Re: [CentOS] Intel Displayport on Centos 7

2015-01-31 Thread Valeri Galtsev
On Sat, January 31, 2015 1:19 pm, John R Pierce wrote: > On 1/31/2015 10:34 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> I see that single link DVI supports up to WQUXGA (3,840 × 2,400) @ 17 Hz >> (164 MHz) whereas dual link DVI supports up to WQUXGA (3,840 × 2,400) @ >> 33 >> Hz with GTF blanking (2 × 159 MHz) >

[CentOS] Installation of qtiplot in Centos 7

2015-01-31 Thread MOHD HOMAIDUR RAHMAN
Dear all I am trying to install qtiplot in Centos 7 (qtiplot is a graph plotting software similar to Origin). I followed the same step as this mention on this. http://poolinfo.physik.hu-berlin.de/qtiplot-installer/README.html At step 8, I experience the following error. cd fitPlugins && make -f

Re: [CentOS] Intel Displayport on Centos 7

2015-01-31 Thread John R Pierce
On 1/31/2015 10:34 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: I see that single link DVI supports up to WQUXGA (3,840 × 2,400) @ 17 Hz (164 MHz) whereas dual link DVI supports up to WQUXGA (3,840 × 2,400) @ 33 Hz with GTF blanking (2 × 159 MHz) those numbers seem wrong to me. nothing I've ever seen uses 17hz

Re: [CentOS] Intel Displayport on Centos 7

2015-01-31 Thread Frank Cox
On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 12:34:32 -0600 (CST) Valeri Galtsev wrote: > I see that single link DVI supports up to WQUXGA (3,840 × 2,400) @ 17 Hz > (164 MHz) whereas dual link DVI supports up to WQUXGA (3,840 × 2,400) @ 33 > Hz with GTF blanking (2 × 159 MHz) The manual for my motherboard states: "The D

Re: [CentOS] Intel Displayport on Centos 7

2015-01-31 Thread Lamar Owen
On 01/31/2015 01:22 PM, Frank Cox wrote: On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 12:21:07 -0500 Lamar Owen wrote: I like the full-size DisplayPort connector the best of any video connector I've dealt with, Thanks! You're quite welcome. ... If this monitor actually does die, I'm thinking that I'll replace it wi

[CentOS] Squid3 on CentOS 6.6: IPv6 PTR endianess

2015-01-31 Thread Max Grobecker
Hello, I'm running a Squid cache (Version 3.1.10) on CentOS 6.6 as a forward proxy which is reachable over a global IPv6 address. For whatever reason, Squid tries to perform PTR lookups on the client's IPv6 address. The weird thing is, that Squid seems to struggle with the "endianess" of the I

Re: [CentOS] Intel Displayport on Centos 7

2015-01-31 Thread Valeri Galtsev
On Sat, January 31, 2015 12:22 pm, Frank Cox wrote: > On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 12:21:07 -0500 > Lamar Owen wrote: > >> I like the full-size DisplayPort connector the best of any video >> connector I've dealt with, > > Thanks! > > I'm waiting to see if my current monitor actually dies. It's an Asus > 1

Re: [CentOS] Intel Displayport on Centos 7

2015-01-31 Thread Frank Cox
On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 12:21:07 -0500 Lamar Owen wrote: > I like the full-size DisplayPort connector the best of any video > connector I've dealt with, Thanks! I'm waiting to see if my current monitor actually dies. It's an Asus 1920x1200 monitor that I like rather a lot, but it occasionally act

Re: [CentOS] Intel Displayport on Centos 7

2015-01-31 Thread Lamar Owen
On 01/28/2015 03:30 PM, Frank Cox wrote: ... Having never used DisplayPort before, I'm wondering if this means that if I purchase the BenQ monitor above, or something similar, I can then reasonably expect to plug it in and have it just-work with my Centos 7 setup. I like the full-size DisplayP

Re: [CentOS] Another Fedora decision

2015-01-31 Thread Valeri Galtsev
On Sat, January 31, 2015 4:19 am, johan.vermeul...@telenet.be wrote: > > > - Oorspronkelijk bericht - > Van: "PatrickD Garvey" > Aan: "CentOS mailing list" > Verzonden: Zaterdag 31 januari 2015 02:21:28 > Onderwerp: Re: [CentOS] Another Fedora decision > > On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 4:09 PM

Re: [CentOS] Another Fedora decision

2015-01-31 Thread James B. Byrne
On Sat, January 31, 2015 05:14, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 01/30/2015 06:09 PM, Scott Robbins wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 11:27:55PM +, Marko Vojinovic wrote: >>> On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 14:15:05 -0800 >>> Akemi Yagi wrote: On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Scott Robbins wrote

Re: [CentOS] Another Fedora decision

2015-01-31 Thread Valeri Galtsev
On Sat, January 31, 2015 4:14 am, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 01/30/2015 06:09 PM, Scott Robbins wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 11:27:55PM +, Marko Vojinovic wrote: >>> On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 14:15:05 -0800 >>> Akemi Yagi wrote: On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Scott Robbins wrote: >

Re: [CentOS] Another Fedora decision

2015-01-31 Thread Peter Eckel
Hi Johan, > His point in short: passwords are not all that important any more. > All virus spreading and hacking these days is done by sending malicous mails > and by visiting malicious sites. If your brother in law doesn't see that the virus argument doesn't apply to the question of whether or

Re: [CentOS] Another Fedora decision

2015-01-31 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 01/30/2015 06:09 PM, Scott Robbins wrote: > On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 11:27:55PM +, Marko Vojinovic wrote: >> On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 14:15:05 -0800 >> Akemi Yagi wrote: >>> On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Scott Robbins >>> wrote: > > Centos 7 does that as well. Heh, I guess I've u

Re: [CentOS] Another Fedora decision

2015-01-31 Thread johan . vermeulen7
- Oorspronkelijk bericht - Van: "PatrickD Garvey" Aan: "CentOS mailing list" Verzonden: Zaterdag 31 januari 2015 02:21:28 Onderwerp: Re: [CentOS] Another Fedora decision On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Scott Robbins wrote: > > There is some complaining going on on the Fedora testing

Re: [CentOS] build c7 packages for i686 using mock

2015-01-31 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 01/30/2015 12:41 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 01/30/2015 02:19 AM, Robin Lee wrote: >> Do note the 32bit packages are unofficial and unsupported. RedHat does >> not >> support 32bit in EL7. > > Right, but the CentOS project itself produces multi-arch libraries, so I > guess what I'm really as