Re: [CentOS] ERROR MESSAGE: dracut warning: no root device "block:/dev/mapper/vg_ws194-lv_root" found

On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 23:57:30 -0600 Frank Cox wrote: > dracut warning: no root device "block:/dev/mapper/vg_ws194-lv_root" found > > After that I get the kernel panic message and that's the end of the line. Following the instructions here: https://ask.fedoraproject.org/question/10041/how-to-repa

[CentOS] ERROR MESSAGE: dracut warning: no root device "block:/dev/mapper/vg_ws194-lv_root" found

On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 23:36:55 -0400 Yves Bellefeuille wrote: > Also check that /etc/fstab is correct. I've finally figured out how to get an error message, but I have no idea of how to fix it. By removing "rhgb" and "quiet" from the grub commandline, I see a whole bunch of write-up going by, the

Re: [CentOS] /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-xxx for CHAP PPPoE

On 03/11/2013 01:05 AM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote: > Hi all > > I get a Cisco 1841 router, connecting the office through a CHAP PPPoE link: > [...] > interface Dialer1 >ip address negotiated >ip mtu 1492 >ip nat outside >ip virtual-reassembly >encapsulation ppp >ip tcp

[CentOS] /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-xxx for CHAP PPPoE

Hi all I get a Cisco 1841 router, connecting the office through a CHAP PPPoE link: [...] interface Dialer1 ip address negotiated ip mtu 1492 ip nat outside ip virtual-reassembly encapsulation ppp ip tcp adjust-mss 1452 dialer pool 1 dialer-group 1 no cdp enable ppp authenticati

Re: [CentOS] Postfix setup

On 03/10/2013 11:12 PM, Keith Keller wrote: > On 2013-03-11, Austin Einter wrote: >> Which one is preferred postfix or sendmail. > I suspect this is mostly personal preference. I prefer postfix because > the configuration files are easier to read and write. > >> It says I need to disable firewal

Re: [CentOS] Apache setup problems

On Sun, 2013-03-10 at 20:19 -0400, Bruce Whealton wrote: > I didn't think I needed to make the files executable. Anyway, the simple > index.php has a title, an H1 tag and a couple php statements, one of which > is phpinfo(); > My page, that I get has just the title and the content inside the h1 ta

Re: [CentOS] lost connection during yum update

On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 23:27:25 -0400 Gerry Reno wrote: > Do you know if this grub file was rewritten? > > Can you check it against a backup copy? I don't have a backup copy of the grub.conf file since it's always been automatically managed and updated by grub and friends and I've never really had

Re: [CentOS] Postfix setup

On 03/10/2013 10:54 PM, Austin Einter wrote: > Dear All > I am planning to setup mail server for my domain. > > Which one is preferred postfix or sendmail. I switched to postfix 3 years ago, and never looked back. > I came across a link * > http://ostechnix.wordpress.com/2013/02/08/setup-mail-se

Re: [CentOS] lost connection during yum update

On Sunday 10 March 2013, Frank Cox wrote: > Interesting. How can I check that? I have another almost-identical > system that's still working and I compared grub.conf between the two > of them and didn't notice any significant differences. Nothing that > immediately jumped up and down and screa

Re: [CentOS] lost connection during yum update

On 03/10/2013 11:23 PM, Frank Cox wrote: > On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 23:16:10 -0400 > Gerry Reno wrote: > >> Boot to rescue mode and see if you can mount the device containing the root >> filesystem readonly and see all the files on it. >> >> Then check that the kernel root option is looking at the same

Re: [CentOS] lost connection during yum update

On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 23:16:10 -0400 Gerry Reno wrote: > Boot to rescue mode and see if you can mount the device containing the root > filesystem readonly and see all the files on it. > > Then check that the kernel root option is looking at the same device. I can indeed see all of the files on tha

Re: [CentOS] lost connection during yum update

On 03/10/2013 11:09 PM, Frank Cox wrote: > On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 20:24:55 -0400 > Gerry Reno wrote: > >> It seems like maybe it cannot find the root filesystem. >> >> Kernel panics just like this when it cannot find it. > Interesting. How can I check that? I have another almost-identical system >

Re: [CentOS] Postfix setup

On 2013-03-11, Austin Einter wrote: > > Which one is preferred postfix or sendmail. I suspect this is mostly personal preference. I prefer postfix because the configuration files are easier to read and write. > It says I need to disable firewall. Is it really required. Kindly let me > know. No

Re: [CentOS] lost connection during yum update

On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 20:24:55 -0400 Gerry Reno wrote: > It seems like maybe it cannot find the root filesystem. > > Kernel panics just like this when it cannot find it. Interesting. How can I check that? I have another almost-identical system that's still working and I compared grub.conf betwe

Re: [CentOS] yum update gone wild? - new base?

On 03/10/2013 09:59 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 11.03.2013 02:30, schrieb Robert Moskowitz: >> I am being hit on a number of my systems with yum update reporting 270+ >> rpms to update, and MOST are coming from the base repo. I checked a few >> out, and yes, they are of a higher release. >> >

[CentOS] Postfix setup

Dear All I am planning to setup mail server for my domain. Which one is preferred postfix or sendmail. I came across a link * http://ostechnix.wordpress.com/2013/02/08/setup-mail-server-using-postfixdovecotsquirrelmail-in-centosrhelscientific-linux-6-3-step-by-step/ * for postfix mail setup. It

Re: [CentOS] BIND Setup Issue

Dear All Thanks for great support. Now the issue is completely resolved. I had to add "netcloudjob.com . IN A 173.201.189.43" line in forward zone file. (As suggested by Arzek)perly. Now from remote locations we are able to ping to www.netcloudjobs.com and netcloudjobs.c

Re: [CentOS] yum update gone wild? - new base?

On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 09:30:40PM -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > I don't recall ever seeing the base repo change; it is almost like it is > picking up the the 6.4 base repo instead. That's exactly what it's doing. The "/6" base and update repository always point to the latest version. 6.4 wa

[CentOS] yum update gone wild? - new base?

I am being hit on a number of my systems with yum update reporting 270+ rpms to update, and MOST are coming from the base repo. I checked a few out, and yes, they are of a higher release. I don't recall ever seeing the base repo change; it is almost like it is picking up the the 6.4 base repo

Re: [CentOS] lost connection during yum update

On 03/10/2013 07:40 PM, Frank Cox wrote: > On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 19:29:56 -0400 > Gerry Reno wrote: > >> Did you try booting a rescue disk and reinstalling the bootloader? > I booted the "Centos 6.4 minimal iso", told it to "upgrade an existing > installation", and to install the bootloader. About a

Re: [CentOS] Apache setup problems

I didn't think I needed to make the files executable. Anyway, the simple index.php has a title, an H1 tag and a couple php statements, one of which is phpinfo(); My page, that I get has just the title and the content inside the h1 tag. When I view the source, there is nothing that was inside a php

Re: [CentOS] lost connection during yum update

On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 17:40:39 -0600 Frank Cox wrote: > The bootloader seems to be fine -- grub itself boots up. I get a kernel panic > after that, I just had a thought: Is it possible to just reformat and reinstall the /boot partition? I wonder if that would solve the problem -- MELVILLE

Re: [CentOS] Apache setup problems

Am 10.03.2013 09:28, schrieb Bruce Whealton: > So, it works, except for the php part. I made the files executable. You shouldn't. PHP pages work just fine without execute permission. > What I mean by the php part doesn't work is that it is just being thrown > out. There is no attempt to process

Re: [CentOS] kickstart %pre vda/sda troubles

On 03/10/2013 08:14 AM, Natxo Asenjo wrote: > lets reply to myself then ;-) I missed your first message. I've put a copy of my centos 6 kickstart here in case there are any ideas you think are good ones: http://pastebin.com/rJEnsdvw ___ CentOS mailing

Re: [CentOS] lost connection during yum update

On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 19:29:56 -0400 Gerry Reno wrote: > Did you try booting a rescue disk and reinstalling the bootloader? I booted the "Centos 6.4 minimal iso", told it to "upgrade an existing installation", and to install the bootloader. About all that it appeared to do was install the bootload

Re: [CentOS] lost connection during yum update

On 03/10/2013 07:29 PM, Gerry Reno wrote: > On 03/10/2013 07:00 PM, Frank Cox wrote: >> On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 11:04:37 -0600 >> Frank Cox wrote: >> It may be easier to restore from backup and then attempt to do the update again. >>> Perhaps, but since everything seems to still be in place o

Re: [CentOS] BIND Setup Issue

Am 10.03.2013 16:34, schrieb Peter Eckel: > On 10.03.2013, at 16:14, Arek Czereszewski wrote: > >> Put this in a zone file: >> netcloudjob.com. IN A 173.201.189.43 >> >> Just after a MX line > > Austin already did that, and it doesn't help. Yes it does. The name can now be resolved. > The nam

Re: [CentOS] lost connection during yum update

On 03/10/2013 07:00 PM, Frank Cox wrote: > On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 11:04:37 -0600 > Frank Cox wrote: > >>> It may be easier to restore from backup and then attempt to do the update >>> again. >> Perhaps, but since everything seems to still be in place on those hard >> drives, >> and since my last "yum

Re: [CentOS] BIND Setup Issue

Am 10.03.2013 14:50, schrieb Austin Einter: >From my dedicated server, if I ping to www.netcloudjobs.com , it says > > *[root@ip-173-201-189-43 named]# ping www.netcloudjobs.com > PING www.netcloudjobs.com (173.201.189.43) 56(84) bytes of data. > ^C > --- www.netcloudjobs.com ping statistics --- >

Re: [CentOS] BIND Setup Issue

Am 10.03.2013 12:57, schrieb Austin Einter: > I have a CentOS 6.3 machine. I am trying to setup DNS BIND setup in that > machine. It is having a static global IP. I have done lot of reading , > google search and tried all possible option, but still not able to resolve > the issue. After reading th

Re: [CentOS] lost connection during yum update

On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 11:04:37 -0600 Frank Cox wrote: > > It may be easier to restore from backup and then attempt to do the update > > again. > > Perhaps, but since everything seems to still be in place on those hard drives, > and since my last "yum update" completed without any errors being repor

Re: [CentOS] frozen-bubble for el6-64??

2013/3/10 Fred Smith : > > anybody know of a frozen-bubble package for el6 x86_64? I've been reduced > to trying to build from source, and it ain't going very well. :( > > Thanks! > -- it's available from nux desktop repos: http://li.nux.ro/repos.html -- Eero

Re: [CentOS] frozen-bubble for el6-64??

On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 02:16:25PM -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Fred Smith > wrote: > > > > anybody know of a frozen-bubble package for el6 x86_64? I've been reduced > > to trying to build from source, and it ain't going very well. :( > > Nux! has it: > > http://li

Re: [CentOS] frozen-bubble for el6-64??

On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 10:52:25PM +0200, Eero Volotinen wrote: > 2013/3/10 Fred Smith : > > > > anybody know of a frozen-bubble package for el6 x86_64? I've been reduced > > to trying to build from source, and it ain't going very well. :( > > what is the error message? well, so far when trying t

Re: [CentOS] frozen-bubble for el6-64??

On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Fred Smith wrote: > > anybody know of a frozen-bubble package for el6 x86_64? I've been reduced > to trying to build from source, and it ain't going very well. :( Nux! has it: http://li.nux.ro/download/nux/dextop/el6/x86_64/ Akemi ___

Re: [CentOS] skype not starting anymore, prelink issue?

Yves Bellefeuille wrote: >> This point has already been answered on this mailing list (and >> elsewhere). A bit of search in the archives and elsewhere would >> quickly bring you this: >> http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Skype > > I'm very familiar with that document. :-) And many users, including >

Re: [CentOS] 802.11 Access Point software

On 03/10/2013 04:35 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 3/10/2013 1:22 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: I just found hostapd for Fedora, but it is not showing up in my Centos >> repos. http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/stat/2/simple/2 http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/stat/4/idpl/15160581/dir/

Re: [CentOS] frozen-bubble for el6-64??

2013/3/10 Fred Smith : > > anybody know of a frozen-bubble package for el6 x86_64? I've been reduced > to trying to build from source, and it ain't going very well. :( what is the error message? -- Eero ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://l

[CentOS] frozen-bubble for el6-64??

anybody know of a frozen-bubble package for el6 x86_64? I've been reduced to trying to build from source, and it ain't going very well. :( Thanks! -- Fred Smith -- fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us - I can do all things through Christ

Re: [CentOS] 802.11 Access Point software

On 3/10/2013 1:22 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >>> I just found hostapd for Fedora, but it is not showing up in my Centos >>> >>repos. >> >http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/stat/2/simple/2 >> >http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/stat/4/idpl/15160581/dir/redhat_el_6/com/hostapd-0.5.8-13.el6.x86_64.rpm.html

Re: [CentOS] 802.11 Access Point software

On 03/10/2013 03:15 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 10.03.2013 20:06, schrieb Robert Moskowitz: >> On 03/10/2013 03:01 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >>> Is there a way (software) to turn a Centos server into an AP? >>> >>> The server will have DHCP and RADVD, so no ARP proxying needed. This is >>> f

Re: [CentOS] 802.11 Access Point software

On 03/10/2013 03:01 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > Is there a way (software) to turn a Centos server into an AP? > > The server will have DHCP and RADVD, so no ARP proxying needed. This is > for a small lab setup. > > yumex is not helping me search for an answer. I just found hostapd for Fedora, b

[CentOS] 802.11 Access Point software

Is there a way (software) to turn a Centos server into an AP? The server will have DHCP and RADVD, so no ARP proxying needed. This is for a small lab setup. yumex is not helping me search for an answer. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http:

Re: [CentOS] lost connection during yum update

On 03/10/2013 01:04 PM, Frank Cox wrote: > On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 12:26:51 -0400 > Gerry Reno wrote: > >> The "yum update" that was running in your lost VNC session was in all >> likelihood still running. > If yum was indeed still running, it wasn't using any significant CPU. I did > run top in my lo

Re: [CentOS] lost connection during yum update

On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 12:26:51 -0400 Gerry Reno wrote: > The "yum update" that was running in your lost VNC session was in all > likelihood still running. If yum was indeed still running, it wasn't using any significant CPU. I did run top in my login terminal to see if anything significant was goi

[CentOS] Older versions of packages disappearing from yum repos

I've been designing the infrastructure for a new team using CentOS 6 and Puppet. I'm still learning Puppet, but thought I had things pretty well under control. After this week, I'm beginning to wonder… :-) In the last week I've had versions of three packages disappear from the yum repositorie

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.4 Release Date.

On Sun, 2013-03-10 at 10:24 -0400, Scott Robbins wrote: > > We don't release redhat-release in CentOS at all ... we have > > centos-release instead. > > I figured that, but I now have an /etc/redhat-release saying 6.4, as > does > /etc/centos-release. /etc/redhat-release is a link to /etc/ce

Re: [CentOS] lost connection during yum update

On 03/10/2013 12:12 PM, Frank Cox wrote: > On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 12:14:14 +0100 > Reindl Harald wrote: > >> use "screen" if you update over WAN connections >> yes, i know it is too late but thats the way to go > I was doing it through VNC, thinking that would be more-or-less equivalent to > screen, w

Re: [CentOS] lost connection during yum update

On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 12:14:14 +0100 Reindl Harald wrote: > use "screen" if you update over WAN connections > yes, i know it is too late but thats the way to go I was doing it through VNC, thinking that would be more-or-less equivalent to screen, which it apparently isn't. Somehow my vnc session (

Re: [CentOS] BIND Setup Issue

On 03/10/2013 10:19 AM, Peter Eckel wrote: > Hi Austin, > > since your A record is fine and can be resolved, the issue is obviously not > BIND related but lies somewhere in your network/firewall configuration. > > The last address that is visible in the tracereoute output from here is > >> 15 ip

Re: [CentOS] BIND Setup Issue

On 10.03.2013, at 16:14, Arek Czereszewski wrote: > Put this in a zone file: > netcloudjob.com. IN A 173.201.189.43 > > Just after a MX line Austin already did that, and it doesn't help. The name can already be resolved, and the address cannot be pinged either. I checked before I replied. _

Re: [CentOS] kickstart %pre vda/sda troubles

lets reply to myself then ;-) %pre #!/bin/bash if [ -b /dev/vda ] ; then echo "bootloader --location=mbr --timeout=0 --driveorder=vda --append="crashkernel=auto rhgb quiet"" > /tmp/diskinfo echo "clearpart --linux --drives=vda" >> /tmp/diskinfo echo "part /boot --fstype=ext4 --size=50

Re: [CentOS] BIND Setup Issue

Put this in a zone file: netcloudjob.com. IN A 173.201.189.43 Just after a MX line 10 mar 2013 14:51, "Austin Einter" napisał(a): > My registrar is Godad.com, looks they have registered nameservers > ns1.netcloudjobs.com and ns2.netcloudjobs.com > Now I am able to resolve to ns1.netcloudjobs.com

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.4 Release Date.

On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 08:20:43AM -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 03/09/2013 01:54 PM, Scott Robbins wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 09:41:12AM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > > On 03/08/2013 11:30 AM, Kaushal Shriyan wrote: > > > >>> I just checked the mirrors this morning an

Re: [CentOS] BIND Setup Issue

Hi Austin, since your A record is fine and can be resolved, the issue is obviously not BIND related but lies somewhere in your network/firewall configuration. The last address that is visible in the tracereoute output from here is > 15 ip-208-109-113-174.ip.secureserver.net (208.109.113.174)

Re: [CentOS] BIND Setup Issue

My registrar is Godad.com, looks they have registered nameservers ns1.netcloudjobs.com and ns2.netcloudjobs.com Now I am able to resolve to ns1.netcloudjobs.com I have only 1 IP address that x.x.x.43 , so I can not use x.x.x.44 >From my dedicated server, if I ping to www.netcloudjobs.com , it says

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.4 Release Date.

On 03/09/2013 01:54 PM, Scott Robbins wrote: > On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 09:41:12AM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: > >>> On 03/08/2013 04:49 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 03/08/2013 11:30 AM, Kaushal Shriyan wrote: >>> I just checked the mirrors this morning and nothing has shown up for 6.4

Re: [CentOS] BIND Setup Issue

On 03/10/2013 07:57 AM, Austin Einter wrote: > Dear All > I have a CentOS 6.3 machine. I am trying to setup DNS BIND setup in that > machine. It is having a static global IP. I have done lot of reading , > google search and tried all possible option, but still not able to resolve > the issue. > >

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5 sshd does not log IP address of reverse mapping failure [solved, I guess]

Am 10.03.2013 03:01, schrieb Les Mikesell: > On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Tilman Schmidt > wrote: >> >> Mar 3 04:44:48 gimli sshd[12870]: reverse mapping checking getaddrinfo >> for hn.ly.kd.adsl failed - POSSIBLE BREAK-IN ATTEMPT! >> Mar 3 04:44:49 gimli sshd[12871]: Received disconnect fro

Re: [CentOS] selinux + kvm virtualization + smartd problem

Dear Daniel, > BTW This will be fixed in the RHEL6.4 version of policy. is new policy already available in rhel6.4? On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 9:33 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 01/12/2013 07:35 AM, Ilyas -- wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I'm using HP h

Re: [CentOS] BIND Setup Issue

Dear All My resolv.conf looks as below search netcloudjobs.com nameserver 10.0.0.1 nameserver 8.8.8.8 nameserver 127.0.0.1 I do not have any error logs. I just did one modification in named.conf. *allow-query { localhost; 10.0.0.1/24; 10.0.0.254/24; }; * *Line I modified to * *allow-query

Re: [CentOS] lost connection during yum update

On 03/09/2013 09:36 PM, Frank Cox wrote: > During today's big Centos 6 update I lost my connection to a machine during > the > "yum update" and when I logged back in and ran yum update again it told me to > run yum-complete-transaction. When I ran yum-complete-transaction I got > screen after scr

Re: [CentOS] lost connection during yum update

For whatever it's worth - I yum update'd two VMs without any trouble whatsoever (from 6.3 to 6.4) and am in the process of updating a laptop... Not that it should matter but they are both guests running on a CentOS 5.9 Xen host. I'm in the process of updating a laptop - I'm hoping it works too.

Re: [CentOS] BIND Setup Issue

On Sun, 2013-03-10 at 17:27 +0530, Austin Einter wrote: > Dear All > I have a CentOS 6.3 machine. I am trying to setup DNS BIND setup in that > machine. It is having a static global IP. I have done lot of reading , > google search and tried all possible option, but still not able to resolve > the i

[CentOS] BIND Setup Issue

Dear All I have a CentOS 6.3 machine. I am trying to setup DNS BIND setup in that machine. It is having a static global IP. I have done lot of reading , google search and tried all possible option, but still not able to resolve the issue. My named.conf looks as below. * * * // named.conf // // Pr

Re: [CentOS] CentOs 6.4 and video drivers

On 10/03/13 01:24, Yves Bellefeuille wrote: > Akemi Yagi wrote: > >> Depend on how "new" your card is. :) > > HD 4800 series, RV770 > > > More details are in this ELRepo bug report: >> >> http://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=355 > > So I guess I should try enabling the testing repository. Thanks

Re: [CentOS] Wireless cannot ping gateway after 6.3 CR updates

On 03/06/2013 07:19 PM, b.j. mcclure wrote: > On Wed, 2013-03-06 at 13:06 -0500, b.j. mcclure wrote: > >> I'm having a wireless connection issue with an HP laptop and a Zotac >> media server after the 6.4 package updates from CR repository. Nothing >> changed with wireless config as far as I can t

Re: [CentOS] lost connection during yum update

On 03/10/2013 07:47 AM, Frank Cox wrote: > Well, this is interesting. I have three systems, all of which now have the > same problem. > > I was running "yum update" on these machines via a vnc connection (running a > vnc desktop on one of them, and logging into the others with a a > gnome-terminal

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.4 Release Date.

On 03/09/2013 04:41 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 03/09/2013 09:16 AM, Gerry Reno wrote: >> On 03/08/2013 04:49 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> On 03/08/2013 11:30 AM, Kaushal Shriyan wrote: Hi, Any date planned to release CentOS 6.4 as GA release? >>> The release will be today .. likel

Re: [CentOS] Apache setup problems

I am using http://www.dnsdynamic.org/ for the subdomain fwwebdev.dnsdynamic.com and I changed from http://freedns.afraid.org/ to dnsexit.com for the domain futurewavewebdevelopment.com since the servers at afraid.org seemed to have stopped forwarding the domain. So, it works, except for the php