Is xoscope available in any available CentOS repo?
http://xoscope.sourceforge.net/
--
_
°v°
/(_)\
^ ^ Mark LaPierre
Registerd Linux user No #267004
https://linuxcounter.net/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.
- Original Message -
| It is possible to use semanage to label the files correctly and to
| persist after reboot see man pages for FTP
| Hope this helps
| Russell
I'm really feeling dense today. I can't find anywhere in the FTP man page
anything related to SELinux labels. I've google'd
On 12/26/2012 01:21 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
>>> In fact I either turn everything off, or go through all the prt policy
>>> stuff now.
>> I added iptable rules for ports 25, 110, 143, 587, 993, 995, & 4190. I
>> believe those are all the ports I am using for this (SMTP, IMAP, POP3, &
>> SEIVE).
First things first... Can you confirm that those are still the values in
> place?
>
> cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/eth0/arp_filter
> cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/eth0/arp_ignore
> cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/eth1/arp_filter
> cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/eth1/arp_ignore
> cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/
> Most of 169/8 is, but presumably he meant 169.254.0.0/16.
>
>> The only "non-routable" (i.e. reserved for private networks) IP blocks are:
>
> The list is slightly longer than that:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reserved_IP_addresses#Reserved_IPv4_addresses
No, Mike was right. 169.x.x.x which i
>> We're having to shut eth1 down and bring it up for sync at night.
>
> To what type of equipment are your ethernet devices connected?
I'm asking now.
> Are they
> both connected to the same device?
Same VLAN, not sure about same device yet. Checking.
> I've seen some devices (particularly
> 2
>> In fact I either turn everything off, or go through all the prt policy
>> stuff now.
>
> I added iptable rules for ports 25, 110, 143, 587, 993, 995, & 4190. I
> believe those are all the ports I am using for this (SMTP, IMAP, POP3, &
> SEIVE). Restarted and got the same errors. Were do I fin
On 12/26/2012 12:39 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> On 12/26/2012 12:01 PM, m...@tdiehl.org wrote:
>> On Wed, 26 Dec 2012, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>>
>>> On 12/26/2012 10:41 AM, m...@tdiehl.org wrote:
On Wed, 26 Dec 2012, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> My first time with this. I got postfi
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Mike Burger wrote:
>
> > On 12/26/2012 04:33 AM, Mike Burger wrote:
> >> 169.xxx.xxx.xxx is most certainly a "routable" IP block, as far as
> >> internet standards go.
> >
> > Most of 169/8 is, but presumably he meant 169.254.0.0/16.
> >
> >> The only "non-routabl
On 12/26/2012 12:01 PM, m...@tdiehl.org wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Dec 2012, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
>>
>> On 12/26/2012 10:41 AM, m...@tdiehl.org wrote:
>>> On Wed, 26 Dec 2012, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>>>
My first time with this. I got postfix, mysql, and postfixadmin
setup,
generall
> On 12/26/2012 04:33 AM, Mike Burger wrote:
>> 169.xxx.xxx.xxx is most certainly a "routable" IP block, as far as
>> internet standards go.
>
> Most of 169/8 is, but presumably he meant 169.254.0.0/16.
>
>> The only "non-routable" (i.e. reserved for private networks) IP blocks
>> are:
>
> The lis
On 12/26/2012 04:33 AM, Mike Burger wrote:
> 169.xxx.xxx.xxx is most certainly a "routable" IP block, as far as
> internet standards go.
Most of 169/8 is, but presumably he meant 169.254.0.0/16.
> The only "non-routable" (i.e. reserved for private networks) IP blocks are:
The list is slightly lo
On 12/26/2012 01:05 AM, James A. Peltier wrote:
> I really need to make sure that I can exclude these massive directories if at
> all possible.
The only way that appears to be available is to mark the filesystem
"noauto" and mount it after the system has otherwise started.
_
On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 09:12:40 -0600 (CST)
Michael Hennebry wrote:
> I'm using the default desktop for CentOS 6.
> My screensaver is set for blank, 5 min, no locking.
> In the seconds during which the screen fades to black,
> I cannot make it come back.
> Neither the keyboard nor moving and clicking
On Wed, 26 Dec 2012, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
> On 12/26/2012 10:41 AM, m...@tdiehl.org wrote:
>> On Wed, 26 Dec 2012, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>>
>>> My first time with this. I got postfix, mysql, and postfixadmin setup,
>>> generally following
>>>
>>> http://www.campworld.net/thewiki/pmwiki.p
> mkdir /home/vmail
> chmod 770 /home/vmail
> useradd -r -u 101 -g mail -d /home/vmail -s /sbin/nologin -c "Virtual
> mailbox" vmail
> chown vmail:mail /home/vmail
well, what uid is used to run postfix ? id postfix?
>
> Looking around a bit, there are some log files under
> /var/lib/mysql/postfix
On 12/26/2012 11:25 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
> 2012/12/26 Robert Moskowitz :
>> My first time with this. I got postfix, mysql, and postfixadmin setup,
>> generally following
>>
>> http://www.campworld.net/thewiki/pmwiki.php/LinuxServersCentOS/Cent6VirtMailServer
>>
>> I used postfixadmin to crea
On 12/26/2012 02:06 AM, Gavin Henry wrote:
> # For the dual interface - 06.12.12
> net.ipv4.conf.eth0.arp_filter = 1
> net.ipv4.conf.eth0.arp_ignore = 1
> net.ipv4.conf.eth1.arp_filter = 1
> net.ipv4.conf.eth1.arp_ignore = 1
> net.ipv4.conf.all.arp_filter = 1
First things first... Can you confirm
2012/12/26 Robert Moskowitz :
> My first time with this. I got postfix, mysql, and postfixadmin setup,
> generally following
>
> http://www.campworld.net/thewiki/pmwiki.php/LinuxServersCentOS/Cent6VirtMailServer
>
> I used postfixadmin to create my domain then added my first user and got
> an erro
On 12/26/2012 10:41 AM, m...@tdiehl.org wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Dec 2012, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
>> My first time with this. I got postfix, mysql, and postfixadmin setup,
>> generally following
>>
>> http://www.campworld.net/thewiki/pmwiki.php/LinuxServersCentOS/Cent6VirtMailServer
>>
>> I used po
On Wed, 26 Dec 2012, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> My first time with this. I got postfix, mysql, and postfixadmin setup,
> generally following
>
> http://www.campworld.net/thewiki/pmwiki.php/LinuxServersCentOS/Cent6VirtMailServer
>
> I used postfixadmin to create my domain then added my first user a
I'm using the default desktop for CentOS 6.
My screensaver is set for blank, 5 min, no locking.
In the seconds during which the screen fades to black,
I cannot make it come back.
Neither the keyboard nor moving and clicking the mouse has any affect.
Until the screen goes black, I cannot do anything
My first time with this. I got postfix, mysql, and postfixadmin setup,
generally following
http://www.campworld.net/thewiki/pmwiki.php/LinuxServersCentOS/Cent6VirtMailServer
I used postfixadmin to create my domain then added my first user and got
an error:
Send Welcome mail: yes
Unable to se
Hi,
I'm trying to install ant on my centos 6.3, this is behind a http
(only http and not ftp) proxy server.
after execute yum install ant, I got some error which indicate mirror
speed is extremely low, less than 1bps!
and go to test another mirror and error cycle starts again.
this is error:
"htt
Hello,
trying to use CentOS 6.3 from iscsi root
install works without an issue,
but boot will fail with iscsistart error (can't connect to iscsid)
already tried to make new initramfs with dractut(with iscsi module added)
but still no luck
Anyone can point me to the right direction?
Thanks!
--
Mike Burger
http://www.bubbanfriends.org
"It's always suicide-mission this, save-the-planet that. No one ever just
stops by to say 'hi' anymore." --Colonel Jack O'Neill, SG1
> Dear all,
>
> Has anyone experienced this whilst running DRBD over eth1 between two
> CentOS 5.7 servers?
>
> eth1
Dear all,
Has anyone experienced this whilst running DRBD over eth1 between two
CentOS 5.7 servers?
eth1 is a private IP address, unroutable. eth0 is the public address.
CentOS will reply sometimes once every 3 days or every 14mins~ saying
"My public IP is on eth1" to arp requests when it's not,
It is possible to use semanage to label the files correctly and to persist
after reboot see man pages for FTP
Hope this helps
Russell
On 26 Dec 2012, at 09:05, "James A. Peltier" wrote:
> I'm trying to find a way to exclude file systems during the autorelabel
> process. I have a file system (
I'm trying to find a way to exclude file systems during the autorelabel
process. I have a file system (/exports) that has tens of millions of files on
it and I *know* I don't want it relabeled.
I've tried semanage fcontext -a -t "<>" "/exports(/.*)?" and it seems to
insist on relabeling that f
29 matches
Mail list logo
