Re: [CentOS] Chromium browser for C6

2015-01-22 Thread Sorin Srbu
> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Karanbir Singh > Sent: den 22 januari 2015 18:20 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Chromium browser for C6 > its been withdrawn upstream. > > given the level of interest

Re: [CentOS] Orwell's 1984 from Freedesktop,org?

2015-01-22 Thread Frank Cox
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 09:30:03PM -0600, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > Just out of curiosity: how do you guys look at it? This asks me for > password... In general it is good idea to place something into open URL I think that's what he wanted you to look at. It's a screenshot of a window asking you to

Re: [CentOS] Orwell's 1984 from Freedesktop,org?

2015-01-22 Thread Valeri Galtsev
On Thu, January 22, 2015 9:05 pm, Always Learning wrote: > > On Thu, 2015-01-22 at 21:19 -0500, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote: > >> I object to this sort of crap. Hidden, no reason for an *IX desktop to >> be forced to ignore or deal with this crap. >> >> Anybody else seeing it? >> >> In case attachment

Re: [CentOS] Orwell's 1984 from Freedesktop,org?

2015-01-22 Thread Always Learning
On Fri, 2015-01-23 at 16:18 +1300, Rob Kampen wrote: > > On Thu, 2015-01-22 at 21:19 -0500, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote: > > > >> I object to this sort of crap. Hidden, no reason for an *IX desktop to > >> be forced to ignore or deal with this crap. > >> > >> Anybody else seeing it? > >> > >> In case

Re: [CentOS] Orwell's 1984 from Freedesktop,org?

2015-01-22 Thread Rob Kampen
On 01/23/2015 04:05 PM, Always Learning wrote: On Thu, 2015-01-22 at 21:19 -0500, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote: I object to this sort of crap. Hidden, no reason for an *IX desktop to be forced to ignore or deal with this crap. Anybody else seeing it? In case attachments aren't allowed in the list,

Re: [CentOS] Orwell's 1984 from Freedesktop,org?

2015-01-22 Thread Always Learning
On Thu, 2015-01-22 at 21:19 -0500, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote: > I object to this sort of crap. Hidden, no reason for an *IX desktop to > be forced to ignore or deal with this crap. > > Anybody else seeing it? > > In case attachments aren't allowed in the list, here's the Dropbox url > for the ima

[CentOS] Orwell's 1984 from Freedesktop,org?

2015-01-22 Thread Bill Maltby (C4B)
I object to this sort of crap. Hidden, no reason for an *IX desktop to be forced to ignore or deal with this crap. Anybody else seeing it? In case attachments aren't allowed in the list, here's the Dropbox url for the image. https://www.dropbox.com/s/b2p2ki7t2rwi5ot/FreeDeskTop_Org_Orwell_1984.p

Re: [CentOS] Mystery file /etc/dbus-1/system.d/dnsmasq.conf

2015-01-22 Thread Jonathan Billings
On Jan 22, 2015, at 6:14 PM, Robert Nichols wrote: > That "thekelleys.org.uk" URL appears in a commented example in > /etc/dnsmasq.conf, but what the heck is it doing here? That file _is_ > part of the RPM. uk.org.thekelleys.dnsmasq is the DBus object path for dnsmasq. The author of dnsmasq's h

[CentOS] Reason for removing php-mcrypt from CentOS 6/7

2015-01-22 Thread Somers-Harris, David | David | OPS
Does anybody know why php-mcrypt was removed from the extras repo when CentOS 6 came out? I've been going through the archives and I saw plenty of people complain about it but no explanation for the reason. I know it's available in EPEL but I want to avoid third party repos if at all possible.

[CentOS] Mystery file /etc/dbus-1/system.d/dnsmasq.conf

2015-01-22 Thread Robert Nichols
in CentOS 6.6, dnsmasq-2.48-14.el6 installs file /etc/dbus-1/system.d/dnsmasq.conf with content: = cut == http://www.freedesktop.org/standards/dbus/1.0/busconfig.dtd";>

Re: [CentOS] SELinux permissions for apache

2015-01-22 Thread Tim Dunphy
> > Exactly, SELinux is great. Its a good room to have when you can get it > working and it's another good layer of protection. Its better to learn to > use the tool then just turn it off. > Not every label has a rw option but it never hurts to try. :-) yeah man thanks. I really think it was laz

Re: [CentOS] SELinux permissions for apache

2015-01-22 Thread Jeremy Hoel
Exactly, SELinux is great. Its a good room to have when you can get it working and it's another good layer of protection. Its better to learn to use the tool then just turn it off. Not every label has a rw option but it never hurts to try. :-) On Jan 22, 2015 1:18 PM, "Tim Dunphy" wrote: > > > >

Re: [CentOS] SELinux permissions for apache

2015-01-22 Thread Tim Dunphy
> > The easiest answer is to edit the Selinux config file. By default it is > set to enforce, which really locks it down. > cd /etc/selinux > edit the config file and change SELUNIX=enforcing to SELUNIX=permissive > Save the file and restart httpd, you should be fine.. Yeah dude, exactly. Except

Re: [CentOS] SELinux permissions for apache

2015-01-22 Thread John Plemons
The easiest answer is to edit the Selinux config file. By default it is set to enforce, which really locks it down. cd /etc/selinux edit the config file and change SELUNIX=enforcing to SELUNIX=permissive Save the file and restart httpd, you should be fine.. john plemons On 1/22/2015 1:36 P

Re: [CentOS] SELinux permissions for apache

2015-01-22 Thread Tim Dunphy
Hey Jeremy, > Have you tried changing the folder where it's writing into with these > lables? httpd_sys_content_rw_t or httpd_user_content_rw_t Adding 'rw' to the command did the trick. I tried httpd_sys_content_rw_t and that works fine! Thanks for the tip! Tim On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 1:1

Re: [CentOS] SELinux permissions for apache

2015-01-22 Thread Jeremy Hoel
Have you tried changing the folder where it's writing into with these lables? httpd_sys_content_rw_t or httpd_user_content_rw_t On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 11:09 AM, Tim Dunphy wrote: > Hey all, > > I have a simple php app working that writes some info to a text file. The > app will only work cor

[CentOS] SELinux permissions for apache

2015-01-22 Thread Tim Dunphy
Hey all, I have a simple php app working that writes some info to a text file. The app will only work correctly if SELinux is disabled. If it's enabled and try to use the app, it fails. It seems that SELinux is denying the app ability to write to the text file. So I tried running the following c

Re: [CentOS] CentOS - Firefox and Flash

2015-01-22 Thread Frank Cox
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 09:36:24AM -0500, James B. Byrne wrote: > If one has already done all that and, following the most recent FF > update, all that is displayed is a video window with the Flash > logo/Button in the middle. And regardless of how many times one > clicks on said button no video w

Re: [CentOS] Chromium browser for C6

2015-01-22 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 21/01/15 21:12, Connie Sieh wrote: > On Mon, 19 Jan 2015, Johnny Hughes wrote: > >> On 01/19/2015 06:49 PM, Fred Smith wrote: >>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 05:55:44PM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 01/19/2015 04:10 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote: > On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Johnny H

Re: [CentOS] ** Newbie - HELP **

2015-01-22 Thread Andrew Holway
Hi Darren, Any reason you cant use virtualisation and / or thin client kind of action? If for instance you have a linux hypervisor installed on each machine you could kick up a virtual machine with the required environment. dirty up the image and then replace the image with a clean centos / windo

Re: [CentOS] CentOS - Firefox and Flash

2015-01-22 Thread James B. Byrne
On Wed, January 21, 2015 14:27, Fred Smith wrote: > On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 01:37:43PM -0500, James B. Byrne wrote: >> So, how does one enable flash video and audio in Firefox-31.4.0esr? > > One installs the flash plugin from Adobe and configures firefox to > either run it automatically when neede

Re: [CentOS] ** Newbie - HELP **

2015-01-22 Thread Darren Williams
Thanks for the reply. The idea of using a VHD(X) was to enable use to use disk imaging tools such as ghost, wds etc to deploy images of this type of system to over 500 machines. We have not found an imaging solutions that can image and deploy via multicast a system set up in the standard way y

[CentOS] IP forwarding

2015-01-22 Thread Timothy Murphy
Recently, someone or something has been turning off IP forwarding on my CentOS server: -- [tim@william NumberTheory]$ sudo sysctl net.ipv4.ip_forward net.ipv4.ip_forward = 0 [tim@william NumberTheory]$ sudo sysctl -w net.ipv4.ip_forward=1 net.ipv4.ip_forward = 1 [tim@william

[CentOS] building RPMs with SELinux

2015-01-22 Thread Andrew Holway
Hello, Im trying to find some good info on building RPMs that set the correct SELinux contexts for the installed packages. Any ideas? Thanks, Andrew ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos