Re: [CentOS] clamav

2014-06-02 Thread Emmett Culley
On 05/30/2014 04:41 PM, S.Tindall wrote: > On Fri, 2014-05-30 at 14:14 -0700, Emmett Culley wrote: >> On 05/30/2014 10:46 AM, John R Pierce wrote: >>> On 5/30/2014 8:27 AM, Emmett Culley wrote: So I removed it all again and reinstalled from RPMforge. Now it all works as expected. I nev

Re: [CentOS] clamav

2014-06-02 Thread Emmett Culley
On 05/30/2014 02:59 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Emmett Culley > wrote: >> So I removed it all again and reinstalled from RPMforge. Now it all works as expected. I never should have switch from RPMforge to EPEL for these programs. >>> >>> >>> actual

Re: [CentOS] Centos box and Cisco 3750 VLAN's

2014-06-02 Thread Les Mikesell
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Boris Epstein wrote: > Hello everyone, > > Thanks for thoughtful and thorough advice. No luck so far, though. > > I have two VLAN's now - 0003 and 0004, named "vlan3" and "vlan4" > respectively - and still for some reason the CentOS fails to recognize them > as one

Re: [CentOS] Centos box and Cisco 3750 VLAN's

2014-06-02 Thread Boris Epstein
Hello everyone, Thanks for thoughtful and thorough advice. No luck so far, though. I have two VLAN's now - 0003 and 0004, named "vlan3" and "vlan4" respectively - and still for some reason the CentOS fails to recognize them as one would expect. So I am puzzled as to what is still missing from the

Re: [CentOS] nodejs, epel, SCL

2014-06-02 Thread Jim Perrin
Top posting: Seems someone's already filed this as a bug. You can keep an eye on the progress via -> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1042879 Similar bug impacting SSSD -> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089090 On 05/30/2014 10:18 AM, Eugene Vilensky wrote: > Hello, > >

Re: [CentOS] nodejs, epel, SCL

2014-06-02 Thread Jim Perrin
On 06/02/2014 10:06 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: > There's really a bigger issue of how EPEL is supposed to fit in the > world of 'other' repositories. What should happen when > centosplus/extras has a same-named package? Other 3rd parties? > https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/pdf/FallaciesPoster

Re: [CentOS] nodejs, epel, SCL

2014-06-02 Thread Les Mikesell
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > >>> I consider this a bug, as the SCL's should be self-contained. We'd need >>> to see if this occurs upstream as well, and then file a bug there if so. >>> >> There's really a bigger issue of how EPEL is supposed to fit in the >> world

Re: [CentOS] nodejs, epel, SCL

2014-06-02 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 06/02/2014 10:06 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 8:53 AM, Jim Perrin wrote: >>> That seems pretty dangerous if the packages replace standard or EPEL >>> libraries/components. I'd have expected them to have some sort of >>> namespace concept for dependencies to keep the sets o

Re: [CentOS] nodejs, epel, SCL

2014-06-02 Thread Les Mikesell
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 8:53 AM, Jim Perrin wrote: > >> >> That seems pretty dangerous if the packages replace standard or EPEL >> libraries/components. I'd have expected them to have some sort of >> namespace concept for dependencies to keep the sets of packages >> completely independent. That

Re: [CentOS] nodejs, epel, SCL

2014-06-02 Thread Jim Perrin
On 06/02/2014 07:47 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 6:55 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 05/30/2014 01:58 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: >> >>> Is yum supposed to track the dependencies separately? That is, if an >>> EPEL package requires some other package (expected with the stock >>

Re: [CentOS] nodejs, epel, SCL

2014-06-02 Thread Les Mikesell
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 6:55 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 05/30/2014 01:58 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > >> Is yum supposed to track the dependencies separately? That is, if an >> EPEL package requires some other package (expected with the stock >> paths), can an SCL package fulfill that dependency

Re: [CentOS] nodejs, epel, SCL

2014-06-02 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 05/30/2014 12:50 PM, Eugene Vilensky wrote: > On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Jim Perrin wrote: > >> EPEL is self-reliant. Nothing in EPEL will depend on another other than >> Base/Updates. You need to check which repo you're installing the package >> from, and be careful with the package nam

Re: [CentOS] nodejs, epel, SCL

2014-06-02 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 05/30/2014 01:58 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Jim Perrin wrote: >>> With SCL and epel repositories enabled, some dependencies for the package >>> name 'nodejs' get satisfied with libs from SCL which are placed in paths >>> that are not part of my user's environmen

Re: [CentOS] nodejs, epel, SCL

2014-06-02 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 05/30/2014 12:50 PM, Eugene Vilensky wrote: > On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Jim Perrin wrote: > >> EPEL is self-reliant. Nothing in EPEL will depend on another other than >> Base/Updates. You need to check which repo you're installing the package >> from, and be careful with the package nam

[CentOS] numa support question on centos 6.5

2014-06-02 Thread Jarod. w
Hi, All The vm can't start when using numa based on centos 6.5(kernel: kernel-2.6.32-431.17.1.el6.x86_64, qemu-kvm: qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2-2.415.el6_5.8.x86_64). My numa setting in vm xml is the following: When 'nodeset' sets '0', the vm can sta

Re: [CentOS] traffic distribution not happening in centos 6.5

2014-06-02 Thread Varun Sharma
Hi, No, source IP address differ in packets.Even I change source port also in packets. Regards Varun On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 11:54 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > Em 25-05-2014 07:35, Varun Sharma escreveu: >> Hi, >> >> I am experimenting with libnetfilter_queue. libnetfilter_queue is a >>