On 2013-04-26, Joakim Ziegler wrote:
>
> Sorry, brain fart, I'm running CentOS 6.3, not Fedora. The weird thing
> is that this changed after a reboot. I haven't done any updates that
> seem relevant lately either.
>
> And yes, I know :0.0 shouldn't be depended on, but it seems weird that
> it'd
On 26/04/13 10:36, Keith Keller wrote:
> On 2013-04-26, Michael Hennebry wrote:
>> On Thu, 25 Apr 2013, Joakim Ziegler wrote:
>>
>>> I'm on Fedora 6.3. After a reboot, some proprietary software didn't want
>>> to run. I found out that the startup script for said software manually
>>> sets DISPLAY
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 12:52 PM, Dale Dellutri wrote:
> I've just test an ATI FirePro 2460 graphics card on CentOS 6.4. It
> connects 4 monitors.
> It worked with the standard radeon driver. I was able to arrange the
> monitors into my
> preferred configuration (as a square array, 1 upper left,
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Keith Keller
wrote:
>
>>> I'm on Fedora 6.3. After a reboot, some proprietary software didn't want
>>> to run. I found out that the startup script for said software manually
>>> sets DISPLAY to :0.0, which I know is not a good idea, and I can fix.
>>
>> I'd though
Keith Keller wrote:
>>
>>I'd thought that :0.0 was the norm.
>
> It is, but it's not a hard and fast rule. If you are running multiple
> local X consoles, for example, they can't all be :0.0. I've also seen
> different identifiers when one X session is hung and/or doesn't finish
> cleanly before
On 2013-04-26, Michael Hennebry wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Apr 2013, Joakim Ziegler wrote:
>
>> I'm on Fedora 6.3. After a reboot, some proprietary software didn't want
>> to run. I found out that the startup script for said software manually
>> sets DISPLAY to :0.0, which I know is not a good idea, and
On Thu, 25 Apr 2013, Joakim Ziegler wrote:
> I'm on Fedora 6.3. After a reboot, some proprietary software didn't want
> to run. I found out that the startup script for said software manually
> sets DISPLAY to :0.0, which I know is not a good idea, and I can fix.
I'd thought that :0.0 was the norm
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 12:58 AM, Michel Donais wrote:
>> On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 07:50:38 -0400
>> Michel Donais wrote:
>>
>>> > What do you have in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts?
>>
>>> ifcfg-eth0
>>> ifcfg-eth1
>>
>> What are the contents of these tegining;
>
> The content of these two files was t
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 08:33:31AM -0400, Scott Robbins wrote:
> Sorry, I accidentally deleted the lxde thread, (on mail where I just use
> POP3) so headers may be broken for some of you.
>
> Anyway, ScientificLinux forums have a post about building lxde. It is time
> consuming, but if you really
Sorry, I accidentally deleted the lxde thread, (on mail where I just use
POP3) so headers may be broken for some of you.
Anyway, ScientificLinux forums have a post about building lxde. It is time
consuming, but if you really want it
It's using Fedora 14 as the version and has links to necess
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
Also make sure installed all KDE stuff...
yum groupinstall -y base-x kde-desktop
Then, make sure in your /etc/sysconfig/desktop you have this:
DISPLAYMANAGER=KDE
That's all I am doing and KDE runs great for me on CentOS 5.x and/or 6.x
HTH,
Flossy
On Fri, 26 Apr 2013, Michel Donais wrote:
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 11:30 PM, Gary Hodder wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> anyone know when lxde will be available for centos?
>
Doubtful we'll see LXDE in the official repos. [1] See the note at the
previous link about Openbox packages.
LXDE is something that EPEL or other repos might package to suppl
13 matches
Mail list logo
