On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 11:27 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
> OK guys,
>
> Here is the test version of Chromium version 28 for CentOS-6 (the
> current beta release).
>
> http://people.centos.org/hughesjr/chromium/6/
>
>
Johnny,
Thanks for packaging Chromium for CentOS 6.
I'll second Scott's comment
On Thursday 13 June 2013, Bruce Ferrell wrote:
> I'm looking for a repository that will allow me to install KDE 4.10.
> Are there any? I seem to be asking google the wrong questions
Look in the RPMS.unstable directories here:
http://mirror.ircam.fr/pub/kde-redhat/kde/centos/6/
"Unstable" spe
I have the client working at the recent installed client node.
It took a --uninstall and a fresh reinstall with all --domain= --server= and
--realm= options as before.
My bad. I probably did a second ipa-clien-install without the proper
--unistall before.
- Original Message -
From
> check to see if the system can even see the non-local user exists via getent
> passwd
getent passwd --- returns nothing on the recent installed client node
(as expected - it is not working)
getent passwd --- Fron the ipareplica, it returns the information on
the user. (client is worki
On 6/13/2013 12:48 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> John R Pierce wrote:
>> >On 6/13/2013 12:26 PM,m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>> >>$ lspci -s 03:00 -n
>>> >>03:00.0 0104: 9005:0285 (rev 09)
>> >
>> >https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/scsi/aacraid.txt
>> >
>> >looks to be the Adaptec 2000 family,
>
> Understood, but have to tell you, login tests did NOT work from this
> recently installed client. It looks for local user, which does not exist.
>
>
Concerning - sounds like ipa-client-install didn't update nsswitch or
something ... check to see if the system can even see the non-local user
ex
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 2:37 PM, wrote:
>
>> I gave up and restored a backup onto a host without the EFI boot
>> partition and tweaked it to use the old-style grub invocation. The
>> machines seem to fail back to 'legacy' mode when there is no EFI/fat
>> partition to boot from. This gives a la
John R Pierce wrote:
> On 6/13/2013 12:26 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> $ lspci -s 03:00 -n
>> 03:00.0 0104: 9005:0285 (rev 09)
>
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/scsi/aacraid.txt
>
> looks to be the Adaptec 2000 family, like 2200S and variations. the AAC
> driver should be built into pr
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Tom Bishop wrote:
>> snip
>>
>>> $ lspci -s 03:00 -n
>>> 03:00.0 0104: 9005:0285 (rev 09)
>>> $ lspci -s 04:00 -n
>>> 04:00.0 0104: 9005:0285 (rev 09)
>>>
>>> Which is pretty much what I thought... but again, if I go to Adaptec's
>>> site, and try to search on AAC, it retu
On 6/13/2013 12:26 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> $ lspci -s 03:00 -n
> 03:00.0 0104: 9005:0285 (rev 09)
https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/scsi/aacraid.txt
looks to be the Adaptec 2000 family, like 2200S and variations. the AAC
driver should be built into pretty much every linux kernel sin
Tom Bishop wrote:
> snip
>
>> $ lspci -s 03:00 -n
>> 03:00.0 0104: 9005:0285 (rev 09)
>> $ lspci -s 04:00 -n
>> 04:00.0 0104: 9005:0285 (rev 09)
>>
>> Which is pretty much what I thought... but again, if I go to Adaptec's
>> site, and try to search on AAC, it returns zip.
>>
>>
>> Haven't read it t
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 1:43 AM, Alexandru Chiscan
> wrote:
>> On 06/13/2013 01:41 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>>> device (hd0) HD(1,800,64000,0557c1a7-7538-4ba1-b81e-74c4328b8b8d)
>> Just an ideea: check this line to see if
>> "0557c1a7-7538-4ba1-b81e-74c4328b8b8d" is not relate
> That's good - but bear in mind sssd will be set with that IPA server
> explicitly so no load balancing or failover with that set up
Understood, but have to tell you, login tests did NOT work from this recently
installed client. It looks for local user, which does not exist.
I have an IPA rep
snip
> $ lspci -s 03:00 -n
> 03:00.0 0104: 9005:0285 (rev 09)
> $ lspci -s 04:00 -n
> 04:00.0 0104: 9005:0285 (rev 09)
>
> Which is pretty much what I thought... but again, if I go to Adaptec's
> site, and try to search on AAC, it returns zip.
>
>mark
>
>
> Haven't read it throughly but wh
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 1:43 AM, Alexandru Chiscan
wrote:
> On 06/13/2013 01:41 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> device (hd0) HD(1,800,64000,0557c1a7-7538-4ba1-b81e-74c4328b8b8d)
> Just an ideea: check this line to see if
> "0557c1a7-7538-4ba1-b81e-74c4328b8b8d" is not related to the boot disk.
> you sa
John R Pierce wrote:
> On 6/13/2013 11:52 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>> >We've got this PC PitStop RAID box (they're so proud of it, there's no
>>> >logo), and what lspci tells me is an Adaptec AAC-RAID (ref 09)
>>> > controller. I see there's no F/OSS controllers for
> > If you specify an IPA server, domain and realm does it then work?
>
> For our info it did work and now we have our "Client configuration
> complete."
>
> IPA client is installed now, will test and see.
>
>
That's good - but bear in mind sssd will be set with that IPA server
explicitly so no lo
On 6/13/2013 11:52 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> >We've got this PC PitStop RAID box (they're so proud of it, there's no
>> >logo), and what lspci tells me is an Adaptec AAC-RAID (ref 09) controller.
>> >I see there's no F/OSS controllers for it, but when I go to Adaptec
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> We've got this PC PitStop RAID box (they're so proud of it, there's no
> logo), and what lspci tells me is an Adaptec AAC-RAID (ref 09) controller.
> I see there's no F/OSS controllers for it, but when I go to Adaptec's
> site, the search denies all knowledge of such a con
> If you specify an IPA server, domain and realm does it then work?
For our info it did work and now we have our "Client configuration complete."
IPA client is installed now, will test and see.
- Original Message -
From: "Marcelo Carvalho"
To: "CentOS mailing list"
Sent: Thursday, J
I'm looking for a repository that will allow me to install KDE 4.10. Are there
any? I seem to be asking google the wrong questions
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Yes, thanks.
I will go over all my server install notes and logs and check over all your
leads.
- Original Message -
From: "James Hogarth"
To: "CentOS mailing list"
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2013 9:32:18 AM
Subject: Re: [CentOS] IPA Client Install
> Do you mean the server installati
> Do you mean the server installation may causing the problem on the client
> installation in a different machine?
>
> The error message I mentioned was on a client ipa installation on a
> different box from the server.
>
Have you successfully registered any systems against your IPA topology yet?
From: "Gordon Messmer"
> It's possible that yours is also incomplete.
Do you mean the server installation may causing the problem on the client
installation in a different machine?
The error message I mentioned was on a client ipa installation on a different
box from the server.
- Orig
CentOS 6.4, current, Dell PE R720.
Had an issue today with a bus error, and googling only found two year old
references to problems with non-Dell drives (we just added two WD Reds,
and mdadm raided them).
So, looking through dmesg and /var/log/messages, I ran into a *lot* of
G
gran_size: 128K
I have two SSD laptops. On one of them, I easily installed CentOS.
On the second one, it failed at examining storage--it would either freeze
completely or crash with a kernel panic message.
On the second one, a generic Clevo, I decided to reinstall, and got the
same issue--hanging or kernel pa
On 13 June 2013 14:20, Vishesh kumar wrote:
> You can also use audit2allow, audit2allow will write allow rule for you.
>
>
Not a good option in this case considering there's reasonable likelihood of
messed up labelling...
While the tool audit2allow will create a module that will allow the
activi
You can also use audit2allow, audit2allow will write allow rule for you.
Thanks
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 5:47 PM, James Hogarth wrote:
> >
> > Can someone confirm or deny that making the Logical Volume inactive and
> > then repeating the chcon should change the link to the correct context?
>
> F
>
> Can someone confirm or deny that making the Logical Volume inactive and
> then repeating the chcon should change the link to the correct context?
First off don't use chcon.
What's the output of restorecon -Fvv /path-to-file ?
It seems very odd in the first place for anything in /dev to have
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
Hi
A few days ago we rebooted a server and found that one of the Logical
Volumes would not mount at boot, but mounted cleanly manually.
So I traced the problem to SE Linux. Specifically the context for
/dev/mapper/VolGroup01-lv_
staff is wrong.
s -lsahZ /dev/mapper/VolGroup01-*
lrwxrwxrwx. root
> I am wondering why this import is not happening automatically at install
> time. There must be good reasons for that?
>
>
Anaconda doesn't actually carry out gpg checks... I think it had that added
during the fedora 18/19 rewrite so EL7 might cover that but certain EL5 and
EL6 won't have that ...
Hi, I read
http://www.stigviewer.com/check/RHEL-06-08
The CentOS keys live in /etc/pki/rpm-gpg and when I run yum the first time I am
asked if I want to accept the key. Alternatively I could import them manually
with something like 'rpm --import /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/$key, maybe in the %post of
On 06/12/2013 04:31 PM, Marcelo Carvalho wrote:
> Is it possible to be a CentOS 6.4 problem or it is me that have to go
> back to the drawing board (missing any package, etc..) and see if I
> made any mistake?
The first time that I set up a FreeIPA server, the process errored out
and I did not no
34 matches
Mail list logo
