Dear All,
I would like to make a whole lot of homedirs without Documents,
Downloads ,
like it was in CentOs5.
I know I have to adapt something in /etc/skel but cannot find out how to
do it.
Anyone can give me a hand with this?
greetings , J.
--
IT-medewerker
Opensource Software is the
On 26.09.2012 11:30, Johan Vermeulen wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I would like to make a whole lot of homedirs without Documents,
> Downloads ,
> like it was in CentOs5.
>
> I know I have to adapt something in /etc/skel but cannot find out how
> to
> do it.
>
> Anyone can give me a hand with this?
On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 12:13 +0100, Nux! wrote:
> On 26.09.2012 11:30, Johan Vermeulen wrote:
> > Dear All,
> >
> > I would like to make a whole lot of homedirs without Documents,
> > Downloads ,
> > like it was in CentOs5.
> >
> > I know I have to adapt something in /etc/skel but cannot find o
On Wed, 26 Sep 2012, John Austin wrote:
> To: centos@centos.org
> From: John Austin
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] make /home/user without all the maps
>
> On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 12:13 +0100, Nux! wrote:
>> On 26.09.2012 11:30, Johan Vermeulen wrote:
>>> Dear All,
>>>
>>> I would like to make a whole lo
On 26.09.2012 12:25, John Austin wrote:
> Maybe
>
> yum remove xdg-user-dirs-gtk
>
Good find! This has lead me to:
/etc/xdg/user-dirs.conf
/etc/xdg/user-dirs.defaults
Johan, that's what you need to customise.
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
__
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 01:06:27PM +0100, Keith Roberts wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Sep 2012, John Austin wrote:
>
> > To: centos@centos.org
> > From: John Austin
> > Subject: Re: [CentOS] make /home/user without all the maps
> >
> > On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 12:13 +0100, Nux! wrote:
> >> On 26.09.2012 11:3
this works! commented out all the entry's in /etc/xdg/user-dirs.defaults.
Thanks for all the answers, now I don't have to explain to 50 users they
have to delete all those folders - or at least not use them.
greetings , J
Op 26-09-12 14:16, Nux! schreef:
> On 26.09.2012 12:25, John Austin wrote
On 26.09.2012 13:38, Johan Vermeulen wrote:
> this works! commented out all the entry's in
> /etc/xdg/user-dirs.defaults.
>
> Thanks for all the answers, now I don't have to explain to 50 users
> they
> have to delete all those folders - or at least not use them.
>
> greetings , J
Johan,
Be adv
hmmm. good point. The users on the server I'm configuring now will serve
as guinea piggs :-)
But indeed, I have to sent them a mail about changing the Firefox
default download directory.
greetings, J.
Op 26-09-12 14:35, Nux! schreef:
> On 26.09.2012 13:38, Johan Vermeulen wrote:
>> this works!
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
Dear All,
We recently reinstalled our computing cluster. We were using CentOS
5.3 (32 bits). It is now CentOS 6.3 (64 bits), installed from the
CentOS 6.2 x64 CD, then upgraded to 6.3.
We have some issues with the memory needs of our running jobs. They
require much more than before, it may be d
Hello,
This is on Centos 6 and not something I think is wrong with Centos 6
but I am looking to see if anybody else has experienced this and
if there is solution. So thanks up front for indulging me.
Because Linux makes routing decisions before SNAT it is causing
problems when trying to use FTP w
On 09/26/12 19:14, Jérémie Dubois-Lacoste wrote:
Dear All,
Hi!
We recently reinstalled our computing cluster. We were using CentOS
5.3 (32 bits). It is now CentOS 6.3 (64 bits), installed from the
CentOS 6.2 x64 CD, then upgraded to 6.3.
We have some issues with the memory needs of our runn
Hm, interesting suggestion. But didn't change anything. :(
Thanks anyway,
Jérémie
2012/9/26 Adrian Sevcenco :
> On 09/26/12 19:14, Jérémie Dubois-Lacoste wrote:
>>
>> Dear All,
>
> Hi!
>
>
>> We recently reinstalled our computing cluster. We were using CentOS
>> 5.3 (32 bits). It is now CentO
Jérémie Dubois-Lacoste wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> We recently reinstalled our computing cluster. We were using CentOS
> 5.3 (32 bits). It is now CentOS 6.3 (64 bits), installed from the
> CentOS 6.2 x64 CD, then upgraded to 6.3.
>
> We have some issues with the memory needs of our running jobs. They
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:33 PM, Emmett Culley wrote:
> I have been using BackupPC via rsync daemons on the target machines and all
> has been working well. At least until about the time rsync went to version
> 3.0.6.
>
> Since then backups have been failing for some targets. The failure is a
On Wed, 26 Sep 2012, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Jérémie Dubois-Lacoste wrote:
Python script:
Avg Min Max
32 bits8500 5004 11132
64 bits32800 3 36336
8500 * 2 = 17000
5004 * 2 = 10007
11132 * 2 = 22264
So that ranges from 2-2.5 larger.
Hu
You may have misunderstood.
The detailed number I gave are obtained on distributions that
are not CentOS, and ok, it can makes sense between 32
and 64 bits.
But on CentOS 6.2, 64bits, I obtain:
SH: 103MB
PYTHON: 114MB
R:200MB
This is from a freshly installed CentOS 6.2 machine
On 09/26/2012 11:05 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:33 PM, Emmett Culley
> wrote:
>> I have been using BackupPC via rsync daemons on the target machines and all
>> has been working well. At least until about the time rsync went to version
>> 3.0.6.
>>
>> Since then backups
On 09/26/2012 09:15 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
> Is there a way to make this work correctly?
Shorewall will generate a proper configuration if you specify the
"track" option in the "providers" file. It might be a good idea to use
that to generate your configs rather than building them by hand.
I b
On 09/26/2012 09:14 AM, Jérémie Dubois-Lacoste wrote:
> 1. Run a python script and check the memory that
> it requires (field "VIRT" of the "top" command).
Don't use VIRT as a reference for memory used. RES is a better
indication, but even that won't tell you anything useful about shared
memory
On 09/25/2012 08:33 PM, Emmett Culley wrote:
> Since then backups have been failing for some targets. The failure
> is a TCP ZeroWindow issue. It looks like the server rsync process
> cannot empty it's buffer soon enough and eventually the process
> fails.
If the rsync server sends a TCP ZeroWin
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 7:46 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 09/26/2012 09:15 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
>> Is there a way to make this work correctly?
>
> Shorewall will generate a proper configuration if you specify the
> "track" option in the "providers" file. It might be a good idea to use
> that
Hello,
My name is Manfred. I have to install a flexlm license server on a pc with
centos 6.3 as operating system.
This machine contains two network cards. An Ethernet card and a wifi card.
For the Ethernet card centos generates a device called p3p2.
For the wifi card centos generates a device cal
Check for a typo where you got the 'et0', that's not a normal name (emX,
ethX, pXpY and wlanX are the usual).
As for a general comment/guide; make sure you've updated the
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-X files (note the DEVICE="..." and
HWADDR="..." lines).
Here's a general guide for ren
Hi digimer,
Sorry, I made a mistake.
"... After rebooting centos generates a device called /dev/et0. ..."
should be
"... After rebooting centos generates a device called /dev/eth0. ..."
CentOS made it. I got what I want.
Where is the general guide? I didn't understood what you mean.
> -Ursp
26 matches
Mail list logo