has been completely ruled out. We wouldn't have written an open
> letter, then.
Ok, best of luck
Benjamin Franz wrote:
> Ned Slider wrote:
>> Benjamin Franz wrote:
>>
>>> Ned Slider wrote:
>>>
The "fix" has been available for a long time:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-0440.html
>>> I'm not sure that is the 'fix'. My systems were completely up-to-
>
> Where are these rpms available from? They don't seem to be available as
> normal updates (eg yum update bind...).
>
>
they are -
# yum clean all
# yum update bind
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listi
At Thu, 30 Jul 2009 19:43:23 +0100 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
>
> > I have a CentOS 4 system running BIND and I am wondering:
> >
> > Are there now BIND updates for CentOS 4? Will CentOS 4.8 include
> > updates for BIND? How close is the 4.8 release -- Days, Weeks, Months?
> >
> >
>
>
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Bob Hoffman wrote:
> Hate to ask, but after reading the last few months of centos history online
> I am worried.
> And to learn the lead guy seems to have absconded with the cash and left all
> the hard working devs high and dry..well that is scary.
>
> They all wo
hi Connie,
On 07/30/2009 07:56 PM, Connie Sieh wrote:
>>> Yes, but the goals are rather different.
>
> Not really. Both rebuild RHEL releases. Scientific Linux adds a few
> things and changes a few things. We also make Scientific Linux Fermi
> which takes Scientific Linux and adds a few things
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, Vaclav Mocek wrote:
> Connie Sieh wrote:
>> On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, Bob Hoffman wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hate to ask, but after reading the last few months of centos history online
>>> I am worried.
>>> And to learn the lead guy seems to have absconded with the cash and left all
>>> th
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Ralph Angenendt wrote:
>> Les Mikesell wrote:
>>> Has anyone considered joining forces with Scientific Linux to reduce the
>>> workload and give both a more robust infrastructure?
>>
>> Yes, but the goals are rather different.
>
> I thought both had u
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, Tom Brown wrote:
> people should worry less
If they would carefully read and consider, then they could worry less..
--
Jim Wildman, CISSP, RHCE j...@rossberry.com http://www.rossberry.com
"Society in e
Connie Sieh wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, Bob Hoffman wrote:
>
>
>> Hate to ask, but after reading the last few months of centos history online
>> I am worried.
>> And to learn the lead guy seems to have absconded with the cash and left all
>> the hard working devs high and dry..well that is sca
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> Les Mikesell wrote:
>> Has anyone considered joining forces with Scientific Linux to reduce the
>> workload and give both a more robust infrastructure?
>
> Yes, but the goals are rather different.
I thought both had upstream compatibility as the main goal - and both
s
Connie Sieh wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, Bob Hoffman wrote:
> > If centos falls I have no choice but to go to redhat. I am wondering if the
> > conversion will be easy or a complete reinstall.
>
> There are other RHEL rebuild projects out there.
Yeah, plus: We don't intend to fall, just cleaning
Blackburn, Marvin wrote:
>
> We have and nfs mount from a windows pc nfs server. A file is created
> on the server, but can take as long as 50 seconds to become available
> on the client.
>
> We are running Centos 5.2 (final), using NFS version 3. Is there
> anything we can do from the client sid
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 08:26:37PM +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
>> Les Mikesell wrote:
>>> Has anyone considered joining forces with Scientific Linux to reduce the
>>> workload and give both a more robust infrastructure?
>>
>> Yes, but the goals ar
>>
>>
>> If centos falls I have no choice but to go to redhat. I am wondering if the
>> conversion will be easy or a complete reinstall.
>>
>
> There are other RHEL rebuild projects out there.
>
>
why is everyone getting so jumpy - its only a domain name thats at
stake, he's been AWOL fo
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> Les Mikesell wrote:
>> Has anyone considered joining forces with Scientific Linux to reduce the
>> workload and give both a more robust infrastructure?
>
> Yes, but the goals are rather different.
What is the most significant difference i
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, Les Mikesell wrote:
> R P Herrold wrote:
>> On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, Monty Shinn wrote:
>>
>>> To those that have been able to donate money, I would like to say thank
>>> you. The project is still alive, so the money must have been used to
>>> some extent to support the project
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, Bob Hoffman wrote:
> Hate to ask, but after reading the last few months of centos history online
> I am worried.
> And to learn the lead guy seems to have absconded with the cash and left all
> the hard working devs high and dry..well that is scary.
>
> They all worked so ha
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 18:56 +0200, Farkas Levente wrote:
> see around (it's there since 06.28):
> http://www.lfarkas.org/linux/packages/centos/5/x86_64/virt/RPMS/libvirt-0.6.4-2.el5.x86_64.rpm
FYI: when I try to install libvirt from your repo, libvirt in the CentOS
base and updates repos keep repl
> I have a CentOS 4 system running BIND and I am wondering:
>
> Are there now BIND updates for CentOS 4? Will CentOS 4.8 include
> updates for BIND? How close is the 4.8 release -- Days, Weeks, Months?
>
>
# rpm -qa | grep bind
bind-libs-9.2.4-30.el4_8.4
bind-9.2.4-30.el4_8.4
bind-utils-9.2.
Lots of speculation where little is known. It'd be best to let the
team do their thing and not stress. Flooding their channels with
concern only makes their jobs harder. It'd be best to hang back, wait
to see what happens, and then jump at any opportunity to help when
*requested* by the
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 02:41:51PM -0400, Robert Heller wrote:
> I have a CentOS 4 system running BIND and I am wondering:
>
> Are there now BIND updates for CentOS 4? Will CentOS 4.8 include
> updates for BIND? How close is the 4.8 release -- Days, Weeks, Months?
Seems like I saw mention of th
I have a CentOS 4 system running BIND and I am wondering:
Are there now BIND updates for CentOS 4? Will CentOS 4.8 include
updates for BIND? How close is the 4.8 release -- Days, Weeks, Months?
--
Robert Heller -- 978-544-6933
Deepwoods Software-- Download the Model Railroa
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 08:26:37PM +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> Les Mikesell wrote:
> > Has anyone considered joining forces with Scientific Linux to reduce the
> > workload and give both a more robust infrastructure?
>
> Yes, but the goals are rather different.
It'd almost be nice to go un
We have and nfs mount from a windows pc nfs server. A file is created
on the server, but can take as long as 50 seconds to become available on
the client.
We are running Centos 5.2 (final), using NFS version 3. Is there
anything we can do from the client side to see the file more quickly.
The fi
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
> Actually, the most simple explanation would be that he got terribly ill
> or even dead.
This has been completely ruled out. We wouldn't have written an open
letter, then.
Ralph
pgpES2JJQhFQr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Les Mikesell wrote:
> Has anyone considered joining forces with Scientific Linux to reduce the
> workload and give both a more robust infrastructure?
Yes, but the goals are rather different.
Ralph
pgpGqE5S0SfEQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Ce
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Rob Kampen wrote:
[snip]
> I have read many hundreds of pages, have purchased O'reilly's LDAP System
> Administration but cannot seem to get my dirsrv based LDAP to function.
> I do understand that ds uses LDIF files to store and set things up, but seem
> unable to
Ned Slider wrote:
> Benjamin Franz wrote:
>
>> Ned Slider wrote:
>>
>>> The "fix" has been available for a long time:
>>>
>>> https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-0440.html
>>>
>> I'm not sure that is the 'fix'. My systems were completely up-to-date as
>> of last week so I sho
Benjamin Franz wrote:
> Ned Slider wrote:
>>>
>>>
>> The "fix" has been available for a long time:
>>
>> https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-0440.html
>>
>
> I'm not sure that is the 'fix'. My systems were completely up-to-date as
> of last week so I should not have had a problem with
Bob Hoffman wrote:
> Hate to ask, but after reading the last few months of centos history online
> I am worried.
> And to learn the lead guy seems to have absconded with the cash and left all
> the hard working devs high and dry..well that is scary.
>
You seem to be reading something (into, maybe
Ned Slider wrote:
> Benjamin Franz wrote:
>
>> Bob Hoffman wrote:
>>
>>> Been watching the bind thing for a few days and waiting for my daily yum to
>>> update.
>>> Finally did it by hand and got an interesting message.
>>>
>>> The python dependency killed my yum...lol. A quick look online
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 6:14 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 04:03:37PM -0700, Benjamin Franz wrote:
>>
>> I'm getting dependency issues on the python update itself:
>>
>>
>> I'm getting a missing dependency of /usr/lib64/python2.4 on the python
>> update. :(
>
> This h
Benjamin Franz wrote:
> Bob Hoffman wrote:
>> Been watching the bind thing for a few days and waiting for my daily yum to
>> update.
>> Finally did it by hand and got an interesting message.
>>
>> The python dependency killed my yum...lol. A quick look online and I see a
>> few thousand fedora and
R P Herrold wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, Monty Shinn wrote:
>
>> To those that have been able to donate money, I would like to say thank
>> you. The project is still alive, so the money must have been used to
>> some extent to support the project.
>
> An accounting would answer that question, w
Don't panic.
I am sure the situation is less worrisome than you are making it.
So much that, according to the letter and other e-mails, the guy
disappeared about a year ago, and for this whole time the project went
on, many new versions were released, updates kept showing up as usual.
As I see,
>
> The letter was done in the fashion it was in sorrow, and not
> in anger, as my blog post noted. We remain hopeful that
> lance will step up to doing the right thing vis-a-vis the
> project as to the mentioned items.
>
> -- Russ herrold
Russ,
of course... :-(
there is no doubt in my
On Jul 30, 2009, at 1:03 PM, Rob Kampen wrote:
> Hi,
> I have previously used openLDAP and read many of their howto
> documents for establishing an LDAP server.
> RH and CentOS provide -ds-base and related rpms and I like
> what I see and read about the product.
> I found the wiki article on i
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, Jason Pyeron wrote:
> As I have said before, I have experience in this matter and we have a current
> relationship with tucows. Would the team like our help? We can't and won't
> unless asked.
The letter was done in the fashion it was in sorrow, and not
in anger, as my blog
Hate to ask, but after reading the last few months of centos history online
I am worried.
And to learn the lead guy seems to have absconded with the cash and left all
the hard working devs high and dry..well that is scary.
They all worked so hard and who knows what will happen now.
If centos fal
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, Timo Schoeler wrote:
> BTW: cent-os.org was just being registered:
The signers of the letter have the needed domain trifecta's
locked up already.
-- Russ herrold
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/ma
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, Monty Shinn wrote:
> To those that have been able to donate money, I would like to say thank
> you. The project is still alive, so the money must have been used to
> some extent to support the project.
An accounting would answer that question, wouldn't it?
As the advertisem
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 18:56 +0200, Farkas Levente wrote:
> see around (it's there since 06.28):
> http://www.lfarkas.org/linux/packages/centos/5/x86_64/virt/RPMS/libvirt-0.6.4-2.el5.x86_64.rpm
Wow, I'm blind. Thanks.
Regards,
Ranbir
--
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 2.6.27.25-170.2.72.fc10.x86_64
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Rui Miguel
> Silva Seabra
> Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 12:55
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Open Letter to Lance Davis
>
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 11:51:19AM -0500
On 07/30/2009 07:26 PM, thus Robert spake:
> some recent comments & speculation border on slander.
>
> slander is simply anything that can lower one's view of a person in
> another's eye.
>
> the centos team has already done this, yet may i suggest to all that it
> would be best to give Mr Davis
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, Craig White wrote:
> Perhaps you can just say to Lance, thanks and keep whatever money, just
> turn over the domain name and then you can get your own paypal & adsense
> accounts.
* chuckle * I will sell you this toll bridge for a great
price -- want to know how much it is
some recent comments & speculation border on slander.
slander is simply anything that can lower one's view of a person in
another's eye.
the centos team has already done this, yet may i suggest to all that it
would be best to give Mr Davis every possible benefit of the doubt.
...and "no matter
fabian wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
> I am sorry for the post here but really apprecite if someone could help me
> or advise.
> actually i just could not subscribe to sendmail mailing list
Check your DNS settings, make sure the name server can resolve
your address both forward and reverse, that's often
Dear All,
I am sorry for the post here but really apprecite if someone could help me
or advise.
actually i just could not subscribe to sendmail mailing list
I have the following setup for a long time on a single computer
Centos server running as my primary Mail & Dns server
CentOS release 5 (F
If possible, maintain the centos name.
Is there a .os tld? cent.os ? :)
Rui
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 12:57:48PM -0400, John Plemons wrote:
> *ReCentOS* would work.. *_Re_*introducing _*CentOS*_
>
> john plemons
>
>
> Garry.Dale wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 7:34 AM, Jim Perrin wrote:
>>
>
Hi,
I have previously used openLDAP and read many of their howto documents
for establishing an LDAP server.
RH and CentOS provide -ds-base and related rpms and I like what I
see and read about the product.
I found the wiki article on installing the rpms and getting it running
on a server - so f
*ReCentOS* would work.. *_Re_*introducing _*CentOS*_
john plemons
Garry.Dale wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 7:34 AM, Jim Perrin wrote:
I'd personally like to hear what the community has to say about this,
as it's not just an internal matter. Please speak up so that we know
where the commu
On 07/30/2009 06:26 PM, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 09:14 +0200, Farkas Levente wrote:
>> unfortunately i don't have write access to the howto, but the packages
>> in the virt dir of the
>> http://www.lfarkas.org/linux/packages/centos/5/
>> have the latest stable kvm and qem
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 11:51:19AM -0500, Garry.Dale wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 7:34 AM, Jim Perrin wrote:
> > I'd personally like to hear what the community has to say about this,
> > as it's not just an internal matter. Please speak up so that we know
> > where the community stands on this.
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 7:34 AM, Jim Perrin wrote:
> I'd personally like to hear what the community has to say about this,
> as it's not just an internal matter. Please speak up so that we know
> where the community stands on this. I'd rather be wrong, but know how
> people feel than take a stand f
Bob Hoffman wrote:
> Been watching the bind thing for a few days and waiting for my daily yum to
> update.
> Finally did it by hand and got an interesting message.
>
> The python dependency killed my yum...lol. A quick look online and I see a
> few thousand fedora and redhat issues with this pytho
Sounds to me like Lance, as many in the world, is under heavy financial
duress.
I would venture to say that sometime in the past he started borrowing some
incoming monies. And then eventually got caught up in it and could not face
the music.
I would say, dev team, time to go to plan b with a new
mcclnx mcc wrote:
> Thank you for answer. The problem is database report "corrupt block", but we
> even don't know which disk have that "corrupt block" since we use 15 disks
> Array.
>
most best practices for raids I've seen suggest using not more than 8
disks in a single RAID 5 or 6... if
> > I'm getting a missing dependency of /usr/lib64/python2.4 on
> the python
> > update. :(
>
> This happened on one of two identical (mirror image) servers of
> mine.
>
> "yum clean all && yum update" fixed it.
This is all over the net and I can verify that yum clean and
Bob Hoffman wrote:
Been watching the bind thing for a few days and waiting for my daily yum to
update.
Finally did it by hand and got an interesting message.
The python dependency killed my yum...lol. A quick look online and I see a
few thousand fedora and redhat issues with this python thing.
yum clean all
financial.com AG
Munich head office/Hauptsitz München: Maria-Probst-Str. 19 | 80939 München |
Germany
Frankfurt branch office/Niederlassung Frankfurt: Messeturm |
Friedrich-Ebert-Anlage 49 | 60327 Frankfurt | Germany
Management board/Vorstand: Dr. Steffen Boehnert (CEO/Vorsitz
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 09:14 +0200, Farkas Levente wrote:
> unfortunately i don't have write access to the howto, but the packages
> in the virt dir of the
> http://www.lfarkas.org/linux/packages/centos/5/
> have the latest stable kvm and qemu packages and all of it dependencies.
> we use it for a
Been watching the bind thing for a few days and waiting for my daily yum to
update.
Finally did it by hand and got an interesting message.
The python dependency killed my yum...lol. A quick look online and I see a
few thousand fedora and redhat issues with this python thing. Strange that
it is tr
Tony Mountifield wrote:
> Ok, I've now checked up and it was the ML110 where I discovered that
> behaviour.
> The DL360 I worked with was completely different, using a driver called cciss.
>
CCISS is for smartarray cards, which are typically LSI Logic cards that
HP has reprogrammed. these a
1 - 100 of 148 matches
Mail list logo
