On 5/18/2014 8:51 AM, Chris Weisiger wrote:
> I'm posting from my phone so I can't bottom post
then shut up til you can get on a proper computer that actually knows
how to email.
noone cares that you're crippling yourself by using a telephone
--
john r pierce
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 1:25 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> SME server used to be pretty good at that sort of thing (small
> business server). You could just add users and put them in groups
> with the web interface and set up file shares by group. The ClearOS
> version might be more up to date, thou
On 04/23/2014 12:43 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
> I'm not sure win7/8 professional are happy about joining a NT4 Domain,
> at least not without a bunch of tinkering with security policies.
A registry patch is required, but it's working.
--
Gruß,
Christian
__
On 05/16/2014 04:58 PM, Fred Smith wrote:
> I know there's rsync, which may be a good solution.
Another solution could be rsync with zfs or btrfs.
--
Gruß,
Christian
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/cen
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Steve Thompson wrote:
> On Sun, 18 May 2014, Andrew Holway wrote:
>
> MooseFS and GlusterFS have both been evaluated, and were too slow. In the
> case of GlusterFS, wy too slow.
>
Do you really need filesystem semantics or would ceph's object store work?
--
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 01:30:24PM -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> > An idea is to build it in a directory, as much independent as it is
> > possible from the installed libraries on the centos installation. Is
> > there an automated build system for such an endeavour?
> Run Fedora as a VM?
Or, ru
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 06:10:57PM +0200, Gergely Buday wrote:
> However, sometimes I would like to use fresh software that is not
> available as a package. Compiling from source is indeed an option but
> because centos uses oldish sources not only the sought package should
> be built but a lot of
On 05/15/2014 12:54 PM, Alessandro Baggi wrote:
> Hi list,
> I'm planning to setup a two-node "cluster" with file replication and samba.
A caution--a two-node replicated cluster is a poor choice. If something
gets into a split-brain condition (easier to happen than it should be)
there are only
On 05/18/2014 11:47 AM, Steve Thompson wrote:
> MooseFS and GlusterFS have both been evaluated, and were too slow. In the
> case of GlusterFS, wy too slow.
How recently have you looked at Gluster? It has seen some significant
progress, though small files are still its weakest area. I believ
On 18/05/14 05:21 PM, Stephen Harris wrote:
> On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 02:00:32PM -0700, ngeorgop wrote:
>> Please tell me your opinion.
>> How legal is to use, redistribute, include in installation cds, repos etc,
>
> This is not a legal mailing list. Any opinion represented is not worth
> the ele
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 02:00:32PM -0700, ngeorgop wrote:
> Please tell me your opinion.
> How legal is to use, redistribute, include in installation cds, repos etc,
This is not a legal mailing list. Any opinion represented is not worth
the electrons used to transmit it.
If you are concerned abo
Please tell me your opinion.
How legal is to use, redistribute, include in installation cds, repos etc,
rpms/srpms like this:
http://pull-mirror.yandex.net/fedora/russianfedora/russianfedora/nonfree/fedora/updates/19/SRPMS/chromium-pepper-flash-13.0.0.206-1.fc19.R.src.rpm
--
View this message in
Am 18.05.2014 um 17:51 schrieb Chris Weisiger :
> I'm posting from my phone so I can't bottom post,
I can say that the usability of the mail application for such a goal
doesn't support it in the way to accomplishing it in an efficient manner,
but you can do it - it is not a nature law that is pr
On 05/18/2014 12:10 PM, Gergely Buday wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I use centos as it is stable and provides all the software that is
> needed for everyday use.
>
> However, sometimes I would like to use fresh software that is not
> available as a package. Compiling from source is indeed an option but
> becau
Hi,
I use centos as it is stable and provides all the software that is
needed for everyday use.
However, sometimes I would like to use fresh software that is not
available as a package. Compiling from source is indeed an option but
because centos uses oldish sources not only the sought package sh
I'm posting from my phone so I can't bottom post, but I believe this thread has
gone on way to long. Lets drop it and get back to what this mailing list is all
about. I would rather read posts about the same technical things over and over
again that have been asked hundreds of times. But when qu
On Sun, 18 May 2014, Andrew Holway wrote:
> Have you looked at parallel filesystems such as Lustre and fhgfs?
I have not looked at Lustre, as I have heard many negative things about it
(including Oracle ownership). The only business using Lustre where I know
the admins has had a lot of trouble
17 matches
Mail list logo
