On 08/23/12 4:15 PM, Jobst Schmalenbach wrote:
> I will try the LABEL way of doing
the problem with labels, there's no guarantee they will be unique. the
default labels that the centos installer uses are the same on every
system, so if you plug a drive into another computer, the odds are
I agree with the UUID stuff, I do not like them for the exact same reason.
I do not understand why RedHat cannot include the partition into the UUID,
e.g.
dev-sda1-c05e-449a-837b-b2579b949d55
As for the first drive, when the kernel boots I think it assigns the
drives in order of the controlle
On Thu, August 23, 2012 18:17, James B. Byrne wrote:
> I believe that I made a boo boo recently when recovering some unused
> disk space. Without going into painfully embarrassing detail I need
> to delete an entry in fstab for a now non-existent logical volume.
>
> The system reports that the th
On 08/23/2012 06:56 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> On 08/23/2012 10:39 AM, John Doe wrote:
>> From: Jimmy Bradley
>>> I've been reading up some about the new "secure boot" that's
>>> coming out on new machines when MS releases Win 8. Has a workaround been
>>> developed yet for thos
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 7:39 AM, Ross Cavanagh wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 7:17 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
>
>> I believe that I made a boo boo recently when recovering some unused
>> disk space. Without going into painfully embarrassing detail I need
>> to delete an entry in fstab for a no
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 7:17 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
> I believe that I made a boo boo recently when recovering some unused
> disk space. Without going into painfully embarrassing detail I need
> to delete an entry in fstab for a now non-existent logical volume.
>
> The system reports that the
I believe that I made a boo boo recently when recovering some unused
disk space. Without going into painfully embarrassing detail I need
to delete an entry in fstab for a now non-existent logical volume.
The system reports that the there is a bad superblock for said logical
volume. Mainly I expe
I've unsuccessfully been attempting to get Gambas to compile on Centos 5.8.
I've seen comment that it also doesn't compile on Centos 6.2. Has anyone gotten
a successful compile of Gambas on any version of Centos. I'd greatly appreciate
hearing from you.
2012/8/22 Les Mikesell
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 8:01 AM, Richard Reina
> wrote:
> > I have a simple perl script that every few hours pings the handful of
> > machines on my LAN. Lately I've sometimes been getting
> >
> > ping of 192.168.0.1 succeeded
> > ping of 192.168.0.7 succeeded
> > ping o
On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 19:46 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 08/17/2012 01:40 PM, Cal Webster wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 17:01 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> >> On 08/16/2012 11:43 AM, Cal Webster wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 13:56 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 08/15/2012 09:47 A
On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 19:46 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 08/17/2012 01:40 PM, Cal Webster wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 17:01 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> >> On 08/16/2012 11:43 AM, Cal Webster wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 13:56 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 08/15/2012 09:47 A
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
Adrian Sevcenco wrote:
> On 08/23/12 17:41, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Adrian Sevcenco wrote:
>>> On 08/23/12 15:01, Jobst Schmalenbach wrote:
>>
>>> I dont know about root(hd0,0) .. i have the grub and / installed on an
>>> disk which by system is recognized as /dev/sdc and in grub.conf i have
>>
On 08/23/12 17:41, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Adrian Sevcenco wrote:
>> On 08/23/12 15:01, Jobst Schmalenbach wrote:
>
>> I dont know about root(hd0,0) .. i have the grub and / installed on an
>> disk which by system is recognized as /dev/sdc and in grub.conf i have
>> hd(2,msdos1)
>>
> Ok... to fo
Adrian Sevcenco wrote:
> On 08/23/12 15:01, Jobst Schmalenbach wrote:
> I dont know about root(hd0,0) .. i have the grub and / installed on an
> disk which by system is recognized as /dev/sdc and in grub.conf i have
> hd(2,msdos1)
>
Ok... to follow myself up, I started looking. There is zero indic
Adrian Sevcenco wrote:
> On 08/23/12 15:01, Jobst Schmalenbach wrote:
> I dont know about root(hd0,0) .. i have the grub and / installed on an
> disk which by system is recognized as /dev/sdc and in grub.conf i have
> hd(2,msdos1)
I've never seen anything like msdos1 - I assume it's a label, but
On 08/23/12 15:01, Jobst Schmalenbach wrote:
> Hi Adrian
Hi!
> yes this will do.
> Because I do not know (yet) the UUID of the new partitions (drives),
> if I specify the UUID for the known drives for the partitions
> the kernel will assign the new drives to higher sdx?
AFAIK the sdX names are gi
Markus Falb wrote:
> On 23.8.2012 14:01, Jobst Schmalenbach wrote:
>> Hi Adrian
>>
>> yes this will do.
>> Because I do not know (yet) the UUID of the new partitions (drives),
>> if I specify the UUID for the known drives for the partitions
>> the kernel will assign the new drives to higher sdx?
>>
From: Jobst Schmalenbach
> At least once I need to boot the rescue disk to select the
> bootpartition and install grub on the new drives, I need to insmod
> the drivers, but I do not know where and how to do that during
> the boot process of the rescue disk (there is no menu for that).
Look at t
Hi Jobst,
I believe you'll need to build a new initrd image and include the driver
modules. Try http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/CreateNewInitrd for a
start. There are other guides out there too.
Good luck!
Stu
On 23 August 2012 13:08, Jobst Schmalenbach wrote:
> Sorry, maybe I did not
On 23.8.2012 14:01, Jobst Schmalenbach wrote:
> Hi Adrian
>
> yes this will do.
> Because I do not know (yet) the UUID of the new partitions (drives),
> if I specify the UUID for the known drives for the partitions
> the kernel will assign the new drives to higher sdx?
> Is this correct?
After r
Sorry, maybe I did not give enough information.
I have the drivers from adaptecs site (plus the kmod stuff).
At least once I need to boot the rescue disk to select the
bootpartition and install grub on the new drives, I need to insmod
the drivers, but I do not know where and how to do that during
Hi Adrian
yes this will do.
Because I do not know (yet) the UUID of the new partitions (drives),
if I specify the UUID for the known drives for the partitions
the kernel will assign the new drives to higher sdx?
Is this correct?
thanks
Jobst
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 12:49:38PM +0300, Adrian Se
On 08/23/2012 10:39 AM, John Doe wrote:
> From: Jimmy Bradley
>> I've been reading up some about the new "secure boot" that's
>> coming out on new machines when MS releases Win 8. Has a workaround been
>> developed yet for those of us who don't want to run windows? Typically,
>> I most
On 08/23/12 12:13, Jobst Schmalenbach wrote:
> Is there a way to tell the kernel in which order to load the drives
> and assign the drive order in a way that the new drives are assigned
> SDC and SDD and the old drives get SDA and SDB?
use UUID= in fstab (lsblk -o NAME,KNAME,UUID) and you will get
From: Jobst Schmalenbach
> I got a new Adaptec 6405 card with a set of new harddrives.
> Problem that I assumed that the card had kernel drivers, which it has but
> only
> from 2.6.39 onwards.
>
> I installed the kmod-aacraid drivers, they see the card and drives, fine.
>
> However, I need to
Hi.
I bought a new Adaptec 6405 card including new (much larger) SAS drives
(arrays).
I need to copy content of the current SATA (old adaptec 2405) drives to the new
SAS drives.
When I put the new controller into the machine, the card is seen and I can see
that the kernel loads the new drives
Hi
I got a new Adaptec 6405 card with a set of new harddrives.
Problem that I assumed that the card had kernel drivers, which it has but only
from 2.6.39 onwards.
I installed the kmod-aacraid drivers, they see the card and drives, fine.
However, I need to get a "linux rescue" to work, thus I n
From: Jimmy Bradley
> I've been reading up some about the new "secure boot" that's
>coming out on new machines when MS releases Win 8. Has a workaround been
>developed yet for those of us who don't want to run windows? Typically,
>I mostly build my own desktops, and I install cent os ri
On 23 August 2012 05:51, Jimmy Bradley wrote:
> I've been reading up some about the new "secure boot" that's
> coming out on new machines when MS releases Win 8. Has a workaround been
> developed yet for those of us who don't want to run windows? Typically,
> I mostly build my own desk
30 matches
Mail list logo
