Re: [CentOS-docs] http://www.centos.org/docs

2012-04-20 Thread Crunch
On 04/06/2012 08:08 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: snip Hi All Some comments on the foot note for the documentation at http://www.centos.org/docs. The comments are with regard to the open commons license that comes with the original documentation.

Re: [CentOS-docs] http://www.centos.org/docs

2012-04-20 Thread Ed Heron
On Fri, 2012-04-20 at 14:44 -0300, Crunch wrote: ... 1) Why if the original document was licensed with an open commons license is the document being relicensed as an open publication license. I think Red Hat changed their license since that footer was written. 2) Why does the foot note

Re: [CentOS-docs] http://www.centos.org/docs

2012-04-20 Thread Crunch
On 04/20/2012 03:16 PM, Ed Heron wrote: On Fri, 2012-04-20 at 14:44 -0300, Crunch wrote: ... 1) Why if the original document was licensed with an open commons license is the document being relicensed as an open publication license. I think Red Hat changed their license since that footer

[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2012:0498 CentOS 5 glibc Update

2012-04-20 Thread Johnny Hughes
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:0498 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0498.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386:

[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2012:0505 CentOS 5 cman Update

2012-04-20 Thread Johnny Hughes
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:0505 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0505.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386:

[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2012:0499 CentOS 5 aide Update

2012-04-20 Thread Johnny Hughes
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:0499 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0499.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386:

[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2012:0506 CentOS 5 autofs Update

2012-04-20 Thread Johnny Hughes
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:0506 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0506.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386:

[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2012:0502 CentOS 6 device-mapper-multipath Update

2012-04-20 Thread Johnny Hughes
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:0502 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0502.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386:

[CentOS-announce] CEEA-2012:0503 CentOS 6 cnic Update

2012-04-20 Thread Johnny Hughes
CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2012:0503 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2012-0503.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386:

[CentOS-announce] CEEA-2012:0503 CentOS 6 bnx2 Update

2012-04-20 Thread Johnny Hughes
CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2012:0503 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2012-0503.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386:

[CentOS-announce] CEEA-2012:0503 CentOS 6 bnx2i Update

2012-04-20 Thread Johnny Hughes
CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2012:0503 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2012-0503.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386:

[CentOS-announce] CEEA-2012:0503 CentOS 6 bnx2x Update

2012-04-20 Thread Johnny Hughes
CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2012:0503 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2012-0503.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386:

[CentOS-announce] CEEA-2012:0503 CentOS 6 bnx2fc Update

2012-04-20 Thread Johnny Hughes
CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2012:0503 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2012-0503.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386:

Re: [CentOS-es] Problema de Caracteres en Desktop

2012-04-20 Thread Luciano Andrés Chiarotto
Hola Carlos. Disculpa por la siguiente consulta, que esta relacionada pero no directamente. Cuando hablas de instalar paquetería X y que te carga el virt-manager, entiendo que tenes que instalar el virt-manager y que tipo de paquetería necesitas instalar para que te funcione el servicio de

Re: [CentOS-es] Problema de Caracteres en Desktop

2012-04-20 Thread Claudio Ceballos Paz
Si, tiene instalados los grupos Sistema X Window y Escritorio. Sigue igual. Tambien si levanto localmente el servidor X con startx. Todo igual. Paso a reinstalar todo con los DVD'S Completos. Saludos. El 19 de abril de 2012 17:17, Carlos Restrepo restrcar...@gmail.comescribió: El 19 de abril de

[CentOS] fail2ban attempt, anyone want to add anything?

2012-04-20 Thread Bob Hoffman
Tonight I added fail2ban to one of my webservers to test it out. Here is my step by step, as best as I could figure it out...documentation a bit sketchy. feel free to add anything to it or suggest changes. I tried to set it up to deal with ssh, http authentication, dovecot, ftp, and postfix

Re: [CentOS] fail2ban attempt, anyone want to add anything?

2012-04-20 Thread Bob Hoffman
On 4/20/2012 2:02 AM, Bob Hoffman wrote: /etc.fail2ban/jail.conf commented out the mailto section port=25,465,993,995, protocol=tcp] action = iptables-multiport[name=ApacheAuth, port=80,443, protocol=tcp] service fail2ban start chkconfig fail2ban on service iptables restart (not

Re: [CentOS] fail2ban attempt, anyone want to add anything?

2012-04-20 Thread Bob Hoffman
On 4/20/2012 2:24 AM, Bob Hoffman wrote: if I could add something, definitely put ports, if numbers, in quotes...without quotes I got some errors in the logs port=ftp, no quotes.port= quotes and I added one for vsftp, I use port 5000 [vsftpd-iptables] enabled = true filter =

Re: [CentOS] Using eth0 on desktops with single network interface

2012-04-20 Thread Lars Hecking
I think it is still only for certain Dell models and it probably only works with new 6.2 installs, but it is a badly needed capability to be able to predictably map the device/config names to the matching physical NICs. I was wondering about this because the T3500 I'm setting up with fresh

[CentOS] Cluster with VM and global resources

2012-04-20 Thread Baptiste AGASSE
Hi all, I've a little problem with software cluster provided by CentOS 6.2 (cman, rgmanager cie), VM cluster services and global cluster resources. Here is my system arch: --- -- |clusternode1 |--+---| GFS2:vmimages1 | --- | ||

Re: [CentOS] A request from the CentOS Project

2012-04-20 Thread Tilman Schmidt
Am 19.04.2012 23:42, schrieb Giles Coochey: On 19/04/2012 01:28, Larry Martell wrote: 18) If you're on AOL, don't worry about anything I've said here. You're already a fucking laughing stock, and there's no hope for you. Oh, that fateful day when AOL joined usenet, and usenet died. IIRC

Re: [CentOS] High load averages copying USB

2012-04-20 Thread Giovanni Tirloni
On Apr 20, 2012 2:42 AM, Lists li...@benjamindsmith.com wrote: Problem as follows: 1) Plug in an external USB drive. 2) Mount it anywhere. Doesn't matter how. 3) Copy a few GB of data to the drive from a non-USB disk. 4) Watch the load average climb to 5.x, sometimes 10.x or more. Why?

Re: [CentOS] local repo question

2012-04-20 Thread John Doe
From: Jerry Geis ge...@pagestation.com If I uncomment the line I get some error about dbus package is incorrect. for VERSION in 6.2 do     mkdir -p /var/www/html/centos/$VERSION/updates/x86_64/Packages Did you check your apache logs for 404s? Try with VERSION = '6'... JD

Re: [CentOS] A request from the CentOS Project

2012-04-20 Thread Giles Coochey
On 20/04/2012 12:35, Tilman Schmidt wrote: Am 19.04.2012 23:42, schrieb Giles Coochey: On 19/04/2012 01:28, Larry Martell wrote: 18) If you're on AOL, don't worry about anything I've said here. You're already a fucking laughing stock, and there's no hope for you. Oh, that fateful day when

[CentOS] XEN or KVM - performance/stability/security?

2012-04-20 Thread Rafał Radecki
Hi all. I am currently building a small test cloud based on Eucalyptus 2.0.3 and CentOS 5.8 x64. I have a choice which hypervisor to use: KVM or XEN. KVM is the default in CentOS 6 but I have read also many good things (for example PV guest machines, isolation between Dom0 and DomU) about XEN.

Re: [CentOS] A request from the CentOS Project

2012-04-20 Thread Les Mikesell
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 7:49 AM, Giles Coochey gi...@coochey.net wrote: On 20/04/2012 12:35, Tilman Schmidt wrote: Am 19.04.2012 23:42, schrieb Giles Coochey: On 19/04/2012 01:28, Larry Martell wrote: 18) If you're on AOL, don't worry about anything I've said here. You're already a fucking

Re: [CentOS] XEN or KVM - performance/stability/security?

2012-04-20 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 04/20/2012 01:59 PM, Rafał Radecki wrote: I am currently building a small test cloud base.. ... Could you share your experience in these areas? try the centos-virt list ? Lots of people there ( including people who write a lot of the code behind some of these things! ) -- Karanbir Singh

Re: [CentOS] A request from the CentOS Project

2012-04-20 Thread Arif Hossain
Dear Johnny, Your past history clearly shows this is a case of the pot calling the kettle black. You have unceremoniously told numerous users to take a flying leap if they didn't like it your way. Please reveal to the Centos Community who penned this piece for you to post. Yours Truly,

Re: [CentOS] A request from the CentOS Project

2012-04-20 Thread Mihamina Rakotomandimby
On 04/20/2012 04:01 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: 18) If you're on AOL, don't worry about anything I've said here. You're already a fucking laughing stock, and there's no hope for you. Oh, that fateful day when AOL joined usenet, and usenet died. IIRC that wasn't the same day. Was still a case of

[CentOS] modprobe blacklist

2012-04-20 Thread Markus Falb
Hi, I am referring to the last kernel update for CentOS 5 http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2012-April/018578.html Upstream details tell me that if I dont want to reboot into the new kernel I could blacklist the xfrm6_tunnel module. How do I test that the blacklist of a module

Re: [CentOS] XEN or KVM - performance/stability/security?

2012-04-20 Thread Jonathan Vomacka
On 4/20/2012 8:59 AM, Rafał Radecki wrote: Hi all. I am currently building a small test cloud based on Eucalyptus 2.0.3 and CentOS 5.8 x64. I have a choice which hypervisor to use: KVM or XEN. KVM is the default in CentOS 6 but I have read also many good things (for example PV guest

Re: [CentOS] XEN or KVM - performance/stability/security?

2012-04-20 Thread Rafał Radecki
Why? 2012/4/20 Jonathan Vomacka juvi...@gmail.com On 4/20/2012 8:59 AM, Rafał Radecki wrote: Hi all. I am currently building a small test cloud based on Eucalyptus 2.0.3 and CentOS 5.8 x64. I have a choice which hypervisor to use: KVM or XEN. KVM is the default in CentOS 6 but I have

Re: [CentOS] A request from the CentOS Project

2012-04-20 Thread Arif Hossain
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 6:28 AM, Larry Martell larry.mart...@gmail.com wrote: I think this classic from 1996 (author unknown) needs to be resurrected. Welcome to the Internet. No one here likes you. This is not 1996. Internet is more than a thousands times more accessible to people. Back

Re: [CentOS] XEN or KVM - performance/stability/security?

2012-04-20 Thread Dmitry Cherkasov
Hi, KVM if used as it is will show very poor performance on CentOS5. To achieve better results you need to update kernel to at least 2.6.32 and compile newer versions of libvirt and qemu. On CentOS6 all is fine with KVM right out of the box. Never used XEN so cannot compare. Dmitry Cherkasov

Re: [CentOS] fail2ban attempt, anyone want to add anything?

2012-04-20 Thread Tilman Schmidt
Am 20.04.2012 08:02, schrieb Bob Hoffman: /etc.fail2ban/jail.conf In all sections I commented out the mailto section [...] I don't use mailto either. It's just not manageable if you have more than a very small number of machines. line 16, added a space then my server ip address

Re: [CentOS] fail2ban attempt, anyone want to add anything?

2012-04-20 Thread Bob Hoffman
On 4/20/2012 9:25 AM, Tilman Schmidt wrote: Am 20.04.2012 08:02, schrieb Bob Hoffman: ction = iptables-multiport[name=ApacheAuth, port=80,443, protocol=tcp] I prefer action = iptables-allports on all of these, so that a source address attempting a bruteforce attack on one service is

Re: [CentOS] Using eth0 on desktops with single network interface

2012-04-20 Thread Alfred von Campe
On Apr 19, 2012, at 14:14, Scott Robbins wrote: What I do is this for an existing one. I change /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-whatever to ifcfg-eth0 (or whatever it might be, e.g., eth0 and eth1). I ended up writing a script to automate this on my CentOS 6 systems which looks

Re: [CentOS] A request from the CentOS Project

2012-04-20 Thread m . roth
Tilman Schmidt wrote: Am 19.04.2012 23:42, schrieb Giles Coochey: On 19/04/2012 01:28, Larry Martell wrote: 18) If you're on AOL, don't worry about anything I've said here. You're already a fucking laughing stock, and there's no hope for you. Oh, that fateful day when AOL joined usenet, and

Re: [CentOS] modprobe blacklist

2012-04-20 Thread m . roth
Markus Falb wrote: Hi, I am referring to the last kernel update for CentOS 5 http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2012-April/018578.html Upstream details tell me that if I dont want to reboot into the new kernel I could blacklist the xfrm6_tunnel module. How do I test that the

Re: [CentOS] fail2ban attempt, anyone want to add anything?

2012-04-20 Thread Bob Hoffman
On 4/20/2012 9:25 AM, Tilman Schmidt wrote: I prefer action = iptables-allports on all of these, so that a source address attempting a bruteforce attack on one service is immediately banned from all services. I can't imagine a scenario where a machine that got blocked, for example, for

Re: [CentOS] boot-time NFS mount failures

2012-04-20 Thread Tilman Schmidt
Am 19.04.2012 19:30, schrieb Veli-Pekka Kestilä: On 19.4.2012 20:12, Tilman Schmidt wrote: backup:/home/backup/Oracle /backup_nfs nfs The last time this happened, I found a message on the console: mount: can't get address for backup So it seems that the failure was caused by the

Re: [CentOS] centos 6.2; mount 6TB OSX formatted FW

2012-04-20 Thread Lamar Owen
On Thursday, April 19, 2012 02:49:41 PM aurfalien wrote: Trying to mount an FW800 6TB volumes. The logs say; cannot find hfs+ superblock Aurf, (it's Friday: and now I'm channelling Michael J Fox in Teen Wolf pronouncing that name... sorry). My first question is: which HFS+ filesystem

Re: [CentOS] High load averages copying USB

2012-04-20 Thread Les Mikesell
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 12:42 AM, Lists li...@benjamindsmith.com wrote: Problem as follows: 1) Plug in an external USB drive. 2) Mount it anywhere. Doesn't matter how. 3) Copy a few GB of data to the drive from a non-USB disk. 4) Watch the load average climb to 5.x, sometimes 10.x or

Re: [CentOS] High load averages copying USB

2012-04-20 Thread Lamar Owen
On Friday, April 20, 2012 10:54:51 AM Les Mikesell wrote: The CPU has to do the work of the transfer over usb - which is why it is cheap. Real disk controllers use DMA without a lot of CPU involvement. And this includes USB 3.0, incidentally. I have found that on my Fedora 14 (soon to be

[CentOS] defer (not skip) boot fsck?

2012-04-20 Thread Les Mikesell
I have some large filesystems that are only used for rarely used archived data. Is there any way to specify in fstab or elsewhere that if these have passed their 'time to run fsck' that it could be put in the background and the system could go ahead and boot, mounting them whenever the operation

Re: [CentOS] boot-time NFS mount failures

2012-04-20 Thread Tilman Schmidt
Am 19.04.2012 23:10, schrieb Vahan Yerkanian: backup:/home/backup/Oracle /backup_nfs nfs hard,intr,noexec,rsize=32768,wsize=32768 Just add _netdev to the mount options. From man: _netdev The filesystem resides on a device that requires network access (used to prevent the

Re: [CentOS] A request from the CentOS Project

2012-04-20 Thread Tilman Schmidt
Am 20.04.2012 16:02, schrieb m.r...@5-cent.us: Tilman Schmidt wrote: Am 19.04.2012 23:42, schrieb Giles Coochey: Oh, that fateful day when AOL joined usenet, and usenet died. IIRC that wasn't the same day. Usenet did not die that way. [...] That's what I was trying to say. mark

Re: [CentOS] boot-time NFS mount failures

2012-04-20 Thread Veli-Pekka Kestilä
On 20.4.2012 17:27, Tilman Schmidt wrote: Am 19.04.2012 19:30, schrieb Veli-Pekka Kestilä: On 19.4.2012 20:12, Tilman Schmidt wrote: backup:/home/backup/Oracle /backup_nfs nfs The last time this happened, I found a message on the console: mount: can't get address for backup So it

Re: [CentOS] A request from the CentOS Project

2012-04-20 Thread Bob Hoffman
On 4/20/2012 11:12 AM, Tilman Schmidt wrote: Am 20.04.2012 16:02, schrieb m.r...@5-cent.us: mark why, yes, I *do* remember Kantor Siegal, and the aftermath to them Don't get me started. Ah, the good old pre-spam days! I was not working for a computer company, but I finally got

Re: [CentOS] modprobe blacklist

2012-04-20 Thread Markus Falb
On 20.4.2012 16:06, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Markus Falb wrote: Hi, I am referring to the last kernel update for CentOS 5 http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2012-April/018578.html Upstream details tell me that if I dont want to reboot into the new kernel I could blacklist the

Re: [CentOS] A request from the CentOS Project

2012-04-20 Thread m . roth
Bob Hoffman wrote: On 4/20/2012 11:12 AM, Tilman Schmidt wrote: Am 20.04.2012 16:02, schrieb m.r...@5-cent.us: mark why, yes, I *do* remember Kantor Siegal, and the aftermath to them Don't get me started. Ah, the good old pre-spam days! I was not working for a computer company,

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 86, Issue 11

2012-04-20 Thread centos-announce-request
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-annou...@centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to

Re: [CentOS] boot-time NFS mount failures

2012-04-20 Thread Tilman Schmidt
Am 19.04.2012 19:30, schrieb Veli-Pekka Kestilä: You could set in fstab ipaddress instead of the server name, so there is no need for name lookup or you can put the ip and name in /etc/hosts Tried that now and it didn't help. When the backup server is down, the message is no route to host

Re: [CentOS] local repo question

2012-04-20 Thread Jerry Geis
I tried the two suggestions: I am now using createrepo . and chown -R and chmod -R to make sure they are readable by apache. I also change my repo line from using 6.2 to just use 6. repo --name=Updates --baseurl=http://192.168.1.14/centos/6/updates/x86_64/ I have a symbolic link from 6 to

Re: [CentOS] local repo question

2012-04-20 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
On 04/20/2012 06:08 PM, Jerry Geis wrote: I tried the two suggestions: I am now using createrepo . and chown -R and chmod -R to make sure they are readable by apache. I also change my repo line from using 6.2 to just use 6. repo --name=Updates

Re: [CentOS] A request from the CentOS Project

2012-04-20 Thread Les Mikesell
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Tilman Schmidt t.schm...@phoenixsoftware.de wrote:         mark why, yes, I *do* remember Kantor Siegal, and the aftermath to them Don't get me started. Ah, the good old pre-spam days! You mean when the internet consisted of defense contractors and the

Re: [CentOS] defer (not skip) boot fsck?

2012-04-20 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
On 04/20/2012 05:03 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: I have some large filesystems that are only used for rarely used archived data. Is there any way to specify in fstab or elsewhere that if these have passed their 'time to run fsck' that it could be put in the background and the system could go ahead

Re: [CentOS] A request from the CentOS Project

2012-04-20 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 04/20/2012 05:19 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: You mean when the internet consisted of defense contractors and the universities in that business? I prefer 'open to the public', even with the baggage it brings. lets not get carried away, and try to atleast keep conversations CentOS centric. I am

Re: [CentOS] A request from the CentOS Project

2012-04-20 Thread m . roth
Les Mikesell wrote: On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Tilman Schmidt t.schm...@phoenixsoftware.de wrote:         mark why, yes, I *do* remember Kantor Siegal, and the aftermath to them Don't get me started. Ah, the good old pre-spam days! You mean when the internet consisted of defense

Re: [CentOS] local repo question

2012-04-20 Thread Jerry Geis
You should post entire error text. Are you sure that that dbus package is not corrupted? Try downloading it fo local directory and install from there. Or just delete dbus rpm and run rsync again (or whatever) and then createrepo. The rest of the message had no additional information so I

Re: [CentOS] local repo question

2012-04-20 Thread Giovanni Tirloni
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 1:59 PM, Jerry Geis ge...@pagestation.com wrote: my repo line in my kickstart file is: repo --name=Updates --baseurl=http://192.168.1.14/centos/6/updates/x86_64/ Test your repo with yum, try `yum info` on the packages, etc. Take kickstart out of the picture first. --

Re: [CentOS] local repo question

2012-04-20 Thread Tony Schreiner
On Apr 20, 2012, at 12:59 PM, Jerry Geis wrote: You should post entire error text. Are you sure that that dbus package is not corrupted? Try downloading it fo local directory and install from there. Or just delete dbus rpm and run rsync again (or whatever) and then createrepo. The rest

Re: [CentOS] LibreOffice rpm's vs Centos testing repo

2012-04-20 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
On 03/19/2012 11:28 AM, Philippe Naudin wrote: I am also using a meta-package to ease installation of official *Office. It is far from perfect, because it don't work if I just do yum update openoffice, I have to uninstall openoffice* ooobasis* and then install again openoffice (or libreoffice

Re: [CentOS] A request from the CentOS Project

2012-04-20 Thread Al Sparks
From: m.r...@5-cent.us m.r...@5-cent.us To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org Cc: Sent: Friday, April 20, 2012 7:49 AM Subject: Re: [CentOS] A request from the CentOS Project Bob Hoffman wrote: On 4/20/2012 11:12 AM, Tilman Schmidt wrote: Am 20.04.2012 16:02, schrieb

Re: [CentOS] defer (not skip) boot fsck?

2012-04-20 Thread Michael Coffman
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic off...@plnet.rswrote: On 04/20/2012 05:03 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: I have some large filesystems that are only used for rarely used archived data. Is there any way to specify in fstab or elsewhere that if these have passed their 'time

[CentOS] Building Dovecot CentOS 5 RPMs with custom LDAP packages

2012-04-20 Thread Nikolaos Milas
Hi, We are (still) mainly using CentOS 5 (5.8 x86_64). As CentOS / EL 5 standard OpenLDAP packages are rather old (2.3.x), we've been using LTB OpenLDAP packages ( http://ltb-project.org/wiki/download#openldap), which get installed in non-standard file system locations. I am not much

[CentOS] Centos 4 repos help me!

2012-04-20 Thread Gustavo Lacoste
Dear CentOS Community Is totally clear there's no support to Centos 4 platform today, but I need to install some packages -ideally- from repositories, so I'll be glad if someone can provide me still working ones, (obviously non-official). If isn't possible I'll move on CentOS5, but (initially)

Re: [CentOS] Centos 4 repos help me!

2012-04-20 Thread fred smith
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 03:57:22PM -0400, Gustavo Lacoste wrote: Dear CentOS Community Is totally clear there's no support to Centos 4 platform today, but I need to install some packages -ideally- from repositories, so I'll be glad if someone can provide me still working ones, (obviously

Re: [CentOS] Centos 4 repos help me!

2012-04-20 Thread Bowie Bailey
On 4/20/2012 3:57 PM, Gustavo Lacoste wrote: Dear CentOS Community Is totally clear there's no support to Centos 4 platform today, but I need to install some packages -ideally- from repositories, so I'll be glad if someone can provide me still working ones, (obviously non-official). If

Re: [CentOS] Building Dovecot CentOS 5 RPMs with custom LDAP packages

2012-04-20 Thread fakessh
Le 2012-04-20 21:45, Nikolaos Milas a écrit : Hi, We are (still) mainly using CentOS 5 (5.8 x86_64). As CentOS / EL 5 standard OpenLDAP packages are rather old (2.3.x), we've been using LTB OpenLDAP packages ( http://ltb-project.org/wiki/download#openldap), which get installed in

Re: [CentOS] A request from the CentOS Project

2012-04-20 Thread Lamar Owen
On Friday, April 20, 2012 02:07:39 PM Al Sparks wrote: From: m.r...@5-cent.us m.r...@5-cent.us Usenet is, of course, still alive, though a lot of folks know it as google groups My first usenet browser was rn. Anybody know if 'trn' and C-News are in any CentOS 6 repos? I want to

Re: [CentOS] strange partitioning problem

2012-04-20 Thread Boris Epstein
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic off...@plnet.rswrote: On 04/13/2012 06:55 PM, Boris Epstein wrote: On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn denni...@conversis.de wrote: On 04/12/2012 03:14 PM, Boris Epstein wrote: Hello listmates, Here's I am,

[CentOS] CentOS-Base.repo file for CentOS-4.9 in Vault

2012-04-20 Thread Johnny Hughes
All, There have been many people asking for how to do installs now that CentOS-4 has moved past End Of Life. First, I want to tell you that it is VERY dangerous to use CentOS-4 now. There is at least 1 critical (ie, remotely exploitable root) issue on CentOS 4 already:

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-Base.repo file for CentOS-4.9 in Vault

2012-04-20 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 04/20/2012 04:22 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: All, There have been many people asking for how to do installs now that CentOS-4 has moved past End Of Life. First, I want to tell you that it is VERY dangerous to use CentOS-4 now. There is at least 1 critical (ie, remotely exploitable root)

Re: [CentOS] strange partitioning problem

2012-04-20 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
On 04/20/2012 11:08 PM, Boris Epstein wrote: On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevicoff...@plnet.rswrote: On 04/13/2012 06:55 PM, Boris Epstein wrote: On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn denni...@conversis.de wrote: On 04/12/2012 03:14 PM, Boris Epstein

Re: [CentOS] A request from the CentOS Project

2012-04-20 Thread Tilman Schmidt
On 04/20/2012 05:19 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: You mean when the internet consisted of defense contractors and the universities in that business? I prefer 'open to the public', even with the baggage it brings. Nope, I mean the early nineties, when the Internet was still young and largely spam

Re: [CentOS] A request from the CentOS Project

2012-04-20 Thread Les Mikesell
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Tilman Schmidt t.schm...@phoenixsoftware.de wrote: On 04/20/2012 05:19 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: You mean when the internet consisted of defense contractors and the universities in that business?  I prefer 'open to the public', even with the baggage it brings.

Re: [CentOS] Centos 4 repos help me!

2012-04-20 Thread David Hrbáč
Dne 20.4.2012 21:57, Gustavo Lacoste napsal(a): Dear CentOS Community Is totally clear there's no support to Centos 4 platform today, but I need to install some packages -ideally- from repositories, so I'll be glad if someone can provide me still working ones, (obviously non-official). Hi