When we consolidated all CentOS Distro builders in a new centralized
setup, covering all arches (so basically x86_64, i386, ppc64le, ppc64,
aarch64 and armhfp those days), we wanted also to add redundancy where
it was possible to.
The interesting "SecureBoot" corner case came on the table and we h
> Since the update from kernel-2.6.32-754.2.1.el6.x86_64
> to kernel-2.6.32-754.3.5.el6.x86_64 I can not boot my
> KVM guests anymore!? The workstation panics immediately!
>
> I would not have expected this behavior now (last phase of OS).
> It was very robust until now (Optiplex Workstation). I se
TUTORIAL: How to Install Apache Web Server in CentOS 7.5 (1805) Linux in Amazon
AWS Cloud with URL/HTTP/HTTPS Redirection
AUTHOR OF THIS TUTORIAL: MR. TURRITOPSIS DOHRNII TEO EN MING (ZHANG ENMING) @
TIME TRAVELLER
AGE: 40 YEARS OLD
COUNTRY OF RESIDENCE: SINGAPORE
DATE: 30TH AUGUST 2018 THURSDAY
Added back the IPV6 to /etc/hosts a couple days ago for grins and giggles.
No longer getting IPV6 errors in logwatch for bind. Everything working.
I think removing my ISP's nameservers from /etc/resolv.conf was the fix.
They have been in there forever so still have my fingers crossed.
Again, many
On 08/29/2018 05:17 PM, Ian Mortimer wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-08-29 at 19:20 +0200, Ulf Volmer wrote:
>
>> i'm running bind on an up to date CentOS 6.10 and missing the bind
>> update from the announcement above.
>
> I looked for them yesterday on AU mirrors and a few in the US and
> Europe but didn
On 08/29/2018 09:22 AM, wwp wrote:
On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 08:27:06 -0700 Gordon Messmer
wrote:
On 08/28/2018 11:33 PM, wwp wrote:
- it doesn't expand *foo whereas there are *foo-named files in current dir,
for instance:
# rm *foo
will show nothing whereas there's a file barfoo in c
On Aug 29, 2018, at 02:57, Dhanasekaran Balakrishnan
wrote:
>
> Yes nvidia driver is installed in the computer. I am not sure how my
> colleague did this and presently he is not in my lab.
You will need to fix the nvidia driver. I suggest using the packages from
elrepo.org if you aren’t alre
On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 at 18:16, Leon Fauster via CentOS
wrote:
> Am 29.08.2018 um 23:46 schrieb Stephen John Smoogen :
> >
> > On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 at 17:41, Leon Fauster via CentOS
> wrote:
> >> Since the update from kernel-2.6.32-754.2.1.el6.x86_64
> >> to kernel-2.6.32-754.3.5.el6.x86_64 I can n
Just as I saw your email as grep found it.
[root@hxx grub2]# cat /etc/default/grub
GRUB_TIMEOUT=5
GRUB_DISTRIBUTOR="$(sed 's, release .*$,,g' /etc/system-release)"
GRUB_DEFAULT=saved
GRUB_DISABLE_SUBMENU=true
GRUB_TERMINAL_OUTPUT="console"
GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX="crashkernel=auto rd.lvm.lv=centos/root
On Wed, 29 Aug 2018, wwp wrote:
>while bash completion was working great to me in CentOS6, since I'm
>using C7 I spend my day stuck on completion not working the way it
>should.
Since you don't want what it provides you can either remove the
bash-completions* packages or append "complete -r" to
On Wed, 2018-08-29 at 19:20 +0200, Ulf Volmer wrote:
> i'm running bind on an up to date CentOS 6.10 and missing the bind
> update from the announcement above.
I looked for them yesterday on AU mirrors and a few in the US and
Europe but didn't find them. Still not there this morning.
--
Ian
_
Am 29.08.2018 um 23:46 schrieb Stephen John Smoogen :
>
> On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 at 17:41, Leon Fauster via CentOS
> wrote:
>> Since the update from kernel-2.6.32-754.2.1.el6.x86_64
>> to kernel-2.6.32-754.3.5.el6.x86_64 I can not boot my
>> KVM guests anymore!? The workstation panics immediately
On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 at 17:41, Leon Fauster via CentOS
wrote:
> Since the update from kernel-2.6.32-754.2.1.el6.x86_64
> to kernel-2.6.32-754.3.5.el6.x86_64 I can not boot my
> KVM guests anymore!? The workstation panics immediately!
>
> I would not have expected this behavior now (last phase of O
Since the update from kernel-2.6.32-754.2.1.el6.x86_64
to kernel-2.6.32-754.3.5.el6.x86_64 I can not boot my
KVM guests anymore!? The workstation panics immediately!
I would not have expected this behavior now (last phase of OS).
It was very robust until now (Optiplex Workstation). I see some
Steffan A. Cline wrote:
> I’ve looked and looked and can’t seem to find anything which would
> explain why grub.cfg would have been rewritten with a whole new volume
> group name.
>
> Suggestions?
>
C6 or C7? In either case, have you looked in /etc/default/grub?
mark
_
I’ve looked and looked and can’t seem to find anything which would explain why
grub.cfg would have been rewritten with a whole new volume group name.
Suggestions?
Steffan A. Cline
stef...@hldns.com
602-793-0014
> On Aug 21, 2018, at 11:27 PM, Steffan A. Cline wrote:
>
> I ran into somethi
I read the clear-as-mud docs, and it appears that if we want to modify
system-auth-ac, we can create a local, and point system-auth to it.
Howver.. in the default, I see
auth[success=3 default=ignore] pam_succeed_if.so service notin
login:gdm:xdm:kdm:xscreensaver:gnome-screensaver:kscreens
Hi Stephen,
Thanks! So I think this is what I need then.
part raid.0011 --usepart/dev/sda1
part raid.0021 --usepart/dev/sdb2
part raid.0013 --usepart/dev/sda3
part raid.0022 --usepart/dev/sdb3
raid / --device=md0 --fstype="xfs" --level=1
--useexisting raid.0011 raid.0021
On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 at 15:50, Jerry Geis wrote:
> I am using a kickstart file for CentOS 7
>
> raid / --device=md0 --fstype="xfs"
> --level=1 --useexisting
> raid /home --noformat --device=md1
> --level=1 --useexisting
>
> It is erroring out on the
Sorry - I did not include that I am actually "updating" a system from C6 to
C7 and it has an existing RAID /dev/md0 and /dev/md1. Hit send to quick.
Jerry
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 3:52 PM Jerry Geis wrote:
> I am using a kickstart file for CentOS 7
>
> raid /
I am using a kickstart file for CentOS 7
raid / --device=md0 --fstype="xfs"
--level=1 --useexisting
raid /home --noformat --device=md1
--level=1 --useexisting
It is erroring out on the --useexisting.
The exact text is:
RAID volume "0" specified wit
Hello,
i'm running bind on an up to date CentOS 6.10 and missing the bind
update from the announcement above.
[root@fw ~]# yum list bind
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
* epel: ftp.nluug.nl
Installed Packages
bind.x86_64 32:9.8.2-0.68
Hello Gordon,
On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 08:27:06 -0700 Gordon Messmer
wrote:
> On 08/28/2018 11:33 PM, wwp wrote:
> > - it doesn't expand *foo whereas there are *foo-named files in current
> > dir, for instance:
> > # rm *foo
> > will show nothing whereas there's a file barfoo in curdir.
On 08/28/2018 11:33 PM, wwp wrote:
- it doesn't expand *foo whereas there are *foo-named files in current dir,
for instance:
# rm *foo
will show nothing whereas there's a file barfoo in curdir.
Tab completion finishes a single word, given a string that appears at
the beginning of a
Hi, Jerry,
Jerry Geis wrote:
> I have a remote machine running C6. I desire to update it to C7. Not
> possible to be on-site. Can I copy the Everything ISO for C7 to the
> machine, mount -o loop C7.Everything.iso /media/cdrom
>
> then do a "yum upgrade" ?
>
> Will that work? The server is using s
On 29/08/2018 13:24, Jerry Geis wrote:
Hello all...
I have a remote machine running C6. I desire to update it to C7. Not
possible to be on-site. Can I copy the Everything ISO for C7 to the
machine,
mount -o loop C7.Everything.iso /media/cdrom
then do a "yum upgrade" ?
Will that work? The serve
Hello all...
I have a remote machine running C6. I desire to update it to C7. Not
possible to be on-site. Can I copy the Everything ISO for C7 to the
machine,
mount -o loop C7.Everything.iso /media/cdrom
then do a "yum upgrade" ?
Will that work? The server is using software raid.
Thanks
Jerry
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ.
28 matches
Mail list logo
