On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 11:03:50PM -0500, Mark LaPierre wrote:
> Hey Y'all,
>
> I have the Stanford University Folding At Home project running on three
> of my machines. I had them all set up so that I could control them all
> from my main machine, 192.168.15.101, but some time ago something
> ch
Hey Y'all,
I have the Stanford University Folding At Home project running on three
of my machines. I had them all set up so that I could control them all
from my main machine, 192.168.15.101, but some time ago something
changed so that I can no longer connect to the FAH clients on the other
two m
On 12/28/15 22:38, Always Learning wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2015-12-28 at 19:23 -0500, Mark LaPierre wrote:
>
>> The place to complain about this is the Fedora list since what CentOS
>> has comes from them by way of RHEL. They, Fedora, are not apt to pay
>> you any mind because they have already aband
I just updated my fileserver to version 7.2 and got some NFS problems
after that. In /etc/exports I have the following line
/path hostname(ro,insecure)
Now that host can no longer mount that share. I get
mount.nfs: access denied by server while mounting x
Also when I do restart of the NFS server
On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 10:47 AM, James Hogarth
wrote:
>
> > > Can you pastebin the init script by any chance? I wonder if it's
> > actually a
> > > properly written init script or if it's bad enough that the generator
> > > fails to parse it ...
> >
> >
> > Yes - here is a pastebin with that sc
On my Centos6 mailserver (really Redsleeve6), I installed clamav and
clamd (and lots more).
I am working up to moving to Centos7 (really Centos7-arm), and no
clamd. clamav is there.
So is the clamd functions moved into clamav now or what do I do to get
whatever clamd did for me? :)
thank
Hello,
i follow your discussion. The first 2 posts using multiple default
routes solve my problem perfect.
Thank you all.
J
Am 2015-12-30 17:21, schrieb Eliezer Croitoru:
On 30/12/2015 10:22, Paul R. Ganci wrote:
On 12/30/2015 12:44 AM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
"I want that the request o
On 30/12/2015 10:22, Paul R. Ganci wrote:
On 12/30/2015 12:44 AM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
"I want that the request of incoming traffic dont use the default
gateway. Incoming traffic sould be answered using the gateway of the
incoming device "
I'm sorry but I have been following this thread fo
On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 8:50 AM, Nicholas Geovanis
wrote:
> I see that I couldn't previously find it with systemctl because it is a
> "static" service, neither enabled nor disabled. What is "static" really
> intended to mean here? The other static services seem to be boot-time
> related for the mo
>The service you are referring to is hostnamed [1]. hostnamed is
>designed to start on request and terminate after an idle period.
>Programs on your computer are probably querying the service to
>determine if your hostname has changed.
I see that I couldn't previously find it with systemctl becaus
On 30 December 2015 at 15:25, Mike - st257 wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 10:06 AM, James Hogarth
> wrote:
>
> >
> > > > Best way to see this is using systemctl (status|cat|show)
>
> > > ...
> > > >
> > > > I expect if you do this for your failing service you'll get a better
> > > > understan
On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 10:06 AM, James Hogarth
wrote:
>
> > > Best way to see this is using systemctl (status|cat|show)
> > ...
> > >
> > > I expect if you do this for your failing service you'll get a better
> > > understanding of what's going on.
> >
> >
> > ~]# systemctl status lsi_mrdsnmp.s
On 30 December 2015 at 14:23, Mike - st257 wrote:
> Consolidating my reply to both James and Gordon in one message.
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 2:38 AM, James Hogarth
> wrote:
>
> > On 30 Dec 2015 00:55, "Mike - st257" wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Joseph L. Casale <
> >
Hello,
I've noticed a strange delay while booting a CentOS 7 guest on a CentOS
7 host with slow disks (7200RPM) with write cache off.
The guest and host are freshly installed Centos 7 (host was fully
patched before guest install). Guest is installed on an lvm pool
residing on an md raid1 wit
Consolidating my reply to both James and Gordon in one message.
On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 2:38 AM, James Hogarth
wrote:
> On 30 Dec 2015 00:55, "Mike - st257" wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Joseph L. Casale <
> jcas...@activenetwerx.com
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > Instead of converti
On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 7:52 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> I have a remote home server updated to CentOS-7.2.1511
> (as stated in /etc/redhat-release)
> but I have not re-booted since the update.
> The machine is currently running kernel 3.10.0-229.11.1.el7.x86_64.
>
> I'm wondering if anyone has a
I have a remote home server updated to CentOS-7.2.1511
(as stated in /etc/redhat-release)
but I have not re-booted since the update.
The machine is currently running kernel 3.10.0-229.11.1.el7.x86_64.
I'm wondering if anyone has advice on any safety steps I can take
before re-booting, so that in t
On 12/30/2015 12:44 AM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
"I want that the request of incoming traffic dont use the default
gateway. Incoming traffic sould be answered using the gateway of the
incoming device "
I'm sorry but I have been following this thread for a while and
everything that Gordon (a
I'm struggling to understand what you meant when you said that the
destination is the gateway. If you just mean that the traffic is
NATed, then again, I was not assuming that in any of my explanations.
I said that, assuming the host with 2 public ips mentioned in the OP
could be the gateway fo
19 matches
Mail list logo
