On 2019-07-03 23:36, Phil Perry wrote:
On 04/07/2019 03:12, Florin Andrei wrote:
I've installed an RH8 IAM in AWS and I'm trying to build packages on
it. I've noticed there are many *-devel packages that I cannot
install:
You want to enable the codeready-builder reposi
On 2019-07-03 19:12, Florin Andrei wrote:
I've installed an RH8 IAM in AWS and I'm trying to build packages on
I meant an RH8 AMI.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.o
nk everything important is
enabled.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
at triggers different results. BTW, chef-client
is running as a service via /etc/init.d/chef-client
Adding SYS_UID_MAX to /etc/login.defs doesn't help.
Any clue what's going on? Why useradd has different behaviors depending
on how it's launched?
--
Florin Andrei
http://
On 2015-04-14 11:44, Eero Volotinen wrote:
2015-04-14 21:40 GMT+03:00 Florin Andrei :
http://serverfault.com/a/655752/24406
If that is accurate, the documentation, and the clustering / load
balancing might tilt the balance in the direction of strongSwan.
Well, both packages can do ipsec to
On 2015-04-14 11:25, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 04/14/2015 11:07 AM, Florin Andrei wrote:
I looked in the yum repositories for CentOS 7 and I noticed that there
are no packages for any of the major open source IPSec VPN apps -
Openswan, strongSwan, etc. I'm pretty sure CentOS 6 had Ope
uot;server"
(concentrator, whatever) on CentOS 7, that will do site-to-site
connections with Cisco hardware at the other end? Is any of the *swan
apps still considered the best option for that?
Any guidelines w.r.t. IPSec VPN in general on this platform?
Thanks.
--
Florin Andrei
http://
; to rc.local, but that obviously doesn't work,
because the login prompt overwrites everything I do.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 2014-01-20 14:24, Nux! wrote:
>
> Yes, it was not built/distributed. You can either rebuild the SRPM and
> enable the build of the server package or even better - get the RPMs
> from gluster.org.
So, what is the reason for not distributing it?
--
Florin Andrei
http://flo
On 2014-01-20 12:32, Florin Andrei wrote:
> to install the glusterfs-package as if it was available directly in the
I meant the "glusterfs-server package". Sorry.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@ce
for
CentOS 6. Does anyone know what happened to it?
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
it to find printers too.
Wait a sec, I have that setup (just mediatomb instead of ps3mediaserver)
and there's no avahi on my network. Yet the PS3 is perfectly capable of
discovering and using the DLNA server.
It might be useful for *something* but it doesn't appear to be requi
xit
point, and I don't control the routers in between. I must use a proxy.
Fortunately, OpenVPN seems to work well with dante-server. Too bad
dante-server is not in EPEL, but RPM packages are available online.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
On 01/09/2012 04:51 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 01/09/12 4:34 PM, Florin Andrei wrote:
>> OpenVPN normally uses UDP.
>
> it does? I thought OpenVPN used ssl/tls as the transport, which is most
> decidedly TCP. I'll admit I haven't used it in quite a long time
op
Perhaps openssh is only a SOCKS server for TCP
protocols? OpenVPN normally uses UDP.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
CentOS?
Thanks.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2011-August/017689.html
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Anyone packaging the new kernel for RH / CentOS?
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
7;m reading the notes now.
It's not terribly bad, since there are few systems nowadays with only
512 MB of RAM (that you would want to run C6 on). Just a bit annoying.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@cent
stall mode. The system boots up with networking and all
the niceties enabled.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 07/08/2011 01:59 PM, Steven Crothers wrote:
> How is the site excellent if it changes nearly every other day, displays
> zero useful information on the development cycle, and discourages people
Take a break, breathe deeply.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.my
he time zone
displayed to match my own, so as to make more sense of the timestamps on
the various posts in there, that would be perfect. :)
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
le WiFi access point is much better. The Linux server
becomes the router.
The third network card goes into a switch that connects all the local LAN.
The Linux box does NAT for all the networks behind it. Also runs a local
DNS cache and stuff like that.
--
Florin Andrei
ht
On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 13:46:38 -0500
Les Mikesell wrote:
> Have you tried upgrading to a current release?
I'm running the same version like you: Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9 (except
it's on Linux)
--
Florin Andrei
http://fl
whatnot).
Maybe that's what Thunderbird does - re-scans the IMAP folders, but in a more
sneaky way, and it's dumb enough to put a Big Lock on the whole interface. Hmm.
I opened a bug report with them:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=650400
--
Florin Andrei
http
ep messages for this
> account on this computer"
It's unchecked already.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
ty often, no relation to sending emails.
The IMAP and SMTP servers are defined by IP address, not hostname. But
even if that was the case, a software that blocks the UI completely
while waiting for something in the background? Sounds like 1999 all over
again.
--
Florin Andrei
http://flo
all that stuff from me, do the updates or whatever in the
background, instead of blocking the UI until it's done. Ironically, it
blocked when I was done with this paragraph and I hit Enter. Sticking it
to the man one last time, I guess.
Any suggestions? Thanks.
--
F
In any case, the explanation would have to account for the fact that
network transfers, *and* local disk activity, are both slow.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 04/13/2011 01:55 PM, Benjamin Franz wrote:
>
> 1) Are you untarring from *and* to the SAN volume or is the source on
> the local volume?
Source on SAN, destination on SAN. Still slow.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mai
so
they were a symptom, not the cause.
I'm still kind of hoping it's a software issue, but chances are slim.
OTOH, I can't imagine any hardware problem that would exhibit these
symptoms.
Any idea what to test?
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
On 06/18/2010 05:49 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 18/06/2010 22:28, Florin Andrei wrote:
>> Fun fact: Postfix-2.3.3 has been released in August 2006. Think about that.
>
> While you are doing that - also think about this : Red Hat have a
> policy, and they stick with it. Its so
ve with that.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
se you can deal with the upgrades on a case-by-case basis.
Just "rpm -U" the 2.7 package and that's it. For a mail relay, the rest
is good.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
livery rate by 50% in some cases (e.g. if you deliver
thousands of emails to Yahoo). With config changes, the improvement
might be even bigger.
Fun fact: Postfix-2.3.3 has been released in August 2006. Think about that.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
site:
http://ftp.wl0.org/official/
Anybody using it? Good things, bad things?...
Anybody using Postfix 2.7 on CentOS by the way? Do you have any
observations?
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
t happen? Any
particular options in dhclient.conf or something like that?
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 12/9/2009 3:51 PM, Florin Andrei wrote:
> So, my favorite RPM repository (EPEL) only has the ancient nagios-2.12
> or so.
>
> What's the repo you use for Nagios 3?
I asked too soon. "rpmbuild -tb" works pretty well on the source tarball. :)
--
Florin And
So, my favorite RPM repository (EPEL) only has the ancient nagios-2.12
or so.
What's the repo you use for Nagios 3?
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
ising and unjustified.
FWIW, I was at SGI when XFS for Linux was released, and I probably was
among its first users. It was great back then, but now it's over-rated.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
for network-based dumps (the remote end may be
unavailable due to a number of reasons).
The local storage is a couple SATA drives with hardware-based mirror
RAID. The chassis is a Dell PowerEdge.
Also, what it the recommended size for a dedicated raw partition for kdump?
--
Florin Andrei
to do it that way. :-)
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
27;t expecting 5.4 to be out for
> another few weeks
http://twitter.com/CentOS/status/4831596086
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
es the
modification of resolv.conf, not how to cover up the issue. It's easy to
hide the problem, either do what you suggest, or edit away
make_resolv_conf(). But the underlying cause will remain, and may
resurface if these changes are undone.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
__
but anyway all that junk serves no purpose there (well, arguably you
could put back USERCTL and stuff like that, if you really need it).
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
ow the docs. What I was saying is - it will not help finding
the cause, which is what the OP requested. It will just make the problem
go away.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
/etc | grep -v selinux | grep -v /ifup-eth: \
| grep -v /ifdown-eth:
# to see if it's called from somewhere else than the regular places
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Clint Dilks wrote:
>
> Try adding PEERDNS=no to /etc/sysconfig/network :)
aw, man :)
This is not fixing the leaking faucet. It's hammering the water pipe
shut instead.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing
g/network-scripts/ifcfg-*
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Meenoo Shivdasani wrote:
>
> One option would be to comment out the make_resolv_conf() function in
> /sbin/dhclient-script.
That's the last-ditch solution. Never use it, unless everything else fails.
--
Florin Andrei
http://f
nate wrote:
> Florin Andrei wrote:
>
>> Any luck with proprietary drivers? Any problems those drivers may cause
>> with bonding?
>
> I don't think there are proprietary drivers for broadcom NICs,
> about 5 years ago there was proprietary fault tolerance drivers
&g
luck with proprietary drivers? Any problems those drivers may cause
with bonding?
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
d you have
a system running 24/7 somewhere on the network. Most distributions
provide some sort of plug-and-play recursive resolver, you just need to
install it and turn it on.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
Cen
o a "permit all" firewall:
iptables [-t nat] -F; iptables [-t nat] -X
or
service iptables stop
See if the iptables service is enabled:
chkconfig --list iptables
Tip: if the FORWARD chain doesn't seem to work, check
net.ipv4.ip_forward in /
Ryan Pugatch wrote:
>
> Oh, and no sparse files either :)
Last time I saw this issue, no sparse files, nothing legit, it was a
corrupted FS. :(
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.or
Ryan Pugatch wrote:
>
> I recognize that in most cases du and df are not going to report the
> same but I am concerned about having a 12GB disparity. Does anyone have
> any thoughts about this or reason as to why there is a big difference?
Sparse files?
--
Florin
Max Hetrick wrote:
>
> the zealots
Nah, it's just the way the human mind works, according to its current
blueprint. It can be pretty awesome in what it can do sometimes, but it
does have obvious fundamental flaws too.
You and I have biases too, but nobody is aware of their own. :)
Ubuntu though, it's gaining ground real fast
and it's using the best strategy (that worked before for the likes of
Intel, Microsoft and, yes, Linux in general): they're co-opting the
low-end first. Things are going to get pretty interesting a few years
down the road.
wesome sportbikes!" :-)
Same here. In the end, Linux is the same, just different flavors for
different tastes.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
thbuntu for MythTV, Windows for games.
It's a great setup, and yes, it can be done on CentOS or just about any
Linux distro. But with Ubuntu everything is just there, so the
install/admin effort is greatly reduced.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
__
s owned by random innocents. :) It works fine for the most
part, but once in a while it can do silly things. That's fine for me,
cause I can fix it, but it's not fine for the non-tech user.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mai
hat segment. And if you're a non-techie you want to stay
with the crowd.
What I'm saying is, they will be able to figure out more things by
themselves on Ubuntu, if they can use a browser. Maybe even become
totally independent after a while.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
_
and
digital video processing, I find myself booting Vista a lot more often
on my home PC - it's a long story and yes I am aware of all the
wonderful Linux video apps)
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.or
Good suggestions, thanks.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
actually tccat, part of the transcode package, but the idea
is the same. Here's the actual command:
n=14
for i in `seq -w 1 ${n}`; do
echo "${i} out of ${n}"
tccat -i /dev/dvd -T 1,${i} > ch${i}.mpeg
done
sync
ls -lh
--
that so many times, now I just use absolute paths with
cron every time. :-)
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
is is better
>> or worse than others.
>
> +1 for TouchTerm.
+2
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
p://lmgtfy.com/?q=5.3+%22yum+update+glibc+%22+site%3Aredhat.com
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
OS on both of my laptops, and all three of my
> desktops, and I can power any one of those machines up, and so far Cent
> OS has never failed me. Cent OS just works. That's what matters to me.
>
>Just my 2 cents
That's very much the minds
On one mirror that I tried, at least.
So, is it live yet? :-)
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
e considering it, but in practice
strong crypto does work to some extent. But if it's just "security by
obscurity" should we not use crypto either?
Yes, "security by obscurity" is useless when it's alone, but it can be
good if used appropriately and combined with vari
Les Mikesell wrote:
> Florin Andrei wrote:
>>
>> Maybe I don't trust the IMAP server enough to expose it. Maybe I should.
>
> Anything that can survive in a university environment should be safe
> enough for the rest of us.
That's a good point.
Okay, I have a
hen a good
part of those issues is alleviated. The question is whether the Linux
IPSec server supports UDP encapsulation (and whether the iPhone client
does too).
The machine has a public interface exposed directly to the Internet, so
that simplifies thing
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> Florin Andrei wrote:
>> So far, OpenVPN has been working very well for me. Unfortunately, the
>> iPhone doesn't have (yet?) an OpenVPN client, so I'm forced to work with
>> what's available.
>>
>> The options are: L2
Hywel Richards wrote:
> Florin Andrei wrote:
>> The options are: L2TP, PPTP and IPSec. If you were to install a VPN
>> endpoint on CentOS, which protocol would you prefer?
>
> I know this doesn't answer your question as put, but it may be worth
> taking a differen
written.
Another condition is ease of installation. I will compile from source if
I have no other choice, but I'd rather avoid wasting time with that, as
I'm quite busy with non-tech things nowadays. If the application is in a
repo somewhere, that would be perfect.
Thanks!
-
i/EPEL/FAQ#howtouse
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
. This is a lot of work, no matter how much automation
is involved.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
esktops, but even there the
situation is changing. Maybe this year I'll use 64 bit on my desktop(s)
for the first time, as it seems most of the lingering problems are being
solved, finally.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS ma
uto-updates to the critical
components.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote:
>
>new.mydomain.net - - [11/Feb/2009:14:34:58 -0500] "GET /
> HTTP/1.0" 403 - "-" "Apache/2.2.3 (CentOS)
> (internal dummy connection)"
>
> What is it? Why do I have it now, and not before?
ht
sk anything related to my setup. I already use a couple
different load balancing technologies.
I was just curious about performance comparisons between different types
of load balancers in general.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS maili
g qmail
back in the day - yes, I was a DJB fanboy. It was great, especially at a
time when Sendmail had more holes in it than a metric ton of Swiss
cheese. But then Postfix came along, and I had no reason to stick with
qmail anymore.
Such is the computer industry - licentious and forgetful. :-)
--
F
r), while the kernel-space
ones are faster (provide more in terms of raw speed and max load). I
could be wrong.
Can anybody provide a performance comparison between, say, nginx and
LVS? (max connections, max new connections rate, max bandwidth, max
packets per second, etc.)
--
Florin Andrei
ht
Scott Silva wrote:
> on 1-23-2009 1:19 PM Ashley M. Kirchner spake the following:
>> Quoting Florin Andrei :
>>
>>> I like the stability of Ext3, but in terms of speed it's not the
>>> sharpest lightbulb in the toolshed.
>> Isn't that supposed
et slower.
Ext4 is a welcome improvement. The upcoming btrfs perhaps even more so.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
up traps like that.
Thanks for the notice.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Ext4 performs for
> this.
Exactly. There are differences between file systems even when using very
large files sequentially. I did benchmarks on various controllers and my
experience was the same: the file system does matter.
--
Florin Andrei
h
hich protocol is fastest nowadays, but I guess you can do
a quick test and find out.
There might be some security implications for using a different crypto
protocol, but you need to figure that out yourself.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
__
MHR wrote:
>
> I think you meant nspluginwrapper - ndiswrapper is for Window$ drivers
> to run in Linux.
d'oh! brain segfault :)
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.cent
e distro, then 64
bit on the desktop is OK.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
de, and Servers would benefit from 64bit mode.
I've seen essentially no major issues with 64 bit on the servers. I've
been using it for quite a while, whenever possible. In fact, 32 bit on
the server nowadays seems like a last-resort fallback solution, in those
rare cases when 64 bit
Les Mikesell wrote:
>
> I can't see anything to indicate why it doesn't show the disk, but I've
> used dynamic disks for installation before.
I exclusively use dynamic allocation and it works for me with CentOS 5.2
as a guest.
Host is Ubuntu 8.10
--
Florin Andrei
t, with generic conversations
moving to the centos-tech list.
Nah. It will be too fragmented and people will never figure out the
difference between the lists.
Just my $0.02
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@
Florin Andrei wrote:
Get the vanilla kernel tarball.
Apply the mkspec patch. (*)
Now do this:
export RPM_RH5_STYLE=1
Otherwise the patch is pointless.
Or hack the patch and remove the "if $RPM_RH5_STYLE; then" conditionals
so it's always generated "RH5 style".
ore features that you need. This
patch adds them. See the file attached to this message.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
--- linux-2.6.23.1.orig/scripts/package/mkspec 2007-10-19 02:07:58.0
-0700
+++ linux-2.6.23.1/scripts/package/mkspec 2007-10-19 05:42:47.0
Gordon Messmer wrote:
Florin Andrei wrote:
If you were running tcpdump in promiscuous mode, re-run the tests with
it non-promiscuous. Just to make sure the SYN is actually received by
that system.
I ran the test again with "tcpdump -i eth0 -p" and then thinking better
of it, wit
Gordon Messmer wrote:
Florin Andrei wrote:
Maybe it does reply, just on a different interface? Is this a
multi-homed system? Bonded interfaces?
There's only one interface with an IP address, and only one route back
to the office.
If you were running tcpdump in promiscuous mode, r
?
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
ase.
This will give you a relatively "minimal" system. If you want to install
anything after that, just do a "yum install".
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
1 - 100 of 176 matches
Mail list logo
