Re: [CentOS] Static routes with a metric?

2011-12-16 Thread Mike Burger
Hi, Matt. Sorry for the top post, but my iPad mail client seems averse to allowing me to bottom post. Just wanted to take a moment to note that I believe you've got things a little bit reversed. The use Of the route-ethX files and the "ip" command are the "newer" method. Setting the NETMASK a

Re: [CentOS] Backup Redux

2011-12-16 Thread Les Mikesell
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 5:17 PM, Jonathan Nilsson wrote: > > >> >From the little I've read it seems to be very similar to BackupPC. > > > I think the only thing they have in common is that they both use rsync as > the transfer agent. Well, they are both perl scripts... Backuppc just has more of

Re: [CentOS] Backup Redux

2011-12-16 Thread Jonathan Nilsson
good info in this thread -but so far no mention of rsnapshot > > Any comment on it ? > we use rsnapshot. i think of it basically as a wrapper around rsync. it isn't a fully featured backup solution just on it's own, but it is a great tool. we have written a bash shell script wrapper around rsnapsh

Re: [CentOS] Monitoring services

2011-12-16 Thread Lucian
On 16 December 2011 16:19, Alan McKay wrote: > > But I'm still left wondering whether I should fall back to Nagios. If you're considering that then also have a look at Opsview: http://www.opsview.com/community/compare-opsview ___ CentOS mailing list Cen

Re: [CentOS] Backup Redux

2011-12-16 Thread Les Mikesell
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Alan McKay wrote: > OK, I'm getting ready to finally dig into replacing our backups.  Lots of > good info in this thread -but so far no mention of rsnapshot > > Any comment on it ?   Our environment is all Linux except for Mac desktops > which would like have a di

Re: [CentOS] Backup Redux

2011-12-16 Thread Alan McKay
OK, I'm getting ready to finally dig into replacing our backups. Lots of good info in this thread -but so far no mention of rsnapshot Any comment on it ? Our environment is all Linux except for Mac desktops which would like have a different solution for backups. >From the little I've read it s

Re: [CentOS] 6.x - find interface with link up

2011-12-16 Thread Les Mikesell
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote: > On Thursday 15 December 2011 16:04:35 Les Mikesell wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 3:39 PM,   wrote: >> In earlier versions 'mii-tool' would iterate over interfaces and >> show >> which have link up.   In 6.x it wants an i

Re: [CentOS] Monitoring services

2011-12-16 Thread Les Mikesell
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Alan McKay wrote: >> > Thoughts form anyone on any of this? >> >> Network monitoring is not trivial no matter what tool you use.  Pick >> something that you trust to scale to the proportions you will need so >> you don't do a lot of work and then hit a wall.   And

Re: [CentOS] Monitoring services

2011-12-16 Thread Alan McKay
> > Thoughts form anyone on any of this? > > Network monitoring is not trivial no matter what tool you use. Pick > something that you trust to scale to the proportions you will need so > you don't do a lot of work and then hit a wall. And if you have a > lot of systems, avoid anything that needs

Re: [CentOS] Monitoring services

2011-12-16 Thread Les Mikesell
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 10:19 AM, Alan McKay wrote: > > On the one hand I like having an agent on the remove device since it allows > you to have functionality that is more purpose-driven to what we are trying > to do.   On the other hand, what above devices that cannot run the agent? >  e.g. moni

Re: [CentOS] 6.x - find interface with link up

2011-12-16 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Thursday 15 December 2011 16:04:35 Les Mikesell wrote: > On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 3:39 PM, wrote: > In earlier versions 'mii-tool' would iterate over interfaces and > show > which have link up. In 6.x it wants an interface as a parameter. > What is the appropriate way to f

Re: [CentOS] java installation failure

2011-12-16 Thread m . roth
Les Mikesell wrote: > On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 8:09 AM, e-letter wrote: >> Further information: >> >> the environment is centos60 64bit. >> >> the reason to change is the bug previously reported: >> http://icedtea.classpath.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=827 > > Is that still a problem if you update

Re: [CentOS] Monitoring services

2011-12-16 Thread Alan McKay
OK, I've had a Zabbix and a Zenoss server running now for 2 or 3 days and would like to morph this thread into a discussion of what each of these systems can and cannot do. At the base of what I see so far, Zabbix is only able to monitor devices that have the Zabbix agent on it - is that correct?

Re: [CentOS] java installation failure

2011-12-16 Thread Les Mikesell
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 8:09 AM, e-letter wrote: > Further information: > > the environment is centos60 64bit. > > the reason to change is the bug previously reported: > http://icedtea.classpath.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=827 Is that still a problem if you update to 6.1? Or at least update ope

Re: [CentOS] java installation failure

2011-12-16 Thread m . roth
e-letter wrote: > Have tried to install various versions of java, none successful. The > reason is that originally davmail32bit (my mistake to try) was found > not to work with the original centos jdk. Then this was tried with > davmail64bit which was also unsuccessful I would suggest that if open

Re: [CentOS] java installation failure

2011-12-16 Thread e-letter
Have tried to install various versions of java, none successful. The reason is that originally davmail32bit (my mistake to try) was found not to work with the original centos jdk. Then this was tried with davmail64bit which was also unsuccessful ___ CentO

Re: [CentOS] java installation failure

2011-12-16 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 12/16/2011 08:26 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 12/16/2011 08:09 AM, e-letter wrote: >> Further information: >> >> the environment is centos60 64bit. >> >> the reason to change is the bug previously reported: >> http://icedtea.classpath.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=827 > > But you are not trying

Re: [CentOS] java installation failure

2011-12-16 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 12/16/2011 08:09 AM, e-letter wrote: > Further information: > > the environment is centos60 64bit. > > the reason to change is the bug previously reported: > http://icedtea.classpath.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=827 But you are not trying to install openjdk, you are trying to install ibm-jdk

Re: [CentOS] java installation failure

2011-12-16 Thread e-letter
Further information: the environment is centos60 64bit. the reason to change is the bug previously reported: http://icedtea.classpath.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=827 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/cen

Re: [CentOS] java installation failure

2011-12-16 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 12/16/2011 06:03 AM, John Doe wrote: > From: e-letter > >> strings: '/lib/libc.so.6': No such file >> /lib/ld-linux.so.2: bad ELF interpreter: No such file or directory > > It seems to need 32bits glibc ... And you are likely trying to install it on a x86_64 system ... if I were to render a

Re: [CentOS] java installation failure

2011-12-16 Thread John Doe
From: e-letter > strings: '/lib/libc.so.6': No such file > /lib/ld-linux.so.2: bad ELF interpreter: No such file or directory It seems to need 32bits glibc ... JD ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/cento

Re: [CentOS] java installation failure

2011-12-16 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
Vreme: 12/16/2011 12:33 PM, e-letter piše: > Readers, > > Openjdk and ibm java versions have failed to install, all reporting a > bad elf, e.g. > > ./ibm-java-i386-sdk-7.0-0.0.bin > Preparing to install... > Extracting the JRE from the installer archive... > Unpacking the JRE... > Extracting the in

[CentOS] java installation failure

2011-12-16 Thread e-letter
Readers, Openjdk and ibm java versions have failed to install, all reporting a bad elf, e.g. ./ibm-java-i386-sdk-7.0-0.0.bin Preparing to install... Extracting the JRE from the installer archive... Unpacking the JRE... Extracting the installation resources from the installer archive... Configurin

Re: [CentOS] UUID for network cards

2011-12-16 Thread Michael Simpson
On 15 December 2011 13:23, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: > On 12/14/2011 04:47 PM, Helmut Drodofsky wrote: >> Hello, >> The server connects correct the network with the updated HWADDR without >> any UUID. Why do I need an UUID? >> >> Thank you for help in advance. > > I'm only speculating here sin

Re: [CentOS] how to find source of data loss / corruption

2011-12-16 Thread John Doe
From: Rudi Ahlers > Where do I get inotifywait ? > yum what provides "*/inotifywait" didn't return anything Got inotify-tools from repoforge. JD ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos