On Oct 1, 2010, at 4:58 PM, Steve Huff wrote:
> On Oct 1, 2010, at 10:34 AM, Gilbert Sebenste wrote:
>
>> Starting spamd: Subroutine NetAddr::IP::UtilPolluted::AF_INET6 redefined
>> at /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/Exporter.pm line 65.
>> at
>> /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/Ne
On Oct 1, 2010, at 2:27 PM, Boris Epstein wrote:
> Hello listmates,
>
> I have discovered a very strange SFTP problem which I can not connect to
> anything but NIS thus far. See here:
>
> http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-server-73/sftp-seems-to-fail-for-nis-accounts-under-openssh-
On Fri, 2010-10-01 at 17:37 -0600, Ski Dawg wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I have a CentOS 5 system. On this system, I used the usermod -n and
> groupmod -g to change the user id and the group id for a standard,
> regular user from 500 to 1000.
>
> I then ran the following commands (as root), to ma
Here's the full output in a text file.
=== Al
- Original Message
From: Al Sparks
To: Centos List
Sent: Thu, September 30, 2010 5:14:51 PM
Subject: [CentOS] Patching openssl rpms
Running CentOS release 5.5.
I'm trying to update or patch an SRPMS file, specifically
openssl-0.9.8e
Hello everyone,
I have a CentOS 5 system. On this system, I used the usermod -n and
groupmod -g to change the user id and the group id for a standard,
regular user from 500 to 1000.
I then ran the following commands (as root), to make sure all the
files were changed to match:
find / -uid 500 -exe
On Oct 1, 2010, at 2:57 PM, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 02:47:09PM -0700, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> On Oct 1, 2010, at 2:16 PM, Steve Thompson wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 1 Oct 2010, Craig White wrote:
>>>
As for OpenLDAP being a royal PITA, I suppose that's a matter
On Oct 1, 2010, at 2:57 PM, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 02:47:09PM -0700, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> On Oct 1, 2010, at 2:16 PM, Steve Thompson wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 1 Oct 2010, Craig White wrote:
>>>
As for OpenLDAP being a royal PITA, I suppose that's a matter of
On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 02:47:09PM -0700, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> On Oct 1, 2010, at 2:16 PM, Steve Thompson wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 1 Oct 2010, Craig White wrote:
> >
> >> As for OpenLDAP being a royal PITA, I suppose that's a matter of
> >> perspective because I've been using it for at leas
On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 05:16:49PM -0400, Steve Thompson wrote:
> Agreed. I have found that LDAP, in the guise of OpenLDAP, is not very
> difficult at all once you have done your first setup, providing, as Craig
> says, you take the time to understand why you're doing what you're doing
> and you
>ehh -- The version in RawHide will build and run under C5,
>with some tedious gathering and packaging of buildchain work
>
>[herr...@centos-5 zoneminder]$ rpm -q zoneminder
>zoneminder-1.24.2-5orc
>[herr...@centos-5 zoneminder]$ ls *src.rpm | grep orc | wc
> 28 281021
>[herr...@cen
On Oct 1, 2010, at 2:16 PM, Steve Thompson wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Oct 2010, Craig White wrote:
>
>> As for OpenLDAP being a royal PITA, I suppose that's a matter of
>> perspective because I've been using it for at least 7 years now and
>> it
>> works for me without any problems whatsoever.
>
> Agre
On Fri, 1 Oct 2010, Craig White wrote:
> As for OpenLDAP being a royal PITA, I suppose that's a matter of
> perspective because I've been using it for at least 7 years now and it
> works for me without any problems whatsoever.
Agreed. I have found that LDAP, in the guise of OpenLDAP, is not very
Craig White wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-10-01 at 16:46 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
>> *shrug* I've never used it. Trust me, openLDAP is a royal PITA, but with
>> AD as an alternative
>
> well AD *is* LDAP but it has many other services/requirements beyond
> LDAP.
>
> As for OpenLDAP being a
On Fri, 2010-10-01 at 16:46 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> *shrug* I've never used it. Trust me, openLDAP is a royal PITA, but with
> AD as an alternative
well AD *is* LDAP but it has many other services/requirements beyond
LDAP.
As for OpenLDAP being a royal PITA, I suppose that's a m
Boris Epstein wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 4:46 PM, wrote:
>
>> Stephen Harris wrote:
>> > On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 04:22:58PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> When
>> > I did Solaris 9 training it took 2 sentences. Yes, NIS+ may be more
>> > secure than NIS, but it's a FPOS to use properly a
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 4:46 PM, wrote:
> Stephen Harris wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 04:22:58PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> >
> >> And I'd at *least* go to NIS+. openLDAP is an unbelievable pain, but
> >
> > Nobody in their right mind uses NIS+. Even Sun have stopped it.
> >
> > When
Stephen Harris wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 04:22:58PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
>> And I'd at *least* go to NIS+. openLDAP is an unbelievable pain, but
>
> Nobody in their right mind uses NIS+. Even Sun have stopped it.
>
> When I did Solaris 2.4 training NIS+ took 2 chapters of the ma
On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 04:22:58PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> And I'd at *least* go to NIS+. openLDAP is an unbelievable pain, but
Nobody in their right mind uses NIS+. Even Sun have stopped it.
When I did Solaris 2.4 training NIS+ took 2 chapters of the manual. When
I did Solaris 9 trai
James Pearson wrote:
> Boris Epstein wrote:
>> Hello listmates,
>>
>> I have discovered a very strange SFTP problem which I can not connect to
>> anything but NIS thus far. See here:
>>
>> http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-server-73/sftp-seems-to-fail-for-nis-accounts-under-openssh-5-x-
Tom Bishop wrote:
> So I have been playing with a RAID 10 f2 ( 2 disks far layout)
> setup...thanks for all of the advice..Now I am playing with the format
> and want to make sure I have it setup the best that I can, my raid was
> built using the raid 10 option with 2 disks with the layout=far,
Hi there --
We use NIS on our site which is a mixture of HP-UX and Linux systems.
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of
Ben McGinnes
Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 2:50 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] how many
On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 10:24:43AM -0700, Scott Silva wrote:
> on 9-30-2010 8:35 AM Dario Lesca spake the following:
> > Il giorno gio, 30/09/2010 alle 07.54 -0400, mark ha scritto:
> >> Dario Lesca wrote:
> >>
...
> > Now I have reinstall and solved this issue
> > adding a "exclude=kernel*" into
On 10/1/10 2:27 PM, "Boris Epstein" wrote:
> Hello listmates,
>
> I have discovered a very strange SFTP problem which I can not connect to
> anything but NIS thus far. See here:
>
> http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-server-73/sftp-seems-to-fail-for
> -nis-accounts-under-openssh-5-x-
Boris Epstein wrote:
> Hello listmates,
>
> I have discovered a very strange SFTP problem which I can not connect to
> anything but NIS thus far. See here:
>
> http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-server-73/sftp-seems-to-fail-for-nis-accounts-under-openssh-5-x-816020/
>
> http://readlis
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Don Krause
> Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 15:40
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] how many people still use NIS?
>
>
> On Oct 1, 2010, at 11:50 AM, Ben McGinnes w
On Oct 1, 2010, at 11:50 AM, Ben McGinnes wrote:
> On 2/10/10 4:27 AM, Boris Epstein wrote:
>> Hello listmates,
>>
>> I have discovered a very strange SFTP problem which I can not connect to
>> anything but NIS thus far. See here:
>>
>> http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-server-73/sf
On 2/10/10 4:27 AM, Boris Epstein wrote:
> Hello listmates,
>
> I have discovered a very strange SFTP problem which I can not connect to
> anything but NIS thus far. See here:
>
> http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-server-73/sftp-seems-to-fail-for-nis-accounts-under-openssh-5-x-816020/
So I have been playing with a RAID 10 f2 ( 2 disks far layout)
setup...thanks for all of the advice..Now I am playing with the format and
want to make sure I have it setup the best that I can, my raid was built
using the raid 10 option with 2 disks with the layout=far, chunk size
512now I read
Hello listmates,
I have discovered a very strange SFTP problem which I can not connect to
anything but NIS thus far. See here:
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-server-73/sftp-seems-to-fail-for-nis-accounts-under-openssh-5-x-816020/
http://readlist.com/lists/suse.com/suse-linux-e/38/
>That doesn't really "solve" the issue, it only stops you from getting
>important kernel updates.
An unfortunate way of life if you insist on using HP's modules. They do
their own QA testing and it takes a moons age. I have never had a need
to use the latest cciss for example versus the shipped mo
on 9-30-2010 8:35 AM Dario Lesca spake the following:
> Il giorno gio, 30/09/2010 alle 07.54 -0400, mark ha scritto:
>> Dario Lesca wrote:
>>
>>> ... start with "linux dd" and, at the end of setup, install the
>>
>> What? What are you saying you did with the dd command?
> At dvd boot prompt, I hav
On Fri, 1 Oct 2010, David Hrbá? wrote:
Hi,
sa-update and spamd restart works for me. What's the rpm -q spamassasin
perl perl-NetAddr-IP and uname -a?
Hi David,
Here you go:
Linux machine.something 2.6.18-225.el5 #1 SMP Mon Sep 27 10:34:23 EDT
2010 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
spamassassin-3.3
rrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance)
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http://lists.
Dne 1.10.2010 16:34, Gilbert Sebenste napsal(a):
> On Fri, 1 Oct 2010, Gilbert Sebenste wrote:
>
>> Check this out:
>>
>> % sa-update
>>
>> Subroutine NetAddr::IP::UtilPolluted::AF_INET6 redefined at
>> /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/Exporter.pm line 65.
>> at
>> /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linu
On Fri, 1 Oct 2010, Steve Huff wrote:
> looks like it should be fixed in revision 4.033, which is already in RPMforge
> SVN but not yet pushed to the repo.
>
> how much troubleshooting did you do before you assumed it was CentOS's fault?
> :)
Hi Steve,
I wish I knew how to troubleshoot it. But
On Oct 1, 2010, at 10:34 AM, Gilbert Sebenste wrote:
> I'll raise that and a restart:
>
> % /etc/rc.d/init.d/spamassassin restart
> Stopping spamd:[ OK ]
> Starting spamd: Subroutine NetAddr::IP::UtilPolluted::AF_INET6 redefined
> at /usr/lib/perl5/
giggzounet wrote:
> Le 28/09/2010 12:33, James Pearson a écrit :
>> Does anyone have the 'MegaRAID Storage Manager' GUI working on CentOS
>> 5.5?
>>
>> I can run it, but it won't let me log in.
>>
>> The docs state that it requires the local root username and password -
>> but it always rejects thi
on 9-29-2010 2:43 PM lostson spake the following:
> Quoting M�rio Barbosa :
>
>> LostSon wrote:
>>> Yes I did run newaliases and still no joy
>>>
>>> Mark Van Bogart wrote:
>>>
Did you run 'newaliases' after editing /etc/aliases?
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 28, 2010, at 6:
On Fri, 1 Oct 2010, Gilbert Sebenste wrote:
> Check this out:
>
> % sa-update
>
> Subroutine NetAddr::IP::UtilPolluted::AF_INET6 redefined at
> /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/Exporter.pm line 65.
> at
> /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/NetAddr/IP/Util.pm
> line 180
I'll raise that
Le 28/09/2010 12:33, James Pearson a écrit :
> Does anyone have the 'MegaRAID Storage Manager' GUI working on CentOS 5.5?
>
> I can run it, but it won't let me log in.
>
> The docs state that it requires the local root username and password -
> but it always rejects this with "Message = Login fa
Check this out:
% sa-update
Subroutine NetAddr::IP::UtilPolluted::AF_INET6 redefined at
/usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/Exporter.pm line 65.
at
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/NetAddr/IP/Util.pm
line 180
***
-Original Message-
From: "John Doe"
Date: Fri Oct 01 12:45:21 GMT 2010
To: "CentOS mailing list"
CC:
Subject: Re: [CentOS] question on mkfs.hfsplus
From: Jerry Geis
> I am wanting to use the mkfs.hfsplus as mentioned here
> http://www.oli.id.au/createosxdmgdiskimagesinlinux
> but I
-Original Message-
From: "John Doe"
Date: Fri Oct 01 12:45:21 GMT 2010
To: "CentOS mailing list"
CC:
Subject: Re: [CentOS] question on mkfs.hfsplus
From: Jerry Geis
> I am wanting to use the mkfs.hfsplus as mentioned here
> http://www.oli.id.au/createosxdmgdiskimagesinlinux
> but I
From: Jerry Geis
> I am wanting to use the mkfs.hfsplus as mentioned here
> http://www.oli.id.au/createosxdmgdiskimagesinlinux
> but I dont have the command.
> yum provides "*/mkfs.hfsplus" returns no packages found.
> Where do I find this command? Thanks.
If you don't find one for CentOS, m
I am wanting to use the mkfs.hfsplus as mentioned here
http://www.oli.id.au/createosxdmgdiskimagesinlinux
but I dont have the command.
yum provides "*/mkfs.hfsplus" returns no packages found.
Where do I find this command? Thanks.
Jerry
___
CentOS maili
On Sep 28, 2010, at 2:30 PM, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
> Mailman works well for our mailing lists, but the archive is
> unacceptable - the worst thing is lack of search function.
>
> I got one tip for this:
>
> 1) emails converted to html format with mhonarc
> 2) search can be done with htdig
>
> Opinion
On 09/30/2010 05:02 PM, John Doe wrote:
> From: Mitja Mihelič
>> I am trying to use hping to chek the latency of our network.
>> Somehow things are not going to plan and I thought someone might be able
>> to shed some light on the subject.
>> Here is the setup:
>> (the IP addresses gvien here are
47 matches
Mail list logo
