On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 22:59:47 -0300
Filipe Rosset wrote:
> On 04/25/2011 10:35 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> >
> > I have pushed what I think are all of the SRPMS for os and updates.
>
> Great, thank you!
>
Just to close this one off - I am now seeing all the SRPMS that I need
on the Australian m
On 04/25/2011 10:35 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
> I have pushed what I think are all of the SRPMS for os and updates.
Great, thank you!
--
Filipe
Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listin
On 04/25/2011 09:16 AM, Filipe Rosset wrote:
> On 04/21/2011 06:41 PM, Bob Hepple wrote:
>> On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 11:30:37 +0100
>> Karanbir Singh wrote:
>>
>>> On 04/21/2011 12:18 AM, Bob Hepple wrote:
Hmmm - it's 10 days on and I still can't see all of the [a-l]
*.src.rpm's. I strongly s
On 04/21/2011 06:41 PM, Bob Hepple wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 11:30:37 +0100
> Karanbir Singh wrote:
>
>> On 04/21/2011 12:18 AM, Bob Hepple wrote:
>>> Hmmm - it's 10 days on and I still can't see all of the [a-l]
>>> *.src.rpm's. I strongly suspect that something's gone wrong - or
>>> perhaps
On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 11:30:37 +0100
Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 04/21/2011 12:18 AM, Bob Hepple wrote:
> > Hmmm - it's 10 days on and I still can't see all of the [a-l]
> > *.src.rpm's. I strongly suspect that something's gone wrong - or
> > perhaps I'm looking in the wrong place -
> >
>
> Yes, yo
On Apr 21, 2011, at 3:32 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 04/21/2011 12:47 AM, Don Krause wrote:
>> It doesn't appear to be me, as much as kernel.org. Their webpage
>> http://mirrors.kernel.org/centos/5.6/os/SRPMS/?C=M;O=D
>> has nothing newer than Dec 14th either..
>>
>> Something must be broke
On 04/21/2011 12:47 AM, Don Krause wrote:
> It doesn't appear to be me, as much as kernel.org. Their webpage
> http://mirrors.kernel.org/centos/5.6/os/SRPMS/?C=M;O=D
> has nothing newer than Dec 14th either..
>
> Something must be broke (or really slow) out there.
>
Broke yes, but in a good way.
On 04/21/2011 12:18 AM, Bob Hepple wrote:
> Hmmm - it's 10 days on and I still can't see all of the [a-l]
> *.src.rpm's. I strongly suspect that something's gone wrong - or
> perhaps I'm looking in the wrong place -
>
Yes, you are right. Amongst the various tests, there is one that checks
for dup
On Apr 20, 2011, at 4:38 PM, Bob Hepple wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 16:26:51 -0700
> Don Krause wrote:
>
>> On Apr 20, 2011, at 4:18 PM, Bob Hepple wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 11:58:43 +0100
>>> Karanbir Singh wrote:
>>>
Also, the first batch of srpms is now on the seed machine, s
On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 16:26:51 -0700
Don Krause wrote:
> On Apr 20, 2011, at 4:18 PM, Bob Hepple wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 11:58:43 +0100
> > Karanbir Singh wrote:
> >
> >> Also, the first batch of srpms is now on the seed machine, should start
> >> going public in about 8 - 12 hours ( t
On Apr 20, 2011, at 4:18 PM, Bob Hepple wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 11:58:43 +0100
> Karanbir Singh wrote:
>
>> Also, the first batch of srpms is now on the seed machine, should start
>> going public in about 8 - 12 hours ( this is [a-l]*.src.rpm ). The rest
>> I'll move in first thing on Wed
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 11:58:43 +0100
Karanbir Singh wrote:
> Also, the first batch of srpms is now on the seed machine, should start
> going public in about 8 - 12 hours ( this is [a-l]*.src.rpm ). The rest
> I'll move in first thing on Wednesday morning.
Hmmm - it's 10 days on and I still can't
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 14:23:51 -0300
Filipe Rosset wrote:
> On 04/13/2011 07:54 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> >
> > They are definitely in there, just slow.
> >
> > - KB
>
> Hi guys,
>
> Still without SRPM's in 5.6/os/SRPMS/
They just started to appear this morning (UTC+1000) - but I can't
see h
On 04/13/2011 07:54 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>
> They are definitely in there, just slow.
>
> - KB
Hi guys,
Still without SRPM's in 5.6/os/SRPMS/
--
Filipe
Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/
Karanbir Singh wrote on 04/13/2011 06:54 AM:
> They are definitely in there, just slow.
Must be vanishingly slow. :-)
Just checked half a dozen tier 1 mirrors and none has src.rpm files in
.../5.6/os/SRPMS/ There are some in 5.6/updates/SRPMS/.
Phil
On 04/13/2011 11:51 AM, Phil Schaffner wrote:
> Karanbir Singh wrote on 04/11/2011 06:58 AM:
>> Also, the first batch of srpms is now on the seed machine, should start
>> going public in about 8 - 12 hours ( this is [a-l]*.src.rpm ).
>
> More like 72 hours and still no 5.6/os/SRPMS/ in evidence. Di
Karanbir Singh wrote on 04/11/2011 06:58 AM:
> Also, the first batch of srpms is now on the seed machine, should start
> going public in about 8 - 12 hours ( this is [a-l]*.src.rpm ).
More like 72 hours and still no 5.6/os/SRPMS/ in evidence. Did the valve
not get turned on?
Phil
___
On 4/12/11 7:48 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 04/12/2011 02:28 AM, Bob Hepple wrote:
>> While I'm here - thanks to the whole CentOS team for a great effort on
>> 5.6. I installed it on a laptop for the wife and she loves it!! For
>> myself - once I've the sources get here I can start our patch and
On 12 April 2011 13:48, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 04/12/2011 02:28 AM, Bob Hepple wrote:
>> While I'm here - thanks to the whole CentOS team for a great effort on
>> 5.6. I installed it on a laptop for the wife and she loves it!! For
>> myself - once I've the sources get here I can start our patc
On 04/12/2011 02:28 AM, Bob Hepple wrote:
> While I'm here - thanks to the whole CentOS team for a great effort on
> 5.6. I installed it on a laptop for the wife and she loves it!! For
> myself - once I've the sources get here I can start our patch and
> re-compile for our in-house discless cluster
I got frustrated with having to edit my repo files every time an update
came along to the release package, so I looked for "a better way". What
I found was
http://www.gurulabs.com/goodies/YUM_automatic_local_mirror.php, which
gave me the clues I needed to have my local repositories added to th
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 11:58:43 +0100
Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 04/11/2011 12:46 AM, Bob Hepple wrote:
> > Oh well, so much for that idea! According to the release notes
> > (http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS5.6) there is a list
> > of packages modified by centos - and that include
Tom Brown wrote on Mon, 11 Apr 2011 15:08:48 +0100:
> because by removing them from the centos-release package and
> rebuilding it they are not there in the first place.
Yeah, but you have to do that all the time (e.g. with each update).
Replacing with empty files is a one-time operation.
Kai
> Instead of removing the unwanted .repo files, replace them with empty files.
> That way an upgrade should just result in a .rpmnew file being created.
because by removing them from the centos-release package and
rebuilding it they are not there in the first place.
___
On 04/11/2011 05:53 AM, Tom Brown wrote:
>>> I'm hazarding a guess here - that the os/{i386,x86_64}/CentOS/*.rpm's that
>>> have 'centos' in the name have had changes made for CentOS. The others
>>> have not and the sources are available from upstream at eg
>>>
>>> http://mirrors.kernel.org/redhat/
On 04/11/2011 12:46 AM, Bob Hepple wrote:
> Oh well, so much for that idea! According to the release notes
> (http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS5.6) there is a list
> of packages modified by centos - and that includes httpd. So the
> absence of 'centos' in the release string does _n
>> I'm hazarding a guess here - that the os/{i386,x86_64}/CentOS/*.rpm's that
>> have 'centos' in the name have had changes made for CentOS. The others
>> have not and the sources are available from upstream at eg
>>
>> http://mirrors.kernel.org/redhat/redhat/linux/enterprise/5Server/en/os/SRPMS/
>
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 09:40:25 +1000
Bob Hepple wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Apr 2011 23:42:41 +0100
> Tom Brown wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > Is there any ETA for the SRPM's from the base tree of 5.6? I need to
> > get my hands on the src for the centos-release package as i have to
> > rebuilt it to prevent th
On Sat, 9 Apr 2011 23:42:41 +0100
Tom Brown wrote:
> Hi
>
> Is there any ETA for the SRPM's from the base tree of 5.6? I need to
> get my hands on the src for the centos-release package as i have to
> rebuilt it to prevent the repo definitions from being included.
>
> I see the src's for the up
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Ah, I see now why you are doing this, I wasn't aware that the release package
> contains those .repo files. *However*, as I said earlier (and unless you use
> different filenames for your local repo) the new centos-release will *not*
> overwrite your existing CentOS-Base.re
Tom Diehl wrote on Sun, 10 Apr 2011 11:47:04 -0400 (EDT):
> I cannot speak for the other Tom but in my case I rebuild the centos-release
> rpm and add my own repo files so that all of my machines pull from my local
> repos. Yes, I know that the modified repo files do not get overwritten but
> that
Hi,
On Sun, 10 Apr 2011, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote on Sun, 10 Apr 2011 12:53:54 +0200:
>
>> Just to be sure there is no misunderstanding. I add that line in any
>> *.repo file in /etc/yum.repos.d/ folder, as an option for every
>> repository definition in those files where
Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote on Sun, 10 Apr 2011 12:53:54 +0200:
> Just to be sure there is no misunderstanding. I add that line in any
> *.repo file in /etc/yum.repos.d/ folder, as an option for every
> repository definition in those files where repository has "releases" rpms.
I don't understand
Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> I added "exclude=*releases" for every repo that uses them (base/os,
> updates, rpmforge, atrpms, elrepo, ) since I use my own local copy
> of those repos. Yum just skips them.
Just to be sure there is no misunderstanding. I add that line in any
*.repo file in /e
I added "exclude=*releases" for every repo that uses them (base/os,
updates, rpmforge, atrpms, elrepo, ) since I use my own local copy
of those repos. Yum just skips them.
Tom Brown wrote:
> Hi
>
> Is there any ETA for the SRPM's from the base tree of 5.6? I need to
> get my hands on the sr
On 9 April 2011 23:42, Tom Brown wrote:
> Hi
>
> Is there any ETA for the SRPM's from the base tree of 5.6? I need to
> get my hands on the src for the centos-release package as i have to
> rebuilt it to prevent the repo definitions from being included.
>
> I see the src's for the updates RPM's bu
Hi
Is there any ETA for the SRPM's from the base tree of 5.6? I need to
get my hands on the src for the centos-release package as i have to
rebuilt it to prevent the repo definitions from being included.
I see the src's for the updates RPM's but not the base.
many thanks
37 matches
Mail list logo
