n...@li.nux.ro writes:
> Hi guys,
>
> I've been working on a yum repo for PHP 5.2 and today I wanted to update
> it[1], however on a test machine using my PHP packages (e.g.
> php-common-5.2.16-1nux) a yum update to the new RPMs with version 5.2.17
> gives the following error: "Error: Package
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 11:13 PM, Robert Spangler
wrote:
> On Sunday 09 January 2011 13:33, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
>
>> Our intranet's WAN interface just stopped working yesterday, and I
>> can't figure it out.
>
> Look in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts. There you should see ifcfg-eth# If
> ifcfg-e
This has been puzzling me for some time and despite bothering Auntie
Google rather a lot, I've yet to find a satisfying answer.
As an old-time (since 1981) unix and X guy, I've generally been fairly
well-able to get fonts to behave in a rational manner. My needs are
pretty simple - I just want 8-p
Kai Schaetzl writes:
> I want to replace an existing 32bit with a 64bit installation (Centos 5).
> There's an existing LVM with lots of partitions. Most are used for Xen
> guests. The system itself uses only one of them plus a separate /boot
> partition that is not on LVM.
> What's the best cou
>> Don't forget AMD's K6 processors -- these are also i586 processors.
>
> I have an AMD K6 that won't boot Fedora 7 (or later) due to missing
> some bit of architecture (I forget specifics, sorry...). So I suspect
> it's not truly an i586 processor? (fwiw, It did boot and install Linux
> Mint 9,
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 7:30 PM, derleader mail wrote:
>>On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 7:20 PM, derleader mail wrote:
> Red hat yum downloads packages from RHN
> Centos yum downloads packages from the fastest mirror?
>
> There is difference in configuration.
Redhat uses yum rhnplu
>On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 7:20 PM, derleader mail wrote:
Red hat yum downloads packages from RHN
Centos yum downloads packages from the fastest mirror?
There is difference in configuration.
>>>
>>>Redhat uses yum rhnplugin to download packages from rhnet.
>>>
>>>It's o
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 4:51 PM, Alan Hodgson wrote:
> On January 7, 2011 06:37:15 pm Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>> > I haven't tried that, but wouldn't you bridge the bond device instead of
>> > bonding bridged nics?
>>
>> That would make sense, but it didn't work at all. I assume this is
>> because
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 7:20 PM, derleader mail wrote:
>>> Red hat yum downloads packages from RHN
>>> Centos yum downloads packages from the fastest mirror?
>>>
>>> There is difference in configuration.
>>
>>Redhat uses yum rhnplugin to download packages from rhnet.
>>
>>It's only difference. rhnp
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> I want to replace an existing 32bit with a 64bit installation (Centos 5).
> There's an existing LVM with lots of partitions. Most are used for Xen
> guests. The system itself uses only one of them plus a separate /boot
> partition that is not o
>> Red hat yum downloads packages from RHN
>> Centos yum downloads packages from the fastest mirror?
>>
>> There is difference in configuration.
>
>Redhat uses yum rhnplugin to download packages from rhnet.
>
>It's only difference. rhnplugin is closed source system that ties into
>rhn.re
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Cia Watson wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Jan 2011 14:54:21 -0500
> Robert Heller wrote:
>
>> At Sun, 09 Jan 2011 11:19:22 -0800 CentOS mailing list
>> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > On 01/09/11 11:09 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>> > > And highly, highly recommended to use a kernel opt
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 7:02 PM, derleader mail wrote:
> Yes it's free webmail. I don't understand what is broken in my web client?
Well, you are replying *before* the quoted message. You may also be
sending HTML (which is showing up correctly in my GMail interface.)
Please use plain text for tec
>On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 4:02 PM, derleader mail wrote:
>> Yes it's free webmail. I don't understand what is broken in my web client?
>
>It doesn't appear to know how to create the special In-Reply-To:
>and/or References: headers that sophisticated email clients use to
>track conversation
> Red hat yum downloads packages from RHN
> Centos yum downloads packages from the fastest mirror?
>
> There is difference in configuration.
Redhat uses yum rhnplugin to download packages from rhnet.
It's only difference. rhnplugin is closed source system that ties into
rhn.redhat.com
--
Eero
__
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 4:02 PM, derleader mail wrote:
> Yes it's free webmail. I don't understand what is broken in my web client?
It doesn't appear to know how to create the special In-Reply-To:
and/or References: headers that sophisticated email clients use to
track conversational threads.
Yes it's free webmail. I don't understand what is broken in my web client?
>On 01/09/11 3:36 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>> On 01/09/2011 11:35 PM, derleader __ wrote:
>>> >On 01/09/2011 11:13 PM, derleader __ wrote:
>>> >> Hi,
>> your email client is still broken
>
>he appears to be u
Hello Everyone,
I was wondering if anyone out there has successfully implemented 389 as a
replacement or to support to a windows AD environment. I'm just starting to
toy around with it in a few vm's and trying to get a feel for integrating
the two together. So far I have the 389 up now I'm just wo
On 01/09/11 3:36 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 01/09/2011 11:35 PM, derleader __ wrote:
>> >On 01/09/2011 11:13 PM, derleader __ wrote:
>> >> Hi,
> your email client is still broken
he appears to be using some kind of Bulgarian webmail ('abvmail' which
is roughly ABC Mail, www.abv.bg) :-/
On Sun, 9 Jan 2011 14:54:21 -0500
Robert Heller wrote:
> At Sun, 09 Jan 2011 11:19:22 -0800 CentOS mailing list
> wrote:
>
> >
> > On 01/09/11 11:09 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > > And highly, highly recommended to use a kernel optimized for i686
> > > if that's your real architecture: ther
On 01/09/2011 11:35 PM, derleader __ wrote:
>
> >On 01/09/2011 11:13 PM, derleader __ wrote:
> >> Hi,
your email client is still broken
- KB
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>On 01/09/2011 11:13 PM, derleader __ wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Can you tell me what ate differences in the source code between the
>> original Red Hat yum and the one which Centos uses for update
>
>there are no differences functionally, they are now identical packages.
>
>- KB
>__
On 01/09/2011 11:13 PM, derleader __ wrote:
> Hi,
> Can you tell me what ate differences in the source code between the
> original Red Hat yum and the one which Centos uses for update
there are no differences functionally, they are now identical packages.
- KB
Sikkandar,
typically, we do this & put this text
ETHTOOL_OPTS="speed 100 duplex full autoneg off"
in this file
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0
and any others files there as necessary
reboot unit or whatever is best for your admin situation...
you may have other issues that
Hi,
Can you tell me what ate differences in the source code between the original
Red Hat yum and the one which Centos uses for updates?
Regards
Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Jan 9, 2011, at 10:31 AM, Robert Heller wrote:
> At Sun, 09 Jan 2011 09:31:19 -0500 CentOS mailing list
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Hi List,
>> just doing my weekly yum update and noticed that the kernel is
>> designated .i686 but the headers package is .i386??
>> surely the headers should mat
I want to replace an existing 32bit with a 64bit installation (Centos 5).
There's an existing LVM with lots of partitions. Most are used for Xen
guests. The system itself uses only one of them plus a separate /boot
partition that is not on LVM.
What's the best course of action here? Should I do
On January 7, 2011 06:37:15 pm Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > I haven't tried that, but wouldn't you bridge the bond device instead of
> > bonding bridged nics?
>
> That would make sense, but it didn't work at all. I assume this is
> because the features are simply not simultaneously supportable.
>
On Sunday 09 January 2011 13:33, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> Our intranet's WAN interface just stopped working yesterday, and I
> can't figure it out.
Look in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts. There you should see ifcfg-eth# If
ifcfg-eth0 isn't there copy ifcfg-eth1 to ifccfg-eth0 and then configure
On Sun, 9 Jan 2011, Bart Schaefer wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Thomas Dickey wrote:
>> But the request was for something that would retain the same screen
>> dimensions while changing the lines/columns.
>
> Actually I believe the request is for something that will retain the
> same l
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> But the request was for something that would retain the same screen
> dimensions while changing the lines/columns.
Actually I believe the request is for something that will retain the
same lines/columns while varying the font size to match t
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 2:23 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 01/09/11 11:14 AM, derleader __ wrote:
>> >No, those are at ftp://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/linux/updates/enterprise/
>>
>> why there is no version 6? only 2, 3 and 4
>
> ftp://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/linux/updates/rhn/5Server/
>
>
> I don't beli
On 01/09/2011 03:31 PM, Robert Heller wrote:
> The headers package contains no compiled code -- it only contains
> source code (.h files). As such it is processor netural. It really
> could be '.noarch', but the version of rpmbuild shipped with CentOS 5.5
> does not allow the creation of .noarch
On 01/09/2011 07:48 PM, derleader __ wrote:
> Ok thank you everybody.
> MY second question is about Red Hat Network. Is it 100% open source? The
> only code that I found is the source code of red hat network upstream
> project Spacewalk. http://spacewalk.redhat.com/source/1.2/RHEL/5/
> I would like
At Sun, 09 Jan 2011 11:19:22 -0800 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> On 01/09/11 11:09 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > And highly, highly recommended to use a kernel optimized for i686 if
> > that's your real architecture: there's a big performance difference.
>
> since the last mainstream i586
>> >No, those are at ftp://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/linux/updates/enterprise/
>>
>> why there is no version 6? only 2, 3 and 4
>
>ftp://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/linux/updates/rhn/5Server/
>
>
>I don't believe there are any updates for 6 yet, are there?
>___
On Sun, 2011-01-09 at 11:23 -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 01/09/11 11:14 AM, derleader __ wrote:
> > >No, those are at ftp://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/linux/updates/enterprise/
> >
> > why there is no version 6? only 2, 3 and 4
>
> ftp://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/linux/updates/rhn/5Server/
>
>
> I
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 2:23 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 01/09/11 11:14 AM, derleader __ wrote:
>> >No, those are at ftp://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/linux/updates/enterprise/
>>
>> why there is no version 6? only 2, 3 and 4
>
> ftp://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/linux/updates/rhn/5Server/
>
>
> I don't beli
On 01/09/11 11:14 AM, derleader __ wrote:
> >No, those are at ftp://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/linux/updates/enterprise/
>
> why there is no version 6? only 2, 3 and 4
ftp://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/linux/updates/rhn/5Server/
I don't believe there are any updates for 6 yet, are there?
__
On 01/09/11 11:09 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> And highly, highly recommended to use a kernel optimized for i686 if
> that's your real architecture: there's a big performance difference.
since the last mainstream i586 CPU was the original Pentium (60-133Mhz)
and Pentium/MMX (up to 200Mhz?), and
> Hi,
> I'm interested from where Centos gets the source RPMs of updates for
> Red Hat Linux? I suppose that they are publicly available but where?
>
> regards
> Peter
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5/os/SRPMS/
>>>
>>>I believe the OP is asking, where doe
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Robert Heller wrote:
> At Sun, 09 Jan 2011 09:31:19 -0500 CentOS mailing list
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Hi List,
>> just doing my weekly yum update and noticed that the kernel is
>> designated .i686 but the headers package is .i386??
>> surely the headers should match
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 1:56 PM, derleader __ wrote:
>
Hi,
I'm interested from where Centos gets the source RPMs of updates for
Red Hat Linux? I suppose that they are publicly available but where?
regards
Peter
>>> http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5/os/SRPMS/
>>
>>I bel
>>> Hi,
>>> I'm interested from where Centos gets the source RPMs of updates for
>>> Red Hat Linux? I suppose that they are publicly available but where?
>>>
>>> regards
>>> Peter
>> http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5/os/SRPMS/
>
>I believe the OP is asking, where does the centos p
On 01/09/11 10:05 AM, Digimer wrote:
> On 01/09/2011 12:04 PM, derleader __ wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I'm interested from where Centos gets the source RPMs of updates for
>> Red Hat Linux? I suppose that they are publicly available but where?
>>
>> regards
>> Peter
> http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5/
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 12:04 PM, derleader __ wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm interested from where Centos gets the source RPMs of updates for Red
> Hat Linux? I suppose that they are publicly available but where?
>
> regards
> Peter
http://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/
There is probably a
Hi all,
Our intranet's WAN interface just stopped working yesterday, and I
can't figure it out.
The machine has a Gigabyte motherboard, with on-board
RTL-8110SC/8169SC Gigabit Ethernet and D-Link PCI NIC for the LAN
side. I can get into the LAN side without an issue, but can't see the
WAN side a
On Sun, 09 Jan 2011 10:06:55 -0800
Bart Schaefer wrote:
> With gnome-terminal you have to configure the desired appearance as a
> Profile and use the Terminal menu. I just created one with Edit ->
> Profiles... and chose to base it on the Default profile, named it
> Maximize, turned off "Use the
On Sun, 9 Jan 2011, Bart Schaefer wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Frank Cox wrote:
>> On Sun, 09 Jan 2011 14:15:44 -0300
>> Eduardo Grosclaude wrote:
>>
>>> How about running your app under 'screen', then fire up a second
>>> gnome-terminal and attach to it with 'screen -x'. Zoom in as d
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Frank Cox wrote:
> On Sun, 09 Jan 2011 14:15:44 -0300
> Eduardo Grosclaude wrote:
>
>> How about running your app under 'screen', then fire up a second
>> gnome-terminal and attach to it with 'screen -x'. Zoom in as desired
>> with regular control-+ sequences. Then
On 01/09/2011 04:46 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 01/09/11 1:40 AM, Ritika Garg wrote:
>> In centos 5.5 system->administration->logical volume management comes
>> whereas in centos5.3 i don't see the option logical volume management
>> under system->administration. How to see it?
>
> LVM command
On 01/09/2011 12:04 PM, derleader __ wrote:
> Hi,
>I'm interested from where Centos gets the source RPMs of updates for
> Red Hat Linux? I suppose that they are publicly available but where?
>
> regards
> Peter
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5/os/SRPMS/
--
Digimer
E-Mail: digi...@alteeve.
On Sun, 09 Jan 2011 14:15:44 -0300
Eduardo Grosclaude wrote:
> How about running your app under 'screen', then fire up a second
> gnome-terminal and attach to it with 'screen -x'. Zoom in as desired
> with regular control-+ sequences. Then minimize and keep it lurking.
> When user wants to show bi
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
> On Sun, 09 Jan 2011 02:53:02 -0500
> JohnS wrote:
> I wrote a program that manages classified ads. It's designed to run on an
> 80x24 screen size with ncurses and it currently runs in gnome-terminal.
>
> When a customer comes in with a question o
Hi,
I'm interested from where Centos gets the source RPMs of updates for Red Hat
Linux? I suppose that they are publicly available but where?
regards
Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Sun, 09 Jan 2011 13:42:41 -0300
Eduardo Grosclaude wrote:
> Can they use Compiz? I have seen guys showing off some
> control-wheel-something-else combo to zoom the screen. Looks like it's
> a continuous zoom.
That may be an option for the future but at this time the application runs on a
LTSP
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
> I wrote a program that manages classified ads. It's designed to run on an
> 80x24 screen size with ncurses and it currently runs in gnome-terminal.
>
> When a customer comes in with a question or change to their ads, the people
> who use the prog
I agree... LVM command line is the way to go in this case, it offers more
flexibility than having to configure stuff with the actual GUI. Likely a GUI
will be integrated in 6.x I hope in order to aid those that are afraid of the
CLI.
--Original Message--
From: John R Pierce
Sender: cent
On Sun, 09 Jan 2011 02:53:02 -0500
JohnS wrote:
> I don't know about resizing the text but this "gnome-terminal
> --geometry=80x50" will give you a window that size 80 char wide and 50
> lines.
That I already knew, but it's not what I want to do.
I wrote a program that manages classified ads.
At Sun, 09 Jan 2011 09:31:19 -0500 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
>
> Hi List,
> just doing my weekly yum update and noticed that the kernel is
> designated .i686 but the headers package is .i386??
> surely the headers should match the kernel geometry that it was compiled
> for?
> confused.
T
Hi List,
just doing my weekly yum update and noticed that the kernel is
designated .i686 but the headers package is .i386??
surely the headers should match the kernel geometry that it was compiled
for?
confused.
TIA
Rob
<>___
CentOS mailing list
CentO
When seagate hard disk mounts on my laptop, nothing can be "cut" from the
hard disk to the laptop. Nothing can be "cut" or "copied" from the laptop to
the hard disk.
Also I am not able to change permissions of files on the hard disk.
What can I do to resolve the problem?
___
On Sun, 9 Jan 2011, JohnS wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2011-01-08 at 22:18 -0600, Frank Cox wrote:
>
>> Is there a terminal that allows you to set the rows and columns that you want
>> and then resizes the text instead? gnome-terminal has a zoom-in and zoom-out
>> function that's close to what I want but i
2011/1/8 aurf alien :
> Hmmm, perhaps user quotas?
>
> I can easily script that into any user creation process.
>
> So I can taylor home size on a per user basis as my power users would need
> more space than my standard users.
>
> Has any one done this?
Group quotas are more flexible. They provid
On 01/09/11 1:40 AM, Ritika Garg wrote:
> In centos 5.5 system->administration->logical volume management comes
> whereas in centos5.3 i don't see the option logical volume management
> under system->administration. How to see it?
LVM command line
In centos 5.5 system->administration->logical volume management comes
whereas in centos5.3 i don't see the option logical volume management under
system->administration. How to see it?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mail
On 01/09/11 1:34 AM, Ritika Garg wrote:
> I have a executable and when i run it then the error comes:
>
> /lib64/libc.so.6: version 'GLIBC_2.7' not found
>
> I don't have the source code of the executable. And I can't find glibc
> 2.7 for centos 5.5.
if you did, you'd likely break all kinds of st
I have a executable and when i run it then the error comes:
/lib64/libc.so.6: version 'GLIBC_2.7' not found
I don't have the source code of the executable. And I can't find glibc 2.7
for centos 5.5.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists
- Original Message -
> From: "Rajagopal Swaminathan"
> To: "CentOS mailing list"
> Sent: Friday, January 7, 2011 6:35:00 PM
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] [OT] RHEVM List
> Greetings,
>
> On 1/7/11, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 9:16 PM, Jim Wildman
> > wrote:
> >> On
69 matches
Mail list logo
