[CentOS] Firewall question

2021-11-09 Thread Jerry Geis
Hi - When updating my CentOS 7 - firewalld why does the virt-manager loose connections to all GUI's ? I just close the virt-manager main window - select the virt-manager from gnome side panel and re-run - and then they all come back after you click on them - but why is the connection to the GUI

Re: [CentOS] Date question

2021-02-18 Thread Jerry Geis
On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 1:57 PM Jerry Geis wrote: > SO from the man page on date I can do > > current=`TZ=":America/Indianapolis" date` > echo $current > current=`TZ=":America/Los_Angeles" date ` > echo $current > > And I get correct data. LA is 3 hours earlier. But doing this: > >

Re: [CentOS] Date question

2021-02-17 Thread Jonathan Billings
On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 01:57:50PM -0500, Jerry Geis wrote: > > SO from the man page on date I can do > > current=`TZ=":America/Indianapolis" date` > echo $current > current=`TZ=":America/Los_Angeles" date ` > echo $current > > And I get correct data. LA is 3 hours earlier. But doing this: > >

Re: [CentOS] Date question

2021-02-17 Thread Chris Schanzle via CentOS
On 2/17/21 1:57 PM, Jerry Geis wrote: > SO from the man page on date I can do > > current=`TZ=":America/Indianapolis" date` > echo $current > current=`TZ=":America/Los_Angeles" date ` > echo $current > > And I get correct data. LA is 3 hours earlier. But doing this: > >

[CentOS] Date question

2021-02-17 Thread Jerry Geis
SO from the man page on date I can do current=`TZ=":America/Indianapolis" date` echo $current current=`TZ=":America/Los_Angeles" date ` echo $current And I get correct data. LA is 3 hours earlier. But doing this: current=`TZ=":America/Indianapolis" date +%s` echo $current

Re: [CentOS] CentOS repo question

2020-04-23 Thread Tony Molloy
On Thu, 2020-04-23 at 09:29 -0500, joh...@centos.org wrote: > > On Wed, 2020-04-22 at 08:25 -0500, joh...@centos.org wrote: > > > > > > > Thanks Johnny. I'll go with the Stream repos enabled and see how > > that > > works out. > > > > For the record .. i just updated to what we have in the QA

Re: [CentOS] CentOS repo question

2020-04-23 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 4/22/20 9:38 AM, Tony Molloy wrote: > On Wed, 2020-04-22 at 08:25 -0500, joh...@centos.org wrote: >> EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email originated from outside of the University >> of Limerick. Do not click on links or open attachments unless you >> recognize the sender's email address and know the

Re: [CentOS] CentOS repo question

2020-04-22 Thread Tony Molloy
On Wed, 2020-04-22 at 08:25 -0500, joh...@centos.org wrote: > EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email originated from outside of the University > of Limerick. Do not click on links or open attachments unless you > recognize the sender's email address and know the content is safe. > On 4/21/20 2:09 PM, Tony

Re: [CentOS] CentOS repo question

2020-04-22 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 4/21/20 2:09 PM, Tony Molloy wrote: > > Hi All, > > I've just installed a test laptop with CentOS Stream 8.1. > > I notice that the default install has both CentOS-Base and > CentOS-Base-Appstream repos enabled. Is that necessary, or should I > just have the Appstream repos enabled. >

[CentOS] CentOS repo question

2020-04-21 Thread Tony Molloy
Hi All, I've just installed a test laptop with CentOS Stream 8.1. I notice that the default install has both CentOS-Base and CentOS-Base-Appstream repos enabled. Is that necessary, or should I just have the Appstream repos enabled. The reason I'm asking is because I'm having trouble

Re: [CentOS] HPC question: torques replacement

2020-04-19 Thread Benson Muite
> maybe consolidating on to a single scheduler would be easier for them? > > (also, it's been a while ... hi!  ) > Richard > > -Original Message- > From: CentOS On Behalf Of Valeri Galtsev > Sent: Friday, April 17, 2020 10:28 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: [Ce

Re: [CentOS] HPC question: torques replacement

2020-04-17 Thread Dahringer, Richard
- From: CentOS On Behalf Of Valeri Galtsev Sent: Friday, April 17, 2020 10:28 To: centos@centos.org Subject: [CentOS] HPC question: torques replacement Dear Experts, I know there are many HPC (high performance computing) experts on this list. I'd like to ask your advise. Almost two decades ago

Re: [CentOS] HPC question: torques replacement

2020-04-17 Thread Benson Muite
Dear Valeri Slurm (https://slurm.schedmd.com/) is also reasonable. You might also take a look at Cobalt (https://xgitlab.cels.anl.gov/aig-public/cobalt) which is not developed too far from you. Benson ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] HPC question: torques replacement

2020-04-17 Thread Jonathan Billings
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 11:28:13AM -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > I wonder what other options experts would recommend. Hopefully, not too far > from torque (or PBS) from user prospective. My workplace switched from Torque (with moab as the scheduler) to Slurm (https://slurm.schedmd.com/) for our

[CentOS] HPC question: torques replacement

2020-04-17 Thread Valeri Galtsev
Dear Experts, I know there are many HPC (high performance computing) experts on this list. I'd like to ask your advise. Almost two decades ago I chose to go with OpenPBS (turned down condor and other alternatives for whatever reason) for clusters and number crunchers I support for the

Re: [CentOS-virt] Question about latest CentOS 7 AWS AMI

2020-03-08 Thread Andy Holt
This seems to cover it: https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=17035 hth, Andy On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 at 19:35, Edward Mossman wrote: > Hi, > > I'm seeing some strange behavior when trying to use the latest CentOS 7 > AMI from the AWS marketplace. > > The AMI that we've been using previously is

Re: [CentOS] Borgbackup question

2020-03-02 Thread Alessandro Baggi
Il 02/03/20 13:50, Tobias Kirchhofer ha scritto: On 2 Mar 2020, at 13:35, Alessandro Baggi wrote: Il 02/03/20 13:18, Tobias Kirchhofer ha scritto: On 2 Mar 2020, at 12:58, Alessandro Baggi wrote: Il 01/03/20 20:18, Tobias Kirchhofer ha scritto: On 1 Mar 2020, at 20:00, Gordon Messmer

Re: [CentOS] Borgbackup question

2020-03-02 Thread Tobias Kirchhofer
On 2 Mar 2020, at 13:35, Alessandro Baggi wrote: Il 02/03/20 13:18, Tobias Kirchhofer ha scritto: On 2 Mar 2020, at 12:58, Alessandro Baggi wrote: Il 01/03/20 20:18, Tobias Kirchhofer ha scritto: On 1 Mar 2020, at 20:00, Gordon Messmer wrote: On 3/1/20 12:40 AM, Alessandro Baggi wrote:

Re: [CentOS] Borgbackup question

2020-03-02 Thread Alessandro Baggi
Il 02/03/20 13:18, Tobias Kirchhofer ha scritto: On 2 Mar 2020, at 12:58, Alessandro Baggi wrote: Il 01/03/20 20:18, Tobias Kirchhofer ha scritto: On 1 Mar 2020, at 20:00, Gordon Messmer wrote: On 3/1/20 12:40 AM, Alessandro Baggi wrote: borgbackup is a very interesting backup tool with a

Re: [CentOS] Borgbackup question

2020-03-02 Thread Tobias Kirchhofer
On 2 Mar 2020, at 12:58, Alessandro Baggi wrote: Il 01/03/20 20:18, Tobias Kirchhofer ha scritto: On 1 Mar 2020, at 20:00, Gordon Messmer wrote: On 3/1/20 12:40 AM, Alessandro Baggi wrote: borgbackup is a very interesting backup tool with a lot of features. It is ready for "production" or I

Re: [CentOS] Borgbackup question

2020-03-02 Thread Tobias Kirchhofer
On 2 Mar 2020, at 12:58, Alessandro Baggi wrote: Il 01/03/20 20:18, Tobias Kirchhofer ha scritto: On 1 Mar 2020, at 20:00, Gordon Messmer wrote: On 3/1/20 12:40 AM, Alessandro Baggi wrote: borgbackup is a very interesting backup tool with a lot of features. It is ready for "production" or I

Re: [CentOS] Borgbackup question

2020-03-02 Thread Alessandro Baggi
Il 01/03/20 20:18, Tobias Kirchhofer ha scritto: On 1 Mar 2020, at 20:00, Gordon Messmer wrote: On 3/1/20 12:40 AM, Alessandro Baggi wrote: borgbackup is a very interesting backup tool with a lot of features. It is ready for "production" or I should expect some bad surprise? I don't know

Re: [CentOS] Borgbackup question

2020-03-01 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 3/1/20 11:18 AM, Tobias Kirchhofer wrote: This runs nicely for around two years without interruption. It's been working for me, too, but I think that people who've seen the tool fail are better equipped to answer whether a tool is "production ready" than those who haven't.

Re: [CentOS] Borgbackup question

2020-03-01 Thread Tobias Kirchhofer
On 1 Mar 2020, at 20:00, Gordon Messmer wrote: On 3/1/20 12:40 AM, Alessandro Baggi wrote: borgbackup is a very interesting backup tool with a lot of features. It is ready for "production" or I should expect some bad surprise? I don't know the answer to that, but to me that implies two

Re: [CentOS] Borgbackup question

2020-03-01 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 3/1/20 12:40 AM, Alessandro Baggi wrote: borgbackup is a very interesting backup tool with a lot of features. It is ready for "production" or I should expect some bad surprise? I don't know the answer to that, but to me that implies two questions: 1) Are there failure conditions that it

[CentOS] Borgbackup question

2020-03-01 Thread Alessandro Baggi
Hi all, borgbackup is a very interesting backup tool with a lot of features. It is ready for "production" or I should expect some bad surprise? Anyone use it for work purpose? Thanks in advance. Alessandro. ___ CentOS mailing list

Re: [CentOS] C8 Question

2020-01-25 Thread Alessandro Baggi
Il 24/01/20 23:00, Orion Poplawski ha scritto: On 1/24/20 4:38 AM, Alessandro Baggi wrote: Hi list, I installed on my workstation C8.1 (1911) and performed a minimal install and then installed XFCE from EPEL. I noticed a strange behaviour (don't know if this is the wanted default). If I try

Re: [CentOS] C8 Question

2020-01-24 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 1/24/20 4:38 AM, Alessandro Baggi wrote: > Hi list, > > I installed on my workstation C8.1 (1911) and performed a minimal install and > then installed XFCE from EPEL. > > I noticed a strange behaviour (don't know if this is the wanted default). If I > try ,from normal user shell, to run

Re: [CentOS] C8 Question

2020-01-24 Thread Alessandro Baggi
Il 24/01/20 15:44, Pete Biggs ha scritto: I noticed a strange behaviour (don't know if this is the wanted default). If I try ,from normal user shell, to run command like "reboot" or "shutdown -h now" system will reboot/shutdown. This happens on tty console, on xfce terminal and ssh session.

Re: [CentOS] C8 Question

2020-01-24 Thread Alessandro Baggi
Il 24/01/20 15:47, Simon Matter via CentOS ha scritto: Il 24/01/20 15:11, Simon Matter via CentOS ha scritto: Hi list, I installed on my workstation C8.1 (1911) and performed a minimal install and then installed XFCE from EPEL. I noticed a strange behaviour (don't know if this is the wanted

Re: [CentOS] C8 Question

2020-01-24 Thread Simon Matter via CentOS
> >> I noticed a strange behaviour (don't know if this is the wanted >> default). If I try ,from normal user shell, to run command like "reboot" >> or "shutdown -h now" system will reboot/shutdown. This happens on tty >> console, on xfce terminal and ssh session. > > I've just created a normal

Re: [CentOS] C8 Question

2020-01-24 Thread Simon Matter via CentOS
> > Il 24/01/20 15:11, Simon Matter via CentOS ha scritto: >>> Hi list, >>> >>> I installed on my workstation C8.1 (1911) and performed a minimal >>> install and then installed XFCE from EPEL. >>> >>> I noticed a strange behaviour (don't know if this is the wanted >>> default). If I try ,from

Re: [CentOS] C8 Question

2020-01-24 Thread Pete Biggs
> I noticed a strange behaviour (don't know if this is the wanted > default). If I try ,from normal user shell, to run command like "reboot" > or "shutdown -h now" system will reboot/shutdown. This happens on tty > console, on xfce terminal and ssh session. I've just created a normal user on

Re: [CentOS] C8 Question

2020-01-24 Thread Alessandro Baggi
Il 24/01/20 15:11, Simon Matter via CentOS ha scritto: Hi list, I installed on my workstation C8.1 (1911) and performed a minimal install and then installed XFCE from EPEL. I noticed a strange behaviour (don't know if this is the wanted default). If I try ,from normal user shell, to run

Re: [CentOS] C8 Question

2020-01-24 Thread Simon Matter via CentOS
> Hi list, > > I installed on my workstation C8.1 (1911) and performed a minimal > install and then installed XFCE from EPEL. > > I noticed a strange behaviour (don't know if this is the wanted > default). If I try ,from normal user shell, to run command like "reboot" > or "shutdown -h now" system

[CentOS] C8 Question

2020-01-24 Thread Alessandro Baggi
Hi list, I installed on my workstation C8.1 (1911) and performed a minimal install and then installed XFCE from EPEL. I noticed a strange behaviour (don't know if this is the wanted default). If I try ,from normal user shell, to run command like "reboot" or "shutdown -h now" system will

Re: [CentOS] Unusual question

2019-12-10 Thread Fleur
Hi Mark, we can do some checks ... [ starting from https://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS6.8 ] 1. No versions of CentOS 6 will work with Secure Boot turned on. Secure Boot must be disabled to install CentOS 6. Take a look at CentOS Bug #6321 2. On Intel (and also AMD based) processor

Re: [CentOS] Unusual question

2019-12-10 Thread Jonathan Billings
On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 01:24:58PM -, Mark (Netbook) wrote: > Is the Intel Celeron J5005 processor supported on CentOS 6.8. > > If not, is there a CentOS version which supports this processor. The J5005 is a 64-bit Intel CPU launched in Q4 2017, yes, CentOS 6, 7 and 8 should support it. You

Re: [CentOS] Unusual question

2019-12-10 Thread Mark (Netbook)
Hello, Is the Intel Celeron J5005 processor supported on CentOS 6.8. If not, is there a CentOS version which supports this processor. Regards, Mark Woolfson MW Consultancy Ltd Leeds LS18 4LY United Kingdom Tel: +44 113 259 1204 Mob: +44 786 065 2778

Re: [CentOS] Installation question?

2019-07-31 Thread John Chludzinski
Intel all the way baby! (Sorry to say!) On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 7:18 PM Darr247 wrote: > > Try booting from a live CD to see if that gives you any info. TBH it > sounds like a hardware issue. > > > I concur; I'll wager a coffee on graphics driver. > > Is it a AMD, NVIDIA, or integrated Intel

Re: [CentOS] Installation question?

2019-07-31 Thread Darr247
> Try booting from a live CD to see if that gives you any info. TBH it sounds like a hardware issue. I concur; I'll wager a coffee on graphics driver. Is it a AMD, NVIDIA, or integrated Intel (or combination of 2 or all 3)? ___ CentOS mailing list

Re: [CentOS] Installation question? Net-install Ger van Dijck.

2019-07-31 Thread Ger van Dijck
On Tue, 30 Jul 2019 21:48:02 +0200, Pete Biggs wrote: On Tue, 2019-07-30 at 13:24 -0400, John Chludzinski wrote: I've been doing a CentOS 7.6.1810 net-install since last night. The machine seems ok but has been stuck with "performing post-installation setup tasks" for hours. This is an old

Re: [CentOS] Installation question?

2019-07-31 Thread Miroslav Geisselreiter
Try text installation, I used to have similar problem with graphics installation. Mirek Dne 31.7.2019 v 15:32 John Chludzinski napsal(a): After finally completing and trying to reboot, the machine goes into "Emergency Mode" and asks that I log in as root. That fails and the machine becomes

Re: [CentOS] Installation question?

2019-07-31 Thread Pete Biggs
On Wed, 2019-07-31 at 09:32 -0400, John Chludzinski wrote: > After finally completing and trying to reboot, the machine goes into > "Emergency Mode" and asks that I log in as root. That fails and the machine > becomes completely unresponsive. > > I tried the minimum install and got the same

Re: [CentOS] Installation question?

2019-07-31 Thread mark
John Chludzinski wrote: > After finally completing and trying to reboot, the machine goes into > "Emergency Mode" and asks that I log in as root. That fails and the > machine becomes completely unresponsive. > > I tried the minimum install and got the same result. > > > Hard to diagnose an

Re: [CentOS] Installation question?

2019-07-31 Thread John Chludzinski
After finally completing and trying to reboot, the machine goes into "Emergency Mode" and asks that I log in as root. That fails and the machine becomes completely unresponsive. I tried the minimum install and got the same result. Hard to diagnose an unresponsive machine. On Tue, Jul 30, 2019

Re: [CentOS] Installation question?

2019-07-30 Thread isdtor
Pete Biggs writes: > On Tue, 2019-07-30 at 13:24 -0400, John Chludzinski wrote: > > I've been doing a CentOS 7.6.1810 net-install since last night. The machine > > seems ok but has been stuck with "performing post-installation setup tasks" > > for hours. This is an old Dell T5400 box, so it isn't

Re: [CentOS] Installation question?

2019-07-30 Thread Pete Biggs
On Tue, 2019-07-30 at 13:24 -0400, John Chludzinski wrote: > I've been doing a CentOS 7.6.1810 net-install since last night. The machine > seems ok but has been stuck with "performing post-installation setup tasks" > for hours. This is an old Dell T5400 box, so it isn't blazing fast but ... > >

[CentOS] Installation question?

2019-07-30 Thread John Chludzinski
I've been doing a CentOS 7.6.1810 net-install since last night. The machine seems ok but has been stuck with "performing post-installation setup tasks" for hours. This is an old Dell T5400 box, so it isn't blazing fast but ... Is there a way to pull up its skirt (so to speak) and check/monitor

Re: [CentOS] compile question on CentOS 7

2019-03-18 Thread Jerry Geis
>which indicates that those values aren't available UNLESS your program >has defines matching the first line shown. I haven't bothered to check >for the value of _POSIX_C_SOURCE in the absence of commandline options >that change the GCC default behavior, but just defining _GNU_SOURCE >is enough to

Re: [CentOS] compile question on CentOS 7

2019-03-17 Thread Fred Smith
On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 09:23:23PM -0400, Jerry Geis wrote: > I am trying to use the fnmatch() function in a C program and pass as the > 3rd arg (options) of case insensitive search... > > When I use the value FNM_CASEFOLD it does not work... > > I'm confused on what to send to fnmatch() to do a

[CentOS] compile question on CentOS 7

2019-03-17 Thread Jerry Geis
I am trying to use the fnmatch() function in a C program and pass as the 3rd arg (options) of case insensitive search... When I use the value FNM_CASEFOLD it does not work... I'm confused on what to send to fnmatch() to do a case insensitive search. Any pointers ? Thanks. Jerry

Re: [CentOS] A question about why the function "recv" return 0

2018-12-20 Thread Steven Tardy
> after the ssl handshake, the client side reset the tcp connection. Client doesn’t like TLS cypher list. Client doesn’t have intermediate certificate. Server needs intermediate certificate configured. Client needs remote certificate “installed”. Many more TLS issues. >

Re: [CentOS] VNC question

2018-12-19 Thread Robert Moskowitz
On 12/19/18 4:36 AM, isdtor wrote: We have run into the infamous black screen problem with tigervnc under CentOS7, which prompted me to look into how vnc is configured here. https://access.redhat.com/solutions/966063 Am I reading this correctly - root needs to set up a systemd vnc service

Re: [CentOS] VNC question

2018-12-19 Thread isdtor
> No. Users can run vncserver and attach to them like you could before, > or you can run Xvnc -inetd, just as a systemd service/socket pair > instead of out of xinetd. > > The black screen problem that you mentioned does sound familiar -- > I've seen it with VNC clients that don't support

Re: [CentOS] VNC question

2018-12-19 Thread isdtor
Jonathan Billings writes: > On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 11:56:11AM +, isdtor wrote: > > What you describe doesn't make much sense to me either. > > > > In this case, there are no user logins on the console, this is meant > > to be a remote login server. Anyone logging in via vnc gets the > >

Re: [CentOS] VNC question

2018-12-19 Thread Jonathan Billings
On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 11:56:11AM +, isdtor wrote: > What you describe doesn't make much sense to me either. > > In this case, there are no user logins on the console, this is meant > to be a remote login server. Anyone logging in via vnc gets the > black screen treatment. There is no login

Re: [CentOS] VNC question

2018-12-19 Thread Jonathan Billings
On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 09:36:44AM +, isdtor wrote: > We have run into the infamous black screen problem with tigervnc > under CentOS7, which prompted me to look into how vnc is configured > here. > > https://access.redhat.com/solutions/966063 > > Am I reading this correctly - root needs to

Re: [CentOS] VNC question

2018-12-19 Thread isdtor
Mike McCarthy, W1NR writes: > > On 12/19/18 4:36 AM, isdtor wrote: > > We have run into the infamous black screen problem with tigervnc under > > CentOS7, which prompted me to look into how vnc is configured here. > > > > https://access.redhat.com/solutions/966063 > > > > Am I reading this

Re: [CentOS] VNC question

2018-12-19 Thread Mike McCarthy, W1NR
On 12/19/18 4:36 AM, isdtor wrote: > We have run into the infamous black screen problem with tigervnc under > CentOS7, which prompted me to look into how vnc is configured here. > > https://access.redhat.com/solutions/966063 > > Am I reading this correctly - root needs to set up a systemd vnc

[CentOS] VNC question

2018-12-19 Thread isdtor
We have run into the infamous black screen problem with tigervnc under CentOS7, which prompted me to look into how vnc is configured here. https://access.redhat.com/solutions/966063 Am I reading this correctly - root needs to set up a systemd vnc service for every user and display

Re: [CentOS] A question about why the function "recv" return 0

2018-12-17 Thread yf chu
I have used tcpdump to capture the data packets and found that after the ssl handshake, the client side reset the tcp connection. Is there any method to pinpoint the culprit who drops the tcp connection? At 2018-12-18 01:58:36, "Fred Smith" wrote: >On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 01:30:14PM

Re: [CentOS] A question about why the function "recv" return 0

2018-12-17 Thread Fred Smith
On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 01:30:14PM +0800, yf chu wrote: > I am a website developer. We deploy a Nginx server on centos to provide HTTP > services. Recently, some customers of our website were complaining about that > occasionally they could not open the webpage, the web browser show that the >

[CentOS] A question about why the function "recv" return 0

2018-12-16 Thread yf chu
I am a website developer. We deploy a Nginx server on centos to provide HTTP services. Recently, some customers of our website were complaining about that occasionally they could not open the webpage, the web browser show that the tcp connection was reset. I checked the Nginx logs and source

Re: [CentOS-docs] question for CentOS6.2

2018-10-28 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 9:26 PM 田邊 晃一郎 wrote: > Dear CentOS project's member > > I hope to decide the following problem with your knowledge. > > 1.I installed the CentOS6.2 into the DELL PC( >

[CentOS-docs] question for CentOS6.2

2018-10-28 Thread 田邊 晃一郎
Dear CentOS project's member I hope to decide the following problem with your knowledge. 1.I installed the CentOS6.2 into the DELL PC(https://www.dell.com/support/manuals/jp/ja/jpbsd1/latitude-e7440-ultrabook/late7440om-v3/specifications?guid=guid-247916a5-f1d3-44b2-82b7-f14374bb9a73=en-us)

Re: [CentOS] selinux question

2018-08-23 Thread Nataraj
On 08/21/2018 05:45 PM, Warren Young wrote: > >> I could be convinced otherwise if I could see where running the php as the >> app users, would make more sense. > That depends on whether the boundary between user php and this unknown > “appuser” is bidirectional or not. > > If there are things

Re: [CentOS] selinux question

2018-08-21 Thread Warren Young
On Aug 21, 2018, at 4:34 PM, Nataraj wrote: > > On 08/21/2018 02:20 PM, Warren Young wrote: >> On Aug 21, 2018, at 1:27 PM, Nataraj wrote: >>> I have a web application which uses sudo to invoke python scripts as the >>> user under which the application runs (NO root access). >> Why is the web

Re: [CentOS] selinux question

2018-08-21 Thread Nataraj
On 08/21/2018 02:20 PM, Warren Young wrote: > On Aug 21, 2018, at 1:27 PM, Nataraj wrote: >> I have a web application which uses sudo to invoke python scripts as the >> user under which the application runs (NO root access). > Why is the web app not running with that user’s permissions in the

Re: [CentOS] selinux question

2018-08-21 Thread Warren Young
On Aug 21, 2018, at 1:27 PM, Nataraj wrote: > > I have a web application which uses sudo to invoke python scripts as the > user under which the application runs (NO root access). Why is the web app not running with that user’s permissions in the first place? If your answer is that it needs

Re: [CentOS] selinux question

2018-08-21 Thread Nataraj
On 08/21/2018 12:41 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 12:27:53PM -0700, Nataraj wrote: >> Source RPM Packages sudo-1.7.2p1-29.el5_10 >> Policy RPMselinux-policy-2.4.6-351.el5 >> Platform Linux myhost.mydomain.com

Re: [CentOS] selinux question

2018-08-21 Thread Jonathan Billings
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 12:27:53PM -0700, Nataraj wrote: > Source RPM Packages sudo-1.7.2p1-29.el5_10 > Policy RPMselinux-policy-2.4.6-351.el5 > Platform Linux myhost.mydomain.com 2.6.18-419.el5 #1 SMP > Fri Feb 24 22:06:09 UTC 2017 i686 i686

Re: [CentOS] selinux question

2018-08-21 Thread Daniel Walsh
On 08/21/2018 12:27 PM, Nataraj wrote: I have a web application which uses sudo to invoke python scripts as the user under which the application runs (NO root access).  Is there any reason why sudo would would require sys_ptrace access for this?  I only get this violation intermittenly, and not

[CentOS] selinux question

2018-08-21 Thread Nataraj
I have a web application which uses sudo to invoke python scripts as the user under which the application runs (NO root access).  Is there any reason why sudo would would require sys_ptrace access for this?  I only get this violation intermittenly, and not with every call to sudo.  Here's the

Re: [CentOS] Bash question

2018-07-07 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 07/06/2018 06:18 AM, Jerry Geis wrote: /opt/libreoffice5.4/program/soffice.bin --headless --convert-to csv "/tmp/file 2.xlsx" MSG="file 2" MSG="csv \"$MSG\"" echo $MSG /opt/libreoffice5.4/program/soffice.bin --headless --convert-to $MSG I'd describe what you're trying to do as "using one

Re: [CentOS] Bash question

2018-07-06 Thread Anand Buddhdev
On 06/07/2018 15:18, Jerry Geis wrote: > MSG="file 2" > MSG="csv \"$MSG\"" > echo $MSG > /opt/libreoffice5.4/program/soffice.bin --headless --convert-to $MSG This is a really convoluted way of doing things, and you'd have to be a super expert in quoting to get this right. Instead, why don't you

Re: [CentOS] Bash question

2018-07-06 Thread Pete Biggs
> I am trying to make a variable containing spaces which is MSG. Then add to > that variable the argument csv. The "echo" above prints the write stuff. > But when I try to use it in the last command its no longer valid and says > Source file could not be loaded. > > What am I missing? much

Re: [CentOS] Bash question

2018-07-06 Thread mark
Jerry Geis wrote: > Hi All, > > I am trying to build a command line with spaces in the argument. This > demonstrates what I am trying to do. Clearly the first two commands work > fine. However, the last 4 lines to not. > > /opt/libreoffice5.4/program/soffice.bin --headless --convert-to csv >

[CentOS] Bash question

2018-07-06 Thread Jerry Geis
Hi All, I am trying to build a command line with spaces in the argument. This demonstrates what I am trying to do. Clearly the first two commands work fine. However, the last 4 lines to not. /opt/libreoffice5.4/program/soffice.bin --headless --convert-to csv "/tmp/file.xlsx"

Re: [CentOS] ldd question on CentOS 6.8 (64bit)

2018-06-07 Thread Leon Fauster
> Am 07.06.2018 um 15:43 schrieb ejm : > > Hi all, > > Will ldd display the paths to different libraries depending on their > locations? > > I'm trying to build libxml2 version 2.9.6 in /usr/local with a newer version > of zlib (1.2.8) than what are in the system folders for CentOS 6.8. >

[CentOS] ldd question on CentOS 6.8 (64bit)

2018-06-07 Thread ejm
Hi all, Will ldd display the paths to different libraries depending on their locations? I'm trying to build libxml2 version 2.9.6 in /usr/local with a newer version of zlib (1.2.8) than what are in the system folders for CentOS 6.8. I get the following output from ldd: $ ldd ./libxml2.so

[CentOS] A question about smb.conf between C6 and c7

2018-02-21 Thread m . roth
Are there any? Will a C 6 conf work under C 7? A pointer to a README would be appreciated on configuration differences, if any. Thanks in advance. mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Unbound question: forward-zone and stub-zone

2018-02-13 Thread C. L. Martinez
Hi all, I have a strange case with unbound ... I have defined a stub-zone to query to a secondary DNS server: stub-zone: name: "mydomain.org" stub-addr: 172.22.54.4 stub-zone: name: "54.22.172.in-addr.arpa." stub-addr: 172.22.54.4 ... but it doesn't works:

Re: [CentOS] A question about NBD kernel module...

2018-02-12 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 7:59 AM, Raghuram Devarakonda wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to mount a device using NBD protocol on CentOS 7 but it looks > like the module is not available by default in the kernel. Is there a way I > can install it (like from a rpm somewhere)? I

[CentOS] A question about NBD kernel module...

2018-02-12 Thread Raghuram Devarakonda
Hi, I would like to mount a device using NBD protocol on CentOS 7 but it looks like the module is not available by default in the kernel. Is there a way I can install it (like from a rpm somewhere)? I found instructions to build such a module but want to make sure that it is not already available

Re: [CentOS] LUKS question

2017-12-13 Thread m . roth
John Hodrien wrote: > On Wed, 13 Dec 2017, Kern, Thomas (CONTR) wrote: > >> If your requirement is for the entire system to be encrypted then I >> think the only is a system rebuild, but if you can convince management that a >> good compromise is encrypting only the applications and their data,

Re: [CentOS] LUKS question

2017-12-13 Thread John Hodrien
On Wed, 13 Dec 2017, Kern, Thomas (CONTR) wrote: If your requirement is for the entire system to be encrypted then I think the only is a system rebuild, but if you can convince management that a good compromise is encrypting only the applications and their data, you should be able to add

Re: [CentOS] LUKS question

2017-12-13 Thread Kern, Thomas (CONTR)
leidos.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2017 9:41 AM To: CentOS mailing list <centos@centos.org> Subject: [CentOS] LUKS question I have existing systems with un-encrypted disks. I have tried unsuccessfully to encrypt them using LUKS. Has anyone out there been able to encrypt an existing system

Re: [CentOS] LUKS question

2017-12-12 Thread John R Pierce
On 12/12/2017 3:42 PM, Robert Nichols wrote: On 12/12/2017 08:41 AM, Wells, Roger K. wrote: I have existing systems with un-encrypted disks. I have tried unsuccessfully to encrypt them using LUKS. Has anyone out there been able to encrypt an existing system (after the fact, so to speak)? You

Re: [CentOS] LUKS question

2017-12-12 Thread Robert Nichols
On 12/12/2017 08:41 AM, Wells, Roger K. wrote: I have existing systems with un-encrypted disks. I have tried unsuccessfully to encrypt them using LUKS. Has anyone out there been able to encrypt an existing system (after the fact, so to speak)? You can do that with cryptsetup-reencrypt, but it

Re: [CentOS] LUKS question

2017-12-12 Thread Valeri Galtsev
On Tue, December 12, 2017 9:06 am, Christian, Mark wrote: > On Tue, 2017-12-12 at 09:41 -0500, Wells, Roger K. wrote: >> I have existing systems with un-encrypted disks. >> I have tried unsuccessfully to encrypt them using LUKS. >> Has anyone out there been able to encrypt an existing system

Re: [CentOS] LUKS question

2017-12-12 Thread Christian, Mark
On Tue, 2017-12-12 at 09:41 -0500, Wells, Roger K. wrote: > I have existing systems with un-encrypted disks. > I have tried unsuccessfully to encrypt them using LUKS. > Has anyone out there been able to encrypt an existing system (after the > fact, so to speak)? Using cryptsetup to create a LUKS

[CentOS] LUKS question

2017-12-12 Thread Wells, Roger K.
I have existing systems with un-encrypted disks. I have tried unsuccessfully to encrypt them using LUKS. Has anyone out there been able to encrypt an existing system (after the fact, so to speak)? TIA -- Roger Wells, P.E. leidos 221 Third St Newport, RI 02840 401-847-4210 (voice) 401-849-1585

Re: [CentOS] A question on networking (CentOS 6)

2017-02-13 Thread KM
ebruary 13, 2017 1:31 PM Subject: Re: [CentOS] A question on networking (CentOS 6) Like I said, wishful thinking. The light is still out, so it could be the HW. I ran those commands (ip addr show, ip route show) on the 2 servers.  The output is identical except for the IP addresses and

Re: [CentOS] A question on networking (CentOS 6)

2017-02-13 Thread KM
13, 2017 12:49 PM Subject: Re: [CentOS] A question on networking (CentOS 6) I will get back to the mailing list.   But to answer your questions, yes the IP addresses and interface names are as expected (as before) with the new MAC/HW addresses.  I have someone else looking into it bec

Re: [CentOS] A question on networking (CentOS 6)

2017-02-13 Thread KM
: Gordon Messmer <gordon.mess...@gmail.com> To: CentOS mailing list <centos@centos.org> Sent: Monday, February 13, 2017 12:08 PM Subject: Re: [CentOS] A question on networking (CentOS 6) On 02/13/2017 06:55 AM, KM wrote: > The NIC went bad and it has been replaced.  I knew enough t

Re: [CentOS] A question on networking (CentOS 6)

2017-02-13 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 02/13/2017 06:55 AM, KM wrote: The NIC went bad and it has been replaced. I knew enough to update the HW address in the ifcfg-* files. The network service restarts successfully without errors. However I cannot connect via ping or ssh with the pt2pt network setup on 192.168.x.*. When I

[CentOS] A question on networking (CentOS 6)

2017-02-13 Thread KM
Hi AllThis is NOT specifically related to CentOS per se.  I have 2 servers that are on two networks.  I did NOT set this up.  The NIC went bad and it has been replaced.  I knew enough to update the HW address in the ifcfg-* files.  The network service restarts successfully without errors. 

Re: [CentOS] dumb question on permissions out of the box

2016-11-15 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 11/15/2016 01:19 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: mark "Ve Must Protect You From Using Command Line!" No one is making the command line any harder to use than it used to be. You can still use the old methods to allow non-root users to mount devices. The developers are just adding

Re: [CentOS] dumb question on permissions out of the box

2016-11-15 Thread m . roth
Yamaban wrote: > On Tue, 15 Nov 2016 21:49, m.roth@... wrote: >> >> Can someone explain to me the logic that I, as a user, cannot, by >> default, mount a DVD from the command line, but I can mount it via dolphin? > > Dolphin (and consorts) call "udisks" via messagebus / udev protocoll, and > thus

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >