Re: [CentOS] phpmyadmin

2010-05-06 Thread Lucian
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 3:18 AM, Jobst Schmalenbach wrote: > > If you look into the config file you'll find > >  $cfg['Servers'][$i]['history'] = '';  // table to store SQL history >                                        //   - leave blank for no SQL query > history >                            

Re: [CentOS] Benchmark Disk IO

2010-05-06 Thread Евгений Килимчук
Hi! Use a simple test: time dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/test-hd bs=1M count=1000 Sysbench: http://sysbench.sourceforge.net/docs/#fileio_mode And this: http://assets.en.oreilly.com/1/event/27/Linux%20Filesystem%20Performance%20for%20Databases%20Presentation.pdf 2010/5/5 Matt Keating > What is the

Re: [CentOS] Benchmark Disk IO

2010-05-06 Thread przemolicc
On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 09:47:19AM -0700, nate wrote: > Matt Keating wrote: > > What is the best way to benchmark disk IO? > > > > I'm looking to move one of my servers, which is rather IO intense. But > > not without first benchmarking the current and new disk array, To make > > sure this isn't a

Re: [CentOS] Benchmark Disk IO

2010-05-06 Thread John R Pierce
??? wrote: > Use a simple test: > time dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/test-hd bs=1M count=1000 sequential cached writes, yeah, thats useful. *not* ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Benchmark Disk IO

2010-05-06 Thread John R Pierce
przemol...@poczta.fm wrote: > The above numbers are true if we have random (!) IO pattern. > In case of sequential (!) IO even SATA disks can deliver much, much higher > numbers. > sequential IO is remarkably rare in a typical server environment anyways, the IOPS numbers on sequential operat

Re: [CentOS] Benchmark Disk IO

2010-05-06 Thread Евгений Килимчук
2010/5/6 John R Pierce > ??? wrote: > > Use a simple test: > > time dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/test-hd bs=1M count=1000 > > sequential cached writes, yeah, thats useful. *not* > > This is one of the steps. You can use sysbench random read and random write for multi-thirds. > _

Re: [CentOS] ibmasm service

2010-05-06 Thread Janez Kosmrlj
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 12:35 PM, John Doe wrote: > From: Janez Kosmrlj > >On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 8:27 AM, Janez Kosmrlj < > postnali...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >>>Does someone have any info on this service. It's supposed to configure > and have the tools to communicate with the ibm RSA. > >>I

Re: [CentOS] Benchmark Disk IO

2010-05-06 Thread przemolicc
On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 12:56:55AM -0700, John R Pierce wrote: > przemol...@poczta.fm wrote: > > The above numbers are true if we have random (!) IO pattern. > > In case of sequential (!) IO even SATA disks can deliver much, much higher > > numbers. > > > > > sequential IO is remarkably rare

Re: [CentOS] Benchmark Disk IO

2010-05-06 Thread Matt Keating
Thanks for all the updates. Will look into iozone and the advice given about the rest. 2010/5/6 : > On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 12:56:55AM -0700, John R Pierce wrote: >> przemol...@poczta.fm wrote: >> > The above numbers are true if we have random (!) IO pattern. >> > In case of sequential (!) IO eve

Re: [CentOS] Benchmark Disk IO

2010-05-06 Thread Matt Keating
Sorry for the top post - clicked send before looking ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] ssh slow

2010-05-06 Thread ann kok
but I put this to no the ssh is still slow any hints thank you --- On Wed, 5/5/10, John R Pierce wrote: > From: John R Pierce > Subject: Re: [CentOS] ssh slow > To: "CentOS mailing list" > Received: Wednesday, May 5, 2010, 8:52 PM > ann kok wrote: > > Hi > > > > How I can configure sshd_co

[CentOS] bridge :: kernel panic

2010-05-06 Thread Adrian Sevcenco
Hi! I have an bridge that keeps crashing (random times .. days with 5-6 crashes with normal functioning of 1-2 weeks) my machine that is used also as gateway (nat). the problem is that i don't have an log of the kenel panic so i don have what to post ... The configuration of bridge is like this: (e

Re: [CentOS] ssh slow

2010-05-06 Thread Les Mikesell
ann kok wrote: > but I put this to no > > the ssh is still slow > Did you restart the sshd service after the change? I don't know if it reads the config file otherwise. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@ce

Re: [CentOS] bridge :: kernel panic

2010-05-06 Thread Wahyu Darmawan
Hi, Please see the /var/log/messages and compare it with time that you have crash in your machine. Rgds, On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 7:26 PM, Adrian Sevcenco wrote: > Hi! I have an bridge that keeps crashing (random times .. days with 5-6 > crashes with normal functioning of 1-2 weeks) my machine th

Re: [CentOS] ssh slow

2010-05-06 Thread John Doe
From: ann kok > ssh is still slow Tried to use verbose to see what's going on...? ssh -vvv JD ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] phpmyadmin

2010-05-06 Thread ann kok
Hi Jobst Thank you I set it to TRUE $cfg['Servers'][$i]['history'] = TRUE; // table to store SQL history I try to run the sql in phpmyadmin but where is pma_history ? Thank you --- On Wed, 5/5/10, Jobst Schmalenbach wrote: > From: Jobst Schmalenbach > Subject: Re: [CentOS

Re: [CentOS] need document to setup rsync???

2010-05-06 Thread Alan McKay
What do you want to rsync from where to where? It is really easy to set up - in fact I just got done writing an internal wiki page on how to do a simple setup. The following is what I use for my kickstart servers so the main server can rsync itself out to slave servers. This sets up /var/www/htm

Re: [CentOS] Benchmark Disk IO

2010-05-06 Thread Alan McKay
There is a dd test that floats around the PostgreSQL lists, so I wrote this simple script to automate it - use at your own risk! #!/bin/bash # do something which parses command line parameters DEFAULT_BLOCK=8 DEFAULT_PATH=/data/tmp DEFAULT_FILE=ddfile helpme() { echo "Usage: $0 [RAM=x]

Re: [CentOS] Benchmark Disk IO

2010-05-06 Thread Chan Chung Hang Christopher
Les Mikesell wrote: > On 5/5/2010 12:00 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: >>> Try to run the same IO operations as your production server is running. >>> Bonnie++ could be good application for benchmarking. Also run some >>> parallel rsync, rm, find, etc proccesses. >>> >> I am with John Pierce on this one

Re: [CentOS] phpmyadmin

2010-05-06 Thread John Doe
From: ann kok > I set it to TRUE > $cfg['Servers'][$i]['history'] = TRUE; It is supposed to be the name of an existing sql table... Use 'pma_history' as advised... And check the table phpmyadmin.pma_history JD ___ CentOS mailing list C

Re: [CentOS] ssh slow

2010-05-06 Thread Khusro Jaleel
I've found that if I'm on an Ubuntu machine and SSHing to a Centos 5.4 machine, it does the same thing, i.e. it sort of hangs for a while then comes back after about 10-15 secs with a login prompt. I've found that editing the /etc/ssh/ssh_config (note ssh_config, NOT sshd_config) file on the Ub

[CentOS] Resolving dependencies from the command-line

2010-05-06 Thread Marco Shaw
CenOS 5.4 x64 I'm stuck at the command-line. I'm only familiar with the RPM command, but AFAIK, that cannot automatically resolve any dependencies when installing packages. Is there a command-line utility that I can force to automatically install all the dependencies for a particular package? I

Re: [CentOS] Resolving dependencies from the command-line

2010-05-06 Thread Marcelo M. Garcia
Marco Shaw wrote: > CenOS 5.4 x64 > > Is there a command-line utility that I can force to automatically > install all the dependencies for a particular package? yum? mg. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/lis

Re: [CentOS] Resolving dependencies from the command-line

2010-05-06 Thread Christoph Maser
Am Donnerstag, den 06.05.2010, 18:22 +0200 schrieb Marco Shaw: > CenOS 5.4 x64 > > I'm stuck at the command-line. I'm only familiar with the RPM > command, but AFAIK, that cannot automatically resolve any dependencies > when installing packages. > > Is there a command-line utility that I can force

Re: [CentOS] Resolving dependencies from the command-line

2010-05-06 Thread m . roth
> CenOS 5.4 x64 > > I'm stuck at the command-line. I'm only familiar with the RPM > command, but AFAIK, that cannot automatically resolve any dependencies > when installing packages. > > Is there a command-line utility that I can force to automatically > install all the dependencies for a particul

Re: [CentOS] Resolving dependencies from the command-line

2010-05-06 Thread Marco Shaw
"Stuck"... I'm working with a remote instance through terminal services into a VM running on Microsoft Hyper-V... The mouse didn't work at all, but yum has that all fixed up now. Thanks all... > Several folks have already pointed to yum. This is the *intended* package > manager, as pkgmanager i

Re: [CentOS] ssh slow

2010-05-06 Thread Tait Clarridge
On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 16:39 +0100, Khusro Jaleel wrote: > I've found that if I'm on an Ubuntu machine and SSHing to a Centos 5.4 > machine, it does the same thing, i.e. it sort of hangs for a while then > comes back after about 10-15 secs with a login prompt. > > I've found that editing the /et

Re: [CentOS] ssh slow

2010-05-06 Thread Gary Greene
On 5/6/10 10:20 AM, "Tait Clarridge" wrote: > On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 16:39 +0100, Khusro Jaleel wrote: >> I've found that if I'm on an Ubuntu machine and SSHing to a Centos 5.4 >> machine, it does the same thing, i.e. it sort of hangs for a while then >> comes back after about 10-15 secs with a log

Re: [CentOS] Resolving dependencies from the command-line

2010-05-06 Thread m . roth
> "Stuck"... I'm working with a remote instance through terminal > services into a VM running on Microsoft Hyper-V... The mouse didn't > work at all, but yum has that all fixed up now. > > Thanks all... > mark wrote: >> Several folks have already pointed to yum. This is the *intended* >> package

Re: [CentOS] Resolving dependencies from the command-line

2010-05-06 Thread Alan McKay
yum -- “Don't eat anything you've ever seen advertised on TV” - Michael Pollan, author of "In Defense of Food" ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] ldap: adding user to multiple groups

2010-05-06 Thread aurfalien
Hi all, Not having much luck adding a user to more then 1 group in OpenLDAP thats provided in Centos. Any suggestions to have the outcome of having a user belong to multiple groups? Should I create a new group that has multiple GIDs and assign a user to that new group? If so, how? :) Tha

[CentOS] Install of 5.4 i386 formatting is very slow

2010-05-06 Thread Jason Pyeron
It is writing an inode every 10 seconds. (1621 inodes in total) It is a recent Seagate sata HD. MB=Jetway J7F5M1G2E-VHE-PB -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- - - - Jason Pyeron PD

Re: [CentOS] ldap: adding user to multiple groups

2010-05-06 Thread Jacob Bresciani
are you adding users to local groups in /etc/group or are you creating groups in ldap? On 2010-05-06, at 11:03 AM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote: > Hi all, > > Not having much luck adding a user to more then 1 group in OpenLDAP > thats provided in Centos. > > Any suggestions to have the outcome

Re: [CentOS] Resolving dependencies from the command-line

2010-05-06 Thread Les Mikesell
On 5/6/2010 12:55 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> "Stuck"... I'm working with a remote instance through terminal >> services into a VM running on Microsoft Hyper-V... The mouse didn't >> work at all, but yum has that all fixed up now. >> >> Thanks all... >> > mark wrote: >>> Several folks have alr

Re: [CentOS] Resolving dependencies from the command-line

2010-05-06 Thread Ryan Manikowski
On 5/6/2010 1:55 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> "Stuck"... I'm working with a remote instance through terminal >> services into a VM running on Microsoft Hyper-V... The mouse didn't >> work at all, but yum has that all fixed up now. >> >> Thanks all... >> >> > mark wrote: > >>> Several fo

Re: [CentOS] Install of 5.4 i386 formatting is very slow

2010-05-06 Thread Joseph L. Casale
>It is writing an inode every 10 seconds. (1621 inodes in total) > >It is a recent Seagate sata HD. > >MB=Jetway J7F5M1G2E-VHE-PB Not at all surprising on that mobo, u really need CentOS on that puny thing? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http:

[CentOS] Not firewall, but what?

2010-05-06 Thread Jussi Hirvi
I have a strange problem, where some clients see the website on my server and some do not. It is not about the iptables, and seems to be not about tcp wrapper. Still it is something within the box. More details: - the problem is only with some clients, with no geographical connection between th

Re: [CentOS] ldap: adding user to multiple groups

2010-05-06 Thread aurfalien
Sorry for that. Adding via ldap. I've tried adding groupOfNames to the users ldif file like so; objectClass: groupOfNames ... member: cn=staff,ou=groups,dc=foo,dc=bar member: cn=pm,ou=groups,dc=foo,dc=bar Both staff and pm are defined as follows; # staff, groups, logan.tv dn: cn=staff,ou=groups

Re: [CentOS] Not firewall, but what?

2010-05-06 Thread Gavin Carr
Is one of your dns servers broken? On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 09:31:22PM +0300, Jussi Hirvi wrote: > I have a strange problem, where some clients see the website on my > server and some do not. It is not about the iptables, and seems to be > not about tcp wrapper. Still it is something within the b

Re: [CentOS] ldap: adding user to multiple groups

2010-05-06 Thread Paul Heinlein
On Thu, 6 May 2010, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote: > Hi all, > > Not having much luck adding a user to more then 1 group in OpenLDAP > thats provided in Centos. > > Any suggestions to have the outcome of having a user belong to > multiple groups? > > Should I create a new group that has multiple GID

Re: [CentOS] Not firewall, but what?

2010-05-06 Thread Ryan Manikowski
On 5/6/2010 2:35 PM, Gavin Carr wrote: > Is one of your dns servers broken? > > On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 09:31:22PM +0300, Jussi Hirvi wrote: > >> I have a strange problem, where some clients see the website on my >> server and some do not. It is not about the iptables, and seems to be >> not a

Re: [CentOS] Not firewall, but what?

2010-05-06 Thread Paul Heinlein
On Thu, 6 May 2010, Jussi Hirvi wrote: > I have a strange problem, where some clients see the website on my > server and some do not. It is not about the iptables, and seems to be > not about tcp wrapper. Still it is something within the box. > > More details: > - the problem is only with some cli

Re: [CentOS] ldap: adding user to multiple groups

2010-05-06 Thread aurfalien
On May 6, 2010, at 11:35 AM, Paul Heinlein wrote: > On Thu, 6 May 2010, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Not having much luck adding a user to more then 1 group in OpenLDAP >> thats provided in Centos. >> >> Any suggestions to have the outcome of having a user belong to >> multiple gr

Re: [CentOS] ldap: adding user to multiple groups

2010-05-06 Thread Paul Heinlein
On Thu, 6 May 2010, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote: >> In short: >> >> 1. Define the posixGroup DN >> 2. Add one or more memberUid entries. > > O, I think I follow. > > Say my current group definition in ldap is; > > # pm, groups, foo.bar > dn: cn=pm,ou=groups,dc=foo,dc=bar > objectClass: top > objec

Re: [CentOS] Not firewall, but what?

2010-05-06 Thread Rob Kampen
Paul Heinlein wrote: On Thu, 6 May 2010, Jussi Hirvi wrote: I have a strange problem, where some clients see the website on my server and some do not. It is not about the iptables, and seems to be not about tcp wrapper. Still it is something within the box. More details: - the pr

Re: [CentOS] ldap: adding user to multiple groups

2010-05-06 Thread aurfalien
On May 6, 2010, at 11:47 AM, Paul Heinlein wrote: > On Thu, 6 May 2010, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote: > >>> In short: >>> >>> 1. Define the posixGroup DN >>> 2. Add one or more memberUid entries. >> >> So would I extend this and add members there instead of in there own >> entry? How would it look?

Re: [CentOS] ldap: adding user to multiple groups

2010-05-06 Thread Arun Khan
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 11:33 PM, wrote: > Not having much luck adding a user to more then 1 group in OpenLDAP > thats provided in Centos. > > Any suggestions to have the outcome of having a user belong to > multiple groups? > > Should I create a new group that has multiple GIDs and assign a user

Re: [CentOS] Not firewall, but what?

2010-05-06 Thread Benjamin Franz
On 05/06/2010 11:42 AM, Ryan Manikowski wrote: Notice the op posted they get timeouts even when going directly to a numerical address (if the apache server is configured to respond to *:80 it should at least display something) Try using telnet from a client machine that can not connect. e.g

Re: [CentOS] ldap: adding user to multiple groups

2010-05-06 Thread aurfalien
On May 6, 2010, at 12:00 PM, Arun Khan wrote: > On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 11:33 PM, wrote: >> Not having much luck adding a user to more then 1 group in OpenLDAP >> thats provided in Centos. >> >> Any suggestions to have the outcome of having a user belong to >> multiple groups? >> >> Should I crea

Re: [CentOS] was, Resolving dependencies from the command-line, is ProCurve switch

2010-05-06 Thread m . roth
> On 5/6/2010 1:55 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >>> "Stuck"... I'm working with a remote instance through terminal >>> services into a VM running on Microsoft Hyper-V... The mouse didn't >>> work at all, but yum has that all fixed up now. >> mark wrote: >> Could be worse - I'm trying to get mini

Re: [CentOS] was, Resolving dependencies from the command-line, is ProCurve switch

2010-05-06 Thread Joseph L. Casale
>Meanwhile, on the switch (ssh'ing in, but I need to get the serial port >working so I can get a newer version of the firmware there (what's there >is *ancient*), show console reports flow control as xon/xoff If you have ssh access, why are you trying to use a serial console for firmware updat

Re: [CentOS] was, Resolving dependencies from the command-line, is ProCurve switch

2010-05-06 Thread Ryan Manikowski
On 5/6/2010 3:19 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > >> Try this >> >> Bits per second: 115200 (or try 9600) >> Data bits: 8 >> Parity: None >> Submit >> Stop bits: 1 >> Flow control: None >> > Thanks - yeah, I saw that in the manual, and online, saw the 9600, did > that, no joy at all. Just sits th

Re: [CentOS] was, Resolving dependencies from the command-line, is ProCurve switch

2010-05-06 Thread m . roth
> On 5/6/2010 3:19 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> >>> Try this >>> >>> Bits per second: 115200 (or try 9600) >>> Data bits: 8 >>> Parity: None >>> Submit >>> Stop bits: 1 >>> Flow control: None >>> >> Thanks - yeah, I saw that in the manual, and online, saw the 9600, did >> that, no joy at all. Jus

Re: [CentOS] was, Resolving dependencies from the command-line, is ProCurve switch

2010-05-06 Thread m . roth
Joseph wrote: >>Meanwhile, on the switch (ssh'ing in, but I need to get the serial port >>working so I can get a newer version of the firmware there (what's there >>is *ancient*), show console reports flow control as xon/xoff > > If you have ssh access, why are you trying to use a serial consol

Re: [CentOS] ldap: adding user to multiple groups

2010-05-06 Thread Paul Heinlein
On Fri, 7 May 2010, Arun Khan wrote: > Even though you may not require the SMB extensions, the smbldaptools > may be worth looking into. It's toolset are similar to the regular > Linux user management tools, with the backend taking care of > populating the LDAP DIT and you keeping your sanity

Re: [CentOS] was, Resolving dependencies from the command-line, is ProCurve switch

2010-05-06 Thread Joseph L. Casale
>Because I was trying to avoid setting up a tftp server. Because it >*should* have been no big deal. /me ducking... Just "how" long you been avoiding a simple `yum install tftp-server`? Mark buddy, I think its Miller time:) ___ CentOS mailing list Cent

Re: [CentOS] was, Resolving dependencies from the command-line, is ProCurve switch

2010-05-06 Thread Les Mikesell
On 5/6/2010 2:43 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Joseph wrote: >>> Meanwhile, on the switch (ssh'ing in, but I need to get the serial port >>> working so I can get a newer version of the firmware there (what's there >>> is *ancient*), show console reports flow control as xon/xoff >> >> If you hav

Re: [CentOS] was, Resolving dependencies from the command-line, is ProCurve switch

2010-05-06 Thread m . roth
Joeseph wrote: mark wrote: >>Because I was trying to avoid setting up a tftp server. Because it >>*should* have been no big deal. > > /me ducking... > > Just "how" long you been avoiding a simple `yum install tftp-server`? Yeah, well, I had to go through the first fire drill just to get on in the

Re: [CentOS] Install of 5.4 i386 formatting is very slow

2010-05-06 Thread fred smith
On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 02:16:05PM -0400, Jason Pyeron wrote: > It is writing an inode every 10 seconds. (1621 inodes in total) > > It is a recent Seagate sata HD. > > MB=Jetway J7F5M1G2E-VHE-PB Is this one of the new 4096-bytes-per-sector Seagate drives? If so, you need to do some research arou

Re: [CentOS] Install of 5.4 i386 formatting is very slow

2010-05-06 Thread Jason Pyeron
-- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- - - - Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us - - Principal Consultant 10 West 24th Street #100- - +1 (443) 269-1555 x333

Re: [CentOS] Install of 5.4 i386 formatting is very slow

2010-05-06 Thread Jason Pyeron
> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org > [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Joseph L. Casale > Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 14:27 > To: 'CentOS mailing list' > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Install of 5.4 i386 formatting is very slow > > >It is writing an inode ev

Re: [CentOS] Install of 5.4 i386 formatting is very slow

2010-05-06 Thread Benjamin Franz
On 05/06/2010 11:16 AM, Jason Pyeron wrote: > It is writing an inode every 10 seconds. (1621 inodes in total) > > It is a recent Seagate sata HD. > > MB=Jetway J7F5M1G2E-VHE-PB > What do you get from running 'iostat -kx 5' (be sure to wait until the second report) while the formatting is runni

Re: [CentOS] Install of 5.4 i386 formatting is very slow

2010-05-06 Thread Jason Pyeron
> -Original Message- > From: Benjamin Franz > Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 17:12 > To: CentOS mailing list > Cc: Jason Pyeron > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Install of 5.4 i386 formatting is very slow > > On 05/06/2010 11:16 AM, Jason Pyeron wrote: > > It is writing an inode every 10 seconds. (1

Re: [CentOS] Install of 5.4 i386 formatting is very slow

2010-05-06 Thread Jason Pyeron
> -Original Message- > From: Jason Pyeron > Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 17:32 > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Install of 5.4 i386 formatting is very slow > > > -Original Message- > > From: Benjamin Franz > > Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 17:12 > > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Install of 5.4 i38

Re: [CentOS] Install of 5.4 i386 formatting is very slow

2010-05-06 Thread Joseph L. Casale
>avg-cpu: %user %nice %system %iowait %steal %idle > 0.260.00 99.740.000.000.00 What options exist in your bios for that controller? That's rather high %system:) But it is a rather small proc... ___ CentOS mailing list

Re: [CentOS] Install of 5.4 i386 formatting is very slow

2010-05-06 Thread John R Pierce
Jason Pyeron wrote: >> What do you get from running 'iostat -kx 5' (be sure to wait >> until the second report) while the formatting is running? >> > > avg-cpu: %user %nice %system %iowait %steal %idle >0.530.00 99.470.000.000.00 > > Device: rrqm/s

Re: [CentOS] Install of 5.4 i386 formatting is very slow

2010-05-06 Thread Tim Nelson
- "Jason Pyeron" wrote: > > Why is my SATA drive showing up under /dev/hdb? > Check your BIOS and set the SATA controller mode to 'NATIVE'. Right now, I'd be willing to bet it's in 'Legacy' or something similar which causes the drives to run in IDE mode, hence why your drive shows up as h

Re: [CentOS] Install of 5.4 i386 formatting is very slow

2010-05-06 Thread Joseph L. Casale
>Why is my SATA drive showing up under /dev/hdb? That was my hunch:) Config your bios to use AHCI, not compat/ide/or whatever mode it's in now... Watch your fstab/initrd(if custom) if you boot off this disc. If you are using default lvm/initrd, you'll be ok with a change like this. __

Re: [CentOS] Install of 5.4 i386 formatting is very slow

2010-05-06 Thread John R Pierce
Tim Nelson wrote: > - "Jason Pyeron" wrote: > >> Why is my SATA drive showing up under /dev/hdb? >> >> > > Check your BIOS and set the SATA controller mode to 'NATIVE'. Right now, I'd > be willing to bet it's in 'Legacy' or something similar which causes the > drives to run in IDE mo

Re: [CentOS] Install of 5.4 i386 formatting is very slow

2010-05-06 Thread Jason Pyeron
inode tables: 207/235 > -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org > [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of John R Pierce > Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 17:44 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Install of 5.4 i386 formatting is very slow > > Tim Nelso

Re: [CentOS] Install of 5.4 i386 formatting is very slow

2010-05-06 Thread Jason Pyeron
> -Original Message- > From: Behalf Of John R Pierce > Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 17:44 > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Install of 5.4 i386 formatting is very slow > > Tim Nelson wrote: > > - "Jason Pyeron" wrote: > > > >> Why is my SATA drive showing up under /dev/hdb? > >> > >> >

Re: [CentOS] Install of 5.4 i386 formatting is very slow

2010-05-06 Thread Jason Pyeron
> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org > [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Jason Pyeron > Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 18:39 > To: 'CentOS mailing list' > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Install of 5.4 i386 formatting is very slow > > > -Original Message- >

[CentOS] bandwidth graph

2010-05-06 Thread ann kok
Hi I am using cact banwdith monitor but the bandwidt graph is not showing when it is over 120M I already set it every minute instead of 5 mintues. pls help Thank you ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinf

[CentOS] installing gtkmm

2010-05-06 Thread Ming-ching Chiu
Hi, I've been building a gtkmm project on ubuntu and things run smoothly. Now i have to move the project to CentOS 5.4. I set up rpm forge and installed gtkmm. Turns out that the package on rpmforge is too old that my project doesn't compile. I wonder if there is other way to get newer version o

[CentOS] USB key installed OS; file system goes read-only randomly...

2010-05-06 Thread Jason Pyeron
This happened a few times now, I (soft) reboot and do the fsck thing and all is fine until it happens again. Any ideas? [r...@test-dhcp ~]# yum remove bluez-libs bluez-utils Loaded plugins: fastestmirror Setting up Remove Process Resolving Dependencies Finished Transaction Test Transaction Test

Re: [CentOS] Install of 5.4 i386 formatting is very slow

2010-05-06 Thread Robert Heller
At Thu, 6 May 2010 17:37:19 -0400 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Jason Pyeron > > Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 17:32 > > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Install of 5.4 i386 formatting is very slow > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Benjamin Franz >

Re: [CentOS] USB key installed OS; file system goes read-only randomly...

2010-05-06 Thread John R Pierce
Jason Pyeron wrote: > [r...@test-dhcp ~]# tail -f /var/log/dmesg /var/log/secure /var/log/messages > /var/log/faillog > ... note that /var/log/dmesg is just a snapshot of the output of the program dmesg taken after boot time. the dmesg command dumps the current kernel message buffer, but

Re: [CentOS] Install of 5.4 i386 formatting is very slow

2010-05-06 Thread Jason Pyeron
> -Original Message- > From: Robert Heller > Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 22:30 > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Install of 5.4 i386 formatting is very slow > > At Thu, 6 May 2010 17:37:19 -0400 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Jason Pyeron >

Re: [CentOS] USB key installed OS; file system goes read-only randomly...

2010-05-06 Thread Jason Pyeron
> -Original Message- > From: John R Pierce > Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 22:35 > Subject: Re: [CentOS] USB key installed OS;file system goes > read-only randomly... >From dmesg: EXT3-fs error (device dm-0): ext3_free_blocks_sb: bit already cleared for block 506003 Aborting journal on

Re: [CentOS] Install of 5.4 i386 formatting is very slow

2010-05-06 Thread John R Pierce
Jason Pyeron wrote: > Unfortunatly, there is no option to change this. I will search for a new BIOS > for it, but as the system will be running off a flash drive in production I am > not in a hurry. > you might just see if you can enable DMA with the hdparm command. first off... # hdpar

Re: [CentOS] USB key installed OS; file system goes read-only randomly...

2010-05-06 Thread John R Pierce
Jason Pyeron wrote: > This happened a few times now, I (soft) reboot and do the fsck thing and all > is > fine until it happens again. > A) your USB key is flakey B) your systems USB ports are flakey C) the cabling between the mainboard and the USB port is flakey. I've run into C) quite a

Re: [CentOS] USB key installed OS; file system goes read-only randomly...

2010-05-06 Thread Jason Pyeron
> -Original Message- > From: John R Pierce > Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 22:54 > Subject: Re: [CentOS] USB key installed OS;file system goes > read-only randomly... > > Jason Pyeron wrote: > > This happened a few times now, I (soft) reboot and do the > fsck thing > > and all is fine un

Re: [CentOS] installing gtkmm

2010-05-06 Thread Arun Khan
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 6:50 AM, Ming-ching Chiu wrote: > Hi, > I've been building a gtkmm project on ubuntu and things run smoothly. Now i > have to move the project to CentOS 5.4. I set up rpm forge and installed > gtkmm. Turns out that the package on rpmforge is too old that my project > does

Re: [CentOS] Not firewall, but what?

2010-05-06 Thread Jussi Hirvi
Ok, thanks for ideas - many new things to test. So far no luck. Too bad i don't have first-hand access to any of the client machines who *do* have this problem. Next, I will go and switch the ethernet cable to a different slot on the router - kind of desperate, I know. Some more details: - thi

Re: [CentOS] ldap: adding user to multiple groups

2010-05-06 Thread Arun Khan
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 12:52 AM, wrote: > On May 6, 2010, at 12:00 PM, Arun Khan wrote: > >> >> >> Even though you may not require the SMB extensions, the smbldaptools >> may be worth looking into.  It's toolset are similar to the regular >> Linux user management tools, with the backend taking ca

Re: [CentOS] Install of 5.4 i386 formatting is very slow

2010-05-06 Thread Rajagopal Swaminathan
Greetings, On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 3:08 AM, Joseph L. Casale wrote: >>Why is my SATA drive showing up under /dev/hdb? > I have seen this problem solved by just adding ide0-noprobe ideprobe=0 to the kernel line in the menu.lst of grub at least in in some model of HP desktops. adn a reboot of cour