Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 04:27:34PM +, Harold Pritchett wrote:
> I'm trying to install DB2 on a CentOS 7 server. The problem I'm
> seeing is that the Apache httpd server fails to pick up the db2
> environment variables. On an older version running under CentOS 5
> this was
I'm trying to install DB2 on a CentOS 7 server. The problem I'm seeing is that
the Apache httpd server fails to pick up the db2 environment variables. On an
older version running under CentOS 5 this was done by inserting the following
lines into the httpd start script in /etc/sysconfig/httpd:
On 3/30/2015 11:44 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 3/30/2015 8:32 AM, Harold Pritchett wrote:
Db2 is running our of shared memory.
open a ticket with IBM DB2 support.
IBM db2 Express-C does not include support. You get what you pay for (and db2
Express-C is free)
Harold
Db2 is running our of shared memory.
The environment:
Virtual computers running under VMware ESXi hypervisor version 5.5.
Two different virtual machines, each running CentOS 5, db2 express C,
and Apache/PHP and vmware tools. The machines each have 8 GB of memory,
4 processors, and a couple
On 8/2/2014 2:39 PM, Harold Pritchett wrote:
> On 8/1/2014 10:47 PM, Gardner Bell wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 1 August 2014 22:33, Harold Pritchett wrote:
>>
>>> I am having problems making selinux modules on CentOS 6.
>>>
>>> Under CentOS 5, the f
On 8/2/2014 2:39 PM, Harold Pritchett wrote:
More information...
After changing /etc/selinux/config from "SELINUXTYPE=targeted" to
SELINUXTYPE=mls" I was unable to log on remotely as root, nor could I "su" to
root from a regular id. Who knows
what else changed. I&#x
On 8/1/2014 10:47 PM, Gardner Bell wrote:
>
>
> On 1 August 2014 22:33, Harold Pritchett wrote:
>
>> I am having problems making selinux modules on CentOS 6.
>>
>> Under CentOS 5, the following procedure works:
>>
>> Procedure to make an seliux policy
I am having problems making selinux modules on CentOS 6.
Under CentOS 5, the following procedure works:
Procedure to make an seliux policy named mickey1...
# su -
# cd /var/log/audit
# rm *
# service auditd restart
# echo 0 > /selinux/enforce
# Do whatever selinux is blocking...
# echo 1 > /seli
On 11/2/2013 8:57 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> I have two CentOS-6.4 servers, in different places.
> I am running postfix/amavis on one, and sendmail/procmail on the other.
> I don't recall having any difficulty setting up sendmail many years ago
> using sendmail.mc .
> But I found postfix very comp
On 3/8/2013 10:08 AM, SilverTip257 wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
>> On 03/08/2013 09:21 AM, Harold Pritchett wrote:
>>> On 3/8/2013 8:57 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>>>> On 03/08/2013 08:07 AM, SilverTip257 wrote:
>>>
On 3/8/2013 8:57 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> On 03/08/2013 08:07 AM, SilverTip257 wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 10:54 PM, Harold Pritchett wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/7/2013 10:10 PM, Stephen Harris wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 09:54:59PM -0500, Haro
On 3/7/2013 10:10 PM, Stephen Harris wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 09:54:59PM -0500, Harold Pritchett wrote:
>> What other information do I need which may be available?
> What does 'vgscan' say? 'vgchange -a y' ?
>
[root@mickey www]# vgscan
Reading all
I have a vanilla CentOS 5.9 system. I have a pair of 2Tb sata drives with a
RAID 1 array on them. This array contains an LVM physical volume. I have
added these two drives to my
system and now need to access the volume group on this physical volume. This
volume group, vg0, contains 10 ext3
Here I am following up on my own post...
It occurred to me that all of this stuff must be magic.
How does it work when the mdadm.conf file is on a raid/LVM volume which is not
available at boot time?
I looked in the /boot filesystem, the only one which is available at boot time
and there is no
Somewhere, mdadm is cacheing information. Here is my /etc/mdadm.conf file:
more /etc/mdadm.conf
# mdadm.conf written out by anaconda
DEVICE partitions
MAILADDR root
ARRAY /dev/md0 level=raid1 num-devices=4 metadata=0.90
UUID=55ff58b2:0abb5bad:42911890:5950dfce
ARRAY /dev/md1 level=raid1 num-devi
I have a system with 4 disk drives, two 512 Gb and two 1 Tb.
It look like this:
CentOS release 5.9 (Final)
Disk /dev/sda: 500.1 GB, 500107862016 bytes
Disk /dev/sdb: 1000.2 GB, 1000204886016 bytes
Disk /dev/sdc: 500.1 GB, 500107862016 bytes
Disk /dev/sdd: 1000.2 GB, 1000204886016 bytes
==
On 2/25/2013 9:03 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> On 02/25/2013 02:48 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>> I have read a couple old threads here on updates for servers, and I am
>> looking for some mechanics to getting the actual updates done. I don't
>> want automatic updates; I want to control when
On 2/3/2013 11:47 PM, Bent Terp wrote:
> So my advice is to use a wildcard domain covering *.mycompany.com - but
> remember that mycompany.com does not match *.mycompany.com, so you'll need a
> redirect to
> www.mycompany.com BR Bent PS Just realised that we did this on nginx not
> apache,
On 12/26/2012 4:05 AM, James A. Peltier wrote:
> I'm trying to find a way to exclude file systems during the autorelabel
> process. I have a file system (/exports) that has tens of millions of files
> on it and I *know* I don't want it relabeled.
>
How often do you need to do this? The obvious
On 12/2/2012 6:08 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 12/2/2012 2:46 PM, Tilman Schmidt wrote:
>> Not a good advice for someone who already has some experience
>> with Sendmail but none with Postfix. He'll have to read docs
>> either way, but staying with Sendmail spares him the effort
>> of reinstallati
Use remote logging to a second machine which only you have access to.
http://www.linuxjournal.com/content/creating-centralized-syslog-server
Harold
8/8/2012 12:56 PM, Heng Su wrote:
> hello,
>
> I want to protect the history file from deleted for all users except
> user 'root' can do it, is
Problem: My network uses the 192.168.1.0/24 network. Since is the most common
network in all of the world it begins presenting problems when I want to set up
vpns, or try to do
other routing.
The solution: Change the network from 192.168.1.0/24 to 172.24.24.0/22. This
is somewhere in the m
On 3/15/2012 3:20 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 03/15/12 6:31 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
>> I eventually managed to read the tape at 1600 bpi in raw
>> block format and from the headers determined that the
>> encoding was EBCDIC and that the tape had been created on
>> a CDC machine.
> if it was fro
I am attempting to install Etherpad on a CentOS 5.7 system.
The system is at current patchlevels.
I am using a cookbook found at http://pauleira.com/13/installing-etherpad/
My main problem seems to be that this howto is a couple of years old and none
of the software is still at the levels descr
On 1/2/2012 9:41 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> On 01/03/2012 03:30 AM, Bennett Haselton wrote:
>> In other words, when SELinux causes a problem, it can take hours or days
>> to find out that SELinux is the cause -- and even then you're not done,
>> because you have to figure out a workaround if
On 8/11/2011 7:00 PM, Devin Reade wrote:
--On Wednesday, August 10, 2011 01:52:21 PM -0400 Harold Pritchett
wrote:
[harold@newmick ~]$ sieveshell localhost
connecting to localhost
unable to connect to server at /usr/bin/sieveshell line 170.
As an aid to finding out what was happening, I
On 8/10/2011 5:40 PM, Simon Matter wrote:
> SELinux? I'm out of ideas apart from that.
>
> Simon
>
>
audit2allow http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 8/10/2011 2:28 PM, Simon Matter wrote:
>> On 8/10/2011 2:00 PM, Simon Matter wrote:
I don't know if this is the right place to report this or not.
I am building a new server on a 64 bit CentOS 6.0 platform.
[root@newmick ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release
CentOS Linux rele
On 8/10/2011 2:00 PM, Simon Matter wrote:
>> I don't know if this is the right place to report this or not.
>>
>> I am building a new server on a 64 bit CentOS 6.0 platform.
>>
>> [root@newmick ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release
>> CentOS Linux release 6.0 (Final)
>> [root@newmick ~]# uname -a
>> Linux ne
I don't know if this is the right place to report this or not.
I am building a new server on a 64 bit CentOS 6.0 platform.
[root@newmick ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release
CentOS Linux release 6.0 (Final)
[root@newmick ~]# uname -a
Linux newmick.halshome.net 2.6.32-71.29.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP
Mon Jun 27
I don't know if this is the right place to report this or not.
I am building a new server on a 64 bit CentOS 6.0 platform.
[root@newmick ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release
CentOS Linux release 6.0 (Final)
[root@newmick ~]# uname -a
Linux newmick.halshome.net 2.6.32-71.29.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP
Mon Jun 27
31 matches
Mail list logo
